Four dimensional Science and Technology planning: A new approach based on bibliometrics and technology roadmapping

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 81, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 39-48

  Huang, Lu ^a   Zhang, Yi ^a   Guo, Ying ^a   Zhu, Donghua ^a   Porter, Alan L ^b,c  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Search Technology Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Four dimensional planning; Patent analysis; Science and Technology (S T) planning; Solar cells; Technology roadmapping

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOMETRICS; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; FOUR DIMENSIONS; PATENT ANALYSIS; PLANNING FRAMEWORK; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ROADMAPPING;

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; INDUSTRY; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SOLAR CELLS;

TECHNOLOGY;

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); GLOBALIZATION; INNOVATION; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SOLAR POWER; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

CHINA;

EID: 84888050193     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.010     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Phaal R., Farrukh C.J.P., Probert D.R. Technology roadmapping-a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2004, 71:5-26.
2. Porter A.L., Detampel M.J. Technology opportunities analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 1995, 49:237-255.
3. Groenveld P. Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res. Technol. Manage. 1997, 40(5).
4. Kappel T.A. Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 2001, 18:39-50.
5. Kostoff R.N., Geisler E. Strategic management and implementation of textual data mining in government organizations. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 1999, 11(4):493-525.
6. Moed H.F., Glanzel W., Schmoch U. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research 2005, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
7. Porter A.L., Cunningham S.W. Tech Mining: Exploiting New Technologies for Competitive Advantage 2005, John Wiley, New York, NY.
8. Van Raan A.F.J. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 1996, 36(3):397-420.
9. Choi C., Park Y. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2009, 76:754-768.
10. Juznic P., Peclin S., Zaucer M., Mandelj T., Pusnik M., Demsar F. Scientometric indicators: peer-review, bibliometric methods and conflict of interests. Scientometrics 2010, 85:429-441.
11. Lee Y., Song Y. Selecting the key research areas in nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: a case study based on National R&D Programs in South Korea. Technovation 2007, 27:57-64.
12. Ezra A.A. Technology utilization: incentives and solar energy. Science 1975, 187:707-713.
13. Li J., Wang S., Zhang M., Ma L. 2007 China Solar PV Report 2007, China Environmental Science Press, Beijing.
14. Wenk E., Kuehn T.J. Interinstitutional networks in technological delivery systems. Science and Technology Policy 1977, 153-175. Lexington Books, Lexington.
15. Roper A.T., Cunningham S.W., Porter A.L., Mason T.W., Rossini F.A., Banks J. Forecasting and Management of Technology 2011, John Wiley, New York, NY. 2nd edition.