Exploiting the CRISPR/Cas9 System for Targeted Genome Mutagenesis in Petunia

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Zhang, Bin ^a   Yang, Xia ^a   Yang, Chunping ^a   Li, Mingyang ^a   Guo, Yulong ^a  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALBINO; CHROMOSOME; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; GENE DELETION; GENOME; HOMOZYGOSITY; INDEL MUTATION; MODEL; MUTAGENESIS; ORNAMENTAL PLANT; PETUNIA; PHENOTYPE; SPECIES; TRANSGENE; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; GENE SILENCING; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PLANT GENE; PROCEDURES; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; TRANSGENIC PLANT;

CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE SILENCING; GENES, PLANT; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PETUNIA; PHENOTYPE; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; SEQUENCE DELETION;

EID: 84957818484     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep20315     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Puchta, H. & Fauser, F. Synthetic nucleases for genome engineering in plants: prospects for a bright future. Plant J. 78, 727-741, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12338 (2014).
2. Bortesi, L. & Fischer, R. The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol. Adv. 33, 41-52, doi: 10.1016/j. biotechadv.2014.12.006 (2015).
3. Li, J. et al. Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 688-691, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2654 (2013).
4. Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., Jones, J. D. & Kamoun, S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 691-693, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2655 (2013).
5. Shan, Q. et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 686-688, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2650 (2013).
6. Feng, Z. et al. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1229-1232, doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.114 (2013).
7. Jiang, W. et al. Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e188, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt780 (2013).
8. Mao, Y. et al. Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. Mol. Plant 6, 2008-2011, doi: 10.1093/mp/sst121 (2013).
9. Miao, J. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res. 23, 1233-1236, doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.123 (2013).
10. Xie, K. & Yang, Y. RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Mol. Plant 6, 1975-1983, doi: 10.1093/mp/sst119 (2013).
11. Voytas, D. F. Plant genome engineering with sequence-specific nucleases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 327-350 (2013).
12. Chen, K. & Gao, C. Targeted genome modification technologies and their applications in crop improvements. Plant Cell Rep. 33, 575-583, doi: 10.1007/s00299-013-1539-6 (2014).
13. Belhaj, K., Chaparro-Garcia, A., Kamoun, S., Patron, N. J. & Nekrasov, V. Editing plant genomes with CRISPR/Cas9. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 32, 76-84, doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.007 (2015).
14. Kumar, V. & Jain, M. The CRISPR-Cas system for plant genome editing: advances and opportunities. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 47-57, doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru429 (2015).
15. Jain, M. Function genomics of abiotic stress tolerance in plants: a CRISPR approach. Frontiers in Plant Sci. 6, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00375 (2015).
16. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821, doi: 10.1126/science.1225829 (2012).
17. Puchta, H. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. J. Exp. Bot. 56, 1-14, doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri025 (2005).
18. Jiang, W., Yang, B. & Weeks, D. P. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and inheritance of modified genes in the T2 and T3 generations. Plos One 9, 99225, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099225.g001 (2014).
19. Fauser, F., Schiml, S. & Puchta, H. Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 79, 348-359, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12554 (2014).
20. Feng, Z. et al. Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 4632-4637, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400822111 (2014).
21. Belhaj, K., Chaparro-Garcia, A., Kamoun, S. & Nekrasov, V. Plant genome editing made easy: targeted mutagenesis in model and crop plants using the CRISPR/Cas system. Plant Methods 9, doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-39 (2013).
22. Gao, J. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol. Biol. 87, 99-110, doi: 10.1007/s11103-014-0263-0 (2015).
23. Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 797-807, doi: 10.1111/pbi.12200 (2014).
24. Zhou, H., Liu, B., Weeks, D. P., Spalding, M. H. & Yang, B. Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10903-10914, doi: 10.1093/nar/gku806 (2014).
25. Upadhyay, S. K., Kumar, J., Alok, A. & Tuli, R. RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 3, 2233-2238, doi: 10.1534/g3.113.008847/-/DC1 (2013).
26. Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nature Biotechnol. 32, 947-951, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2969 (2014).
27. Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Chen, K. & Gao, C. Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. J. Genet. Genomics 41, 63-68, doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2013.12.001 (2014).
28. Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z. B. & Van Eck, J. Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 system. Plant Physiol. 166, 1292-1297, doi: 10.1104/pp.114.247577 (2014).
29. Ito, Y., Nishizawa-Yokoi, A., Endo, M., Mikami, M. & Toki, S. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 467, 76-82, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.117 (2015).
30. Ron, M. et al. Hairy root transformation using Agrobacterium rhizogenes as a tool for exploring cell type-specific gene expression and function using tomato as a model. Plant Phsiol. 166, 455-469, doi: 10.1104/pp.114.239392 (2014).
31. Wang, S. et al. Efficient targeted mutagenesis in potato by the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Plant Cell Rep. 34, 1473-1476, doi: 10.1007/s00299-015-1816-7 (2015).
32. Jia, H. & Wang, N. Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA. Plos One 9, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093806 (2014).
33. Fan, D. et al. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in populus in the first generation. Sci. Rep. 5, 12217, doi: 10.1038/srep12217 (2015).
34. Sugano, S. S. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha L. Plant Cell Physiol. 55, 475-481, doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu014 (2014).
35. Schiml, S., Fauser, F. & Puchta, H. The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny. Plant J. 80, 1139-1150, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12704 (2014).
36. Yagi, M. Recent progress in genomic analysis of ornamental plants, with a focus on carnation. Horticulture J. 84, 3-13, doi: 10.2503/hortj.MI-IRO1 (2015).
37. Gerats, T. & Vandenbussche, M. A model system for comparative research: Petunia. Trends Plant Sci. 10, 251-256, doi: 10.1016/j. tplants.2005 (2005).
38. Qin, G. et al. Disruption of phytoene desaturase gene results in albino and dwarf phenotypes in Arabidopsis by impairing chlorophyll, carotenoid, and gibberellin biosynthesis. Cell Res. 17, 471-482, doi: 10.1038/cr.2007.40 (2007).
39. Ma, X. et al. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol. Plant 8, 1274-1284, doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007 (2015).
40. Lowder, L. G. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolbox for multiplexed plant genome editing and transcriptional regulation. Plant physiology 169, 971-985, doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00636 (2015).
41. Xie, K., Minkenberg, B. & Yang, Y. Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 3570-3575, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1420294112 (2015).
42. Xing, H.-L. et al. A CRISPR/Cas9 toolkit for multiplex genome editing in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 14, doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0327-y (2014).
43. Hanahan, D., Jessee, J. & Bloom, F. R. Plasmid transformation of escherichia-coli and other bacteria. Methods Enzymol. 204, 63-113 (1991).
44. Mikami, M., Toki, S. & Endo, M. Comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 expression constructs for efficient targeted mutagenesis in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 88, 561-572, doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0342-x (2015).
45. Ali, Z. et al. Efficient virus-mediated genome editing in plants using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Mol. Plant 8, 1288-1291, doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.011 (2015).
46. Yin, K. et al. A geminivirus-based guide RNA delivery system for CRISPR/Cas9 mediated plant genome editing. Sci. Rep. 5, 14926, doi: 10.1038/srep14926 (2015).
47. Hellens, R. P., Edwards, E. A., Leyland, N. R., Bean, S. & Mullineaux, P. M. pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 819-832, doi: 10.1023/a:1006496308160 (2000).
48. Napoli, C., Lemieux, C. & Jorgensen, R. Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible cosuppression of homologous genes in trans. Plant Cell 2, 279-289, doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.4.279 (1990).
49. Conner, A. J., Albert, N. W. & Deroles, S. C. In Petunia: Evolutionary, Developmental and Physiological Genetics (eds Tom Gerats & Judith Strommer) Ch. 19, 395-410 (Springer, 2009).