Regional open innovation roadmapping: A new framework for innovation-based regional development

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 2301-2321

  Schwerdtner, Wim ^a   Siebert, Rosemarie ^b   Busse, Maria ^b   Freisinger, Ulf B ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH ZALF   (Germany)

^c FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Germany; Land use governance; open innovation (OI); Precision farming (PF); Regional stakeholder involvement; Sustainable regional development; Technology roadmapping (TRM); wood fuel

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; FUELWOOD; INNOVATION; LAND USE CHANGE; NEW RECORD; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RURAL DEVELOPMENT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

GERMANY;

EID: 84926297237     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su7032301     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Von Malmborg, F. Stimulating learning and innovation in networks for regional sustainable development: The role of local authorities. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1730-1741.
2. Gerstlberger, W. Regional innovation systems and sustainability-Selected examples of international discussion. Technovation 2004, 24, 749-758.
3. Schwerdtner, W. Erfolgsfaktoren im Regionalmarketing läNdlicher Räume: Eine Empirische Studie der LEADER ± und REGIONENaktiv-Regionen in Deutschland und Österreich; Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2008.
4. Etzkowitz, H.; Klofsten, M. The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development. RD Manag. 2005, 35, 243-255.
5. Porter, M.E.; Stern, S. Innovation: Location Matters. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2001, 42, 28-36.
6. Boekholt, P. From planned economy to global markets: The RITTS project in south Brandenburg. In Regional Innovation Strategies: The Challenge for Less-Favoured Regions; Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2004; pp. 138-159.
7. Koschatzky, K. The Role of Clusters and Regional Networks in Economic Transformation-Empirical Evidence and Conclusions from the East German Innovation System. In Innovation Networks & Knowledge Clusters. Findings and Insights from the US, EU and Japan, Carayannis, E.G., Assimakopoulos, D., Kondo, M., Eds.; Palgrave McMillan: Basingstok, England, 2008; pp. 210-229.
8. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy, Eds. European Comission Innovative Strategies and Actions. Results from 15 Years of Regional Experimentation. European Comission Working Document. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/funds/2007/innovation/guide_innovation_en.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2015).
9. Charles, D.R.; Nauwelaers, C.; Mouton, B.; Bradley, D. Assessment of the Regional Innovation and Technology Transfer Strategies and Infrastructures (RITTS) Scheme-Final Evaluation Report; ECSC-EC-EAEC: Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg, 2000.
10. Kindras, A.; Meissner, D.; Vishnevskiy, K.; Cervantes, M. Regional Foresight for Bridging National Science, Technology and Innovation with Company Innovation: Expriences from Russia; Basic Research Program Working Papers. Series: Science, Technology and Innovation, WP BRP 29/STI/2014; National Research University Higher School of Economics: Moscow, Russia, 2014.
11. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Eds. FOR-RIS: Experiences and Ideas for Developing Foresight in a Regional Innovation Strategy Context (RIS/RITTS). Blueprints for Foresight Actions in the Regions. Available online: Ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/foresight/docs/blueprint-for-ris.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2015).
12. Gavigan, J., Scapalo, F., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Farhi, F., Lecoq, F., Capriati, M., Bartolome, T, Eds. A Practical Guide to Regional Foresight, FOREN Final Report; IPTS: Sevilla, Spain, 2001.
13. Georghiou, L.; Keenan, M. Towards a typology of evaluating foresight exercises. In Proceedings of the EU-US Seminar: New Technology Foresight, Forecasting and Assessment Methods, Seville, Spain, 13-14 May 2004.
14. Puglisi, M.; Marvin, S. Developing urban and regional foresight: Exploring capacities and identifying needs in the North West. Futures 2002, 34, 761-777.
15. Vecchiato, R.; Roveda, C. Foresight for public procurement and regional innovation policy: The case of Lombardy. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 438-450.
16. Cuhls, K.; Kolz, H.; Hadnagy, C.M. A regional foresight process to cope with demographic change: Future radar 2030 (Zukunftsradar 2030). Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 2012, 8, 311-334.
17. Koschatzky, K. Foresight as a governance concept at the interface between global challenges and regional innovation potentials. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2005, 13, 619-639.
18. European Foresight Platform (EFP). Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/scientifictool/european-foresight-platform (accessed on 30 January 2015).
19. Phaal, R.; Farrukh, C.J.P.; Probert, D.R. Strategic roadmapping: A workshop-based approach for identifying and exploring strategic issues and opportunities. Eng. Manag. J. 2007, 19, 3-12.
20. Phaal, R. Public-Domain Roadmaps. Available online: Http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ctm/trm/documents/published_roadmaps7_6_09.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2014).
21. Weissenberger-Eibl, M.; Speith, S. Flexibles Roadmapping-Eine Methode für die Vorausschau und Technologieplanung im Umfeld technologischer Durchbrüche. In Vorausschau und Technologieplanung, Gausemeier, J., Ed.; Heinz Nixdorf Institut: Paderborn, Germany, 2006; pp. 396-424.
22. Nathasit Gerdsri, R.S.V. Dealing with the dynamics of technology roadmapping implementation: A case study. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76, 50-60.
23. Phaal, R.; Farrukh, C.J.P.; Probert, D.R. Technology roadmapping-A planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2004, 71, 5-26.
24. Petrick, I.J.; Echols, A.E. Technology roadmapping in review: A tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2004, 71, 81-100.
25. Garcia, M.L.; Bray, O.H. Fundamentals of Technology Roadmapping; SBDD: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 1997.
26. Phaal, R.; Muller, G. An architectural framework for roadmapping: Towards visual strategy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76, 39-49.
27. Van den Bosch, S.J.M.; Brezet, J.C.; Vergragt, P.J. How to kick off system innovation: A Rotterdam case study of the transition to a fuel cell transport system. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 1027-1035.
28. Lee, J.H.; Phaal, R.; Lee, S.-H. An integrated service-device-technology roadmap for smart city development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 286-306.
29. Carvalho, M.M.; Fleury, A.; Lopes, A.P. An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 1418-1437.
30. Caetano, M.; Amaral, D.C. Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments. Technovation 2011, 31, 320-335.
31. Gassmann, O.; Enkel, E.; Chesbrough, H.O.W. The future of open innovation. R&D Manag. 2010, 40, 213-221.
32. Chesbrough, H.O.W. The era of open innovation. MIT Manag. Rev. 2003, 44, 35-41.
33. Chesbrough, H.O.W., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., Eds. Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2006.
34. Schaffers, H. Guerrero Cordoba, M.; Hongisto, P.; Kallai, T.; Merz, C.; van Rensburg, J. Exploring Business Models for Open Innovation in Rural Living Labs. Sophia-Antipolis, France, 2007. Available online: http://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/bitstream/10204/1583/1/Schaffers_ 2007.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2014).
35. EURIS Project Embracing OPEN INNOVATION IN EUROPE-A Best Practices Guide on Open Innovation Policies. Available online: http://www.euris-programme.eu/themed/euris/files/docs/108/193/euris_guide_1.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2013).
36. Belussi, F.; Sammarra, A.; Sedita, S.R. Learning at the boundaries in an "Open Regional Innovation System": A focus on firms' innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry. Res. Policy 2010, 39, 710-721.
37. Laborde, D. Assessing the Land Use Change Consequences of European Biofuel Policies; ATLASS Consortium; IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
38. Gomiero, T.; Paoletti, M.G.; Pimentel, D. Biofuels: Efficiency, Ethics, and Limits to Human Appropriation of Ecosystem Services. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2010, 23, 403-434.
39. Pedersen, S.M.; Kirketerp Scavenius, I.M. Environmental Impact with Environmental Indicators-With Precision Farming and Controlled Traffic Systems. FutureFarm Report. Available online: http://www.futurefarm.eu/system/files/FFD5.6_Environmental_impact_final.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2015).
40. Ancev, T.; Whelan, B.; McBratney, A. Evaluating the benefits from precision agriculture: The economcis of meeting traceability requirements and envrionmental targets. In Agriculture '05, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Precision Agriculture, Uppsala, Sweden, 9-12 June 2005; Staffort, J., Ed.; Wageningen Academica Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 985-994
41. Yu, M.; Segarra, E.; Lascano, R.; Booker, J. Economic Impacts of Precision Farming in Irrigated Cotton Production. Tex. J. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2003, 16, 1-14.
42. Werner, A.; Schwarz, J.; Dreger, F. IT-Farming: Linking agriculture production with the value chain in food production to enhance sustainability in rural land use. In Enhancing the Capacities of Agricultural Systems and Producers, Margraf: Weikersheim, Germany, 2008; pp. 58-74.
43. Bogner, A.; Littig, B.; Menz, W. Interviews mit Experten: Eine Praxisorientierte Einführung; Qualitative Sozialforschung, Springer VS: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2014.
44. Strauss, J.; Radnor, M.; Peterson, J.J. Plotting and navigating a non-linear roadmap: Knowledge-based roadmapping for emerging and dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the East Asian Conference on Knowledge Creation Management, Singapore, 6-7 March 2008.
45. Berthold, N.; Kögel, D.; Kullas, M. Die Bundesländer im Innovationswettbewerb; Bertelsmann-Stiftung: Berlin, Germany, 2009.
46. Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. Jahresbericht 2009; DPMA: München, Germany, 2009.
47. Koschatzky, K.; Lo, V.; Stahlecker, T. Innovationsbedingungen und Innovationspotentiale in Ostdeutschland. Exemplarische Analyse von Drei Grenzregionen; Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung ISI: Karlsruhe, Germany, 2006.
48. Statistisches Bundesamt. VGR des Bundes-Bruttowertschöpfung; Bruttoinlandsprodukt: Bruttowertschöpfung in den Ländern der BRD 1991 bis 2013; Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Würtemberg: Stuttgart, Germany, 2014.
49. Landesamt für Bauen und Verkehr. Kreisprofil Märkisch-Oderland 2009; Landesamt für Bauen und Wohnen: Hoppegarten, Germany, 2009.
50. Prognos, A.G. Zukunftsatlas 2007: Ergebnisübersicht Gesamtranking; Prognos: Berlin, Germany, 2007.
51. Muller, E.; Doloreux, D.; Heraud, J.; Jappe, A.; Zenker, A. Regional Innovation Capacities in New Member States: A Typology. J. Eur. Integr. 2008, 30, 653-669.
52. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
53. Reichardt, M.; Jürgens, C. Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: Results of several surveys among different agricultural target groups. Precis. Agric. 2009, 10, 73-94.
54. Fountas, S.; Blackmore, S.; Ess, D.; Hawkins, S.; Blumhoff, G.; Lowenberg-Deboer, J.; Sorensen, C.G. Farmer Experience with Precision Agriculture in Denmark and the US Eastern Corn Belt. Precis. Agric. 2005, 6, 121-141.
55. Srinivasan, A.; Srinivasan, A.E. Handbook of Precision Agriculture: Principles and Applications, Food Products Press: Bringhamton, NY, USA, 2006.
56. Kotler, P.; Armstrong, G. Principles of Marketing, 14th ed.; Prentice Hall: Boston, MA, USA, 2011.
57. Helming, K.; Tscherning, K.; König, B.; Sieber, S.; Wiggering, H.; Kuhlman, T.; Wascher, D.; Perez-Soba, M.; Smeets, P.; Tabbush, P.; et al. Ex ante impact assessment of land use changes in European regions-The SENSOR approach. In Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes; Helming, K., Pérez-Soba, M., Tabbush, P., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Germany; Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 77-105.
58. Schwerdtner, W.; Freisinger, U.B.; Siebert, R.; Werner, A. Regional Open Innovation Roadmapping for Sustainable Regional Development-A Practical Guide; Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF): Müncheberg, Germany, 2010.
59. FSC Council-Forest Stewardship Council. Available online: Http://www.fsc-deutschland.de/(accessed on 20 April 2014).
60. PEFC-Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification. Available online: Http://www.pefc.org (accessed on 20 April 2014).
61. European Commission Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2014. Available online: Http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ris/ris-2014_en.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2014).
62. Roveda, C.; Vecchiato, R.; Vercesi, P. Relationships between national and regional foresight: Lessons from experience. Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 2004, 1, 318-324.
63. Tuckman, B.W. Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychol. Bull. 1965, 63, 384-399.
64. Williamson, O.E. Technology and transaction cost economics: A reply. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1988, 10, 355-363.
65. Williamson, O.E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism; Free Press: New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 1998.
66. Specht, K.; Siebert, R.; Hartmann, I.; Freisinger, U.B.; Sawicka, M.; Werner, A.; Thomaier, S.; Henckel, D.; Walk, H.; Dierich, A. Urban agriculture of the future: An overview of sustainability aspects of food production in and on buildings. Agric. Hum. Values 2014, 31, 33-51.