Environmental conditions during early life determine the consequences of inbreeding in Agrostemma githago (Caryophyllaceae)

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 499-508

  Goodrich, S H ^a   Beans, C M ^a   Roach, D A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Early life environment; Life stages; Natural selection; Purging; Relative performance

Indexed keywords

DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FITNESS; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; LIFE CYCLE; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; NATURAL SELECTION; SIBLING;

AGROSTEMMA; ALLELE; ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWER; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; INBREEDING; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; SELF FERTILIZATION; TIME;

AGROSTEMMA; ALLELES; CROSSES, GENETIC; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWERS; GENETIC FITNESS; INBREEDING; SEEDS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SELF-FERTILIZATION; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

AGROSTEMMA; AGROSTEMMA GITHAGO; CARYOPHYLLACEAE;

EID: 84873730037     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12065     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agren, J. & Schemske, D.W. 1993. Outcrossing rate and inbreeding depression in two annual monoecious herbs, Begonia hirsuta and B. semiovata. Evolution 47: 125-135.
2. Agren, J. & Schemske, D.W. 1994. Evolution of trichome number in a naturalized population of Brassica rapa. Am. Nat. 143: 1-13.
3. Armbruster, P. & Reed, D.H. 2005. Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity 95: 235-242.
4. Ashman, T.L. 1992. The relative importance of inbreeding and maternal sex in determining progeny fitness in Sidalcea oregana Ssp spicata, a gynodioecious plant. Evolution 46: 1862-1874.
5. Barrett, S.C.H. & Charlesworth, D. 1991. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature 352: 522-524.
6. Bennington, C.C. & McGraw, J.B. 1995. Phenotypic selection in an artificial population of Impatiens pallida: the importance of the invisible fraction. Evolution 49: 317-324.
7. Bijlsma, R., Bundgaard, J. & Van Putten, W.F. 1999. Environmental dependence of inbreeding depression and purging in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Bio. 12: 1125-1137.
8. Byers, D.L. 1998. Effect of cross proximity on progeny fitness in a rare and a common species of Eupatorium (Asteraceae). Am. J. Bot. 85: 644-653.
9. Byers, D.L. & Waller, D.M. 1999. Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30: 479-513.
10. Carr, D.E. & Dudash, M.R. 1995. Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus - consequences for potential male and female function. Heredity 75: 437-445.
11. Carr, D.E. & Dudash, M.R. 2003. Recent approaches into the genetic basis of inbreeding depression in plants. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 358: 1071-1084.
12. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18: 237-268.
13. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1990. Inbreeding depression with heterozygote advantage and its effect on selection for modifiers changing the outcrossing rate. Evolution 44: 870-888.
14. Donohue, K. 2002. Germination timing influences natural selection on life-history characters in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecology 83: 1006-1016.
15. Dudash, M.R. 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L (Gentianaceae): a comparison in three environments. Evolution 44: 1129-1139.
16. Dudash, M.R., Carr, D.E. & Fenster, C.B. 1997. Five generations of enforced selfing and outcrossing in Mimulus guttatus: inbreeding depression variation at the population and family level. Evolution 51: 54-65.
17. Enders, L.S. & Nunney, L. 2012. Seasonal stress drives predictable changes in inbreeding depression in field-tested captive populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. B. 279: 3756-3764.
18. Firbank, L.G. 1988. Agrostemma githago L. J. Ecol. 76: 1232-1246.
19. Fisher, R.A. 1965. The theory of inbreeding, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York, NY.
20. Fox, C.W. & Reed, D.H. 2011. Inbreeding depression increases with environmental stress: an experimental study and meta-analysis. Evolution 65: 246-258.
21. Glémin, S., Ronfort, J. & Bataillon, T. 2003. Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations. Genetics 165: 2193-2212.
22. Goodrich, S. H. 2009. The consequences of early life environment on phenotype and selection across the life cycle in Agrostemma githago (Ph.D. diss). Univ. of Virginia.
23. Grueber, C.E., Laws, R.J., Nakagawa, S. & Jamieson, I.G. 2010. Inbreeding depression accumulation across life-history stages of the endangered Takahe. Conserv. Biol. 24: 1617-1625.
24. Hedrick, P.W. & Kalinowski, S.T. 2000. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31: 139-162.
25. Holzner, W. & Numata, M. 1982. Biology and ecology of weeds. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Boston, MA.
26. Hufford, K.M. & Mazer, S.M. 2003. Plant ecotypes: genetic differentiation in the age of ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 147-155.
27. Hunt, R. & Cornelissen, J.H.C. 1997. Components of relative growth rate and their interrelations in 59 temperate plant species. New Phytol. 135: 395-417.
28. Husband, B.C. & Schemske, D.W. 1996. Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50: 54-70.
29. Jurgens, A. 2006. Comparative floral morphometrics in day-flowering, night-flowering and self-pollinated Caryophylloideae (Agrostemma, Dianthus, Saponaria, Silene, and Vaccaria). Plant Syst. Evol. 257: 233-250.
30. Jurgens, A., Witt, T. & Gottsberger, G. 2002. Pollen grain numbers, ovule numbers and pollen-ovule ratios in Caryophylloideae: correlation with breeding system, pollination, life form, style number, and sexual system. Sex. Plant Reprod. 14: 279-289.
31. Keller, L.F. & Waller, D.M. 2002. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends in Ecol. Evol. 17: 230-241.
32. Koelewijn, H.P. 1998. Effects of different levels of inbreeding on progeny fitness in Plantago coronopus. Evolution 52: 692-702.
33. Kristensen, T.N., Loeschcke, V. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2008. Linking inbreeding effects in captive populations with fitness in the wild: release of replicated Drosophila melanogaster lines under different temperatures. Conserv. Biol. 22: 189-199.
34. Lande, R. & Schemske, D.W. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. 1. Genetic models. Evolution 39: 24-40.
35. Laws, R.J., Townsend, S.M., Nakagawa, S. & Jamieson, I.G. 2010. Limited inbreeding depression in a bottlenecked population is age but not environment dependent. J. Avian Biol. 41: 645-652.
36. Lynch, M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45: 622-629.
37. Mayer, S.S., Charlesworth, D. & Meyers, B. 1996. Inbreeding depression in four populations of Collinsia heterophylla Nutt (Scrophulariaceae). Evolution 50: 879-891.
38. McCall, C., Waller, D.M. & Mitchell-Olds, T. 1994. Effects of serial inbreeding on fitness components in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 48: 818-827.
39. Metcalfe, N.B. & Monaghan, P. 2001. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 254-260.
40. Miller, S. 2003. Pest Fact Sheet: Agrostemma githago. North American Plant Protection Organization, Ontario.
41. Nason, J.D. & Ellstrand, N.C. 1995. Lifetime estimates of biparental inbreeding depression in the self-incompatible annual plant Raphanus sativus. Evolution 49: 307-316.
42. Reed, D.H., Fox, C.W., Enders, L.S. & Kristensen, T.N. 2012. Inbreeding-stress interactions: evolutionary and conservation consequences. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1256: 33-48.
43. SAS Institute. 2000. SAS 8.1: Users' Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
44. Schmitt, J. & Ehrhardt, D.W. 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution 44: 269-278.
45. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, NY.
46. Swindell, W.R. & Bouzat, J.L. 2006. Selection and inbreeding depression: effects of inbreeding rate and inbreeding environment. Evolution 60: 1014-1022.
47. Templeton, A.R. & Read, B. 1984. Factors eliminating inbreeding depression in a captive herd of spekes gazelle (Gazella spekei). Zoo Biol. 3: 177-199.
48. Thompson, P.A. 1973. The effects of cultivation on the germination character of the corn cockle (Agrostemma githago). Ann. Bot.-London. 37: 133-154.
49. Waller, D.M., Dole, J. & Bersch, A.J. 2008. Effects of stress and phenotypic variation on inbreeding depression in Brassica rapa. Evolution 62: 917-931.
50. Wang, J., Hill, W.G., Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1999. Dynamics of inbreeding depression due to deleterious mutations in small populations: mutation parameters and inbreeding rate. Genet. Res., Camb. 74: 165-178.
51. Whitlock, M.C., Ingvarsson, P.K. & Hatfield, T. 2000. Local drift load and the heterosis of interconnected populations. Heredity 84: 452-457.
52. Willis, J.H. 1999. The role of genes of large effect on inbreeding depression in Mimulus guttatus. Evolution 53: 1678-1691.
53. Ziehe, M. & Roberds, J.H. 1989. Inbreeding depression due to overdominance in partially self-fertilizing plant populations. Genetics 121: 861-868.