Construction of a systemic quality model for evaluating a software product

Software Quality Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 219-242

  Ortega, Maryoly ^a   Pérez, María ^b   Rojas, Teresita ^b  

^a Universidad Nacional Experimental de Los Llanos Occidentales Ezequiel Zamora   (Venezuela)

^b UNIVERSIDAD SIMÓN BOLÍVAR   (Venezuela)

Author keywords

Dromey's model; ISO 9126; Metrics; Quality model; Software product quality; Systemic quality

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BENCHMARKING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PRODUCT DESIGN; PROGRAM PROCESSORS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING;

DROMEY'S MODEL; ISO 9126; QUALITY MODEL; SOFTWARE PRODUCT QUALITY; SYSTEMIC QUALITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 3543054780     PISSN: 09639314     EISSN: 15731367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025166710988     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Albrecht, A. and Gaffney, J. 1983. Software function, source lines of code, and development effort prediction: A software science validation, Transactions on Software Engineering 9(6): 639-648.
2. Bertoa, M. and Vallecillo, A. 2002. Atributos de calidad para componentes COTS, Proceedings of IDEAS'02, La Habana, Cuba, pp. 352-363.
3. Boehm, B.W., Brown, J.R., Kaspar, H., Lipow M., McCleod, G.J., and Merritt M.J. 1978. Characteristics of Software Quality. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
4. Callaos, N. and Callaos, B. 1996. Designing with a systemic total quality, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems Analysis and Synthesis, ISAS'96, Orlando, USA, pp. 15-23.
5. Carmines, E. and Zeller, R. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
6. Dromey, G. 1996. Cornering the chimera, IEEE Software (January): 33-43.
7. Fenton, N. and Pfleeger, S.L. 1997. Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd ed. PWS Publishing.
8. Google. 2003. Google Web directory: Testing services, http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Software/ Testing_Services/.
9. Grady, R. and Caswell, D. 1987. Software Metrics: Establishing a Company-Wide Program. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
10. Hernández, R., Fernández, C., and Baptista, P. 1998. Metodología de la Investigación, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill.
11. Humphrey, W.S. 1989. Managing the Software Process. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
12. ISO/IEC IS 9126. 1991. Information Technology - Software Product Evaluation: Quality Characteristics and Guidelines for Their Use. Geneva, ISO.
13. ISO/IEC 9126-1.2. 1998. ISO/IEC 9126-1.2: Information Technology - Software Product Quality, Part 1: Quality Model. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7/WG6.
14. ISO/IEC TR 15504-2. 1998. (E) Information Technology - Software Process Assessment, Part 2: A Reference Model for Processes and Process Capability. Canada, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7.
15. McCall, J.A., Richards, P.K., and Walters, G.F. 1977. Factors in Software Quality, Vols. I-III, AD/A-049-014/015/055. Springfield, VA, National Technical Information Service.
16. Mendoza, L.E., Pérez, M.A., Grimm, A.C., and Ortega, M. 2003. Análisis del impacto del proceso de desarrollo en las caracteristicas de calidad de software, IDEAS'2003, Asunción, Paraguay. OOSPICE. 2002. http://www.oospice.com.
17. Pérez, M.A., Rojas, T., Mendoza, L., and Grimán, A. 2001. Systemic quality model for system development process: Case study, Seventh Americas Conference on Information Systems - AMCIS 2001, eds. D. Strong and D. Straub. Boston Association for Information Systems, pp. 1297-1304, http://www.lisi.usb.ve/publicaciones/calidad11.zip.
18. Pfleeger, S.L. 1998. Software Engineering: Theory and Practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
19. Preiss, O. and Wegmann, A. 2002. A systems perspective on the quality description of software components, 6th World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics. The 8th International Conference on Information System Analysis and Synthesis, Orlando.
20. Pressman, R. 1998. Ingeniería de Software: Un Enfoque Práctico. New York, McGraw-Hill.
21. Rojas, T. and Pérez, M. 1995. A comparison of three information system development methodologies related to effectiveness/efficiency criteria, International Symposium on Applied Corporate Computing (ISACC'95), Monterrey, México.
22. Rojas, T., Pérez, M.A., Griman, A.C., Ortega, M., and Díaz, A.M. 2000. Modelo de decisión para soportar la selección de herramientas CASE, Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería, UCV 15(2): 117-144.
23. Seijas, F. 1999. Investigación por Muestreo. Caracas, Ediciones Faces, UCV.
24. Voas, J. 1999. Certification: Reducing the hidden costs of poor quality, IEEE Software (July/August): 22-25.
25. Writing at CSU. 2003. Overview: Reliability and validity, Writing Center at Colorado State University, http://writing.colostate.edu/references/research/ relval/index.cfm.