Strategic planning for land use under extreme climate changes: A case study in Taiwan

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Huang, Wen Cheng ^a   Lee, Yi Ying ^b  

^a Soil and Water Conservation Bureau Taiwan   (Taiwan)

^b Taiwan Agricultural Science and Technology Resources Logistics Management Association   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Extreme climatic event; Soil and water conservation; Strategic planning; Taiwan

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; EXTREME EVENT; GLOBAL CLIMATE; LAND USE PLANNING; POPULATION DENSITY; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TREND ANALYSIS;

TAIWAN;

EID: 84956599356     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8010053     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Hapgood, M.A. Towards a scientific understanding of the risk from extreme space weather. Adv. Space Res. 2011, 47, 2059-2072.
2. Lu, Q.C.; Zhang, J.Y.; Peng, Z.R.; Rahman, A.B.M.S. Inter-city travel behaviour adaptation to extreme weather events. J. Transp. Geogr. 2014, 41, 148-153.
3. Grand Century Natural Disasters Homepage. Available online: http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/nf425.htm (accessed on 10 May 2015).
4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
5. Travis, W.R. Weather and climate extremes: Pacemakers of adaptation? Weather Clim. Extrem. 2014, 5-6, 29-39.
6. National Hurricane Center, National Climatic Data Center USA. Hurricane Katrina; National Hurricane Center, National Climatic Data Center USA: University Park, FL, USA, 2005.
7. Oven, K.J.; Curtis, S.E.; Reaney, S.; Riva, M.; Stewart, M.G.; Ohlemüller, R.; Dunna, C.E.; Nodwell, S.; Dominelli, L.; Holdenf, R. Climate change and health and social care: Defining future hazard, vulnerability and risk for infrastructure systems supporting older people's health care in England. Appl. Geogr. 2012, 33, 16-24.
8. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 21 Issues for the 21st Century: Result of the UNEP Foresight Process on Emerging Environmental Issues. In UNEP 2012; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2012; p. 56.
9. Executive Yuan (EY). The Project of Overall Forestry Conservancy and Disaster Prevention from 2013-2016; Executive Yuan: Taipei, Taiwan, 2012.
10. Chen, Y.L. Report on Typhoon Morakot (0908) of 2009. Available online: http://photino.cwb.gov.tw/rdcweb/lib/cd/cd02tyrp/typ/2009/98_02_Morakot_0908.pdf (accessed on 6 January 2016). (In Chinese)
11. Council of Agriculture (COA), Executive Yuan (EY). Outlook of Water Environmental Management Strategies in Asia; Executive Yuan, Council of Agriculture: Taipei, Taiwan, 2012.
12. Soil and Water Conservation Bureau (SWCB), Council of Agriculture (COA), Executive Yuan (EY). Research Project on the Foresight and Strategic Planning of Water and Soil Resources Sustainable Management; Executive Yuan, Council of Agriculture, Soil and Water Conservation Bureau: Taipei, Taiwan, 2013.
13. Luca, D.B.; Jiri, K. The Environmental Performance Strategy Map: An integrated LCA approach to support the strategic decision-making process. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 900-906.
14. Cook, C.N.; Inayatullah, S.; Burgman, M.A.; Sutherland, W.J.; Wintle, B.A. Strategic foresight: How planning for the unpredictable can improve environmental decision-making. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2014, 29, 531-541.
15. McDonald, S.L.; Gallagher, D.R. A Story About People and Porpoises: Consensus-Based Decision Making in the Shadow of Political Action. Environ. Manag. 2015, 56, 814-821.
16. Hill, R.; Davies, J.; Bohnet, I.C.; Robinson, C.J.; Maclean, K.; Pert, P.L. Collaboration mobilises institutions with scale-dependent comparative advantage in landscape-scale biodiversity conservation. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 51, 267-277.
17. Mees, H.L.P.; Driessen, P.P.J.; Runhaar, H.A.C. "Cool" governance of a "hot" climate issue: Public and private responsibilities for the protection of vulnerable citizens against extreme heat. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2015, 15, 1065-1079.
18. Roy, M.; Curry, R.; Ellisc, G. Spatial allocation of material flow analysis in residential developments: A case study of Kildare County, Ireland. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2015, 58, 1749-1769.
19. Schwerdtner, W.; Siebert, R.; Busse, M.; Freisinger, U.B. Regional Open Innovation Strategy roadmap: A New Framework for Innovation-Based Regional Development. Sustainability 2015, 7, 2301-2321.
20. Cook, C.N.; Wintle, B.C.; Aldrich, S.C.; Wintle, B.A. Using Strategic Foresight to Assess Conservation Opportunity. Conserv. Biol. 2015, 28, 1474-1483.
21. Raford, N. Online foresight platforms: Evidence for their impact on scenario planning & strategic foresight. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 97, 65-76.
22. Al-Bakri, J.T.; Salahat, M.; Suleiman, A.; Suifan, M.; Hamdan, M.R.; Khresat, S.; Kandakji, T. Impact of Climate and Land Use Changes on Water and Food Security in Jordan: Implications for Transcending "The Tragedy of the Commons". Sustainability 2013, 5, 724-748.
23. Lee, C.; Song, B.; Park, Y. An instrument for scenario-based technology roadmapping: How to assess the impacts of future changes on organisational plans. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 90, 285-301.
24. Mintzberg, H. Managing government-Governing management. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1996, 74, 75-83.
25. Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, D.; Porter, A.L. Four dimensional Science and Technology planning: A new approach based on bibliometrics and technology strategy roadmap. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 81, 39-48.
26. Vishnevskiy, K.; Karasev, O.; Meissner, D. Integrated roadmaps and corporate foresight as tools of innovation management: The case of Russian companies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 90, 433-443.
27. Graham, G.; Mehmood, R.; Coles, E. Exploring future cityscapes through urban logistics prototyping: A technical viewpoint. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2015, 20, 237-248.
28. National Chengchi University (NCUC). Thinking of Policy Foresight; National Chengchi University: Taipei, Taiwan, 2010.
29. Staffas, L.; Gustavsson, M.; McCormick, K. Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches. Sustainability 2013, 5, 2751-2769.
30. Carvalho, M.M.; Fleury, A.; Lopes, A.P. An overview of the literature on technology strategy roadmap (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 1418-1437.
31. Leonidou, L.C.; Leonidou, C.N.; Palihawadana, D.; Hultman, M. Evaluating the green advertising practices of international firms: A trend analysis. Int. Mark. Rev. 2010, 28, 6-33.
32. Yenigun, K.; Ecer, R. Overlay mapping trend analysis technique and its application in Euphrates Basin, Turkey. Meteorol. Appl. 2013, 20, 427-438.
33. Wu, H.Y. Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Eval. Progr. Plan. 2012, 35, 303-320.
34. Spickermann, A.; Grienitz, V.; von der Gracht, H.A. Heading towards a multimodal city of the future? Multiple stakeholder scenarios for urban mobility. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 89, 201-221.
35. Wu, Q.S.; Lin, T.Y. New Dictionary of Education; Higher Education Culture Undertakings Ltd.: Taipei, Taiwan, 2005.
36. Landeta, J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73, 467-482.
37. Spickermann, A.; Zimmermann, M.; von der Gracht, H.A. Surface-and deep-level diversity in panel selection-Exploring diversity effects on response behaviour in foresigh. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 85, 105-120.
38. Gnatzy, T.; Warth, J.; von der Gracht, H.; Darkow, I.L. Validating an innovative real-time Delphi approach-A methodological comparison between real-time and conventional Delphi studies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78, 1681-1694.
39. Hung, C.Y.; Lee, W.Y.; Wang, D.S. Strategic foresight using a modified Delphi with end-user participation: A case study of the iPad's impact on Taiwan's PC ecosystem. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 485-497.
40. Birko, S.; Dove, E.S.; Ozdemir, V. Evaluation of Nine Consensus Indices in Delphi Foresight Research and Their Dependency on Delphi Survey Characteristics: A Simulation Study and Debate on Delphi Design and Interpretation. PLoS ONE 2015.
41. Yoda, T. Perceptions of domain experts on impact of foresight on policy making: The case of Japan. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78, 431-447.
42. Al-Saleh, Y.M.; Vidican, G.; Natarajan, L.; Theeyattuparampil, V.V. Carbon capture, utilisation and storage scenarios for the Gulf Cooperation Council region: A Delphi-based foresight study. Futures 2012, 44, 105-115.
43. Wu, Q.S.; Lin, T.Y. Education noun-Policy Management. Educ. Data Res. 2001, 41, 1-66.
44. Phaal, R.; Farrukh, C.J.P.; Probert, D.R. Technology strategy roadmap-A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2004, 71, 5-26.
45. Ecken, P.; Gnatzy, T.; von der Gracht, H.A. Desirability bias in foresight: Consequences for decision quality based on Delphi results. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78, 1654-1670.