A comparative evaluation of e-learning and traditional pedagogical process elements

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 76-87

  Vavpotič, Damjan ^a   Žvanut, Boštjan ^b   Trobec, Irena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSKA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

E learning; Evaluation; Model; Pedagogical process; Teaching methods; Tools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884161972     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bastable, S. B. (2008). Nurse as educator: principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett
2. Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press
3. Brown, S. A. (2011). Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 50-57
4. Campbell, M., Gibson, W., Hall, A., Richards, D., & Callery, P. (2008). Online vs. face-to-face discussion in a web-based research methods course for postgraduate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(5), 750-759
5. Emerson, R. J. (2007). Nursing education in the clinical setting. St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier
6. Fernández Alemán, J. L., Carrillo de Gea, J. M., & Rodríguez Mondéjar, J. J. (2011). Effects of competitive computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 866-871
7. Forsberg, E., Georg, C., Ziegert, K., & Fors, U. (2011). Virtual patients for assessment of clinical reasoning in nursing - A pilot study. Nurse Education Today, 31(8), 757-762
8. Gaberson, K., & Oermann, M. (2010). Clinical teaching strategies in nursing (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company
9. Gabriela, G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 478-482
10. Gunnar, A. (2009). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 197-205
11. Heydman, A. M. (2006). Planning for accreditation: Evaluating the curriculum. In S. B. Keating (Ed.), Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing (pp. 297-315). Baltimore, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
12. Haw, M. A., & Keating, S. B. (2006). Adaptation of curriculum development and evaluation of staff development and client-centered health education. In S. B. Keating (Ed.), Curriculum Development and Evaluation in Nursing (pp. 319-348). New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
13. Kelly, M., Lyng, C., McGrath, M., & Cannon, G. (2009). A multi-method study to determine the effectiveness of, and student attitudes to, online instructional videos for teaching clinical nursing skills. Nurse Education Today, 29(3), 292-300
14. Lee, J., Cerreto, F. A., & Lee, J. (2010). Theory of planned behavior and teachers' decisions regarding use of educational technology. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 152-164
15. Little, B. B. (2009). Quality assurance for online nursing courses. Journal of Nursing Education, 48(7), 381-387
16. Moule, P., Ward, R., & Lockyer, L. (2010). Nursing and healthcare students' experiences and use of e-learning in higher education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(12), 2785-2795
17. Pucer, P. (2011). Augmented reality. Slovenian Medical Journal, 80(7-8), 578-585
18. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387-415
19. Riemenschneider, C. K., Hardgrave, B. C., & Davis, F. D. (2002). Explaining Software Developer Acceptance of Methodologies: A Comparison of Five Theoretical Models. IEEE transactions on software engineering, 28(12), 1135-1145
20. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press
21. Ruiz, J. G., Mintzer, M. J., & Leipzig, R. M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, 81(3), 207-212
22. Starčič, A. I. (2008). Developing virtual simulation game for authentic learning: Realizing partnership between university and industry. WSEAS transactions on communications, 7(7), 786-795
23. Vavpotic, D., & Bajec, M. (2009). An approach for concurrent evaluation of technical and social aspects of software development methodologies. Information and Software Technology, 51(2), 528-545
24. Vavpotič, D., & Hovelja, T. (2012). Improving the evaluation of software development methodology adoption and its impact on enterprise performance. Computer Science and Information Systems, 9(1), 165-187
25. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
26. Young, L. E., & Maxwell, B. (2007). Student-centered teaching in nursing: From rote to active learning. In S. Yu, I. J. Chen, K. F. Yang, T. F. Wang, & L. L. Yen (2007). A feasibility study on the adoption of e-learning for public health nurse continuing education in Taiwan. Nurse Education Today, 27(7), 755-761
27. Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229-243
28. Žvanut, B., Pucer, P., Ličen, S., Trobec, I., Plazar, N., & Vavpotič, D. (2011). The effect of voluntariness on the acceptance of e-learning by nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31(4), 350-355