Individual differences in competent consumer choice: the role of cognitive reflection and numeracy skills

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Graffeo, Michele ^a   Polonio, Luca ^a   Bonini, Nicolao ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

CRT; Decision making processes; Economic choice; Eye movements; Numeracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84956942746     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00844     Document Type: Review

References (99)

1. Adkins, N. R., and Ozanne, J. L. (2005). The low literate consumer. J. Consum. Res. 32, 93–105. doi: 10.1086/429603
2. Armstrong, J. S. (2010). Persuasive Advertising: Evidence-Based Principles.London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230285804
3. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., and Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
4. Baron, R. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
5. Birnbaum, M. H., and Gutierrez, R. J. (2007). Testing for intransitivity of preferences predicted by a lexicographic semi-order. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 104, 96–112. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.02.001
6. Bonini, N., Tentori, K., and Osherson, D. (2004). A different conjunction fallacy. Mind Lang. 19, 199–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00254.x
7. Burks, S. V., Carpenter, J. P., Goette, L., and Rustichini, A. (2009). Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 7745–7750. doi: 10.1073/pnas.08123 60106
8. Campitelli, G., and Labollita, M. (2010). Correlations of Cognitive Reflection with judgments and choices. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 5, 182–191.
9. Chapman, G. B., and Liu, J. (2009). Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 4, 34–40.
10. Charette, M. F., and Meng, R. (1998). The determinants of literacy and Numeracy, and the effect of literacy and Numeracy on labour market outcomes. Can. J. Econ. 31, 495–517. doi: 10.2307/136200
11. Chen, H. A., and Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: errors in processing multiple percentage changes. J. Consum. Res. 34, 327–340. doi: 10.1086/518531
12. Chiswick, B. R., Lee, Y. L., and Miller, P. W. (2003). Schooling, literacy, Numeracy and labour market success. Econ. Rec. 79, 165–181. doi: 10.1111/1475-4932.t01-1-00096
13. Christelis, D., Jappelli, T., and Padula, M. (2010). Cognitive abilities and portfolio choice. Eur. Econ. Rev. 54, 18–38. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2009. 04.001
14. Cokely, E. T., and Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: a protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 4, 20–33.
15. Crawley, M. J. (2007). The R Book. New York, NY: John Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9780470515075
16. Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York, NY: Avon.
17. Del Missier, F., Mäntylä, T., and Bruin, W. B. (2012). Decision-making competence, executive functioning, and general cognitive abilities. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 25, 331–351. doi: 10.1002/bdm.731
18. Dickert, S., Kleber, J., Peters, E., and Slovic, P. (2011). Numeracy as a precursor to pro-social behavior: the impact of Numeracy and presentation format on the cognitive mechanisms underlying donation decisions. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6, 638–650.
19. Eivazi, S., and Bednarik, R. (2011). “Predicting problem-solving behavior and performance levels from visual attention data,” in Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Machine Interaction at IUI, PaloAlto, CA, 9–16.
20. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychol. Rev. 87, 215–251. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
21. European Parliament, and Council. (2005). Council Directive 2005/29/EC of 11 May 2005 on Unfair Business to Consumer Commercial Practices in the Internal Market and Amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No. 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Luxembourg: European Council.
22. European Parliament, and Council. (2011). Council Directive 2011/83/EU of 25 October 2011 on Consumer Rights, Amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Luxembourg: European Council.
23. Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 255–278. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
24. Eysenck, S. B., and Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychol. Rep. 43, 1247–1255. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1978.43.3f.1247
25. Fernbach, P. M., Sloman, S. A., Louis, R. S., and Shube, J. N. (2013). Explanation fiends and foes: how mechanistic detail determines understanding and preference. J. Consum. Res. 39, 1115–1131. doi: 10.1086/667782
26. Finucane, M. L., and Gullion, C. M. (2010). Developing a tool for measuring the decision-making competence of older adults. Psychol. Aging 25, 271–288. doi: 10.1037/a0019106
27. Fornero, E., and Monticone, C. (2011). Financial literacy and pension plan participation in Italy. J. Pension Econ. Financ. 10, 547–564. doi: 10.1017/S1474747211000473
28. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive Reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42. doi: 10.1257/089533005775196732
29. Fugard, A. J. B., Pfeifer, N., Mayerhofer, B., and Kleiter, G. D. (2011). How people interpret conditionals: shifts toward the conditional event. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 635–648. doi: 10.1037/a0022329
30. Gigerenzer, G. (1994). “Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology (and vice versa),” in Subjective Probability, eds G. Wright and P. Ayton (New York, NY: Wiley), 129-161.
31. Gigerenzer, G., and Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: frequency formats. Psychol. Rev. 102, 684–704. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684
32. Glöckner, A., and Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34, 1055–1075. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1055
33. Glöckner, A., and Herbold, A. K. (2011). An eye-tracking study on information processing in risky decisions: evidence for compensatory strategies based on automatic processes. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 24, 71–98. doi: 10.1002/bdm.684
34. Goodman, L. A. (1972). A modified multiple regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables. Am. Sociol. Rev. 37, 28–46. doi: 10.2307/2093491
35. Graffeo, M., and Bonini, N. (2015). On the evaluation of savings: the role of Numeracy. Neuropsychol. Trends 17, 31–35. doi: 10.7358/neur-2015-017-graf
36. Grecucci, A., Giorgetta, C., Rattin, A., Guerreschi, C., Sanfey, A. G., and Bonini, N. (2014). Time devours things: how impulsivity and time affect temporal decisions in pathological gamblers. PLoS ONE 9:e109197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109197
37. Greene, J., and Peters, E. (2009). Medicaid consumers and informed decision making. Health Care Financ. Rev. 30, 25–40.
38. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76, 408–420. doi: 10.1080/03637750903310360
39. Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling [White Paper]. Available at: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
40. Hibbard, J. H., Peters, E., Dixon, A., and Tusler, M. (2007). Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information it isn’t just about literacy. Med. Care Res. Rev. 64, 379–394. doi: 10.1177/1077558707 301630
41. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93, 1449–1475. doi: 10.1257/000282803322 655392
42. Kahneman, D., and Frederick, S. (2002). “Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment,” in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, edsT.Gilovich, D.Griffin, and D.Kahneman (NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press), 49–81. doi: 10.1017/CBO97805118080 98.004
43. Leland, J. W. (1994). Generalized similarity judgments: an alternative explanation for choice anomalies. J. Risk Uncertain. 9, 151–172. doi: 10.1007/BF010 64183
44. Liberali, J. M., Reyna, V. F., Furlan, S., Stein, L. M., and Pardo, S. T. (2012). Individual differences in Numeracy and Cognitive Reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 25, 361–381. doi: 10.1002/bdm.752
45. Lipkus, I. M., and Peters, E. (2009). Understanding the role of Numeracy in health: proposed theoretical framework and practical insights. Health Educ. Behav. 36, 1065–1081. doi: 10.1177/1090198109341533
46. Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., and Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a Numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med. Decis. Making 21, 37–44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100105
47. Lusardi, A., and Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial literacy around the world: an overview. J. Pension Econ. Financ. 10, 497–508. doi: 10.1017/S1474747211000448
48. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). An Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
49. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., and Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol. Methods 7, 83–103. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X. 7.1.83
50. Manor, B. R., and Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in freeviewing visuocognitive tasks. J. Neurosci. Methods 128, 85–93. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00151-1
51. Mäntylä, T., Carelli, M. G., and Forman, H. (2007). Time monitoring and executive functioning in children and adults. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 96, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.08.003
52. McArdle, J. J., Smith, J. P., and Willis, R. (2009). Cognition and Economic Outcomes in the Health and Retirement Survey (Working Paper No. 15266). Retrieved from National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w15266
53. McIntosh, S., and Vignoles, A. (2001). Measuring and assessing the impact of basic skills on labour market outcomes. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 53, 453–481. doi: 10.1093/oep/53.3.453
54. Menard, S. (2004). Six approaches to calculating standardized logistic regression coefficients. Am. Stat. 58, 218–223. doi: 10.1198/000313004X946
55. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., and Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognit. Psychol. 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
56. Monterosso, J., and Ainslie, G. (1999). Beyond discounting: possible experimental models of impulse control. Psychopharmacology 146, 339–347. doi: 10.1007/PL00005480
57. Moritz, B. B., Hill, A. V., and Donohue, K. L. (2013). Individual differences in the newsvendor problem: behavior and cognitive reflection. J. Oper. Manag. 31, 72–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.11.006
58. Nelson, W., Reyna, V. F., Fagerlin, A., Lipkus, I., and Peters, E. (2008). Clinical implications of Numeracy: theory and practice. Ann. Behav. Med. 35, 261–274. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8
59. Newell, A., and Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). “Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice,” in Cognitive Skills and their Acquisition, ed. J. R. Anderson (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 1–55.
60. Nofsinger, J. R., and Varma, A. (2007). How analytical is your financial advisor? Financ. Serv. Rev. 16, 245–260.
61. Norman, E., and Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M. (2010). “Take a quick click at that1! Mouselab and eye-tracking as tools to measure intuition,” in Foundations for Tracing Intuition: Challenges and Methods, eds A. Glöckner and C. Witteman (New York, NY: Psychology Press), 24–44.
62. OECD (2010). Consumer Policy Toolkit. Paris: OECD Publishing.
63. OECD. (2013). OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
64. Oechssler, J., Roider, A., and Schmitz, P. W. (2009). Cognitive abilities and behavioral biases. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72, 147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.018
65. Paxton, J. M., Ungar, L., and Greene, J. D. (2012). Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment. Cogn. Sci. 36, 163–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011. 01210.x
66. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision-making — information search and protocol analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16, 366–387. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76) 90022-2
67. Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., and Mertz, C. K. (2007a). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Med. Care Res. Rev. 64, 169–190. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301
68. Peters, E., Hibbard, J., Slovic, P., and Dieckmann, N. (2007b). Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff. 26, 741–748. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.741
69. Peters, E., Hart, P. S., and Fraenkel, L. (2011). Informing patients the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions. Med. Decis. Making 31, 432–436. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10391672
70. Peters, E., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., and Mertz, C. K. (2008). Intuitive numbers guide decisions. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 3, 619–635.
71. Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., and Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychol. Sci. 17, 407–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
72. PISA. (2012). Financial Literacy Assessment Framework, Doc: FinLit_Frmwrk_PISA12.
73. Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. comput. 36, 717–731. doi: 10.3758/BF03206553
74. Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
75. Puri, M. (1996). Commercial banks in investment banking conflict of interest or certification role? J. Financ. Econ. 40, 373–401. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(95)00855-9
76. Rabbitt, P. (1997). “Introduction: methodologies and models in the study of executive function,” in Methodology of Frontal and Executive Function, ed.P. Rabbit (Hove: Psychology Press Ltd), 1–38.
77. Rettinger, D. A., and Hastie, R. (2003). “Comprehension and decision making,” in Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research, eds S. L. Schneider and J. Shanteau (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 165–201. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511609978.008
78. Reyna, V. F. (2004). How people make decisions that involve risk a dual-processes approach. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13, 60–66. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00275.x
79. Reyna, V. F., and Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: an interim synthesis. Learn. Individ. Differ. 7, 1–75. doi: 10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4
80. Reyna, V. F., and Brainerd, C. J. (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learn. Individ. Differ. 18, 89–107. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
81. Reyna, V. F., and Lloyd, F. J. (2006). Physician decision-making and cardiac risk: effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 12, 179–195. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.12. 3.179
82. Reyna, V. F., Nelson, W. L., Han, P. K., and Dieckmann, N. F. (2009). How Numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychol. Bull. 135, 943–973. doi: 10.1037/a0017327
83. Rook, D. W., and Fisher, R. J. (1995). Normative influences on impulsive buying behavior. J. Consum. Res. 22, 305–313. doi: 10.1086/209452
84. Royall, D. R., Lauterbach, E. C., Cummings, J. L., Reeve, A., Rummans, T. A., Kaufer, D. I., et al. (2002). Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 14, 377–405. doi: 10.1176/jnp.14.4.377
85. Royzman, E. B., Landy, J. F., and Leeman, R. F. (2014). Are thoughtful people more utilitarian? CRT as a unique predictor of moral minimalism in the dilemmatic context. Cogn. Sci. 39, 325–352. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12136
86. Salthouse, T. A. (2005). Relations between cognitive abilities and measures of executive functioning. Neuropsychology 19, 532–545. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.532
87. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., and Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
88. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., and Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
89. Shrout, P. E., and Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol. Methods 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
90. Shu, S. (2006). “Choosing for the long run: making tradeoffs in multi-period borrowing,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, eds C. Pechmann and L. L. Price (Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research).
91. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 119, 3–22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.3
92. Slovic, P., Monahan, J., and MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law Hum. Behav. 24, 271–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1005595519944
93. Stanovich, K. E., and West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behav. Brain Sci. 23, 645–665. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435
94. Starmer, C. (2000). Developments in non-expected utility theory: the hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econ. Lit. 38, 332–382. doi: 10.1257/jel.38.2.332
95. Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., and Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. J. Financ. Econ. 101, 449–472. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006
96. Velichkovsky, B. M. (1999). “From levels of processing to stratification of cognition: converging evidence from three domains of research,” in Stratification in Cognition and Consciousness, eds B. H. Challis and B. M. Velichkovsky (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company), 203–235.
97. Velichkovsky, B. M., Rothert, A., Kopf, M., Dornhöfer, S. M., and Joos, M. (2002). Towards an express-diagnostics for level of processing and hazard perception. Trans. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 5, 145–156. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8478(02)00013-X
98. Viswanathan, M., Rosa, J. A., and Harris, J. E. (2005). Decision making and coping of functionally illiterate consumers and some implications for marketing management. J. Mark. 69, 15–31. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.69.1.15. 55507
99. Yin, W., and Dubinsky, A. J. (2004). Framing effects of coupon face value on coupon redemption: a literature review with propositions. J. Mark. Manage. 20, 877–896. doi: 10.1362/0267257041838764