Mammalian Genotyping Using Acoustic Droplet Ejection for Enhanced Data Reproducibility, Superior Throughput, and Minimized Cross-Contamination

Journal of Laboratory Automation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 37-48

  Cain Hom, Carol ^a   Pabalate, Ryan ^a   Pham, Anna ^a   Patel, Hetal N ^a   Wiler, Rhonda ^a   Cox, J Colin ^a  

^a GENENTECH INC   (United States)

Author keywords

acoustic droplet ejection; ADE; Echo; genotyping; RT PCR

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; DROPS; DRUG PRODUCTS; GENETIC ENGINEERING; LIQUIDS; MAMMALS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; THROUGHPUT;

ACOUSTIC DROPLET EJECTIONS; ADE; ECHO; GENOTYPING; RT-PCR;

CONTAMINATION;

ACOUSTIC DROPLET EJECTION; ACOUSTIC TECHNOLOGY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; GENOTYPE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL; DEVICES; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLUTIONS;

EID: 84955505703     PISSN: 22110682     EISSN: 22110690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2211068215601637     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Y.H.SungJ.SongH.W.LeeFunctional Genomics Approach Using Mice. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 37, 122–132.
2. K.K.FreseD.A.TuvesonMaximizing Mouse Cancer Models. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2007, 7, 645–658.
3. B.P.ZambrowiczA.T.SandsKnockouts Model the 100 Best-Selling Drugs—Will They Model the Next 100?Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2003, 2, 38–51.
4. L.M.SilverMouse Genetics: Concepts and Application. Oxford University Press: New York, 1995; pp 1–14.
5. D.W.NebertT.P.DaltonG.W.Stuart. “Gene-Swap Knock-In” Cassette in Mice to Study Allelic Differences in Human Genes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 919, 148–170.
6. W.XieJ.L.BarwickM.Downes. Humanized Xenobiotic Response in Mice Expressing Nuclear Receptor SXR. Nature. 2000, 406, 435–439.
7. M.I.PhillipsY.L.TangGenetic Modification of Stem Cells for Transplantation. Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60, 160–172.
8. L.M.SilverMouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. Oxford University Press: New York, 1995; pp 114–132.
9. R.MortensenOverview of Gene Targeting by Homologous Recombination. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 2006, 23, unit 23 21.
10. R.KuhnR.M.TorresCre/loxP Recombination System and Gene Targeting. Methods. Mol. Biol. 2002, 180, 175–204.
11. V.BraultV.BessonL.Magnol. Cre/loxP-Mediated Chromosome Engineering of the Mouse Genome. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2007, 29–48.
12. Y.SunX.ChenD.XiaoTetracycline-Inducible Expression Systems: New Strategies and Practices in the Transgenic Mouse Modeling. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sinica. 2007, 39, 235–246.
13. J.E.BelizarioP.AkaminiP.Wolf. New Routes for Transgenesis of the Mouse. J. Appl. Genet. 2012, 53, 295–315.
14. L.CongF.A.RanD.Cox. Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science. 2013, 339, 819–823.
15. H.WangH.YangC.S.Shivalila. One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Mutations in Multiple Genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering. Cell. 2013, 153, 910–918.
16. H.YangH.WangR.JaenischGenerating Genetically Modified Mice Using CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 1956–1968.
17. K.L.LinaskC.W.LoHigh-Throughput Mouse Genotyping Using Robotics Automation. Biotechniques. 2005, 38, 219–223.
18. G.C.Le GoffJ.C.BresD.Rigal. Robust, High-Throughput Solution for Blood Group Genotyping. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6185–6192.
19. M.StangegaardC.TomasA.J.Hansen. Biomek-3000 and GenPlex SNP Genotyping in Forensic Genetics. J. Assoc. Lab. Automation. 2008, 13, 297–303.
20. M.T.SeippM.HerrmannC.T.WittwerAutomated DNA Extraction, Quantification, Dilution, and PCR Preparation for Genotyping by High-Resolution Melting. J. Biomol. Tech. 2010, 21, 163–166.
21. R.Franco-DuarteI.MendesA.C.Gomes. Genotyping of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains by Interdelta Sequence Typing Using Automated Microfluidics. Electrophoresis. 2011, 32, 1447–1455.
22. B.O’FarrellJ.K.HaaseV.Velayudhan. Transforming Microbial Genotyping: A Robotic Pipeline for Genotyping Bacterial Strains. PLoS One. 2012, 7, e48022.
23. B.BortotE.AthanasakisF.Brun. High-Throughput Genotyping Robot-Assisted Method for Mutation Detection in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 2011, 20, 175–179.
24. R.EllsonM.MutzB.Browning. Transfer of Low Nanoliter Volumes between Microplates Using Focused Acoustics-Automation Considerations. J. Assoc. Lab. Automation. 2003, 8, 29–34.
25. J.BarcoFlexible qPCR Assay Assembly Liquid Handler Designed to Reduce Contamination Risk and Operational Costs. GEN. Apr 1, 2013.
26. R.M.ParkerW.J.BrowneThe Place of Experimental Design and Statistics in the 3Rs. Ilar. J. 2014, 55, 477–485.
27. W.M.RussellThe Development of the Three Rs Concept. Altern. Lab Anim. 1995, 23, 298–304.
28. G.GriffinJ.M.ClarkJ.Zurlo. Scientific Uses of Animals: Harm-Benefit Analysis and Complementary Approaches to Implementing the Three Rs. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2014, 33, 265–272.
29. D.GriffithR.NorthwoodP.Owen. Implementation and Development of an Automated, Ultra-High-Capacity, Acoustic, Flexible Dispensing Platform for Assay-Ready Plate Delivery. J. Lab. Autom. 2012, 17, 348–358.
30. C.QuinteroC.RosensteinB.Hughes. Quality Control Procedures for Dose-Response Curve Generation Using Nanoliter Dispense Technologies. J. Biomol. Screen. 2007, 12, 891–899.
31. M.D.PerryP.L.WhiteR.A.BarnesComparison of Four Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Platforms for the Recovery of DNA from Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 1160–1166.
32. C.J.FregeauC.YensenJ.Elliott. Optimized Configuration of Fixed-Tip Robotic Liquid-Handling Stations for the Elimination of Biological Sample Cross-Contamination. J. Assoc. Lab. Automation. 2007, 12, 339–354.
33. A.StalsH.WerbrouckL.Baert. Laboratory Efforts to Eliminate Contamination Problems in the Real-Time RT-PCR Detection of Noroviruses. J. Microbiol. Methods2009, 77, 72–76.
34. J.WatsonE.B.GreenoughJ.E.Leet. Extraction, Identification, and Functional Characterization of a Bioactive Substance from Automated Compound-Handling Plastic Tips. J. Biomol. Screen. 2009, 14, 566–572.
35. G.R.McDonaldA.L.HudsonS.M.Dunn. Bioactive Contaminants Leach from Disposable Laboratory Plasticware. Science. 2008, 322, 917.
36. A.OlivieriO.S.DegenhardtG.R.McDonald. On the Disruption of Biochemical and Biological Assays by Chemicals Leaching from Disposable Laboratory Plasticware. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2012, 90, 697–703.
37. P.SinghJ.C.SchimentiE.Bolcun-FilasA Mouse Geneticist’s Practical Guide to CRISPR Applications. Genetics2015, 199, 1–15.