Qualitative networks: Mixed methods in sociological research

Qualitative Networks: Mixed Methods in Sociological Research

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-208

  Bellotti, Elisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954601559     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (353)

1. Abbott, A. (1992) ‘What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis’, C. C. Ragin and H. S. Becker (eds) WhatIs a Case? Exploring theFoundations ofSocial Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Abell, P. (2008) ‘History, case studies, statistics, and causal inference’, European Sociological Review 25: 561-7 (first published online 2008; printed in 2009).
3. Adams, R. G. and Allan, G. (eds) (1998) Placing Friendship in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Allan, G. (1979) A Sociology of Friendship and Kinship, London: George Allen & Unwin.
5. Ansell, C. K. (1997) ‘Symbolic networks: the realignment of the French working class, 1887-1894', American Journal ofSociology 103: 359-90.
6. Azarian, R. (2003) ‘The general sociology of Harrison White’, Stockholm: Department of Sociology, Stockholm University.
7. Baert, P. (2005) Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Baldassarri, D. and Bearman, P. (2007) ‘Dynamics of political polarization’, American Sociological Review 72: 784-811.
9. Barnes, B. and Bloor, D. (1982) ‘Relativism, rationalism and sociology of knowledge’, M. Hollis and S. Lukes (eds) Rationality andRelativism, Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Barnes, J. A. (1972) ‘Social networks’, J. B. Casagrande, W. Goodenough and E. Hammel (eds) Module 26, Boston: Addison-Wesley.
11. Bartels, C. and Ketellapper, R. (eds) (1979) Exploratory and Explanatory Statistical Analysis of Spatial Data, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
12. Bauman, Z. (2003) Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds, Cambridge: Polity Press.
13. Bearman, P. S. (1995) FromRelations toRhetorics, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
14. Bearman, P. S., Moody, J. and Stovel, K. (2004) ‘Chains of affection: the structure of adolescent romantic and sexual networks’, American Journal of Sociology 1101: 44-91.
15. Beck, U. and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995) The Normal Chaos of Love, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Becker, H. S. (1982) Art Worlds, Berkley: University of California Press.
17. Bellotti, E. (2008a) ‘What are friends for? Elective communities of single people’, Social Networks 30: 318-29.
18. Bellotti, E. (2008b) Amicizie. Le reti social dei giovani single, Milan: Franco Angeli.
19. Bellotti, E. (2010) ‘Comment on Nick Crossley/1', Sociologica 1.
20. Bellotti, E. (2012) ‘Getting funded: multi-level network of physicists in Italy’, Social Networks 34: 215-29.
21. Bellotti, E. and Mora, E. (2014) ‘Networks of practices in critical consumption’, Journal of Consumer Culture, published online before print, May 26, 2014, doi: 10.1177/1469540514536191.
22. Beltrame, L. (2008) ‘La struttura del campo scientifico: una geografia delle traiettorie dei fisici delle particelle’, E. Bellotti, L. Beltrame and P. Volontè (eds) Il campo sociale della fisicaparticellare in Italia. Uno studio sociologico, Bolzano: Bolzano University Press.
23. Berger, P. L. (2002) ‘Whatever happened to sociology?', First Things, October.
24. Bergman, M. M. (2008) ‘The straw men of the qualitative-quantitative divide and their influence on mixed method research’, M. M. Bergman (ed.) Advances in Mixed Methods Research: Theories and Applications, London: Sage.
25. Berg-Schlosser, D. and De Meur, G. (2009) ‘Comparative research design: case and variable selection’, B. Rihoux and C.C. Ragin (eds) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Berg-Schlosser, D., De Meur, G., Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. C. (2009) ‘Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) as an approach’, B. Rihoux and C. C. Ragin (eds) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Bernard, H. R. (2000) SocialResearchMethods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Bernard, H. R. and Killworth, P. D. (1977) ‘Informant accuracy in social network data II’, Human Communications Research 4: 3-18.
29. Bernard, H. R. and Ryan, G. W. (2010) Analyzing QualitativeData: Systematic Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D. and Sailer, L. (1979/80) ‘Informant accuracy in social network data IV’, Social Networks 2: 191-218.
31. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D. and Sailer, L. (1981), Summary of research on informant accuracy in network data, and on the reverse small world problem’, Connections 4: 11-25.
32. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D. and Sailer, L. (1982) ‘Informant accuracy in social network data V’, Social Science Research 5: 30-66.
33. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Kronenfeld, D. and Sailer, L. (1984) ‘The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data’, Annual Review of Anthropology 13:495-517.
34. Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P. D., Johnsen, E., Shelley, G. and McCarty, C. (2001) ‘Estimating the ripple effect of a disaster’, Connections 24: 18-22.
35. Bernard, L. L. (1930) ‘Schools of sociology’, Southwestern Political and Social Science Quarterly 11: 117-34.
36. Bernardi, L., Keim S. and von der Lippe H. (2007) ‘Social influences on fertility: a comparative mixed methods study in Eastern and Western Germany’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 23-47.
37. Bhaskar, R. (1978 [1975]) A Realist Theory ofScience, Brighton: Harvester.
38. Bhaskar, R. (1998 [1979]) The Possibility ofNaturalism, Brighton: Harvester.
39. Bidart, C. (1991) ‘L’amitié, les amis, leur histoire. Representations et récits’, Sociétés Contemporaines 5: 21-42.
40. Bidart, C. (1997) L’amitié: un lien social, Paris: La Découverte.
41. Bidart, C. and Lavenu, D. (2005) ‘Evolution of personal networks and life events’, Social Networks 27: 359-76.
42. Blau, P. M. (1955) The Dynamics ofBureaucracy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
43. Blau, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. (1967) The American Occupational Structure, New York: Free Press.
44. Bodin, O and Tengo, M. (2012) ‘Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems’, Global Environmental Change 22: 430-9.
45. Borgatti, S. P. (2002) NetDraw: Graph Visualization Software, Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
46. Borgatti, S. P. and Everett, M. G. (1999) ‘Models of core/periphery structures’, Social Networks 21: 375-95.
47. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J. and Labianca G. (2009) ‘Network analysis in the social sciences’, Science 13: 892-5.
48. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. and Johnson, J. C. (2013) Analyzing Social Networks, London: Sage.
49. Boswell, D. M. (1969) ‘Personal crisis and the mobilization of the social network’, J. C. Mitchell (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
50. Bott, E. (1956) ‘Urban families: the norms of conjugal roles’, Human Relations 9: 325-42.
51. Bottero, W. and Crossley, N. (2011) ‘Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social structures’, Cultural Sociology 5: 99-119.
52. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique ofthe Judgement of Taste, London: Routledge.
53. Bourdieu, P. (1985) ‘The social space and the genesis of groups’, Theory and Society 14: 723-44.
54. Bourdieu, P. (1986) ‘The forms of capital’, J. G. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York: Greenwood Press.
55. Bourdieu, P. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Cambridge: Polity Press.
56. Boutroux, É. (1916 [1874]) The Contingency ofthe Laws ofNature, Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
57. Braithwaite, R.B. (1968) Scientific Explanation: A Study ofFunction of Theory Probability and Law in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Brandes, U., Robins, G., Mccranie, A. and Wasserman, W. (2013) ‘What is network science?', NetworkSciences 1: 1-15.
59. Breiger, R. (1974) ‘The duality of persons and groups’, Social Forces 53: 181-90.
60. Bridges, W. P. and Nelson R. L. (1989) ‘Markets in hierarchies: organizational and market influences on gender inequality in a state pay system’, American Journal of Sociology 95: 616-58.
61. Brint, S. (1992) ‘Hidden meanings: cultural content and context in Harrison White’s structural sociology’, Sociological Theory 10: 194-208.
62. Broadbent, J. (2003) ‘Movement in context: thick networks and Japanese environmental protest’, M. Diani and D. McAdam (eds) Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Brotherton, D. C. (2008) ‘Beyond social reproduction: bringing resistance back in gang theory’, Theoretical Criminology 12: 55-77.
64. Bryant, C. (1985) Positivism in Social Theory andResearch, New York: St Martin’s Press.
65. Bryman, A. (2006) ‘Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?', Qualitative Research 6: 97-113.
66. Bryman, A. (2007) ‘Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research’, Journal ofMixed Methods Research 1: 1-18.
67. Bryman, A. (2008) ‘Of methods and methodology’, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management 3: 159-68.
68. Bryman, A., Becker, S. and Sempik, J. (2008) ‘Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: a view from social policy’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11: 261-76.
69. Burk, W. J., Steglich, C.E.G. and Snijders, T. A.B. (2007) ‘Beyond dyadic interdependence: actor-oriented models for co-evolving social networks and individual behaviors’, International Journal of Behavioral Development 31: 397-404.
70. Burt, R. S. (1978/79) ‘Stratification and prestige among elite experts in methodological and mathematical sociology circa 1975', Social Networks 1: 105-58.
71. Burt, R. S. (1984) ‘Network items and the general social survey’, Social Networks 6: 293-339.
72. Burt, R. S. (2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
73. Callon, M. (2001) ‘Les méthodes d’analyse des grands nombres peuvent-elles contribuer à l’enrichissement de la sociologie du travail?', A. Pouchet (ed.) Sociologies du travail: quarante ans après, Paris: Elsevier.
74. Cambrosio, A., Keating, P. and Mogoutov, A. (2004) ‘Mapping collaborative work and innovation in biomedicine’, Social Studies of Science 34: 325-64.
75. Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959) ‘Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix’, Psychological Bulletin 56: 81-105.
76. Coleman, J. (1975) ‘Social structure and a theory of action’, P. Blau (ed.) Approaches to the Study of Social Structure, New York: Free Press.
77. Coleman, J. (1990) The Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Collins, H. (1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. Collins, R. (1981) ‘On the microfoundations of macrosociology’, American Journal of Sociology 86: 984-1014.
80. Comte, A. (1907 [1830-42]) Cours dephilosophiepositive, 5th edn, Paris: Rouen.
81. Cordaz, D. (2011) Dati e processi. sull’integrazione tra metodi quantitativi e metodi qualitativi nelle scienze sociali, Milan: Franco Angeli.
82. Crane, D. (1972) Invisible Colleges, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83. Creswell, J. W. and Tashakkori, A. (2007) ‘Editorial: differing perspectives on mixed methods research’, Journal ofMixed Methods Research 1: 303-8.
84. Crossley, N. (2008) ‘Pretty connected: the social network of the early UK punk movement’, Theory, Culture and Society 25: 89-116.
85. Crossley, N. (2009) ‘The man whose web expanded: network dynamics in Manchester’s post-punk music scene 1976-1980', Poetics 37: 24-49.
86. Crossley, N. (2010) ‘The social world of the network: combining quantitative and qualitative elements in social network analysis’, Sociologica 1.
87. Crossley, N. (2011) Towards Relational Sociology, London: Routledge.
88. Curtis, R., Friedman, A., Neaigus, B., Jose, B., Goldstein, M. and Ildefonso, G. (1995) ‘Street-level drug markets: network structure and HIV risk’, Social Networks 17: 229-49.
89. Czymoniewicz-Klippel, M. T. (2011) ‘Bad boys, big trouble: subcultural formation and resistance in a Cambodian village’, Youth & Society, published online before print, 23 November.
90. Davies, A. (2008) The Gangs of Manchester, Preston: Milo Books.
91. Davies, K. and Heaphy, B. (2011) ‘Interactions that matter: researching critical relationships’, Methodological Innovations Online 6: 5-16.
92. Davis, J. A. and Leinhardt, S. (1972) ‘The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups’, J. Berger (ed.) Sociological Theories in Progress, vol. 2, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
93. Dellinger, A. B. and Leech, N. L. (2007) ‘Toward a unified validation framework in mixed methods research’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 309-32.
94. Denscombe, M. (2008) ‘Communities of practice: a research paradigm for the mixed methods approach’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2: 270-83.
95. Denzin, N. K. (1978) The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, New York: McGraw-Hill.
96. Di Nicola, P. (ed.) (2003) Amici Miei: fenomenologia delle reti amicali nella società del benessere, Milan: Franco Angeli.
97. Doreian, P. (1980) ‘Linear models with spatially distributed data: spatial disturbances or spatial effects?', Sociological Methods and Research 9: 29-60.
98. Dow, M. M., White, D. R. and Burton, M. L. (1983) ‘Multivariate modeling with interdependent network data’, Behavior Science Research 17: 216-45.
99. Dow, M. M., Burton, M. L., White, D. R. and Reitz, K. P. (1984) ‘Galton’s problem as network autocorrelation’, American Ethnologist 11: 754-70.
100. Dow, S. C. (2010) ‘Structured pluralism’, W. Olsen (ed.) RealistMethodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
101. Downward, P. and Mearman, A. (2010) ‘Retroduction as mixed methods triangulation in economic research: reorienting economics into social sciences’, W. Olsen (ed.) Realist Methodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
102. Downward, P., Finch, J. H. and Ramsay, J. (2010) ‘Critical realism, empirical methods and inference: a critical discussion’, W. Olsen (ed.) Realist Methodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
103. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992) ‘Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates’, Journal of Human Evolution 22: 469-93.
104. Durkheim, E. (1964a [1893]) The Division ofLabour in Society, New York: Free Press.
105. Durkheim, E. (1964b [1895]) The Rules ofSociological Method, New York: Free Press.
106. Edmonds, B. (2012) ‘Context in social simulation: why it can’t be wished away’, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 18: 5-21.
107. Edwards, G. (2010) ‘Mixed-method approaches to social network analysis’, Review paper, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/842/(accessed August 2013).
108. Edwards, G. and Crossley, N. (2009) ‘Measures and meanings: exploring the ego-net of Helen Kirkpatrick Watts, militant suffragette’, Methodological Innovations Online 4: 7-61.
109. Elias, N. (1978 [1970]) What is Sociology?, New York: Columbia University Press.
110. Emirbayer, M. (1997) ‘Manifesto for a relational sociology’, AmericanJournal ofSociology 103: 281-317.
111. Emirbayer, M. and Goodwin, J. (1994) ‘Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency’, American Journal ofSociology 99: 1411-54.
112. Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998) ‘What is agency?', American Journal ofSociology 103: 962-1023.
113. Entwisle, B., Faust, K., Rindfuss, R. R. and Kaneda, T. (2007) ‘Networks and contexts: variation in the structure of social ties’, American Journal of Sociology 112: 1495-533.
114. Epstein, A. L. (1969a) ‘The network and urban social organization’, J. C. Mitchell (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
115. Epstein, A. L. (1969b) ‘Gossip, norms and social networks’, J. C. Mitchell (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
116. Erickson, B. (1978) ‘Some problems of inference from chain data’, K. F. Schuessler (ed.) Sociological Methodology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
117. Esbensen, F.-A., Winfree, L.T., Jr., He, N. and Taylor, T. J. (2001) ‘Youth gangs and definitional issues: when is a gang a gang, and why does it matter?', Crime and Delinquency 47: 105-30.
118. Everett, M. G. and Borgatti, S. P. (1994) ‘Regular equivalence: general theory’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 19: 29-52.
119. Fararo, T. J. and Doreian, P. (1984) ‘Tripartite structural analysis: generalizing the Breiger- Wilson formalism’, Social Networks 6: 141-75.
120. Faust, K. (1988) ‘Comparison of methods for positional analysis: structural and general equivalence’, SocialNetworks 10: 313-41.
121. Festinger, L., Back, K. Schachter, S., Kelley, H. H. and Thibaut, J. (eds) (1950) Theory and Experiment in Social Communication, Ann Arbor: Research Center for Dynamics, University of Michigan.
122. Fielding, N. (2005) ‘The resurgence, legitimation and institutionalization of qualitative methods’, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6.
123. Fischer, C. S. (1982a) To Dwell among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
124. Fischer, C. S. (1982b) ‘What do we mean by "friend"? An inductive study’, Social Networks 3: 287-306.
125. Flyvbjerg, B. (2010) ‘Five misunderstandings about case-study research’, W. Olsen (ed.) Realist Methodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
126. Freeman, L. (2000) ‘Visualizing social networks’, Journal ofSocial Structure, www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Freeman.html (accessed 20 December 2013).
127. Freeman, L. (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Vancouver: Empirical Press.
128. Fuhse, J. and Mutzel, S. (2011) ‘Tackling connections, structure, and meaning in networks: quantitative and qualitative methods in sociological network research’, Quality & Quantity 45: 1067-89.
129. Gambetta, D. (1998) ‘Concatenations of mechanisms’, P. Hedrstrom and R. Swedberg (eds) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. Giddens, A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies, Cambridge: Polity Press.
131. Gilbert, N. (2008) Agent-Based Models (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences), London: Sage.
132. Gilbert, N. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists’ Discourse, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967) The Discovery ofGrounded Theory: Strategiesfor Qualitative Research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
134. Gluesing, J., Riopelle, K. and Danowski, J. A. (forthcoming) ‘Innovation networks in global organizations: understanding network practices and dynamics by mixing ethnography and information technology data’, in S. Dominguez and B. Hollstein (eds) Mixed- Methods in Studying Social Networks, New York: Cambridge University Press.
135. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation ofSelfin Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday.
136. Goodman, L. A. (1949) ‘On the estimation of the number of classes in a population’. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 20: 572-9.
137. Goodman, L. A. (1961) ‘Snowball sampling’, Annals ofMathematical Statistics 32: 148-70.
138. Gordon, R. (2000) ‘Criminal business organisations, street gangs and "wanna be" groups: a Vancouver perspective’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 42: 39-60.
139. Gould, R. (1995) Insurgent Identities: Class Community and Protest in Parisfrom 1848 in the Commune, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
140. Gouldner, H. (1987) Speaking of Friendship: Middle-Class Women and their Friends, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
141. Granovetter, M. S. (1973) ‘The strength of weak ties’, American Journal ofSociology 78: 1360-80.
142. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook ofQualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
143. Hagedorn, J. M. and Macon, P. (1988) People and Folks: Gangs, Crime, and the Underclass in a Rustbelt City, Chicago: Lake View Press.
144. Halaby, C. N. and Weakliem, D. L. (1989) ‘Worker control and attachment to the firm’, American Journal of Sociology 95: 549-91.
145. Hall, P. (1987) ‘Interactionism and the study of social organisation’, Sociological Quarterly 28: 1-22.
146. Hallinan, M. T. (1978/79) ‘The process of friendship formation’, Social Networks 1: 193-210.
147. Hallsworth, S. and Young, T. (2004) ‘Getting real about gangs’, Criminal Justice Matters 55: 12-13.
148. Heath, S. (2004) ‘Peer-shared households, quasi-communes and neo-tribes’, Current Sociology 52: 161-79.
149. Heath, S. and Cleaver, E. (2003) Young, Free and Single? Twenty-Somethings and Household Change, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
150. Heath, S., Fuller, A. and Johnston, B. (2009) ‘Chasing shadows: defining network boundaries in qualitative social network analysis’, Qualitative Research 9: 645-61.
151. Hedstrom, P. (2005) Dissecting the Social, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. Hedstrom, P., Sandell, R. and Stern, C. (2000) ‘Mesolevel networks and the diffusion of social movements: the case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party’, American Journal of Sociology 106: 145-72.
153. Heisenberg W. (1989) Physics and Philosophy, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
154. Hennig, M., Brandes, U., Pfeffer, J. and Mergel, I. (2012) Studying Social Networks: A Guide to Empirical Research, Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.
155. Hodgson, G. M. (2000) ‘What is the essence of institutional economics?', Journal of Economic Issues 34: 317-29.
156. Hogan, B., Carrasco, J. A. and Wellman, B. (2007) ‘Visualizing personal networks: working with participant-aided sociograms’, Field Methods 19: 116-44.
157. Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S. (1970) ‘A method for detecting structure in sociometric data’, American Journal ofSociology 70: 492-513.
158. Hollstein, B. (2011) ‘Qualitative approaches’, J. Scott and P. J. Carrington (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, London: Sage.
159. Hollstein, B. (forthcoming) ‘Fuzzy set analysis of network data as mixed method. Personal networks and the transition from school to work’, in B. Hollstein and S. Dominguez (eds) Mixed-Methods Social Network Research, New York: Cambridge University Press.
160. Homans, G. (1958) ‘Social behavior as exchange’, American Journal ofSociology 63: 597-606.
161. Homans, G. (1961) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
162. Hummon, N. P. and Doreian, P. (1989) ‘Connectivity in a citation network: the development of DNA theory’, Social Networks 11: 39-63.
163. Hummon, N. P. andCarley, K. (1993) ‘Social networks as normal science’, SocialNetworks 15: 71-106.
164. Husserl, E. (1960) Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
165. Jack, S. L. (2005) ‘The role, use and activation of strong and weak network ties: a qualitative analysis’, Journal ofManagement Studies 42: 1233-59.
166. James, W. (1907) Pragmatism: A New Namefor Some Old Ways of Thinking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
167. James, W. (1976) Essays inRadical Empiricism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Johnson, E. C. (1986) ‘Structure and process: agreement models for friendship formation’, Social Networks 8: 257-306.
169. Johnson, J. C. (1990) Selecting Ethnographic Informants, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
170. Johnson, J. C. and Orbach, M. K. (2002) ‘Perceiving the political landscape: ego biases in cognitive political networks’, Social Networks 24: 291-310.
171. Johnson, J. C., Boster, J. S. and Holbert, D. (1989) ‘Estimating relational attributes from snowball samples through simulation’, Social Networks 11: 135-58.
172. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Turner, L. A. (2007) ‘Toward a definition of mixed methods research’, Journal ofMixed Methods Research 1: 112-33.
173. Kadushin, C. (1966) ' The friends and supporters of psychotherapy: on social circles in urban life’, American Sociological Review 31: 786-802.
174. Kadushin, C. (1976) ‘Networks and circles in the production of culture’, American Behavioral Scientist 19: 769-84.
175. Kadushin, C. (2012) Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts and Findings, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
176. Kahn, R. L. and Antonucci, T. C. (1980) ‘Convoys over the life course: attachment, roles, and social support’, P. B. Baltes and O. G. Brim (eds) Life-span Development and Behavior, New York: Academic Press.
177. Kapferer, B. (1969) ‘Norms and manipulation of relationships in a work context’, J. C. Mitchell (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
178. Kemp, S. and Holmwood, J. (2010) ‘Realism, regularity and social explanation’, W. Olsen (ed.) RealistMethodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
179. Killworth, P. D. and Bernard, H. R. (1976) ‘Informant accuracy in social network data’, Human Organization 35: 269-96.
180. Killworth, P. D. and Bernard, H. R. (1979/80) ‘Informant accuracy in social network data III’, Social Networks 2: 19-46.
181. Kirke, D. (2010) ‘Comment on Nick Crossley/2', Sociologica 1.
182. Klein, M. W. (1995) The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control, New York: Oxford University Press.
183. Klein, M. W. (2001) ‘Resolving the Eurogang paradox’, M. W. Klein, H.-J. Kerner, C. L. Maxson and E. G. Weitekamp (eds) The Eurogang Paradox: Street Gangs and Youth Groups in the US and Europe, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
184. Knecht, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Baerveldt, C., Steglich, C. E. G. and Raub, W. (2010) ‘Friendship and delinquency: selection and influence processes in early adolescence’. Social Development 19: 494-514.
185. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1992) ‘The couch, the cathedral and the laboratory: on the relationship between experiment and laboratory in science’, A. Pickering (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
186. Knox, H., Savage, M. and Harvey, P. (2006) ‘Social networks and the study of relations: networks as method, metaphor and form’, Economy and Society 35: 113-40.
187. Kogovsek, T. and Ferligoj, A. (2005) ‘Effects on reliability and validity of egocentered network measurements’, Social Networks 27: 205-29.
188. Koskinen, J. H., Robins, G. L., Wang, P. and Pattison, P. E. (2013) ‘Bayesian analysis for partially observed network data, missing ties, attributes and actors’, Social Networks 35: 514-27.
189. Krackhardt, D. (1998) ‘Simmelian tie: super strong and sticky’, R. Kramer and M. Neale (eds) Power and Influence in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
190. Krackhardt, D. and Stern, R. N. (1988) ‘Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation’, Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 123-40.
191. Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure ofScientific Revolutions, 2nd edn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
192. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
193. Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
194. Laumann, E. O., Marsden, P. Y. and Prensky, D. (1983) ‘The boundary specification problem in network analysis’, R. S. Burt and M. J. Minor (eds) Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
195. Lawson, T. (1997) Economics andReality, London: Routledge.
196. Lazega, E., Jourda, M. T., Mounier, L. and Stofer, R. (2008) ‘Catching up with big fish in the big pond? Multi-level network analysis through linked design’, Social Networks 30: 157-76.
197. Leenders, T. T. A. J. (2002) ' Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing the weight matrix’, Social Networks 24: 21-47.
198. Lewis, D. M. G., Conroy-Beam, D., Al-Shawaf, L., Raja, A., DeKay, T. and Buss, D. M. (2011) ‘Friends with benefits: the evolved psychology of same- and opposite-sex friendships’, Evolutionary Psychology 9: 543-63.
199. Liberman, S. and Wolf, K. B. (1998) ‘Bonding number in scientific disciplines’, Social Networks 20: 239-46.
200. Lievrouw, L. A., Rogers, E. M., Lowe, C. U. and Nadel, E. (1987) ‘Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists’, Social Networks 9: 217-48.
201. Lin, N. (1999) ‘Building a network theory of social capital’, Connections 22: 28-51.
202. Lin, N. and Dumin, M. (1986) ‘Access to occupations through social ties’, SocialNetworks 8: 365-85.
203. Lin, N., Ensel, W. M. and Vaughn, J. C. (1981a) ‘Social resources and strength of ties: structural factors in occupational status attainment’, American Sociological Review 46: 393-405.
204. Lin, N., Vaughn, J. C. and Ensel, W. M. (1981b) ‘Social resources and occupational status attainment’, Social Forces 59: 1163-81.
205. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
206. Lonkila, M. and Salmi, A. (2005) ‘The Russian work collective and migration’, Europe- Asia Studies 57: 681-703.
207. Lorrain, F. and White, H. C. (1971) ‘Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 49-80.
208. Lubbers, M., Molina, J. L., Lerner, J., Brandes, U., Avila, J. and McCarty, C. (2010) ‘Longitudinal analysis of personal networks: the case of Argentinean migrants in Spain’, Social Networks 32: 91-104.
209. Luce, R. and Perry, A. (1949) ‘A method of matrix analysis of group structure’, Psychometrika 14: 95-116.
210. Lusher, D., Koskinen, J. and Robins, G. (2012) Exponential Random Graph Modelsfor Social Networks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
211. Lykken, D. (1970) ‘Statistical significance in psychological research’, R. E. Herkel and D. E. Morrison (eds) The Significance Test Controversy, London: Butterworth.
212. McCarty, C. (2010) ‘Comment on Nick Crossley/3', Sociologica 1.
213. MacDonald, J. S. and MacDonald, L. D. (1964) ‘Chain migration ethnic neighborhood formation and social networks’, The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 42: 82-97.
214. McDonald, S. (2005) ‘Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research’, Qualitative Research 5: 455-73.
215. McEvoy, P. and Richards, D. (2010) ‘Critical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing?', W. Olsen (ed.) Realist Methodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
216. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. and Cook, J. M. (2001) ‘Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks’, Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415-44.
217. McRobbie, A. (2000) Feminism and Youth Culture, London: Routledge.
218. Manzo, G. (2009) La spirale des inégalités. choix scolaires en France et en Italie au XXe siècle, Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne.
219. Manzo, G. (2013) ‘Educational choices and social interactions: a formal model and a computational test’, Comparative Social Research 30: 47-100.
220. Marinoff, L. (2003) The Big Questions, London: Bloomsbury.
221. Marsden, P. V. (2005) ‘Recent developments in network measurements’, P. J. Carrington, J. Scott and S. Wasserman (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
222. Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E. and de la Fuente, P. (2003) ‘Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions’, Computers and Education 41: 353-68.
223. Masterman, M. (1970) ‘The nature of paradigms’, I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
224. Matthews, R. B., Gilbert, N. G., Roach, A., Polhill, J. G. and Gotts, N. M. (2007) ‘Agent- based land-use models: a review of applications’, Landscape Ecology 22: 1447-59.
225. Mauss, M. (1954) The Gift, London: Cohen and West.
226. Mead, G. H. (1932) The Philosophy of the Present, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
227. Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Selfand Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
228. Menjivar, C. (2000) Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America, Berkeley: University of California Press.
229. Merton, R. K. (1949) Social Theory and Social Structure, New York: Free Press.
230. Mesa, D. (2003) ‘Il genere come risorsa comunicativa nelle relazioni amicali e nel tempo libero’, E. Besozzi (ed.) Il genere come risorsa comunicativa. maschile efemminile nei processi di crescita, Milan: Franco Angeli.
231. Milgram, S. (1977) The familiar stranger: an aspect of urban anonymity’, in S. Milgram, The Individual in a Social World, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
232. Mill, J. S. (1967 [1843])A SystemofLogic:RatiocinativeandInductive, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
233. Miller, W. B. (1982) Crime by Youth Gangs and Groups in the United States, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
234. Mische, A. (2003) ‘Cross-talk in movements: reconceiving the culture-network link’, M. Diani and D. McAdam (eds) Social Movements and Networks, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
235. Mische, A. (2008) Partisan Publics: Communication and Contention across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
236. Mische, A. and White, H. (1998) ' Between conversation and situation: public switching dynamics across network-domains’, Social Research 65: 295-324.
237. Mitchell, J. C. (ed.) (1969) SocialNetworks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
238. Mitchell, J. C. (ed.) (1983) ‘Case and situational analysis’, Sociological Review 31: 187-211.
239. Mizruchi, M. S. (1996) ‘What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates’, Annual Review of Sociology 22: 271-98.
240. Mok, D., Wellman, B. and Basu, R. (2007) ‘Did distance matter before the Internet? Interpersonal contact and support in the 1970s’, Social Networks 29: 430-61.
241. Morgan, D. L. (2007) ' Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1: 48-76.
242. Morgan, D. L. (2009) Acquaintances: The Space between Intimates and Strangers, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
243. Murray, C. (1990) The Emerging British Underclass, London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
244. Naroll, R. (1961) ‘Two solutions to Galton’s problem’, Philosophy ofScience 28: 15-39.
245. Naroll, R. (1965) ‘Galton’s problem: the logic of cross-cultural analysis’, Social Research 32: 428-51.
246. Neaigus, A., Friedman, S. R., Curtis, R., Des Jarlais, D. C., Terry Furst, R., Jose, B., Mota, P., Stepherson, B., Sufian, M., Ward, T. and Wright, J. W. (1994) ‘The relevance of drug injectors’ social and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection’, Social Science and Medicine 38: 67-78.
247. O’Connor, P. (1992) Friendship between Women: A Critical Review, Indianapolis: Prentice Hall.
248. O’Connor, P. (1998) ‘Women’s friendships in a post-modern world’, R. G. Adams and G. Allan (eds) Placing Friendship in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
249. Ogburn, W. F. (1930) ‘The folk-ways of a scientific sociology’, Publication ofthe American Sociological Society 25: 1-10.
250. Olsen, W. (ed.) (2010) RealistMethodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
251. Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Leech, N. L. (2007) ' Validity and qualitative research: an oxymoron?', Quality & Quantity 41: 233-49.
252. Opp, K. (1999) ‘Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 11: 171-202.
253. Ord, K. (1975) ‘Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 70: 120-6.
254. Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. (1993) ‘Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 14001434', American Journal ofSociology 98: 1259-319.
255. Paine, R. (1969) ‘In search of friendship’, Man 4: 505-24.
256. Parcel, T. L., Kaufman, R. L. and Leeann, J. (1991) ‘Going up the ladder: multiplicity sampling to create linked macro-to-micro organizational samples’, P. Marsden (ed) Sociological Methodology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
257. Pattison, P., Robins, G., Snijders, T. A. B. and Wang, P. (2013) ‘Conditional estimation of exponential random graph models from snowball and other sampling designs’, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 57: 284-296.
258. Pavalko, E. K. (1989) ‘State timing of policy adoption: workmen’s compensation in the United States, 1909-1929', American Journal of Sociology 95: 592-615.
259. Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective, London: Sage.
260. Pearson, M. and Michell, L. (2000) ‘Smoke rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking, and drug-taking’, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 7: 21-37.
261. Peirce, C. S. (1931-58) CollectedPapers ofCharles Sanders Peirce, ed. C. Hartshorne, P Weiss and A. Burks, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
262. Pih, K. K.-H., De La Rosa, M., Rugh, D and Mao, K. 2008 ‘Different strokes for different gangs? An analysis of capital among Latino and Asian gang members’, Sociological Perspectives 51: 473-94.
263. Pitts, J. (2008) Reluctant Gangsters: The Changing Face of Youth Crime, Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
264. Plummer, K. (1997) The Chicago School, London: Routledge.
265. Podolny, J. M. (2001) ‘Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market’, American Journal of Sociology 107: 33-60.
266. Prell, C. (2011) Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology, London: Sage.
267. Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone, New York: Simon & Schuster.
268. Ragin, C. C. (1987) The ComparativeMethod: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies, Berkeley: University of California Press.
269. Ragin, C. C. (1992) ‘Introduction: cases of "What Is a Case?"', C. C. Ragin and H. S. Becker (eds) What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
270. Ragin, C. C. (1994) Constructing Social Research: The Unity and Diversity ofMethod, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
271. Ragin, C. C. (2006) ‘Systematic cross-case analysis with small-Ns’, ESRC Research Methods Festival, 17-20 July, Oxford: St Catherine’s College.
272. Ragin, C. C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
273. Ragin, C. C. and Becker, H. S. (eds) (1992) What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
274. Renouvier, C. B. J. (1859) Essais de critique générale. Premier (deuxième) essai, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
275. Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C. C. (eds) (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
276. Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y. and Lusher, D. (2007) ‘An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks’, Social Networks 29: 173-91.
277. Robinson, S. E., Everett, M. G. and Christley, R. M. (2007) ‘Recent network evolution increases the potential for large epidemics in the British cattle population’, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 4: 669-74.
278. Ron, A. (2010) ‘Regression analysis and the philosophy of social science: a critical realist view’, W. Olsen (ed.) RealistMethodology, vol. 2, London: Sage.
279. Roseneil, S. and Budgeon, S. (2004) ‘Cultures of intimacy and care beyond "the family": personal life and social change in the early 21st century’, Current Sociology 52: 135-59.
280. Rossi, P. H. (1994) ‘The war between the quals and the quants: is a lasting peace possible?', New Directions for Program Evaluation 61: 23-36.
281. Ryan, J. W. (2013) ‘Network hubs and opportunity for complex thinking among young British Muslims’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 52: 573-95.
282. Sailer, L. D. (1978) ‘Structural equivalence: meaning and definition, computation and application’, SocialNetworks 1: 73-90.
283. Saleh, N. (2009) ‘Philosophical pitfalls: the methods debate in American political science’, Journal of Integrated Social Sciences 1: 141-76.
284. Sanchez-Jankowski, M. (1991) Islands in the Street: Gangs in American Urban Society, Berkeley: University of California Press.
285. Sawyer, R. K. (2002) ‘Durkheim’s dilemma: toward a sociology of emergence’, Sociological Theory 20: 227-47.
286. Sayer, A. (1992) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach, London: Routledge.
287. Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science, London: Sage.
288. Schaefer J. (ed.) (1974) Studies in Cultural Diffusion: Galton’s Problem, New Haven, CT: HRAFlex Books.
289. Scheibelhofer, E. (2008) ‘Combining narration-based interviews with topical interviews: methodological reflections on research practices’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11: 403-16.
290. Schutz, A. (1954) ‘Concept and theory formation in the social sciences’, Journal of Philosophy 51: 257-72.
291. Schutz, A. (1966) CollectedPapers, vol. 3, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
292. Schutz, A. (1972) The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
293. Scott, J. (1991) Social NetworkAnalysis: A Handbook, London: Sage.
294. Scott, J. (1997) Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes, New York: Oxford University Press.
295. Scriven M. (1964) ‘Views of human nature’, T. Wann (ed.) Behaviorism and Phenomenology: Contrasting Bases for Modern Psychology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
296. Shibutani, T. (1955) ‘Reference groups as perspectives’, American Journal ofSociology 60: 562-9.
297. Short, J. F., Jr. (1996) Gangs and Adolescent Violence, Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, Regents of the University of Colorado.
298. Shove, E., Pantzar, M. and Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics ofSocial Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes, London: Sage.
299. Simmel, G. (1921) ‘Fragment über die liebe dem nachlass Georg Simmels’, Logos 9: 1-54 (English translation: ‘A fragment on love’, in G. Simmel, On Women, Sexuality and Love, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1984).
300. Simmel, G. (1955 [1922]) Conflict and the Web ofGroup Affiliations, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
301. Simmel, G. (1976a [1903]) ‘The metropolis and mental life’, in The Sociology ofGeorg Simmel, New York: Free Press.
302. Simmel, G. (1976b [1903]) The Sociology ofGeorg Simmel, New York: Free Press.
303. Simon, H. A. (1957) Models of Man: Social and Rational, New York: Wiley.
304. Skvoretz, J. and Faust, K. (2002) ‘Relations, species, and network structure’, Journal of Social Structure 3.
305. Smart, C. (2007) Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking, Cambridge: Polity Press.
306. Smart, C., Davies, K., Heaphy, B. and Mason, J. (2012) ‘Difficultfriendship and ontological insecurity’, Sociological Review 60: 1-19.
307. Smith, S. S. (2005) '"Don’t put my name on it": social capital activation and job finding assistance among the black urban poor’, American Journal of Sociology 111: 1-57.
308. Snijders, T. A. B. and Bosker, R. J. (2012) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling (2nd edn), London: Sage.
309. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G. and Van de Bunt, G. G. (2010) ‘Introduction to actor- based models for network dynamics’, Social Networks 32: 44-60.
310. Spencer, L. and Pahl, R. (2006) Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities Today, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
311. Spradley, J. P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
312. Spradley, J. P. (1980) Participant Observation, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
313. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2010) ed. E.N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/(accessed August 2013).
314. Strauss, A. (1973) ‘Social world perspective’, Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1: 119-28.
315. Sullivan, M. L. (1989) "Getting Paid": Youth Crime and Work in the Inner City, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
316. Sullivan, M. L. (2005) ‘Maybe we shouldn’t study "gangs": does reification obscure youth violence?', Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 21: 170-90.
317. Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (1998) Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, London: Sage.
318. Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J. and Smith, C. A. (2003) Gangs and Delinquency in Developmental Perspective, New York: Cambridge University Press.
319. Thrasher, F. M. (1963 [1927]) The Gang: A Study of1,313 Gangs in Chicago, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
320. Tilly, C. (2002) Stories, Identities and Political Change, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
321. Van de Bunt, G. G., Van Duijn, M. A. J. and Snijder, T. A. B. (1999) ‘Friendship networks through time: an actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model’, Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 5: 167-92.
322. Van der Gaag M. and Snijders, T. A. B. (2003) Social Capital Quantification with Concrete Items, Groningen, Netherlands: University of Groningen Press.
323. Wad, P. (2001) ‘Critical realism and comparative sociology’, Draft paper for the 5th IACR conference, 17-19 August.
324. Wang, P., Robins, G., Pattison, P. and Lazega, E. (2013) ‘Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks’, Social Networks 35: 96-115.
325. Warde, A. (2005) ‘Consumption and the theory of practice’, Journal ofConsumer Culture 5: 131-54.
326. Wasserman, S. S. and Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
327. Watters, E. (2003) Urban Tribes: A Generation Redefines Friendship, Family and Commitment, New York: Bloomsbury.
328. Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology, Berkeley: University of California Press.
329. Weber, M. (2004 [1917]) The Vocation Lectures, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
330. Weeks, J., Heaphy, B. and Donovan, C. (2001) Same Sex Intimacies: Families ofChoice and Other Life Experiments, London: Routledge.
331. Weerman, F. M., Maxson, C. L., Esbensen, F., Aldridge, J., Medina, J. and van Gemert, F. (2009) Eurogang Program Manual: Background, Development, and Use of the Eurogang Instruments in Multi-Site, Multi-Method Comparative Research, University of Missouri at St Louis: Eurogang.
332. Wellman, B. (1979) ' The community question: the intimate networks of east Yorkers’, American Journal of Sociology 84: 1201-31.
333. Wellman, B. (1990) ‘Different strokes from different folks: community ties and social support’, American Journal of Sociology 96: 558-88.
334. Wellman, B. (1993) ‘An egocentric network tale: comment on Bien et al. "An account of the origin and design of the East York studies"', Social Networks 15: 423-36.
335. Wellman, B., Carrington, P. J. and Hall, A. (1988) ‘Networks as personal communities’, B. Wellman and S. D. Berkowitz (eds) Social Structures: A Network Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
336. Werking, K. (1997) We Are Just Good Friends: Women and Men in Nonromantic Relationships, New York: Guilford Press.
337. Weston, K. (1998) Longslowburn: Sexuality and Social Science, New York: Routledge.
338. Wheeldon, P. D. (1969) ‘The operation of voluntary associations and personal networks in the political processes of an inter-ethnic community’, J. C. Mitchell (ed.) Social Networks in Urban Situations, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
339. White, D. R. and Reitz, K. P. (1983) ‘Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on networks of relations’, Social Networks 5: 193-234.
340. White, D. R., Burton, M. L. and Dow, M. M. (1981) ‘Sexual division of labor in African agriculture: a network autocorrelation analysis’, American Anthropologist 83: 824-49.
341. White, H. C. (1973) ‘Everyday life in stochastic networks’, Sociological Inquiry 43: 43-9.
342. White, H. C. (2008 [1992]) Identity and Control, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
343. White, H. C., Boorman, S. and Breiger, R. (1976) ‘Social structure from multiple networks: blockmodels of roles and positions’, American Journal of Sociology 81: 730-80.
344. Whittle, A. and Spicer, A. (2008) ‘Is actor network theory critique?', Organization Studies 29: 611-29.
345. Whyte, W. F. (1943) Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
346. Williams, M. (2000) Science and Social Science: An Introduction, London: Routledge.
347. Williamson, H. (1997) ‘Status zero youth and the "underclass": some considerations’, R. MacDonald (ed.) Youth, the ‘Underclass’andSocialExclusion, London: Routledge.
348. Wilson, T. P. (1982) ' Relational networks: an extension of sociometric concepts’, Social Networks 4: 105-16.
349. Wong, S.-L. and Salaff, J. W. (1998) ‘Network capital: emigration from Hong Kong’, British Journal of Sociology 49: 358-74.
350. Woo Park, H. and Kluver, R. (2009) ' Trends in online networking among South Korean politicians: a mixed-method approach’, Government Information Quarterly 26: 505-15.
351. Wright, P. (1982) ‘Men’s friendship, women’s friendship and the alleged inferiority of the latter’, SexRoles 8: 1-20.
352. Zachary, W. (1977) ‘An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups’, Journal of Anthropological Research 33: 452-73.
353. Znaniecki, F. (1934) The Method ofSociology, New York: Farrar & Rinehart.