Concreteness and psychological distance in natural language use

Psychological Science

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1449-1460

  Snefjella, Bryor ^a   Kuperman, Victor ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Abstraction; Concreteness; Construal level theory; Embodied cognition; Psychological distance; Social media; Twitter

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL MEDIA; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COGNITION; GEOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LINGUISTICS; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL MEDIA;

EID: 84957586151     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797615591771     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161–167
2. Amit, E., & Greene, J. D. (2012). You see, the ends don’t justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment. Psychological Science, 23, 861–868
3. Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610–622
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645
5. Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology & Social Research, 17, 265–271
6. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28
7. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22
8. Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13, 185–189
9. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911
10. Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 501–520
11. Central Intelligence Agency. (2014). The World Factbook: North America: United States. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html
12. D’Argembeau, A., & Van der Linden, M. (2004). Phenomenal characteristics associated with projecting oneself back into the past and forward into the future: Influence of valence and temporal distance. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 844–858
13. Eisenstein, J. (in press). Written dialect variation in online social media. In C. Boberg, J. Nerbonne, & D. Watt (Eds.), Handbook of dialectology. New York, NY: Wiley.
14. Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 781–795
15. Fiedler, K. (2007). Construal level theory as an integrative framework for behavioral decision-making research and consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17, 101–106
16. Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 825–850
17. Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278–282
18. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479
19. Gong, H., & Medin, D. L. (2012). Construal levels and moral judgment: Some complications. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 628–638
20. Hansen, J., & Wanke, M. (2010). Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1576–1588
21. Hirst, W., Phelps, E. A., Meksin, R., Vaidya, C. J., Johnson, M. K., Mitchell, K. J., Olsson, A. (2015). A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 604–623
22. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376
23. Kahle, D., & Wickham, H. (2013). ggmap: Spatial visualization with ggplot2. The R Journal, 5(1), 144–161. Retrieved from http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2013-1/kahle-wickham.pdf
24. Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 32–51
25. Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256–1269
26. Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788–804
27. Nisbett, R. E., Caputo, C., Legant, P., & Marecek, J. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164
28. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29. Parrillo, V. N., & Donoghue, C. (2005). Updating the Bogardus social distance studies: A new national survey. The Social Science Journal, 42, 257–271
30. Pennebaker, J. W., Paez, D., & Rim, B. (2013). Collective memory of political events: Social psychological perspectives. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
31. Pingdom. (2014). Report: Social network demographics in 2012. Retrieved from http://royal.pingdom.com/2012/08/21/reportsocial- network-demographics-in-2012/
32. R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
33. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357
34. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8, 657–661
35. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 499–520
36. Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558–568
37. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2013). A reduced redundancy USENET corpus (2005–2011). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta. Retrieved from http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~westburylab/downloads/usenetcorpus.download.html
38. Soderberg, C. K., Callahan, S. P., Kochersberger, A. O., Amit, E., & Ledgerwood, A. (2015). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 525–548
39. Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 268–280
40. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and timedependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876–889
41. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421
42. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463
43. Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641–653.