Accuracy and reliability of linear measurements using tangential projection and cone beam computed tomography

Dental Research Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 271-277

  Sheikhi, Mahnaz ^a   Dakhil Alian, Mansour ^a   Bahreinian, Zahra ^a  

^a ISFAHAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; dental implants; radiography

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954359648     PISSN: 17353327     EISSN: 20080255     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, et al. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:512-8.
2. Gupta J, Ali SP. Cone beam computed tomography in oral implants. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013;4:2-6.
3. Sheikhi M, Ghorbanizadeh S, Abdinian M, Goroohi H, Badrian H. Accuracy of linear measurements of galileos cone beam computed tomography in normal and different head positions. Int J Dent 2012;2012:214954.
4. Monsour PA, Dudhia R. Implant radiography and radiology. Aust Dent J 2008;53 Suppl 1:S11-25.
5. Hauret L, Hodez C. A new modality for dentomaxillofacial imaging: Cone beam CT. J Radiol 2009;90:604-17.
6. Naser AZ, Mehr BB. A comparative study of accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam and multi-slice computed tomographies for evaluation of mandibular canal location in dry mandibles. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2013;10:15-9.
7. Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y, Peltola J, Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:367-78.
8. Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y, Sakaino R, Tsuchida R, Iwai K, et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:79-85.
9. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:268-73.
10. Coppenrath E, Draenert F, Lechel U, Veit R, Meindl T, Reiser M, et al. Cross-sectional imaging in dentomaxillofacial diagnostics: Dose comparison of dental MSCT and NewTom 9000 DVT. Rofo 2008;180:396-401.
11. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:559-65.
12. Chan HL, Misch K, Wang HL. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning. Implant Dent 2010;19:288-98.
13. Al-Ekrish AA. Effect of exposure time on the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls. Saudi Dent J 2012;24:127-34.
14. Shelley A, Horner K. A transymphyseal X-ray projection to assess the anterior edentulous mandible prior to implant placement. Dent Update 2008;35:689-94.
15. Sewerin I. Tangential projection for depiction of the anterior regions of the jaws performed with the dental X-ray set. Tandlaegebladet 1991;95:473-6.
16. Sewerin I, Skov SJ. A comparison of two methods for pre-operative radiographic examination in treatment with oral implants in the anterior mandibular area. Tandlaegebladet 1992;96:331-5.
17. Sano K, Kitamori H, Ariji E, Yoshida S, Sekine J, Inokuchi T. Simple X-ray film holder for lateral view of the anterior jaws using dental X-ray apparatus. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;36:135-7.
18. Wakoh M, Harada T, Otonari T, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Ohkubo M, Kousuge Y, et al. Reliability of linear distance measurement for dental implant length with standardized periapical radiographs. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2006;47:105-15.
19. Suomalainen A, Vehmas T, Kortesniemi M, Robinson S, Peltola J. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:10-7.
20. Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, et al. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol 2010;75:265-9.
21. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:80-93.
22. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-4.
23. Madrigal C, Ortega R, Meniz C, López-Quiles J. Study of available bone for interforaminal implant treatment using conebeam computed tomography. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E307-12.
24. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multislice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:446-54.
25. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:534-42.
26. Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:67-75.