Clinical implications of numeracy: Theory and practice

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 261-274

  Nelson, Wendy ^a   Reyna, Valerie F ^a,b   Fagerlin, Angela ^c   Lipkus, Isaac ^d   Peters, Ellen ^e,f  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e DECISION RESEARCH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Numeracy; Numerical competence; Quantitative literacy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

COMMUNICATION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 49749099586     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-008-9037-8     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2005). National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://hints.matthewsgroup.com/register/register.aspx. Accessibility verified December 10, 2007.
2. Kirsch I, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult literacy in America: A First Look at the Findings of the National Adult Literacy Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education; 1993.
3. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education; 2006.
4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 2000; 2 November.
5. Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association 1999 Health literacy: Report of the council on scientific affairs J Am Med Assoc 281 552 557
6. D Nutbeam 1998 Health promotion glossary Health Promot Int 13 349 364
7. AL Golbeck CR Ahlers-Schmidt AM Paschal SE Dismuke 2005 A definition and operational framework for health numeracy Am J Prev Med 29 375 376
8. JS Ancker D Kaufman 2007 Rethinking health numeracy: A multidisciplinary literature review J Am Med Inform Assoc 14 713 721
9. VF Reyna CJ Brainerd 2007 The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making Learn Indiv Differ 17 147 159
10. E Peters D Vastfjall P Slovic 2006 Numeracy and decision making Psychol Sci 17 408 414
11. JH Hibbard E Peters A Dixon M Tusler 2007 Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: It isn't just about literacy Med Care Res Rev 64 379 394
12. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Baer J. A First Look at the Literacy of America's Adults in the 21st Century (NCES 2006-470). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office; 2005.
13. MV Williams RM Parker DW Baker 1995 Inadequate functional health literacy among patients at two public hospitals J Am Med Assoc 274 1677 1682
14. RL Rothman R Housam H Weiss 2006 Patient understanding of food labels: The role of literacy and numeracy Am J Prev Med 31 391 398
15. TC Davis MA Crouch SW Long 1991 Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients Fam Med 23 433 435
16. Wilkinson G. WRAT-3: Wide Range Achievement Test, Administration Manual. Wilmington: Wide Range; 1993.
17. LM Schwartz S Woloshin WC Black HG Welch 1997 The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 127 966 972
18. SL Sheridan MP Pignone CL Lewis 2003 A randomized comparison of patients' understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats J Gen Intern Med 18 884 892
19. L Forrow WC Taylor RM Arnold 1992 Absolutely relative: How research results are summarized can affect treatment decisions Am J Med 92 121 124
20. SL Sheridan M Pignone 2002 Numeracy and the medical students' ability to interpret data Eff Clin Pract 5 35 40
21. IM Lipkus G Samsa BK Rimer 2001 General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples Med Decis Mak 21 37 44
22. K Yamigishi 1997 When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication Appl Cogn Psychol 11 495 506
23. VF Reyna FJ Lloyd P Whalen 2001 Genetic testing and medical decision making Arch Intern Med 161 2406 2408
24. DJ Malenka JA Baron S Johansen JW Wahrenberger JM Ross 1993 The framing effect of relative and absolute risk J Gen Intern Med 8 543 548
25. C Chao JL Studts T Abell 2003 Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: How presentation of recurrence risk influences decision making J Clin Oncol 21 4299 4305
26. CD Naylor E Chen B Strauss 1992 Measured enthusiasm: Does the method of reporting trial results alter perceptions of therapeutic effectiveness Ann Intern Med 117 916 921
27. A Edwards G Elwyn J Covey E Matthews R Pill 2001 Presenting risk information: A review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes J Health Commun 6 61 682
28. HC Bucher M Weinbacher K Gyr 1994 Influence of method of reporting study results on decision of physicians to prescribe drugs to lower cholesterol concentration Br Med J 309 761 764
29. JE Hux CD Naylor 1995 Communicating the benefits of chronic preventive therapy: Does the format of efficacy data determine patients' acceptance of treatment? Med Decis Mak 15 152 157
30. D Sarfati P Howden-Chapman A Woodward C Salmond 1998 Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed J Med Screen 5 137 140
31. DA DeWalt ND Berkman S Sheridan KN Lohr MP Pignone 2004 Literacy and health outcomes: A systematic review of the literature J Gen Intern Med 19 1228 1239
32. Berkman ND, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, et al. Literacy and Health Outcomes. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 87. Rockville: AHRQ; 2004. (Prepared by RTI International, University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0016) AHRQ Publication No. 04-E007-1: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; January.
33. DW Baker RM Parker MV Williams WS Clark J Nurss 1997 The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services Am J Pub Health 87 1027 1030
34. TL Sentell HA Halpin 2006 Importance of adult literacy in understanding health disparities J Gen Intern Med 21 862 866
35. MV Williams DW Baker RM Parker JR Nurss 1998 Relationship of functional health literacy to patients' knowledge of their chronic disease Arch Intern Med 158 166 172
36. RM Parker DW Baker MV Williams JR Nurss 1995 The test of functional health literacy in adults J Gen Intern Med 10 537 541
37. DW Baker MV Williams RM Parker JA Gazmararian J Nurss 1999 Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy Patient Educ Couns 38 33 42
38. DW Baker RM Parker MV Williams WS Clark 1998 Health literacy and the risk of hospital admission J Gen Intern Med 13 791 798
39. TL Scott JA Gazmararian MV Williams DW Baker 2002 Health literacy and preventive health care use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization Medical Care 40 395 404
40. CA Estrada M Martin-Hryniewicz BT Peek C Collins JC Byrd 2004 Literacy and numeracy skills and anticoagulation control Am J Med Sci 328 88 93
41. AJ Apter J Cheng D Small 2006 Asthma numeracy skill and health literacy J Asthma 43 705 710
42. JA Gazmararian S Kripalani MJ Miller 2006 Factors associated with medication refill adherence in cardiovascular-related diseases J Gen Intern Med 21 1215 1221
43. LA Lenert CD Sherbourne VF Reyna 2001 Utility elicitation using single item questions compared with a computerized interview Med Decis Mak 21 97 104
44. T Morimoto T Fukui 2002 Utilities measured by rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: Review and reference for health care professionals J Epidemiol 12 160 178
45. S Woloshin LM Schwartz M Moncur S Gabriel ANA Tosteson 2001 Assessing values for health: Numeracy matters Med Decis Mak 21 382 390
46. SR Schwartz J McDowell B Yueh 2004 Numeracy and the shortcomings of utility assessment in head and neck cancer patients Head Neck 26 401 407
47. ST Lindau C Tomori T Lyons 2002 The association of health literacy with cervical cancer prevention knowledge and health behaviors in a multiethnic cohort of women Am J Obstet Gynecol 186 938 943
48. PF Bass JF Wilson CH Griffith DR Barnett 2002 Residents' ability to identify patients with poor literacy skills Acad Med 77 1039 1041
49. ES Rogers LS Wallace BD Weiss 2006 Misperceptions of medical understanding in low-literacy patients: Implications for cancer prevention Cancer Control 3 225 229
50. LG Doak CC Doak 1980 Patient comprehension profiles: Recent findings and strategies Patient Couns Health Educ 2 101 106
51. JR Kicklighter MA Stein 1993 Factors influencing diabetic clients' ability to read and comprehend printed diabetic diet material Diabetes Educ 19 40 46
52. TC Davis MA Crouch G Wills S Miller DM Abdehou 1990 The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials J Family Pract 31 533 538
53. RD Powers 1988 Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials Ann Emerg Med 17 124 126
54. RS Safeer J Keenan 2005 Health literacy: The gap between physicians and patients Am Fam Phys 72 463 468
55. D Dunning C Heath JM Suls 2004 Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace Psychological Science in the Public Interest 5 69 106
56. LM Schwartz S Woloshin HG Welch 2005 Can patients interpret health information? An assessment of the medical data interpretation test Med Decis Mak 25 290 300
57. BD Weiss MZ Mays W Martz 2005 Quick assessment of literacy primary care: The newest vital sign Ann Fam Med 3 514 522
58. C Estrada V Barnes C Collins JC Byrd 1999 Health literacy and numeracy J Ame Med Assoc 282 527
59. VM Montori TW Leung CA Thompson 2004 Validation of a diabetes numeracy evaluation tool [Abstract] Diabetes 53 Suppl 2 A224 A225
60. A Fagerlin BJ Zikmund-Fisher PA Ubel 2007 Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale Med Decis Mak 27 672 680
61. BJ Zikmund-Fisher DM Smith PA Ubel A Fagerlin 2007 Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations Med Decis Mak 27 663 671
62. S Woloshin LM Schwartz HG Welch 2005 Patients and medical statistics: Interest, confidence, and ability J Gen Intern Med 20 996 1000
63. D Feldman-Stewart N Kocovski BA McConnell 2000 Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions Med Decis Mak 20 228 238
64. DJ Mazur JF Merz 1993 How the manner of presentation of data influences older patients in determining their treatment preferences J Am Geriatr Soc 41 223 228
65. J Ancker Y Senathirajah R Kukafka J Starren 2006 Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review J Am Med Inform Assoc 13 608 618
66. IM Lipkus JG Hollands 1999 The visual communication of risk J Natl Cancer Inst Monograph 25 149 163
67. W Cleveland R McGill 1984 Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods J Am Stat Assoc 77 541 547
68. Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Numeracy, ratio bias and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learn Individ Differ (in press, 2008).
69. V Reyna C Brainerd 1995 Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis Learn Individ Differ 7 1 75
70. Reyna VF. A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy-trace theory. Med Decis Mak. (in press, 2008).
71. D Feldman-Stewart MD Brundage V Zotov 2007 Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: Judgments of gist in treatment decisions Med Decis Mak 27 34 43
72. JG Hollands T Tanaka BP Dyre 2002 Understanding bias in proportion production J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28 563 574
73. P Sandman N Weinstein P Miller 1994 High risk or low: How location on a "risk ladder" affected perceived risk Risk Anal 14 35 45
74. Lakoff G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987.
75. BJ Zikmund-Fisher A Fagerlin PA Ubel 2005 What's time got to do with it? Inattention to duration in interpretation of survival graphs Risk Anal 25 1 7
76. Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. The origins of probability judgment: A review of data and theories. In: Wright G, Ayton P, eds. Subjective Probability. New York: Wiley; 1994: 239-272.
77. E Stone J Yates A Parker 1997 Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior J Exp Psychol Appl 3 243 256
78. E Stone W Sieck B Bull 2003 Foreground: Background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance Org Behav Hum Decis Process 90 19 36
79. MM Schapira AB Nattinger CA McHorney 2001 Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care Med Decis Mak 21 459 467
80. J Zacks E Levy B Tversky D Schiano 1998 Reading bar graphs: Effects of extraneous depth cues and graphical context J Exp Psychol Appl 4 119 138
81. Levy E, Zacks J, Tversky B, Schiano D. Gratuitous graphics? Putting preferences in perspective. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver: ACM; 1996: 42-49.
82. Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher B, Ubel P, Smith D. Measuring numeracy and the impact of numeracy on medical decision making. Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine. Washington, DC; 2007.
83. E Peters N Dieckmann A Dixon JH Hibbard CK Mertz 2007 Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers Med Care Res Rev 64 169 190
84. A Bastardi E Shafir 1998 On the pursuit and misuse of useless information J Pers Soc Psychol 75 19 32
85. BJ McNeil SG Pauker HC Sox A Tversky 1982 On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies N Engl J Med 306 1259 1262
86. VF Reyna CJ Brainerd 1991 Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion J Behav Decis Mak 4 249 262
87. Benjamin DJ, Brown SA, Shapiro JM. "Who is "behavioral"? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Available at: SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=675264. Accessibility verified December 17, 2007.
88. S Frederick 2005 Cognitive reflection and decision making J Econ Perspect 19 24 42
89. MH Ashcraft 2002 Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences Curr Dir Psychol Sci 11 181 185
90. Fischhoff B. Assessing adolescent decision-making competence. Dev Rev (in press, 2008).
91. Gigerenzer G. Why the distinction between single-event probabilities and frequencies is important for psychology (and vice versa). In: Wright G, Ayton P, eds. Subjective Probability. New York, NY: Wiley; 1994: 129-161.
92. Dehaene S. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
93. HM Natter DC Berry 2005 Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information Appl Cogn Psychol 19 123 135
94. MK Chen V Lakshminaryanan LR Santos 2006 The evolution of our preferences: Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior J Polit Econ 114 517 537
95. AK Barbey SA Sloman 2007 Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes Behav Brain Sci 30 241 254
96. S Sloman 1996 The empirical case for two systems of reasoning Psychol Bull 119 3 22
97. S Epstein 1994 Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious Am Psychol 49 709 724
98. P Slovic ML Finucane E Peters DG MacGregor 2004 Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality Risk Anal 24 311 322
99. VF Reyna BA Mills 2007 Converging evidence supports fuzzy-trace theory's nested sets hypothesis (but not the frequency hypothesis) Behav Brain Sci 30 278 280
100. VF Reyna SC Ellis 1994 Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children's risky decision making Psychol Sci 5 275 279
101. VF Reyna F Farley 2006 Risk and rationality in adolescent decision making: Implications for theory, practice, and public policy Psychological Science in the Public Interest 7 1 44
102. VF Reyna FJ Lloyd 2006 Physician decision making and cardiac risk: Effects of knowledge, risk perception, risk tolerance, and fuzzy processing J Exp Psychol Appl 12 179 195
103. VF Reyna 1991 Class inclusion, the conjunction fallacy, and other cognitive illusions Dev Rev 11 317 336
104. VF Reyna MB Adam 2003 Fuzzy-trace theory, risk communication, and product labeling in sexually transmitted diseases Risk Anal 23 325 342
105. Rivers S, Mills B, Reyna VF. Risky behavior under the influence: A fuzzy-trace theory of emotion in adolescence. Dev Rev (in press, 2008).
106. Schapira M. The development of a health numeracy measure. Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects. Available at: http://crisp.cit.nih.gov. Accessibility verified December 13, 2007.
107. L Donelle L Hoffman-Goetz JF Arocha 2007 Assessing health numeracy among community-dwelling older adults J Health Commun 12 651 655
108. HK Seligman FF Wang JL Palacios 2005 Physician notification of their diabetes patients' limited health literacy: A randomized controlled trial J Gen Intern Med 20 1001 1007
109. IM Lipkus 2007 Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: Suggested best practices and future recommendations Med Decis Mak 27 696 713
110. BJ Zikmund-Fisher A Fagerlin PA Ubel 2007 Mortality versus survival graphs: Improving temporal consistence in perceptions of treatment effectiveness Patient Educ Couns 66 100 107
111. MM Schapira AB Nattinger TL McAuliffe 2006 The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication J Health Commun 11 569 582
112. ER Stone JF Yates AM Parker 1994 Risk communication: Absolute versus relative expressions of low-probability risks Org Behav Hum Decis Process 60 387 408
113. PA Carpenter P Shah 1998 A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension J Exp Psychol Appl 4 75 100
114. WS Cleveland R McGill 1985 Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data Science 229 828 833
115. J Burkell 2004 What are the chances? Evaluating risk and benefit information in consumer health materials J Med Lib Assoc 92 200 208
116. TS Wallsten DV Budescu R Zwick SM Kemp 1993 Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms Bull Psychon Soc 31 135 138
117. DJ Mazur DH Hickam 1993 Patient interpretations of terms connoting low probabilities when communicating about surgical risk Theor Surg 8 143 145
118. RM Kenney 1981 Between never and always N Engl J Med 305 1097 1098
119. GD Bryant GR Norman 1980 Expressions of probability: Words and numbers N Engl J Med 302 411 412
120. KK Woloshin MT Ruffin DW Gorenflo 1994 Patients' interpretation of qualitative probability statements Arch Fam Med 3 961 966
121. DJ Mazur DH Hickam MD Mazur 1999 How patients' preferences for risk information influence treatment choice in a case of high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty: Asymptomatic localized prostate cancer Med Decis Mak 19 394 398
122. DJ Mazur DH Hickam 1997 Patients' preferences for risk disclosure and role in decision making for invasive medical procedures J Gen Intern Med 12 114 117
123. DJ Mazur DH Hickam 1991 Patients' interpretations of probability terms J Gen Intern Med 6 237 240
124. W Brun KH Teigen 1988 Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? Org Behav Hum Decis Process 41 390 404
125. BJ O'Brien 1989 Words or numbers? The evaluation of probability expressions in general practice J R Coll Gen Pract 39 98 100
126. A Kong GO Barnett F Mosteller C Youtz 1986 How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability N Engl J Med 315 740 744
127. MA Nakao S Axelrod 1983 Numbers are better than words: Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicine Am J Med 74 1061 1065
128. REA Mapes 1979 Verbal and numerical estimates of probability in therapeutic contexts Soc Sci Med 13A 277 282