The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behaviour in gains and losses contexts

Royal Society Open Science

Volumn 2, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Everett, Jim A C ^a   Faber, Nadira S ^a   Crockett, Molly J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ingroup favouritism; Loss aversion; Preferences; Prosocial behaviour; Reputation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84958069092     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20545703     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.150546     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahmed AM. 2007 Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. J. Econ. Psychol. 28, 324-337. (doi: 10. 1016/j. joep. 2007. 01. 007).
2. Kramer RM, Brewer MB. 1984 Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46, 1044-1057. (doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 46. 5. 1044).
3. Brewer MB, Kramer RM. 1986 Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 543-549. (doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 50. 3. 543).
4. Halevy N, Weisel O, Bornstein G. 2012 'In-group love' and 'out-group hate' in repeated interaction between groups. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 25, 188-195. (doi: 10. 1002/bdm. 726).
5. Tajfel H. 1970 Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Sci. Am. 223, 96-102. (doi: 10. 1038/scientificamerican1170-96).
6. Brewer M. 1999 The psychology of prejudice: ingroup love and outgroup hate? J. Soc. Issues 55, 429-444. (doi: 10. 1111/0022-4537. 00126).
7. Brewer MB, Kramer RM. 1985 The psychology of intergroup attitudes and behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 36, 219-243. (doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ps. 36. 020185. 001251).
8. Tajfel H. 1982 Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 33, 1-39. (doi: 10. 1146/annurev. ps. 33. 020182. 000245).
9. Hewstone M, Rubin M, Willis H. 2002 Intergroup bias. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53, 575-604. (doi: 10. 1146/annurev. psych. 53. 100901. 135109).
10. Dovidio JF, Glick P, Rudman LA. 2005 On the nature of prejudice: fifty years after Allport. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
11. Masuda N, Fu F. 2015 Evolutionary models of in-group favoritism. F1000Prime Rep. 3, 7.
12. Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CK. 2014 Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1556-1581. (doi: 10. 1037/a0037737).
13. Everett JA, Faber NS, Crockett MJ. 2015 Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favouritism. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 15. (doi: 10. 3389/fnbeh. 2015. 00015).
14. Tajfel H, Turner J. 1979 An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations (eds WG Austin, SWorchel), pp. 33-48. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
15. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. 1987 Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
16. Yamagishi T, Kiyonari T. 2000 The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Soc. Psychol. Q. 63, 116-132. (doi: 10. 2307/2695887).
17. Yamagishi T, Jin N, Kiyonari T. 1999 Bounded generalized reciprocity: ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Adv. Group Process. 16, 161-197.
18. Camerer CF. 2003 Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. NewYork, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
19. Camerer CF, Fehr E. 2004 Measuring social norms and preferences using experimental games: a guide for social scientists. In Foundations of human sociality (eds J Henrich, R Boyd, S Bowles, C Camerer, E Fehr, H Gintis), pp. 55-95. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20. Charness G, Rabin M. 2002 Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q. J. Econ. 117, 817-869. (doi: 10. 1162/003355302760193904).
21. Fehr E, Schmidt KM. 1999 A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817-868. (doi: 10. 1162/003355399556151).
22. Crockett MJ. 2013 Models of morality. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 363-366. (doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2013. 06. 005).
23. Rand DG, Peysakhovich A, Kraft-Todd GT, Newman GE, Wurzbacher O, Nowak MA, Greene JD. 2014 Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3677. (doi: 10. 1038/ncomms4677).
24. Alexander R. 1987 The biology of moral systems. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
25. Nowak MA, Sigmund K. 1998 The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. J. Theor. Biol. 194, 561-574. (doi: 10. 1006/jtbi. 1998. 0775).
26. Nowak MA, Sigmund K. 2005 Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437, 1291-1298. (doi: 10. 1038/nature04131).
27. Rabin M. 1993 Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83, 1281-1302.
28. Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G. 2004 A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 47, 268-298. (doi: 10. 1016/j. geb. 2003. 06. 003).
29. Kiyonari T, Yamagishi T. 2004 Ingroup cooperation and the social exchange heuristic. In Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (eds DV Suleiman, DV Budescu, I Fischer, DM Messick), pp. 269-286. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Mifune N, Hashimoto H, Yamagishi T. 2010 Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evol. Hum. Behav. 31, 109-117. (doi: 10. 1016/j. evolhumbehav. 2009. 09. 004).
31. Yamagishi T, Mifune N. 2008 Does shared group membership promote altruism? Fear, greed, and reputation. Ration. Soc. 20, 5-30. (doi: 10. 1177/1043463107085442).
32. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. 2004 Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 185-190. (doi: 10. 1016/j. tics. 2004. 02. 007).
33. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. 2004 Third-party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 63-87. (doi: 10. 1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4).
34. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH. 1986 Fairness and the assumptions of economics. J. Bus. 59, S285-S300. (doi: 10. 1086/296367).
35. Chen Y, Li SX. 2009 Group identity and social preferences. Am. Econ. Rev. 99, 431-457. (doi: 10. 1257/aer. 99. 1. 431).
36. Rand DG, Pfeiffer T, Dreber A, Sheketoff RW, Wernerfelt NC, Benkler Y. 2009 Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6187-6191. (doi: 10. 1073/pnas. 0811552106).
37. Stürmer S, Snyder M, Kropp A, Siem B. 2006 Empathy-motivated helping: the moderating role of group membership. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 943-956. (doi: 10. 1177/0146167206287363).
38. Ockenfels A, Werner P. 2014 Beliefs and ingroup favoritism. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 108, 453-462. (doi: 10. 1016/j. jebo. 2013. 12. 003).
39. Klor EF, Shayo M. 2010 Social identity and preferences over redistribution. J. Public Econ. 94, 269-278. (doi: 10. 1016/j. jpubeco. 2009. 12. 003).
40. Charness G, Gneezy U, Kuhn MA. 2012 Experimental methods: between-subject and within-subject design. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 81, 1-8. (doi: 10. 1016/j. jebo. 2011. 08. 009).
41. Kahneman D, Tversky A. 1979 Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47, 263-292. (doi: 10. 2307/1914185).
42. Baron J. 1995 Blind justice: fairness to groups and the do-no-harm principle. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 8, 71-83. (doi: 10. 1002/bdm. 3960080202).
43. Baron J. 1996 Do no harm. In Codes of conduct: behavioral research into business ethics (eds DM Messick, AE Tenbrunsel), pp. 197-213. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
44. Van Beest I, Van Dijk E, De Dreu CK, Wilke HA. 2005 Do-no-harm in coalition formation: why losses inhibit exclusion and promote fairness cognitions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 41, 609-617. (doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2005. 01. 002).
45. Leliveld MC, Beest I van, Dijk E van, Tenbrunsel AE. 2009 Understanding the influence of outcome valence in bargaining: a study on fairness accessibility, norms, and behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 505-514. (doi: 10. 1016/j. jesp. 2009. 02. 006).
46. Dreber A, Ellingsen T, Johannesson M, Rand DG. 2013 Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games. Exp. Econ. 16, 349-371. (doi: 10. 1007/s10683-012-9341-9).
47. Mendoza SA, Lane SP, Amodio DM. 2014 For members only: ingroup punishment of fairness norm violations in the ultimatum game. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 5, 662-670. (doi: 10. 1177/1948550614527115).
48. Shinada M, Yamagishi T, Ohmura Y. 2004 False friends are worse than bitter enemies: 'altruistic' punishment of in-group members. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 379-393. (doi: 10. 1016/j. evolhumbehav. 2004. 08. 001).
49. Hardin JW. 2005 Generalized estimating equations (GEE). In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. See http: //onlinelibrary. wiley. com/doi/10. 1002/ 0470013192. bsa250/abstract (accessed 12 June 2015).
50. Hanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD deb, Forrester JE. 2003 Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am. J. Epidemiol. 57, 364-375. (doi: 10. 1093/aje/kwf215).
51. Peysakhovich A, Nowak MA, Rand DG. 2014 Humans display a 'cooperative phenotype' that is domain general and temporally stable. Nat. Commun. 5, 4939. (doi: 10. 1038/ncomms5939).