Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-8

  Charness, Gary ^a   Gneezy, Uri ^b   Kuhn, Michael A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Between subject; Experimental design and methodology; Within subject

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054064387     PISSN: 01672681     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andreoni J. Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995, 110:1-21.
2. Andreoni J., Samuelson L. Building rational cooperation. Journal of Economic Theory 2006, 127:117-154.
3. Brookshire D.B., Ives B.C., Schulze W.D. The valuation of aesthetic preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1976, 3:325-346.
4. Budescu D., Weiss W. Reflection of transitive and intransitive preferences: a test of prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1987, 39:184-202.
5. Carson R.T., Flores N.E., Meade N.F. Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics 2001, 19:173-210.
6. Deffenbacher K., Leu J., Brown E. Memory for faces: testing method, encoding strategy, and confidence. The American Journal of Psychology 1981, 94:13-26.
7. Desvousges W.H., Johnson F.R., Dunford R.W., Boyle K.J., Hudson S.P., Wilson K.N. Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: tests of validity and reliability. Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment 1993, 91-164. North Holland, Amsterdam. J. Hausman (Ed.).
8. Epley N., Gneezy A. The framing of financial windfalls and implications for public policy. Journal of Socio-Economics 2007, 36:36-47.
9. Fehr E., Gächter S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review 2000, 90:980-994.
10. Fox C., Tverksy A. Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 1995, 110:585-603.
11. Frederick S., Fischhoff B. Scope (in)sensitivity in elicited valuations. Risk Decision and Policy 1998, 3:109-123.
12. Gneezy U. The role of consequences. The American Economic Review 2005, 95:384-394.
13. Greenwald A. Within-subjects designs: to use or not to use. Psychological Bulletin 1976, 83:314-320.
14. Grice G. Dependence of empirical laws upon the source of experimental variation. Psychological Bulletin 1966, 66:488-498.
15. Hershey J., Schoemaker P. Prospect theory's reflection hypothesis: a critical examination. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1980, 25:395-418.
16. Hsee C. The evaluability hypothesis: and explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1996, 67:247-257.
17. Hsee C., Leclerc F. Will products look more attractive when presented separately or together?. The Journal of Consumer Research 1998, 25:175-186.
18. Hsee C., Zhang J. Distinction bias: misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2004, 86:680-695.
19. Isaac R.M., Walker J.M. Group size effects in public goods provision: the voluntary contributions mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1988, 103:179-199.
20. Isaac R.M., Walker J.M. Communication and free-riding behavior: the voluntary contribution mechanism. Economic Inquiry 1988, 26:585-608.
21. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1992, 22:50-57.
22. Kahneman D., Ritov I. Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: a study in the headline model. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1994, 9:5-38.
23. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-292.
24. Milburn M. Sources of bias in the prediction of future events. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1978, 21:17-26.
25. Poulton E. Unwanted range effects from using within-subjects experimental designs. Psychological Bulletin 1973, 81:201-203.
26. Rosenthal R. Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research 1976, Wiley, New York. 2nd ed.
27. Smith V., Kassin S., Ellsworth P. Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: within-versus between-subjects correlations. Journal of Applied Psychology 1989, 74:356-359.
28. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business 1986, 59:S251-S278.
29. White R.A. The influence of the experimenter motivation, attitudes and methods of handling subjects in psi test results. Handbook of Parapsychology 1977, 273-304. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY. B.B. Wolman (Ed.).