Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1576-1588

  Hansen, Jochim ^a   Wänke, Michaela ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

abstractness; concreteness; distance; language; mind set; truth

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENT;

ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STUDENTS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78649848914     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: 15527433     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0146167210386238     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Akehurst, L., Köhnken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons' and police officers' beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 40, 461-471.
2. Bar-Anan Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610-622.
3. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Begg, I.M., Anas, A., & Farinacci, S. (1992). Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 446-458.
5. Bleasdale, F.A. (1987). Concreteness-dependent associative priming: Separate lexical organization for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 582-594.
6. Borgida, E., & Nisbett, R.E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 258-271.
7. Carroll, J.S. (1978). The effect of imagining an event on expectations for the event: An interpretation in terms of the availability heuristic. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 88-96.
8. Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 238-257.
9. de Groot, A.M.B. (1989). Representational aspects of word image-ability and word frequency as assessed through word association. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 824-845.
10. DePaulo, B.M., Lindsay, J.J., Malone, B.E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
11. DePaulo, B.M., Rosenthal, R., Rosenkrantz, J., & Green, C.R. (1982). Actual and perceived cues to deception: A closer look at speech. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 291-312.
12. Douglas, K.M., & Sutton, R.M. (1993). Effects of communication goals and expectancies on language abstraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 682-696.
13. Fiedler, K. (2008). The implicit meta-theory that has inspired and restricted LCM research: Why some studies were conducted but others not. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 182-196.
14. Fiedler, K., Semin, G.R., & Bolten, S. (1989). Language use and reification of social information: Top-down and bottom-up processing in person cognition. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 271-295.
15. Förster, J., & Higgins, E.T. (2005). How global versus local perception fits regulatory focus. Psychological Science, 16, 631-636.
16. Freitas, A.L., Gollwitzer, P.M., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739-752.
17. Fujita, K., Henderson, M., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278-282.
18. Garry, M., Manning, C.G., Loftus, E.F., & Sherman, S.J. (1996). Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood even inflates confidence that it occurred. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 208-214.
19. Gregory, W.L., Cialdini, R.B., & Carpenter, K.M. (1982). Self-relevant scenarios as mediators of likelihood estimates and compliance: Does imagining make it so? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 89-99.
20. Hansen, J., Dechêne, A., & Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687-691.
21. Henderson, M.D., Fujita, K., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Transcending the here: The effect of spatial distance on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 845-856.
22. Herzog, S.M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 483-488.
23. Higgins, E.T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230.
24. Higgins, E.T., Idson, L.C., Freitas, A.L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D.C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140-1153.
25. Houghton Mifflin. (2000). American heritage dictionary of the English language (4th ed.). Retrieved fromwww.thefreedictionary.com.
26. Johnson, M.K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61, 760-771.
27. Johnson, M.K., Bush, J.G., & Mitchell, K.J. (1998). Interpersonal reality monitoring: Judging the sources of other people's memories. Social Cognition, 16, 199-224.
28. Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
29. Johnson, M.K., & Raye, C.L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
30. Koehler, D.J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
31. Kroll, J.F., & Merves, J.S. (1986). Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 92-107.
32. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201-1205.
33. Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advantages in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79-121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Paivio, A. (1969). Mental imagery in associative learning and memory. Psychological Review, 76, 241-263.
35. Parks, C.M., & Toth, J.P. (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13, 225-253.
36. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37. Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338-342.
38. Reyes, R.M., Thompson, W.C., & Bower, G.H. (1980). Judgmental biases resulting from differing availabilities of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 2-12.
39. Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 143-146.
40. Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). Some things you learn aren't so: Cohen's paradox, Asch's paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6, 3-9.
41. Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Contrasts and interactions redux: Five easy pieces. Psychological Science, 7, 253-257.
42. Rubini, M., & Menegatti, M. (2008). Linguistic bias in personnel selection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 168-181.
43. Schmid, J., & Fiedler, K. (1996). Language and implicit attributions in the Nuremberg trials: Analyzing prosecutors' and defense attorneys' closing speeches. Human Communication Research, 22, 371-398.
44. Schmid, J., & Fiedler, K. (1998). The backbone of closing speeches: The impact of prosecution versus defense language on juridical attribution. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1140-1172.
45. Schmid, J., Fiedler, K., Englich, B., Ehrenberger, T., & Semin, G.R. (1996). Taking sides with the defendant: Grammatical choice and the influence of implicit attributions in prosecution and defense speeches. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 12, 127-148.
46. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime: A user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
47. Schooler, J.W., Gerhard, D., & Loftus, E.F. (1986). Qualities of the unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 171-181.
48. Semin, G.R. (2008). Language puzzles: A prospective retrospective on the linguistic category model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 27, 197-209.
49. Semin, G.R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
50. Semin, G.R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
51. Semin, G.R., Higgins, T., Gil de Montes, L., Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J.F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 36-45.
52. Sherman, S.J., Cialdini, R.B., Schwartzman, D.F., & Reynolds, K.D. (1985). Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease: The mediating effect of ease of imagery. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 118-127.
53. ter Doest, L., & Semin, G. (2005). Retrieval contexts and the concreteness effect: Dissociations in memory for concrete and abstract words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 859-881.
54. Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 473-482.
55. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal distance and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876-889.
56. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403-421.
57. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
58. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Judgments of and by representativeness. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 84-100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 219-230.
60. Vrij, A. (2008). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1323-1336.
61. Vrij, A., Evans, H., Akehurst, L., & Mann, S. (2004). Rapid judgements in assessing verbal and nonverbal cues: Their potential for deception researchers and lie detection. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 283-296.
62. Wakslak, C.J., & Trope, Y. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science, 20, 52-58.
63. Wakslak, C.J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641-653.
64. Wigboldus, D.H.J., Semin, G.R., & Spears, R. (2000). How do we communicate stereotypes? Linguistic biases and inferential consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 5-18.