One size doesn’t fit all – effectiveness and subjective evaluations of adaptable information literacy instruction

Communications in Computer and Information Science

Volumn 552, Issue , 2015, Pages 283-292

  Mayer, Anne Kathrin ^a   Peter, Johannes ^a   Leichner, Nikolas ^a   Krampen, Günter ^a,b  

^a Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Blended learning; Information literacy; Learning on demand; Psychology

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE; SOFTWARE TESTING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ADAPTABILITY; BLENDED LEARNING; INFORMATION LITERACY; LEARNING-ON-DEMAND; PSYCHOLOGY;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84955248122     PISSN: 18650929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28197-1_29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Spitzer, K.L., Eisenberg, M.B., Lowe, C.A.: Information Literacy: Essential Skills for the Information Age. Information Resources Publications, Syracuse University, Syracuse (1998)
2. Grassian, E.S., Kaplowitz, J.R.: Information Literacy Instruction Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Neal-Schuman, New York (2009)
3. Mery, Y., Newby, J., Peng, K.: Why one-shot information literacy sessions are not the future of instruction a case for online credit courses. Coll. Res. Libr. 73, 366-377 (2012)
4. Snow, R.: Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educ. Psychol. 15, 151-158 (1980)
5. Jonassen, D.H., Grabowski, B.L.: Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1993)
6. Cronbach, L.J., Snow, R.E.: Aptitudes and Instructional Methods-A Handbook for Research on Interactions. Halsted Press, New York (1977)
7. Heacox, D.: Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom. Free Spirit Publishing, Minneapolis (2002)
8. Leutner, D.: Instructional design principles for adaptivity in open learning environments. In: Seel, N.M., Dijkstra, S. (eds.) Curriculum, Plans, and Processes in Instructional Design, pp. 289-307. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2004)
9. Fischer, G.: Supporting learning on demand with design environments. In: Birnbaum, L. (ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Learning Sciences, pp. 165-172. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Evanston (1991)
10. Brophy, J.E.: Motivating Students to Learn, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York (2010)
11. Karich, A.C., Burns, M.K., Maki, K.E.: Updated meta-analysis of learner control within educational technology. Rev. Educ. Res. 84, 392-410 (2014)
12. Kruger, J., Dunning, D.: Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 77, 1121-1134 (1999)
13. Shin, E.C., Schallert, D.L., Savenye, W.C.: Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students’ learning in a hypertext environment. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 42, 33-46 (1994)
14. Andretta, S.: Information Literacy: a Practitioner’s Guide. Chandos, Oxford (2005)
15. Gross, M., Latham, D.: Undergraduate perceptions of information literacy: defining, attaining, and self-assessing skills. Coll. Res. Libr. 70, 336-350 (2009)
16. Park, O., Lee, J.: Adaptive instructional systems. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, vol. 25, 3rd edn, pp. 469-484. Routledge, London (2008)
17. Kirschner, P.A., van Merriënboer, J.J.: Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educ. Psychol. 48, 169-183 (2013)
18. Owston, R., York, D., Murtha, S.: Student perceptions and achievement in a university blended learning strategic initiative. Internet High. Educ. 18, 38-46 (2013)
19. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL): Psychology information literacy standards (2010). http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/psych_info_lit
20. Leichner, N., Peter, J., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Assessing information literacy among German psychology students. Ref. Serv. Rev. 41, 660-674 (2013)
21. Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Measuring psychology students’ informationseeking skills in a situational judgment test format: construction and validation of the PIKE-P test. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. (2015). doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000239
22. Leichner, N.: Multimethodale Erfassung von Informationskompetenz bei Psychologie studierenden [Multimethodal Assessment of Information Literacy in Psychology Students]. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Trier, Trier (2015)
23. Peter, J., Leichner, N., Mayer, A.-K., Krampen, G.: Das Inventar zur Evaluation von Blended Learning (IEBL). Konstruktion und Erprobung in einem Training professioneller Informationskompetenz [Inventory for the Evaluation of Blended Learning. Construction and Testing Within a Training of Scholarly Information Literacy]. In: Krämer, M., Weger, U., Zupanic, M. (eds.) Psychologiedidaktik und Evaluation X [Didactics of Psychology and Evaluation X], pp. 275-282. Shaker, Aachen (2014)
24. Cronbach, L.J., Furby, L.: How we should measure “change”: or should we? Psychol. Bull. 74, 68-80 (1970)
25. Price, R., Becker, K., Clark, L., Collins, S.: Embedding information literacy in a first-year business undergraduate course. Stud. High. Educ. 36, 705-718 (2011)
26. Webber, S., Boon, S., Johnston, B.: A comparison of UK academics’ conceptions of information literacy in two disciplines: English and marketing. Libr. Inf. Res. 29, 4-15 (2005)
27. Rosman, T., Birke, P.: Fachspezifische Erfassung von Recherchekompetenz durch prozedurale Wissenstests: Psychologie vs. Informatik [Domain-Specific Assessment of Information Searching Skills by Procedural Knowledge Tests: Psychology vs. Computer Sciences]. In: Mayer, A.-K. (ed.) Informationskompetenz im Hochschulkontext-Interdisziplinäre Forschungsperspektiven [Information Literacy in the University Context-Interdisciplinary Research Perspectives], pp. 103-120. Pabst, Lengerich (2015)