Justifying community benefit requirements in international research

Bioethics

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 397-404

  Hughes, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; Exploitation; Fair benefits; International research; Reasonable availability

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MORALITY; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; POLICY; POVERTY; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL JUSTICE; STANDARDS; TAX; TRENDS; UTILIZATION;

ALTRUISM; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; DEVELOPED COUNTRIES; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; HEALTH RESOURCES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; POVERTY; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TAXES;

EID: 84908495944     PISSN: 02699702     EISSN: 14678519     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. S.W. Glickman, J.G. Mc Hutchison, E.D. Peterson et al. Ethical and Scientific Implications of the Globalization of Clinical Research. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 816-823
2. A. Petryna. 2009. When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 10-33, 89-96.
3. B. Pratt & B. Loff. Justice in International Clinical Research. Dev World Bioeth 2010; 11: 75-81.
4. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. 2002. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: guideline 10. Available at: http://www.cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/guidelines_nov_2002_ blurb.htm [Accessed 22 Jun 2012]
5. World Medical Association. 59th General Assembly, Seoul, October 2008, Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects, principle 17. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/[Accessed 22 Jun 2012]
6. A.J. London. 2008. Responsiveness to Host Community Health Needs. In The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. E. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. Crouch et al., eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 737-744.
7. Moral Standards for Research in Developing Countries: From 'Reasonable Availability' to 'Fair Benefits'. Hastings Cent Rep 2004; 34(3): 17-27.
8. D.M. Hausman. Group Risks, Risks to Groups, and Group Engagement in Genetics Research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2007; 17: 351-369
9. R.R. Sharp & M.W. Foster. Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 2000; 28: 41-51.
10. Commission on Health Research for Development. 1990. Health Research: Essential Link to Equity in Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. M. Moran et al. Neglected Disease Research and Development: How Much are we Really Spending? PLoS Med 2009; 6(2): e1000030. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000030 [Accessed 10 Aug 2012].
12. Wolitz, E. Emanuel & S. Shah. Rethinking the Responsiveness Requirement for International Research. Lancet 2009; 374: 847-849.
13. R. Lie, The Fair Benefits Approach Revisited. Hastings Cent Rep 2010; 40(4): 3.
14. A.J. London. Justice and the Human Development Approach to International Research. Hastings Cent Rep 2005; 35(1): 24-37.
15. R.C. Hughes. Individual Risk and Community Benefit in International Research. J Med Ethics 2012, DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100171 [Accessed 10 Aug 2012].
16. D. Wendler & F.G. Miller. Assessing Research Risks Systematically: The Net Risks Test. J Med Ethics 2006; 33: 481-486.
17. N. Barsdorf. South Africa's Duty to Support Health Research for the Global Poor. Unpublished dissertation, University of Bergen 2012: 117.
18. S. Gbadegesin & D. Wendler. Protecting Communities in Health Research from Exploitation. Bioethics 2006; 20: 248-253
19. S. Shah, R. Wolitz, & E. Emanuel. 2011. Refocusing the Responsiveness Requirement. Bioethics 2011, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01903.x [Accessed Aug 2012].
20. A. Wertheimer. 1999. Exploitation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 16-24.
21. J. Millum. Sharing the Benefits of Research Fairly: Two Approaches. J Med Ethics 2012; 38: 219-223.
22. Wertheimer, op. cit. note 18, pp. 64-70.
23. A.J. London & K.J. Zollman. Research at the Auction Block: Problems for the Fair Benefits Approach to International Research. Hastings Cent Rep 2010; 40(4): 34-45.
24. T. Pogge. 2010. The Role of International Law in Reproducing Massive Poverty. In The Philosophy of International Law, S. Besson & J.Tasioulas, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. A. Ballantyne. How to do Research Fairly in an Unjust World. Am J Bioeth 2010; 10(6); 26-35.