What Do the Various Principles of Justice Mean Within the Concept of Benefit Sharing?

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 281-293

  Dauda, Bege ^a   Denier, Yvonne ^a   Dierickx, Kris ^a  

^a Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Benefit sharing; Justice; Post trial obligations; Research ethics; Resource limited countries

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; COOPERATION; ETHICS; GLOBAL HEALTH; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONCEPT FORMATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GLOBAL HEALTH; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH RESOURCES; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; SOCIAL JUSTICE;

EID: 84955592057     PISSN: 11767529     EISSN: 18724353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11673-016-9706-4     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Ambrose, M.L., and A. Arnaud. 2005. Are procedural justice and distributive justice conceptually distinct? In Handbook of organizational justice, edited by J. Greenberg and J. Colquitt, 59–84. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bachmann, A. 2011. Ethical aspects of access and benefit-sharing (ABS): Environment. Zurich: Swiss Federal Council.
3. Ballantyne, A. 2008. “Fair benefits” accounts of exploitation require a normative principle of fairness: Response to Gbadegesin and Wendler, and Emanuel et al. Bioethics 22(4): 239–244.
4. Ballantyne, A. 2010. How to do research fairly in an unjust world. American Journal of Bioethics 10(6): 26–35.
5. Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Benatar, S.R. 2000. Avoiding exploitation in clinical research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9(4): 562–565.
7. Bernard, T.J., and R.S. Engel. 2001. Conceptualizing criminal justice theory. Justice Quarterly 18(1): 1–30.
8. Bone, R.G. 2003. Agreeing to fair process: The problem with contractarian theories of procedural fairness. Boston University Law Review 83(1): 485–552.
9. Brody, B.A. 2010. Intellectual property, state sovereignty, and biotechnology. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20(1): 51–73.
10. Castle, D., and E.R. Gold. 2007. Traditional knowledge and benefit sharing: From compensation to transaction. In Accessing and sharing the benefits of the genomics revolution, edited by P.W.B. Phillips and C.B. Onwueke, 65–79. Dordrecht: Springer.
11. Castree, N. 2003. Bioprospecting: From theory to practice (and back again). Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 28(1): 35–55.
12. CBD. 1992. Convention on biological diversity. Rio de Janeiro: UNEP.
13. Chennells, R. 2010. Toward global justice through benefit sharing. The Hastings Center Report 40(1): 3.
14. Coolsaet, B., and J. Pitseys. 2015. Fair and equitable negotiations? African influence and the international access and benefit-sharing regime. Global Environmental Politics 15(2): 1–20.
15. Daniels, N. 2008. Just health: Meeting health needs fairly, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Dauda, B., and K. Dierickx. 2013. Benefit sharing: An exploration on the contextual discourse of a changing concept. BMC Medical Ethics 14: 36. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-14-36.
17. Denier, Y. 2007. Efficiency justice and care: Philosophical reflections on scarcity in healthcare. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
18. Durocher, E., S. Rappolt, and B.E. Gibson. 2013. Occupational justice: Future directions. Journal of Occupational Science 21(4): 431–442.
19. Gbadegesin, S., and D. Wendler. 2006. Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics 20(5): 248–253.
20. Hill, R.A. 2002. Compensatory justice: Over time and between groups. Journal of Political Philosophy 10(4): 392–415.
21. Holmila, E. 2005. Common heritage of mankind in the law of the sea. Acta Societatis Martensis 1(1): 187–205.
22. Hughes, R.C. 2014. Justifying community benefit requirements in international research. Bioethics 28(8): 75–81.
23. HUGO. 2000. Hugo ethics committee statement on benefit sharing April 9, 2000. Clinical Genetics 58(5): 364–366.
24. HUGO Ethics Committee. 2000. HUGO urges genetic benefit-sharing. Community Genetics 3(2): 88–92.
25. De Jonge, B. 2010. What is fair and equitable benefit-sharing? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24(2): 127–146.
26. De Jonge, B., and M. Korthals. 2006. Vicissitudes of benefit sharing of crop genetic resources: downstream and upstream. Developing World Bioethics 6(3): 144–157.
27. Kamuya, D.M., V. Marsh, P. Njuguna, P. Munywoki, M. Parker, and S. Molyneux. 2014. “When they see us, it’s like they have seen the benefits!” Experiences of study benefits negotiations in community-based studies on the Kenyan coast. BMC Medical Ethics 15: 90. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-90.
28. Korthals, M., and B. De Jonge. 2009. Two different ethical notions of benefit sharing of genetic resources and their implications for global development. New Genetics and Society 28(1): 87–95.
29. London, A.J. 2005. Justice and the human development approach to international research. The Hastings Center Report 35(1): 24–37.
30. London, A.J., and J.S. Zollman. 2010. Research at the auction block: Problems for the fair benefits approach to international research. The Hastings Center Report 40(4): 34–45.
31. McGrew, A. 2004. Cosmopolitanism and global justice. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies 3(1): 1–17.
32. Miller, D. 2008. National responsibility and global justice. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11(4): 383–399.
33. Millum, J. 2010. How should the benefits of bioprospecting be shared? The Hastings Center Report 40(1): 24–33.
34. Ndebele, P., J. Mfutso-Bengo, and T. Mduluza. 2008. Compensating clinical trial participants from limited resource settings in internationally sponsored clinical trials: A proposal. Malawi Medical Journal 20(2): 42–5.
35. Participants in the Conference on Ethical Aspects of Research in Developing Countries. 2004. Moral standards for research in developing countries. The Hastings Center Report 34(3): 17–27.
36. Petryna, A. 2007. Clinical trials offshored: On private sector science and public health. Bio Societies 2(1): 21–40.
37. Pogge, T. 2001. Priorities of global justice. Metaphilosophy 32(1): 6–24.
38. Pratt, B., and B. Loff. 2011. Justice in international clinical research. Developing World Bioethics 11(2): 75–81.
39. Pratt, B., and B. Loff. 2014. A framework to link international clinical research to the promotion of justice in global health. Bioethics 28(8): 387–96.
40. Pullman, D., and A. Latus. 2003. Clinical trials, genetic add-ons, and the question of benefit-sharing. The Lancet 362(9379): 242–244.
41. Rawls, J. 1999a. A theory of justice, revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Rawls, J. 1999b. The law of peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Resnik, D.B. 2004. The distribution of biomedical research resources and international justice. Developing World Bioethics 4(1): 42–57.
44. Sadurski, W. 1984. Social justice and legal justice. Law and Philosophy 3(3): 329–354.
45. Schroeder, D. 2007. Benefit sharing: It’s time for a definition. Journal of Medical Ethics 33(4): 205–9.
46. Schroeder, D. 2009. Justice and benefit sharing. In Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia case, edited by R. Wynberg, 11–27. New York: Springer Science+Bussiness Media.
47. Schroeder, D., and C. Lasén-Díaz. 2006. Sharing the benefits of genetic resources: From biodiversity to human genetics. Developing World Bioethics 6(3): 135–43.
48. Schroeder, D., and B. Pisupati. 2010. Ethics, justice and the convention on biological diversity. Lancashire: UNEP.
49. Schroeder, D., and T. Pogge. 2009. Justice and the convention on biological diversity. Ethics and International Affairs 23(3): 267–280.
50. Schuklenk, U., and A. Kleinsmidt. 2006. North-South benefit sharing arrangements in bioprospecting and genetic research: A critical ethical and legal analysis. Developing World Bioethics 6(3): 122–34.
51. Simm, K. 2005. Benefit-sharing: An inquiry regarding the meaning and limits of the concept in human genetic research. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 1(2): 29–40.
52. Simm, K. 2007a. Benefit sharing frameworks—justifications for and against benefit sharing in human genetic research. A report of GenBenefit. https://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/explore/projects/assets/cpe_genbenefit_frameworks.pdf. Accessed January 7, 2016.
53. Simm, K. 2007b. Benefit-sharing: A look at the history of an ethics concern. Nature Reviews Genetics 8(1): 496. doi:10.1038/nrg2145.
54. Strech, D., and N. Sofaer. 2011. How to write a systematic review of reasons. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(2): 121–126.
55. Tindana, P.O., J.A. Singh, C. Shawn Tracy, et al. 2007. Grand challenges in global health: Community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Medicine 4(9): 1451–1455.
56. Van Parijs, P. 2007. International distributive justice. In A companion to comparative political philosophy, 2nd ed., edited by R. Goodin, P. Pettit, and T. Pogge, 638–652. Oxford: Blackwell.
57. Vermeylen, S. 2007. Contextualizing “fair” and “equitable”: The San’s reflections on the Hoodia benefit-sharing agreement. Local Environment 12(4): 423–436.