Effects of sequences of socially regulated learning on group performance

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 16-20-March-2015, Issue , 2015, Pages 236-240

  Molenaar, Inge ^a   Chiu, Ming Ming ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative Learning; Discourse analysis; Elementary Education; Metacognition; Scaffolding; Temporal Analysis

Indexed keywords

SCAFFOLDS; SEMANTICS;

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; ELEMENTARY EDUCATION; METACOGNITION; SCAFFOLDING; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84955611563     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2723576.2723586     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Schoor, C. & Bannert, M. 2012. Exploring Regulatory Processes during a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Task Using Process Mining. Computers in Human Behavior. 28 (4), 1321-1331.
2. Molenaar, I. & Järvelä, S. 2014. Sequential and Temporal Characteristics of Self and Social regulated Learning. Metacognition and Learning, Vol 9, p. 75-85
3. Molenaar, I., Chiu, M. M., Sleegers, P. J.C. & van Boxtel, C.A.M. 2011. Scaffolding of Small Groups' Metacognitive Activities with an Avatar. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, vol 6 (4), 601-624
4. Molenaar, I., & Chiu, M.M. 2014. Dissecting sequences of regulation and cognition. Metacognition and learning, Vol 9, p. 137-160.
5. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. 2007. A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin's model of self-regulated learning. Review of Educational Research, 77 (3), 334-372.
6. Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S. & Kirchner, P. 2014. Elementary school students' strategic learning: does task-type matter? Metacognition and learning, Vol 9
7. Reimann, P. 2009. Time is precious. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 239-257.
8. Winne, P.H. 2010. Improving measurements of selfregulated learning. Educational psychologist, 45, 267-276.
9. Azevedo, R., Moos, C.D., Johnson, A.M. & Chauncey, A.D. 2010. Measuring Cognitive and Metacognitive Regulatory Processes During Hypermedia Learning: Issues and Challenges. Educational psychologist, 45, 210-223
10. Volet, S. & Järvelä, S. 2001 (Eds.). Motivation in learning contexts. London: Pergamon/Elsevier.
11. liskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. 2004. Sociallyshared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1 (2), 147-178.
12. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. 2010. Self-regulated learning and socio-cognitive theory. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd Edition). New York.
13. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P., & Kanselaar, G. 2010. Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 1-19.
14. Chiu, M. M. 2008. Flowing toward correct contributions during groups' mathematics problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17 (3), 415-463.
15. Molenaar, I. 2003. Exploration-net: Online collaboration. In D. Lassner & C. McNaught (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003 (pp. 398-400). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
16. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
17. Molenaar, I., & Roda, C. 2008. Attention Management for Dynamic and Adaptive Scaffolding. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16 (2), 224-271.
18. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. 2002. CSCL-Learning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. University of Wageningen.
19. Fleiss, J. 1981. Statistical itletlzods for Rates and Proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
20. Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blote, A. W. 2005. The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33 (3), 193-211.
21. Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. 2006. Metacognitive Activities in Text-Studying and Problem-Solving: Development of a Taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12 (3), 209-237.
22. Van Boxtel, C. 2004. Studying peer interaction from three perspectives. In Dialogic learning (pp. 125-143). Springer Netherlands