Inbreeding depression across a nutritional stress continuum

Heredity

Volumn 115, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 56-62

  Schou, M F ^a   Loeschcke, V ^a   Kristensen, T N ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; BODY MASS; FLY; INBREEDING; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY WEIGHT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENETICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; INBREEDING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC FITNESS; INBREEDING; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84930869744     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.16     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Andrewartha HG, Birch LC (1954). The Distribution and Abundance of Animals. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
2. Armbruster P, Reed DH (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-5. http://cran.r-project.org/package=lme4.
4. Bijlsma R, Bundgaard J, Van Putten WF (1999). Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 12: 1125-1137.
5. Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2005). Environmental stress, adaptation and evolution: an overview. J Evol Biol 18: 744-749.
6. Bijlsma R, Loeschcke V (2011). Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evol Appl 5: 117-129.
7. Buri P (1956). Gene frequency in small populations of mutant Drosophila. Evolution 10: 367-402.
8. Cheptou P-O, Berger A, Blanchard A, Collin C, Escarre J (2000). The effect of drought stress on inbreeding depression in four populations of the Mediterranean outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae). Heredity 85: 294-302.
9. Cheptou P-O, Donohue K (2011). Environment-dependent inbreeding depression: its ecological and evolutionary significance. New Phytol 189: 395-407.
10. Core Team R (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org/.
11. Cotton PA (2006). Seasonal resource tracking by Amazonian hummingbirds. Ibis 149: 135-142.
12. Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999). Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83: 260-270.
13. Crow JF, Kimura M (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper Row: New York.
14. Economos AC, Lints FA (1985). Growth rate and life span in Drosophila. IV. Role of cell size and cell number in the biphasic relationship between life span and growth rate. Mech Ageing Dev 32: 193-204.
15. Enders LS, Nunney L (2012). Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279: 3756-3764.
16. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Pearson: Harlow.
17. Fox CW, Reed DH (2011). Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65: 246-258.
18. Hedrick PW (1994). Purging inbreeding depression and the probability of extinction: full-sib mating. Heredity 73: 363-372.
19. Hoffmann AA, Parsons PA (1991). Evolutionary Genetics and Environmental Stress. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
20. Hoffmann AA, Willi Y (2008). Detecting genetic responses to environmental change. Nat Rev Genet 9: 421-432.
21. Johnson MD, Sherry TW (2001). Effects of food availability on the distribution of migratory warblers among habitats in Jamaica. J Anim Ecol 70: 546-560.
22. Koenker RW (2013). quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 5.05. http://cran.r-project.org/package=quantreg.
23. Koenker RW, D'Orey V (1987). Algorithm AS 229: computing regression quantiles. JRStat Soc 36: 383-393.
24. Kristensen TN, Hoffmann AA, Pertoldi C, Stronen AV (2015). What can livestock breeders learn from conservation genetics and vice versa? Front Genet 6: Article 38.
25. Kristensen TN, Pedersen KS, Vermeulen CJ, Loeschcke V (2010). Research on inbreeding in the "omic" era. Trends Ecol Evol 25: 44-52.
26. Kristensen TN, Sørensen P, Pedersen KS, Kruhøffer M, Loeschcke V (2006). Inbreeding by environmental interactions affect gene expression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173: 1329-1336.
27. Leroy G, Mary-Huard T, Verrier E, Danvy S, Charvolin E, Danchin-Burge C (2013). Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genet Sel Evol 45: 1.
28. Markow TA, Raphael B, Dobberfuhl D, Breitmeyer CM, Elser JJ, Pfeiler E (1999). Elemental stoichiometry of Drosophila and their hosts. Funct Ecol 13: 78-84.
29. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ (1956). An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 42: 855-863.
30. Norman JK, Sakai AK, Weller SG, Dawson TE (1995). Inbreeding depression in morphological and physiological traits of Schiedea lydgatei (Caryophyllaceae) in two environments. Evolution 49: 297-306.
31. Nunney L (1993). The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47: 1329-1341.
32. Nunney L (1996). The response to selection for fast larval development in Drosophila melanogaster anditseffect onadultweight: and exampleof afitness trade-off. Evolution 50: 1193-1204.
33. Palstra FP, Ruzzante DE (2008). Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence? Mol Ecol 17: 3428-3447.
34. Reed DH, Fox CW, Enders LS, Kristensen TN (2012). Inbreeding-stress interactions: evolutionary and conservation consequences. Ann NY Acad Sci 1256: 33-48.
35. Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W (2009). Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav Ecol 20: 416-420.
36. Schou MF (2013). Fast egg collection method greatly improves randomness of egg sampling in Drosophila melanogaster. Fly 7: 44-46.
37. Schou MF, Kristensen TN, Kellermann V, Schlötterer C, Loeschcke V (2014). A Drosophila laboratory evolution experiment points to low evolutionary potential under increased temperatures likely to be experienced in the future. J Evol Biol 27: 1859-1868.
38. Suzuki S (1998). Leaf phenology, seasonal changes in leaf quality and herbivory pattern of Sanguisorba tenuifolia at different altitudes. Oecologia 117: 169-176.
39. Sørensen JG, Loeschcke V (2004). Effects of relative emergence time on heat stress resistance traits, longevity and hsp70 expression level in Drosophila melanogaster. J Therm Biol 29: 195-203.
40. Waller DM, Dole J, Bersch AJ (2008). Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62: 917-931.
41. Wang L, Clark AG (1995). Physiological genetics of the response to a high-sucrose diet by Drosophila melanogaster. Biochem Genet 33: 149-165.
42. Wang J, Hill WG, Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1999). Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet Res 74: 165-178.
43. White TCR (1993). The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals. Springer Verlag: Berlin.
44. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009). Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer: New York.