An e-learning theoretical framework

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 292-307

  Aparicio, Manuela ^a,b,c   Bacao, Fernando ^b   Oliveira, Tiago ^b  

^a INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

^b NOVA INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SCHOOL NOVA IMS   (Portugal)

^c UNIDCOM/IADE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

E learning; E Learning concept evolution; E Learning framework; E Learning literature review; E Learning systems dimensions; MOOC

Indexed keywords

EID: 84957617652     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Aggelidis, V. P., & Chatzoglou, P. D. (2012). Hospital information systems: Measuring end user computing satisfaction (EUCS). Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 45(3), 566-579. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2012.02.009
2. Allison, C., Miller, A., Oliver, I., Michaelson, R., & Tiropanis, T. (2012). The Web in education. Computer Networks, 56(18), 3811-3824. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.09.017
3. Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Edmonton, Canada: Athabasca University Press.
4. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2014a). MOOC's business models: Turning black swans into gray swans. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication (pp. 45-49). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2618168.2618175
5. Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2014b). Trends in the e-learning ecosystem: A Bibliometric study. In Proceedings of 20th American Conference on Information System. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2014/Posters/ISEducation/7
6. Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A Systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 133-149.
7. Bain, J. D., McNaught, C., Mills, C., & Lueckenhausen, G. (1998). Describing computer-facilitated learning environments in higher education. Learning Environments Research, 1(2), 163-180. doi:10.1023/A:1009905832421
8. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71-81). New York, NY: Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html
9. Barson, J., Levine, D., Smith, R., Scholl, M., & Scholl, P. (1963). University-level CA1 in French. In P. Suppes (Ed.), University-Level Computer-Assisted Instruction at Stanford: 1968-1980 (pp. 685-706). Stanford, CA: Leland Stanford Junior University. Retrieved from http://suppescorpus.stanford.edu/cai.html
10. Bates, T. (2012). What's right and what's wrong about Coursera-style MOOCs [Blog]. Retrieved from http://www.tonybates.ca/2012/08/05/whats-right-and-whats-wrong-about-coursera-style-moocs/
11. Becker, J. W. (1968, May). Run computer run: A Critique. Paper presented in the Conference on Information Technology and Secondary Education, Harvard University.
12. Beckman, S. (2002). The Nature of artifacts. In B. Dahlbom, S. Beckman & G. B. Nilsson (Eds.), Artifacts and Artificial Science, (pp. 45-92). Stockholm, Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
13. Belleflamme, P., & Jacqmin, J. (2014). An Economic appraisal of MOOC platforms: business models and impacts on higher education. CORE Discussion Paper, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lam/wpaper/14-11.html
14. Bernhardt, K. S. (1960). Review of the undirected society and automatic teaching: The State of the art. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 14(1), 60-61. doi:10.1037/h0083460
15. Bitzer, D. L., & Others, A. (1970). The Plato system and science education. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 042 624)
16. Brox, C., Painho, M., Bação, F., & Kuhn, W. (2004). International exchange of e-learning courses. In Proceedings of EUGISES 2004-Fourth European GIS Education Seminar. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/229043315
17. Carroll, J. M., & Swatman, P. A. (2000). Structured-case: A Methodological framework for building theory in information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(4), 235-242.
18. Chen, R. S., & Liu, I. F. (2013). Research on the effectiveness of information technology in reducing the Rural-Urban Knowledge Divide. Computers & Education, 63, 437-445. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.002
19. Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: Who takes massive open online courses and why? (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2350964). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2350964
20. Cruz-Jesus, F., Oliveira, T., & Bacao, F. (2012). Digital divide across the European Union. Information & Management, 49(6), 278-291.
21. Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for e-learning: A Theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 25-44.
22. Dahlbom, B. (1996). The New informatics. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 8, 29-48.
23. Daniel, J. S. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
24. Darazsdi, J. J., & May, P. L. (1989). The Fight against illiteracy: How one company is making a difference. Management Review, 78(10), 36-39.
25. Dellarocas, C., & Van Alstyne, M. (2013). Money models for MOOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 25-28. doi:10.1145/2492007.2492017
26. Dorai, C., Kermani, P., & Stewart, A. (2001). ELM-N: E-Learning media navigator. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 634-635). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/500141.500269
27. Downes, S. (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Collective intelligence and elearning, 20, 1-26 Retrieved from http://ictlogy.net/bibliography/reports/projects.php?idp=614
28. Downes, S. (2008). Places to go: Connectivism & connective knowledge. Journal of Online Education, 5(1), Article 6., Available at: http://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol5/iss1/6
29. Drumm, J. E., & Groom, F. M. (1997). The Cybermobile: A Gateway for public access to network-based information. Computers in Libraries, 17(1), 29-33.
30. Fini, A. (2009). The Technological dimension of a massive open online course: The Case of the CCK08 course tools. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/643
31. Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813. doi:10.2307/258048
32. Fox, A. (2013). From MOOCs to SPOCs. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 38-40. doi:10.1145/2535918
33. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A Stakeholder approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. Godwin-Jones, R. (2012). Emerging technologies for language learning. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0365/abstract
35. Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A Definition. Research in learning Technology, 3(2), 5-34. doi:10.1080/0968776950030202
36. Gregor, S., Martin, M., Fernandez, W., Stern, S., & Vitale, M. (2006). The Transformational dimension in the realization of business value from information technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 15(3), 249-270. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2006.04.001
37. Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 101-117. doi:10.1007/BF02299733
38. Hart, C. (2009). Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science imagination. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. Hart, R. (1981). The PLATO system and language study. Studies in Language Learning, 3(1).
40. Hewitt, J., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75-96. doi:10.1023/A:1022810231840
41. Hsieh, P. A. J., & Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e-learning tools' success: The Case of instructor-student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2025-2038. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002
42. Ismail, J. (2001). The Design of an e-learning system: Beyond the hype. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 329-336. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00069-0
43. Jonassen, D. H., Grabinger, R. S., & Harris, N. D. C. (1997). Analyzing and selecting instructional strategies and tactics. Originally published in 1991, PIQ 4.2. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(1), 34-54. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.1997.tb00029.x
44. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17. doi:10.1007/BF02313398
45. Jordan, K. (2013). MOOC completion rates: The Data [Online article]. Retrieved from http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html
46. Kassim, E. S., Jailani, S. F. A. K., Hairuddin, H., & Zamzuri, N. H. (2012). Information system acceptance and user satisfaction: The Mediating role of trust. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57, 412-418. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1205
47. Kemeny, J., & Kurtz, T. E. (1967). Dartmouth time sharing. Science, 162, 223-238.
48. Kolowich, S. (2012). MOOCs' little brother [Online article]. Washington, DC: Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/09/06/u-maine-campus-experiments-small-scale-high-touch-open-courses
49. Kong, S. C., Chan, T. W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R., Kinshuk, Looi, C. K., Norris, C., Nussbaum, M., Sharples, M., So, W. M. W., Soloway, E., & Yu, S. (2014). E-learning in school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills: Critical research issues and policy implications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 70-78.
50. Koschmann, T. D. (1994). Toward a theory of computer support for collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 219-225. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0303_1
51. Krzywinski, M. I., Schein, J. E., Birol, I., Connors, J., Gascoyne, R., Horsman, D., Jones, S. J., & Marra, M. A. (2009). Circos: An Information aesthetic for comparative genomics. Genome Research, 19(9), 1639-1645. doi:10.1101/gr.092759.109
52. Lanier, V. (1966). Newer media and the teaching of art. Art Education, 19(4), 4-8. doi:10.2307/3190788
53. Lee, A. S., & Baskerville, R. L. (2003). Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 221-243.
54. Lee, D., Chung, J. Y., & Kim, H. (2013). Text me when it becomes dangerous: Exploring the determinants of college students' adoption of mobile-based text alerts short message service. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 563-569. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.014
55. Lee, J., Bharosa, N., Yang, J., Janssen, M., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Group value and intention to use-A Study of multi-agency disaster management information systems for public safety. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 404-414. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.10.002
56. Lee, J. K., & Lee, W. K. (2008). The Relationship of e-learner's self-regulatory efficacy and perception of e-learning environmental quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(1), 32-47. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.12.001
57. Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The Role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information & Management, 42(8), 1095-1104. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
58. Lee, S. H., Choi, J., & Park, J. I. (2009). Interactive e-learning system using pattern recognition and augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 55(2), 883-890. doi:10.1109/TCE.2009.5174470
59. Lee, S. Y. T., Kim, H. W., & Gupta, S. (2009). Measuring open source software success. Omega, 37(2), 426-438. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2007.05.005
60. Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The Use of information technology to enhance management school education: A Theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 265-291.
61. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
62. Liu, I., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600-610. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
63. Ludvigsen, S., & Mørch, A. I. (2010). Computer-supported collaborative learning: Basic concepts, multiple perspectives, and emerging trends. In B. McGaw, P. Peterson & E. Baker (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (Vol. 5, pp. 290-296). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
64. March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251-266. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
65. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). Elearning: The Key concepts. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
66. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A Meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
67. McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., & Cormie, D. (2010). The MOOC model for digital practice. University of Prince Edward Island. Retrieved from www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf
68. McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (1999). Instructional design for cultural difference: A Case study of indigenous online learning in a tertiary context. In J. Winn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 229-238). Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology.
69. Mehlenbacher, B. (2010). Instruction and technology: Designs for everyday learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
70. Molnar, A. R., & Sherman, B. (1969). US office of education support of computer activities. Washington, DC: Office of Education (DHEW), Bureau of Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 031 959)
71. Mørch, A. I. (2013). Information seeking and collaborative knowledge creation: Exploring collaborative learning in customer service work and software product development. In S. P. Goggins, I. Jahnke, & V. Wulf (Eds.), Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning at the Workplace (pp. 293-313). doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1740-8_14
72. Morri, A. (1997). A Bright future for distance learning: One touch/hughes alliance promotes interactive "e-learning" service. Connected Planet Online, 17. Retrieved from http://connectedplanetonline.com/mag/telecom_bright_future_distance/
73. OECD. (2012). Education at a glance 2012: Highlights. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/2076264x
74. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2003). Exploring technology-mediated learning from a pedagogical perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Environments, 11(2), 111-126.
75. Papazafeiropoulou, A., Pouloudi, A., & Currie, W. L. (2001). Applying the stakeholder concept to electronic commerce: Extending previous research to guide government policy makers. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2001.926521
76. Patterson, D. J. (2011). Becoming researchers: Community college ESL students, information literacy, and the library (Doctoral dissertation, University of California). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5395p4bn#page-2
77. Pesanelli, D. (1993). The Plug-in school: A Learning environment for the 21st century. Futurist, 27(5), 29-32.
78. Peter, S., & Deimann, M. (2013). On the role of openness in education: A Historical reconstruction. Open Praxis, 5(1), 7-14. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.23
79. Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
80. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A Research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401-426.
81. Rodriguez, C. O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 67-73.
82. Rodriguez, O. (2013). The Concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis, 5(1), 67-73. doi:10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.42
83. Rosenberg, M. (2000). E-Learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. Columbus, OH: Mcgraw-Hill.
84. Rosenberg, M. J. (2005). Beyond e-learning: Approaches and technologies to enhance organizational knowledge, learning, and performance. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
85. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Using peer teams to lead online discussions. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2002(1), Article 1. Retrieved from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2002-1
86. Rovai, A. P. (2004). A Constructivist approach to online college learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 79-93. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.10.002
87. Rushby, N. (1998). Where are the desks for the virtual class? ACM SIGCUE Outlook, 26(2), 33-36. doi:10.1145/281083.281093
88. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
89. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology-Saddle Brook then Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 43(6), 51-54. Retrieved from http://www.asianvu.com/bk/UAQ/UAQ_WORKSHOP_PACKAGE/new/Appendix%20B%20-%20blended-learning.pdf
90. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An Historical perspective. In Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/CSCL_English.pdf
91. Stoner, J. A. F., Freeman, R. E., & Gilbert, D. R., Jr. (1995). Management (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
92. Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
93. Thomas, B., Garrett, N., Herrera, J. C., & Ryan, T. (2008). Understanding the roles of knowledge sharing and trust in online learning communities. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2008.481
94. Vavpotic, D., Žvanut, B., & Trobec, I. (2013). A Comparative evaluation of e-learning and traditional pedagogical process elements. Educational Technology & Society, 3(16), 76-87.
95. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
96. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for e-learning success in higher education? A Stakeholders' analysis. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(3), 26-36.
97. Wang, Y. S., Wang, H. Y., & Shee, D. Y. (2007). Measuring e-learning systems success in an organizational context: Scale development and validation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1792-1808. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.006
98. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
99. White, M. A. (1983). Synthesis of research on electronic learning. Educational Leadership, 40(8), 13-15.
100. Yang, J., Kinshuk, Yu, H., Chen, S. J., & Huang, R. (2014). Strategies for smooth and effective cross-cultural online collaborative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 208-221.
101. Zinn, K. L. (2000). Computer-assisted learning and teaching. In Encyclopedia of Computer Science (pp. 328-336). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1074100.1074248