Stress and adaptation in conservation genetics

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 750-755

  Frankham, R ^a,b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Conservation; Disease; Drosophila; Effective population size; Evolutionary potential; Extinction; Reintroduction; Stress

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CONSERVATION GENETICS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EVOLUTION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; INBREEDING; POPULATION GENETICS; STRESS;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; STRESS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 22144438708     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00885.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Bijlsma, R. & Loeschcke, V. (eds). 1997. Environmental Stress, Adaptation and Evolution. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.
2. Bijlsma, R., Bundgaard, J. & Boerema, A.C. 2000. Does inbreeding affect the extinction risk of small populations? Predictions from Drosophila. J. Evol. Biol. 13: 502-514.
3. Borlase, S.C., Loebel, D.A., Frankham, R., Nurthen, R.K., Briscoe, D.A. & Daggard, G.E. 1993. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: consequences of equalization of family sizes. Conserv. Biol. 7: 122-131.
4. Bradshaw, A.D. 1991. Genostasis and the limits to evolution. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 333: 289-305.
5. Channell, R. & Lomollno, M.V. 2000. Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species. Nature 403: 84-86.
6. Cheverud, J.M., Vaughn, T.T., Pletcher, L.S., King-Ellison, K., Bailiff, J., Adams, E., Erickson, C. & Bonislawski, A. 1999. Epistasis and the evolution of additive genetic variation in populations that pass through a bottleneck. Evolution 53: 1009-1018.
7. Crnokrak, P. & Roff, D.A. 1999. Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270.
8. Daszak, P., Cunningham, A.A. & Hyatt, A.D. 2000. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife - threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287: 443-449.
9. Eisen, E.J. 1975. Population size and selection intensity effects on long-term selection response in mice. Genetics 79: 305-323.
10. Endler, J.A. 1986. Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.
11. Falconer, D.S. & Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics,4th edn. Longman, Harlow, UK.
12. Frankham, R. 1996. Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1500-1508.
13. Frankham, R. & Kingslover, J.G. 2004. Response to environmental change: adaptation or extinction. In: Evolutionary Conservation Biology (R. Ferrier, U. Dieckman & D. Couvet, eds), pp. 85-100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
14. Frankham, R. & Loebel D.A. 1992. Modeling problems in conservation genetics using captive Drosophila populations: rapid genetic adaptation to captivity. Zoo Biol. 11: 333-342.
15. Frankham, R., Lees, K., Montgomery, M.E., England, P.R., Lowe, E. & Briscoe, D.A. 1999. Do population size bottlenecks reduce evolutionary potential? Anim. Conserv. 2: 255-260.
16. Frankham, R., Manning, H., Margan, S.H. & Briscoe, D.A. 2000. Does equalisation of family sizes reduce genetic adaptation to captivity? Anim. Conserv. 3: 357-363.
17. Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D. & Briscoe, D.A. 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
18. Franklin, I.R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (M. E. Soulé & B. A. Wilcox, eds), pp. 135-150. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
19. Gilligan, D.M., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2003. Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conserv. Genet. 4: 189-197.
20. Gilligan, D.M., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2005. Comparative rates of loss of quantitative and molecular genetic variation in finite populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. Res. (in press).
21. Hoffmann, A.A. & Parsons, P.A. 1997. Extreme Environmental Change and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Hoffmann, A.A., Hallas, R.J., Dean, J.A. & Schiffer, M. 2003. Low potential for climatic stress adaptation in a rainforest Drosophila species. Science 301: 100-102.
23. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., USA 96: 5083-5088.
24. Jones, L.P., Frankham, R. & Barker, J.S.F. 1968. The effects of population size and selection intensity in selection for a quantitative character in Drosophila. II. Long-term response to selection. Genet. Res. 12: 249-266.
25. Kimura, M. & Crow, J.F. 1963. The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17: 279-288.
26. King, H.D. 1939. Life processes in gray Norway rats during fourteen years in captivity. Amer. Anat. Memoirs 17: 1-77.
27. Kristensen, T.N., Sørensen, A.C., Sorensen, D., Pederson, K.S., Sørensen, J.G. & Loeschcke, V. 2005. A test of quantitative genetic theory using Drosophila - effects of inbreeding and rate of inbreeding on heritabilities and variance components. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 763-770.
28. Lande, R. 1995. Breeding plans for small populations based on the dynamics of quantitative genetic variance. In: Population Management for Survival and Recovery: Analytical Methods and Strategies in Small Population Conservation (J. D. Ballou, M. Gilpin, & T. J. Foose, eds), pp. 318-340. Columbia University Press, New York.
29. Lawton, J.H. & May, R.M. 1995. Extinction Rates, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Leakey, R. & Lewin, R. 1995. The Sixth Extinction: Biodiversity and its Survival. Phoenix, London.
31. Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York.
32. Lynch, M. & Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, USA.
33. Margan, S.H., Nurthen, R.K., Montgomery, M.E., Woodworth. L.M., Lowe, E., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 1998. Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species. Zoo Biol. 17: 467-480.
34. Montgomery, M.E., Woodworth, L.M., Nurthen, R.K., Gilligan, D.M., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2000. Relationships between population size and genetic diversity: comparisons of experimental results with theoretical predictions. Conserv. Genet. 1: 33-43.
35. Mousseau, T.A., Sinervo, B. & Endler, J.A. 2000. Adaptive Genetic Variation in the Wild. Oxford University Press, NY.
36. Reed, D.H. & Frankham, R. 2001. How closely correlated are molecular and quantitative measures of genetic variation? A meta-analysis. Evolution 55: 1095-1103.
37. Reed, D.H., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2002. Inbreeding and extinction: effects of environmental stress and lineages. Conserv. Genet. 3: 301-307.
38. Reed, D.H., Lowe, E.H., Briscoe, D.A., & Frankham, R. 2003. Fitness and adaptation in a novel environment: Effect of inbreeding, prior environment, and lineage. Evolution 57: 1822-1828.
39. Robertson, A. 1960. A theory of limits in artificial selection. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 153: 234-249.
40. Spielman, D., Brook, B.W., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2004a. Does inbreeding and loss of genetic diversity reduce disease resistance? Conserv. Genet. 5: 439-448.
41. Spielman, D., Brook, B.W. & Frankham, R. 2004b. Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors can impact them. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 101: 15261-15264.
42. Weber, K.E. & Diggins, L.T. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster, at two population sizes. Genetics 125: 585-597.
43. Whitlock, M.C. & Fowler, K. 1999. The change in genetic and environmental variance with inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 152: 345-353.
44. Woodworth, L.M., Montgomery, M.E., Briscoe, D.A. & Frankham, R. 2002. Rapid genetic deterioration in captivity: causes and consequences. Conserv. Genet. 3: 277-288.