Software product quality control

Software Product Quality Control

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-210

  Wagner, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CONTROL; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LIFE CYCLE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TEACHING;

CONTROL TECHNIQUES; ENTIRE LIFE CYCLES; HIGH-QUALITY SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; INDUSTRIAL SETTINGS; QUALITY-CONTROL-LOOPS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY; STATE OF THE ART; UNIVERSAL PROPERTIES;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84955657665     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38571-1     Document Type: Book

References (221)

1. Adams, E.N.: Optimizing preventive service of software products. IBM J. Res. Dev. 28(1), 2-14 (1984)
2. Al-Kilidar, H., Cox, K., Kitchenham, B.: The use and usefulness of the ISO/IEC 9126 quality standard. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'05). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2005)
3. Alexander, I.: Misuse cases: Use cases with hostile intent. IEEE Softw. 20(1), 58-66 (2003)
4. Aviˇzienis, A., Laprie, J.C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.: Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 1(1), 11-33 (2004)
5. Ayewah, N., Hovemeyer, D., Morgenthaler, J.D., Penix, J., Pugh, W.: Using static analysis to find bugs. IEEE Softw. 25(5), 22-29 (2008)
6. Bakota, T., Hegedūs, P., Körtvélyesi, P., Ferenc, R., Gyimóthy, T.: A probabilistic software quality model. In: Proceedings of the 27th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'11). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2011)
7. Bansiya, J., Davis, C.G.: A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(1), 4-17 (2002)
8. Basili, V., Donzelli, P., Asgari, S.: A unified model of dependability: Capturing dependability in context. IEEE Softw. 21(6), 19-25 (2004)
9. Basili, V., Green, S., Laitenberger, O., Lanubile, F., Shull, F., Sørumgård, S., Zelkowitz, M.: The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading. Empir. Softw. Eng. 1(2), 133-164 (1996)
10. Basili, V., Rombach, H.: The TAME project: Towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 14(6), 758-773 (1998)
11. Basili, V., Selby, R.: Comparing the effectiveness of software testing strategies. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-13(12), 1278-1296 (1987)
12. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: Goal question metric paradigm. In: Marciniak, J.C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, vol. 1. Wiley, New York (1994)
13. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained. Addison Wesley, Reading (2000)
14. Beck, K.: Test Driven Development. By Example. Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston (2002)
15. Beizer, B.: Software Testing Techniques, 2nd edn. Thomson Learning, London (1990)
16. Belady, L.A., Lehman, M.M.: A model of large program development. IBM Syst. J. 15(3), 225-252 (1976)
17. Beliakov, G., Calvo, T., Mesiar, R.: Guest editorial. Foreword to the special issue on aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15(6), 1030-1031 (2007)
18. Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., Calvo, T.: Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practicioners. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Berlin (2007)
19. Bessey, A., Block, K., Chelf, B., Chou, A., Fulton, B., Hallem, S., Henri-Gros, C., Kamsky, A., McPeak, S., Engler, D.: A few billion lines of code later: Using static analysis to find bugs in the real world. Commun. ACM 53(2), 66-75 (2010)
20. Blin, M.J., Tsoukiàs, A.: Multi-criteria methodology contribution to the software quality evaluation. Softw. Qual. J. 9, 113-132 (2001)
21. Boegh, J., Depanfilis, S., Kitchenham, B., Pasquini, A.: A method for software quality planning, control, and evaluation. IEEE Softw. 16(2), 69-77 (1999)
22. Boehm, B., Huang, L., Jain, A., Madachy, R.: The ROI of software dependability: The iDAVE model. IEEE Softw. 21(3), 54-61 (2004)
23. Boehm, B.W.: Software Engineering Economics. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)
24. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., Macleod, G.J., Merrit, M.J.: Characteristics of Software Quality. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978)
25. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow, M., MacLeod, G.J., Merrit, M.J.: Characteristics of Software Quality. TRW Series of Software Technology, vol. 1. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1978)
26. Broy, M.: Requirements engineering as a key to holistic software quality. In: Proceedings of the 21th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences (ISCIS 2006). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4236, pp. 24-34. Springer, New York (2006)
27. Broy, M., Deissenboeck, F., Pizka, M.: Demystifying maintainability. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Software Quality (4-WoSQ), pp. 21-26. ACM Press, New York (2006)
28. Broy, M., Jonsson, B., Katoen, J.P., Leucker, M., Pretschner, A. (eds.): Model-Based Testing of Reactive Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3472. Springer, New York (2005)
29. BSI: BSI-Standard 100: IT-Grundschutz (2008)
30. Buhr, K., Heumesser, N., Houdek, F., Omasreiter, H., Rothermel, F., Tavakoli, R., Zink, T.: DaimlerChrysler demonstrator: System specification instrument cluster. http://www. empress-itea.org/deliverables/D5.1 Appendix B v1.0 Public Version.pdf (2003). Accessed 15 Jan 2008
31. Calvo, T., Mayor, G., Mesiar, R. (eds.): Aggregation Operators. New Trends and Applications. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Physica, Wurzburg (2002)
32. Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., Visaggio, C.A.: Evaluating advantages of test driven development: A controlled experiment with professionals. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'06), pp. 364-371. ACM Press, New York (2006)
33. Chess, B., West, J.: Secure Programming with Static Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2007)
34. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C.F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(6), 476-493 (1994)
35. Chillarege, R.: Orthogonal defect classification. In: Lyu, M.R. (ed.) Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, Chap. 9. IEEE Computer Society Press/McGraw-Hill, Silver Spring/New York (1996)
36. Chillarege, R., Bhandari, I.S., Chaar, J.K., Halliday, M.J., Moebus, D.S., Ray, B.K., Wong, M.Y.: Orthogonal defect classification-a concept for in-process measurements. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 18(11) (1992)
37. Chulani-Devnani, S.: Bayesian analysis of software cost and quality models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California (1997)
38. Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer, Dordecht (1999)
39. Cielkowski, M., Laitenberger, O., Biffl, S.: Software reviews: The state of the practice. IEEE Softw. 20(6), 46-51 (2003)
40. CMMI Product Team: CMMI for development, version 1.3. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033, Software Engineering Institute (2010)
41. Coleman, D., Lowther, B., Oman, P.: The application of software maintainability models in industrial software systems. J. Syst. Softw. 29(1), 3-16 (1995)
42. Collofello, J.S.: Introduction to software verification and validation. SEI Curriculum Module SEI-CM-13-1.1. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/89cm013.pdf (1988)
43. Common criteria for information technology security evaluation, version 3.1. Available Online at http://www.commoncriteriaportal.org/
44. Cruz-Lemus, J.A., Genero, M., Manso, M.E., Piattini, M.: Evaluating the effect of composite states on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MoDELS'05). Springer, Berlin (2005)
45. Davis, A.M.: Software Requirements: Objects, Functions, and States, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1993)
46. Deissenboeck, F.: Continuous quality control of long-lived software systems. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität München (2009)
47. Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., Juergens, E., Schaetz, B., Wagner, S., Girard, J.F., Teuchert, S.: Clone detection in automotive model-based development. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'08), pp. 603-612. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2008)
48. Deissenboeck, F., Juergens, E., Hummel, B., Wagner, S., y Parareda, B.M., Pizka, M.: Tool support for continuous quality control. IEEE Softw. 25(5), 60-67 (2008)
49. Deissenboeck, F., Juergens, E., Lochmann, K., Wagner, S.: Software quality models: Purposes, usage scenarios and requirements. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Software Quality (WoSQ '09). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2009)
50. Deissenboeck, F., Pizka, M., Seifert, T.: Tool support for continuous quality assessment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP), pp. 127-136. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2005). doi:http://doi. ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/STEP.2005.31
51. Deissenboeck, F., Wagner, S., Pizka, M., Teuchert, S., Girard, J.F.: An activity-based quality model for maintainability. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM '07). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2007)
52. Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
53. Detyniecki, M.: Fundamentals on aggregation operators. In: Proceedings of the AOGP 2001 (2001) http://www-poleia.lip6.fr/_marcin/papers/Detynieck AGOP 01.pdf
54. Dromey, R.G.: A model for software product quality. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21(2) (1995)
55. dSpace: Modeling Guidelines for MATLAB/Simulink/Stateflow and TargetLink (2006)
56. Eick, S.G., Graves, T.L., Karr, A.F., Marron, J.S., Mockus, A.: Does code decay? Assessing the evidence from change management data. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 27(1), 1-12 (2001)
57. Endres, A., Rombach, D.: A Handbook of Software and Systems Engineering: Empirical Observations, Laws and Theories. The Fraunhofer IESE Series on Software Engineering. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2003)
58. European Commission: Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Off. J. Eur. Union L 124, 36-41 (2003)
59. Fagan, M.E.: Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Syst. J. 15(3), 182-211 (1976)
60. Farr, W.H., Smith, O.D.: Statistical Modeling and Estimation of Reliability Functions for Software (SMERFS) Users Guide. Technical Report NAVSWC TR-84-373, Naval Surface Weapons Center (1993)
61. Fenton, N.: Software measurement: A necessary scientific basis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 20(3), 199-206 (1994)
62. Fenton, N.E., Neil, M.: A critique of software defect prediction models. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25(5), 675-689 (1999). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/32.815326
63. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1957)
64. Ficalora, J.P., Cohen, L.: Quality Function Deployment and Six Sigma. A QFD Handbook, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2010)
65. Florac, W.A., Carleton, A.D.:Measuring the Software Process: Statistical Process Control for Software Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)
66. Franch, X., Carvallo, J.P.: Using quality models in software package selection. IEEE Softw. 20(1), 34-41 (2003)
67. Frank, M.: Konzeption und Einführung eines QM-Systems für Software. Diplomarbeit, Technische Universität München (2010)
68. Frankl, P., Hamlet, D., Littlewood, B., Strigini, L.: Choosing a testing method to deliver reliability. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'97), pp. 68-78. ACM Press, New York (1997)
69. Frye, C.: CMM founder: Focus on the product to improve quality. http://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com/news/interview/0,289202, sid92 gci1316385,00. html (2008)
70. Gall, H., Jazayeri, M., Klösch, R., Trausmuth, G.: Software evolution observations based on product release history. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'97), pp. 160-166. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (1997)
71. Garvin, D.A.: What does "product quality" really mean? MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 26(1), 25-43 (1984)
72. Georgiadou, E.: GEQUAMO-a generic, multilayered, cusomisable, software quality model. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 313-323 (2003)
73. Gilb, T., Graham, D.: Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)
74. Glass, R.: A classification system for testing, Part 2. IEEE Softw. 26(1), 104-104 (2009)
75. Gleirscher, M., Golubitskiy, D., Irlbeck, M., Wagner, S.: On the benefit of automated static analysis for small and medium-sized software enterprises. In: Proceedings of the Software Quality Days 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 94, pp. 14-38 (2012)
76. Glinz, M.: Rethinking the notion of non-functional requirements. In: Proceedings of the Third World Congress for Software Quality, vol. II, pp. 55-64 (2005)
77. Grady, R.B., Caswell, D.L.: Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)
78. Graham, D., Fewster, M.: Software Test Automation: Effective Use of Test Execution Tools, illustrated edn. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)
79. Gruber, H., Plösch, R., Saft, M.: On the validity of benchmarking for evaluating code quality. In: Proceedings of the IWSM/MetriKon/Mensura 2010 (2010)
80. van Gurp, J., Bosch, J.: Design erosion: Problems and causes. J. Syst. Softw. 61(2), 105-119 (2002)
81. Hayes, J.H., Zhao, L.: Maintainability prediction: A regression analysis of measures of evolving systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM'05), pp. 601-604. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2005)
82. Heitlager, I., Kuipers, T., Visser, J.: A practical model for measuring maintainability. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Quality of Information and Communications Technology (2007)
83. Homeland Security: Common attack pattern enumeration and classification (CAPEC). Available Online at http://capec.mitre.org/. Accessed Oct 2008
84. Homeland Security: Common weakness enumeration (CWE). Available Online at http://cwe. mitre.org/. Accessed in Oct 2008
85. Huang, L., Boehm, B.: How much software quality investment is enough: A value-based approach. IEEE Softw. 23(5), 88-95 (2006)
86. Hudepohl, J.P., Aud, S.J., Koshgoftaar, T.M., Allen, E.B., Mayrand, J.: Emerald: Software metrics and models on the desktop. IEEE Softw. 13(5), 56-60 (1996)
87. IEEE: Standard 830-1998: Recommended practice for software requirements specifications (1998)
88. IEEE 1219: Software maintenance (1998)
89. ISO 15005:2002: Road vehicles-ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems-dialogue management principles and compliance procedures (2002)
90. ISO 9000:2005: Quality management systems-fundamentals and vocabulary (2005)
91. ISO 9001:2008: Quality management systems-requirements (2008)
92. ISO/IEC 14598: Information technology-software product evaluation (1999)
93. ISO/IEC 15504-1:2004: Information technology-process assessment-Part 1: Concepts and vocabulary (2004)
94. ISO/IEC 15939:2007: Systems and software engineering-measurement process (2007)
95. ISO/IEC 25000:2005: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-guide to SQuaRE (2005)
96. ISO/IEC 25001:2007: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-planning and management (2007)
97. ISO/IEC 25010:2011: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-system and software quality models (2011)
98. ISO/IEC 25012:2008: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-data quality model (2008)
99. ISO/IEC 25020:2007: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-measurement reference model and guide (2007)
100. ISO/IEC 25021:2012: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-quality measure element (2012)
101. ISO/IEC 25030:2007: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-quality requirements (2007)
102. ISO/IEC 25040:2011: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-evaluation process (2011)
103. ISO/IEC 25041:2012: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-evaluation guide for developers, acquirers and independent evaluators (2012)
104. ISO/IEC 25045:2010: Systems and software engineering-systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE)-evaluation module for recoverability (2010)
105. ISO/IEC 26262:2011: Road vehicles-functional safety (2011)
106. ISO/IEC 27001: Information technology-security techniques-information security management systems-requirements (2005)
107. ISO/IEC TR 9126-1:2001: Software engineering-product quality-Part 1: Quality model (2001)
108. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24765:2010: Systems and software engineering-vocabulary (2010)
109. Jones, C.: Applied Software Measurement: Assuring Productivity and Quality.McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)
110. Jones, C.: Software Assessments, Benchmarks, and Best Practices. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston (2000)
111. Jones, W.D., Vouk, M.A.: Field Data Analysis. In: Lyu, M.R. (ed.) Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, Chap. 11. IEEE Computer Society Press/McGraw-Hill, Silver Spring/New York (1996)
112. Juergens, E., Deissenboeck, F., Feilkas, M., Hummel, B., Schaetz, B., Wagner, S., Domann, C., Streit, J.: Can clone detection support quality assessments of requirements specifications? In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'10), pp. 79-88. ACM Press, New York (2010)
113. Juergens, E., Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., Wagner, S.: Do code clones matter? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'09). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2009)
114. Juran, J.M.: Juran's Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)
115. Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M., Vegas, S.: Reviewing 25 years of testing technique experiments. Empir. Softw. Eng. 9, 7-44 (2004)
116. Juristo, N., Moreno, A.M., Vegas, S., Solari, M.: In search of what we experimentally know about unit testing. IEEE Softw. 23(6), 72-80 (2006)
117. Kafura, D., Reddy, G.R.: The use of software complexity metrics in software maintenance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 13(3), 335-343 (1987)
118. Kapser, C., Godfrey, M.W.: "Cloning considered harmful" considered harmful. In: Proceedings of the 13th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE '06), pp. 19-28. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2006)
119. Khaddaj, S., Horgan, G.: A proposed adaptable quality model for software quality assurance. J. Comput. Sci. 1(4), 482-487 (2005)
120. Kitchenham, B.: Towards a constructive quality model. Part I: Software quality modelling, measurement and prediction. Softw. Eng. J. 2(4), 105-113 (1987)
121. Kitchenham, B., Linkman, S., Pasquini, A., Nanni, V.: The SQUID approach to defining a quality model. Softw. Qual. J. 6(3), 211-233 (1997)
122. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software quality: The elusive target. IEEE Softw. 13(1), 12-21 (1996)
123. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L., Fenton, N.: Towards a framework for software measurement validation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 21(12), 929-944 (1995). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/32.489070
124. Kitchenham, B., Pickard, L.M.: Towards a constructive quality model. Part 2: Statistical techniques for modelling software quality in the ESPRIT REQUEST project. Softw. Eng. J. 2(4), 114-126 (1987)
125. Kläs, M., Heidrich, J., Münch, J., Trendowicz, A.: CQML scheme: A classification scheme for comprehensive quality model landscapes. In: Proceedings of the 35th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (2009)
126. Knox, S.T.: Modeling the cost of software quality. Digit. Technol. J. 5(4), 9-17 (1993)
127. Kof, L.: An application of natural language processing to domain modelling-two case studies. Int. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 20, 37-52 (2005)
128. Koschke, R.: Survey of research on software clones. In: Duplication, Redundancy, and Similarity in Software. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (2007)
129. Kotter, J.: Leading Change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996)
130. Kotter, J., Cohen, D.: The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)
131. Krasner, H.: Using the cost of quality approach for software. Crosstalk 11, 6-11 (1998)
132. Laitenberger, O.: A Survey of Software Inspection Technologies. In: Handbook on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 517-555. World Scientific, Singapore (2002)
133. Larkin, T., Larkin, S.: Communicating Change: How to Win Employee Support for New Business Directions. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)
134. Lehman, M.M.: On understanding laws, evolution, and conservation in the large-program life cycle. J. Syst. Softw. 1, 213-221 (1980)
135. Lindvall, M., Donzelli, P., Asgari, S., Basili, V.: Towards reusable measurement patterns. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'05). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2005)
136. Littlewood, B., Verall, J.: A Bayesian Reliability Growth Model for Computer Software. Appl. Stat. 22(3), 332-346 (1973)
137. Lochmann, K.: Engineering quality requirements using quality models. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2010)
138. Luckey, M., Baumann, A., Méndez Ferńandez, D., Wagner, S.: Reusing security requirements using an extend quality model. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ICSE Workshop on Software Engineering for Secure Systems (2010)
139. Lyu, M.R. (ed.): Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press/McGraw-Hill, Silver Spring/New York (1996)
140. MacKay, D.J.C.: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge Press, Cambridge (2003)
141. Mandeville, W.: Software costs of quality. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 8(2), 315-318 (1990)
142. Marinescu, C., Marinescu, R., Mihancea, R.F., Ratiu, D., Wettel, R.: iPlasma: An integrated platform for quality assessment of object-oriented design. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2005)
143. Marinescu, R., Ratiu, D.: Quantifying the quality of object-oriented design: The factorstrategy model. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE'04), pp. 192-201. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2004)
144. The MathWorks: Simulink Reference (2006)
145. MathWorks Automotive Advisory Board: Controller style guidelines for production intent usingMatlab, Simulink and Stateflow. http://www.mathworks.com/industries/auto/maab.html (2001)
146. Mayr, A., Plösch, R., Kläs, M., Lampasona, C., Saft, M.: A comprehensive code-based quality model for embedded systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE 2012). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2012)
147. McCabe, T.: A complexity measure. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. SE-2(4), 308-320 (1976)
148. McCall, J., Walters, G.: Factors in Software Quality. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield (1977)
149. McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., Walters, G.F.: Factors in Software Quality. National Technical Information Service, Springfield (1977)
150. McFeeley, B.: IDEAL: A user's guide for software process improvement. In: Handbook CMU/SEI-96-HB-001. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh (1996)
151. Menzies, T., Butcher, A., Marcus, A., Zimmermann, T., Cok, D.: Loval vs. global models for effort estimation and defect prediction. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE '11), pp. 343-351. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2011)
152. MISRA AC SLSF: Modelling design and style guidelines for the application of simulink and stateflow (2009)
153. MISRA AC TL: Modelling style guidelines for the application of targetlink in the context of automatic code generation (2007)
154. Monden, Y.: Toyota Production System. An Integrated Approach to Just-In-Time, 3rd edn. Engineering & Management Press (1998)
155. Mordal-Manet, K., Balmas, F., Denier, S., Ducasse, S., Wertz, H., Laval, J., Bellingard, F., Vaillergues, P.: The squale model-a practice-based industrial quality model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (2009)
156. Münch, J., Kläs, M.: Balancing upfront definition and customization of quality models. In: Workshop-Band Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und-bewertung (SQMB 2008). Technische Universität München (2008)
157. Musa, J., Ackerman, A.: Quantifying software validation: When to stop testing? IEEE Softw. 6(3), 19-27 (1989)
158. Musa, J.D.: Software Reliability Engineering: More Reliable Software Faster and Cheaper, 2nd edn. AuthorHouse, Bloomington (2004)
159. Musa, J.D., Iannino, A., Okumoto, K.: Software Reliability: Measurement, Prediction, Application. McGraw-Hill, New York (1987)
160. Musa, J.D., Okumoto, K.: A logarithmic poisson execution timemodel for software reliability measurement. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'84), pp. 230-238. ACM Press, New York (1984)
161. Myers, G.J.: The Art of Software Testing. Wiley, New York (1979)
162. Nagappan, N., Ball, T.: Static analysis tools as early indicators of pre-release defect density. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '05). ACM Press, New York (2005)
163. Nagappan, N., Ball, T., Zeller, A.: Mining metrics to predict component failures. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'06), pp. 452-461. ACM Press, New York (2006)
164. Nagel, P.M., Scholz, F.W., Skrivan, J.A.: Software Reliability: Additional Investigations into Modeling with Replicated Experiments. NASA Contractor Rep. 172378, NASA Langley Res. Center (1984)
165. Nagel, P.M., Skrivan, J.A.: Software Reliability: Repetitive Run Experimentation and Modeling. NASA Contractor Rep. 165836, NASA Langley Res. Center (1982)
166. Neuhaus, S., Zimmermann, T., Holler, C., Zeller, A.: Predicting vulnerable software components. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS '07), pp. 529-540. ACM Press, New York (2007)
167. Nuseibeh, B., Easterbrook, S.: Requirements engineering: A roadmap. In: Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering (ICSE '00), pp. 35-46. ACM Press, New York (2000)
168. Oman, P., Hagemeister, J.: Metrics for assessing a software system's maintainability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance (1992)
169. Ortega, M., Pérez, M., Rojas, T.: Construction of a systemic quality model for evaluating a software product. Softw. Qual. J. 11, 219-242 (2003)
170. Parnas, D.L.: Software aging. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE '94), pp. 279-287. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (1994)
171. Pfleeger, S.L., Atlee, J.M.: Software Engineering: Theory and Practice, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2009)
172. Pham, H.: Software Reliability. Springer, New York (2000)
173. Plato, (Translator), R.W.: Symposium, reprint edn. Oxford World's Classics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)
174. Plösch, R., Gruber, H., Hentschel, A., Körner, C., Pomberger, G., Schiffer, S., Saft, M., Storck, S.: The EMISQ method and its tool support-expert based evaluation of internal software quality. J. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 4(1) (2008)
175. Plösch, R., Gruber, H., Körner, C., Pomberger, G., Schiffer, S.: A proposal for a quality model based on a technical topic classification. In: Tagungsband des 2. Workshops zur Software-Qualitätsmodellierung und-bewertung (2009)
176. Plösch, R., Gruber, H., Pomberger, G., Saft, M., Schiffer, S.: Tool support for expert-centred code assessments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation (ICST), pp. 258-267. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2008)
177. Plösch, R., Mayr, A., Körner, C.: Collecting quality requirements using quality models and goals. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Seventh International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (2010)
178. Pohl, K., Rupp, C.: Requirements Engineering Fundamentals. Rocky Nook, Santa Barbara (2011)
179. Poppendieck, M., Poppendieck, T.: Lean Software Development. An Agile Toolkit. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2003)
180. Pretschner, A., Prenninger, W., Wagner, S., Kühnel, C., Baumgartner, M., Sostawa, B., Zölch, R., Stauner, T.: One evaluation of model-based testing and its automation. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'05). ACM Press, New York (2005)
181. Puchner, S.: Sustainable change in organizations. In: Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., Hummel, B., Juergens, E., y Parareda, B.M., Schaetz, B. (eds.) Selected Topics in Software Quality. Technische Universität München, Garching (2008)
182. Reel, J.S.: Critical success factors in software projects. IEEE Softw. 16(3), 18-23 (1999)
183. Robertson, S., Robertson, J.: Mastering the Requirements Process. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley, New York/Reading (1999)
184. Runeson, P., Andersson, C., Thelin, T., Andrews, A., Berling, T.: What do we know about defect detection methods? IEEE Softw. 23(3), 82-90 (2006)
185. Samoladas, I., Gousios, G., Spinellis, D., Stamelos, I.: The SQO-OSS quality model: Measurement based open source software evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Open Source Systems, vol. 275. Springer, New York (2008)
186. Sanchez, J., Williams, L., Maximilien, E.: On the sustained use of a test-driven development practice at IBM. In: Proceedings of the AGILE 2007, pp. 5-14. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2007)
187. Schackmann, H., Jansen, M., Lichter, H.: Tool support for user-defined quality assessment models. In: Proceedings of the MetriKon 2009 (2009)
188. Shewhart, W.A.: Statistical Method from the Viewpoint of Quality Control. Dover, New York (1986)
189. Shull, F., Rus, I., Basili, V.: How perspective-based reading can improve requirements inspections. Computer 33(7), 73-79 (2000)
190. Slaughter, S.A., Harter, D.E., Krishnan, M.S.: Evaluating the cost of software quality. Commun. ACM 41(8), 67-73 (1998)
191. van Solingen, R., Berghout, E.: Goal/Question/Metric Method. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York (1999)
192. Sommerville, I.: Software Engineering, 9th edn. Addison Wesley, Reading (2010)
193. Spillner, A., Linz, T., Roßner, T., Winter, M.: The Software Testing Practice: Test Management: A Study Guide for the Certified Tester Exam ISTQB Advanced Level. Rocky Nook, Santa Barbara (2007)
194. Sun Microsystems: Secure coding guidelines for the java programming language, version 2.0. Available Online at http://java.sun.com/security/seccodeguide.html
195. Tenhunen, V., Sajaniemi, J.: An evaluation of inspection automation tools. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Quality (ECSQ'02). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2349, pp. 351-361. Springer, Berlin (2002)
196. Thelin, T., Runeson, P., Wohlin, C.: Prioritized use cases as a vehicle for software inspections. IEEE Softw. 20(4), 30-33 (2003)
197. Tian, J.: Quality-Evaluation Models and Measurements. IEEE Softw. 21(3), 84-91 (2004)
198. Tian, J.: Software Quality Engineering. Testing, Quality Assurance, and Quantifiable Improvement. Wiley, New York (2005)
199. Voas, J.: Can clean pipes produce dirty water? IEEE Softw. 14(4), 93-95 (1997)
200. Wagner, S.: A literature survey of the quality economics of defect-detection techniques. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'06), pp. 194-203. ACM Press, New York (2006)
201. Wagner, S.: Using economics as basis for modelling and evaluating software quality. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on the Economics of Software and Computation (ESC-1) (2007)
202. Wagner, S.: Cost-Optimisation of Analytical Software Quality Assurance. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, Saarbrücken (2008)
203. Wagner, S.: A Bayesian network approach to assess and predict software quality using activity-based quality models. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52(11), 1230-1241 (2010)
204. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F.: An integrated approach to quality modelling. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Software Quality (5-WoSQ). IEEE Computer Society (2007)
205. Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F., Aichner, M., Wimmer, J., Schwalb, M.: An evaluation of two bug pattern tools for java. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST'08). IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2008)
206. Wagner, S., Fischer, H.: A Software Reliability Model Based on a Geometric Sequence of Failure Rates. Technical Report TUMI-0520, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München (2005)
207. Wagner, S., Fischer, H.: A Software Reliability Model Based on a Geometric Sequence of Failure Rates. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies (Ada-Europe '06). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4006, pp. 143-154. Springer, Berlin (2006)
208. Wagner, S., Jürjens, J.:Model-based identification of fault-prone components. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC-5). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3463, pp. 435-452. Springer, New York (2005)
209. Wagner, S., Jürjens, J., Koller, C., Trischberger, P.: Comparing bug finding tools with reviews and tests. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Testing of Communicating Systems (TestCom'05). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3502, pp. 40-55. Springer, New York (2005)
210. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Heinemann, L., Kläs, M., Lampasona, C., Trendowicz, A., Plösch, R., Mayr, A., Seidl, A., Goeb, A., Streit, J.: Practical product quality modelling and assessment: The Quamoco approach (in preparation)
211. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Heinemann, L., Kläs, M., Trendowicz, A., Plösch, R., Seidl, A., Goeb, A., Streit, J.: The Quamoco product quality modelling and assessment approach. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Silver Spring (2012)
212. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Winter, S., Goeb, A., Klaes, M., Nunnenmacher, S.: Quality models in practice: Survey results. https://quamoco.in.tum.de/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Software Quality Models in Practice.pdf (2010)
213. Wagner, S., Lochmann, K., Winter, S., Goeb, A., Kläs, M., Nunnenmacher, S.: Software quality in practice. survey results. Technical Report TUM-I128, Technische Universität München (2012)
214. Wagner, S., Méndez Ferńandez, D., Islam, S., Lochmann, K.: A security requirements approach for web systems. In: Proceedings of the Quality Assessment in Web (QAW 2009). CEUR (2009)
215. Wallace, D.R., Fujii Roger, U.: Software verification and validation: An overview. IEEE Softw. 6(3), 10-17 (1989)
216. Wiesmann, A., van der Stock, A., Curphey, M., Stirbei, R. (eds.): A Guide to Building Secure Web Applications and Web Services. OWASP (2005)
217. Winter, S., Wagner, S., Deissenboeck, F.: A comprehensive model of usability. In: Proceedings of the Engineering Interactive Systems 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4940, pp. 106-122. Springer, New York (2008)
218. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., Roos, D.: The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production, reprint edn. HarperPaperbacks, Hammersmith (1991)
219. van Zeist, R.H.J., Hendriks, P.R.H.: Specifying software quality with the extended ISO model. Softw. Qual. J. 5(4), 273-284 (1996)
220. Zheng, J., Williams, L., Nagappan, N., Snipes, W., Hudepohl, J.P., Vouk, M.A.: On the value of static analysis for fault detection in software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 32(4), 240-253 (2006)
221. Zhou, Y., Leung, H.: Predicting object-oriented software maintainability using multivariate adaptive regression splines. J. Syst. Softw. 80(8), 1349-1361 (2007)