Effect of exposure time on the accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions in dry skulls

Saudi Dental Journal

Volumn 24, Issue 3-4, 2012, Pages 127-134

  Al Ekrish, Asmáa A ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

CBCT; Dental implantation; Dry skull; Radiation dosage; Reliability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MEASUREMENT ERROR; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD; RADIATION MEASUREMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SKULL RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

EID: 84868658268     PISSN: 10139052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Al-Ekrish A., Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2011, 40:67-75.
2. Arai Y., Tammisalo E., Iwai K., Hashimoto K., Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 1999, 28:245-248.
3. Araki K., Maki K., Seki K., et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2004, 33:51-59.
4. Benavides E., Rios H.F., Ganz S.D., An C.H., Resnik R., Reardon G.T., Feldman S.J., Mah J.K., Hatcher D., Kim M.J., Sohn D.S., Palti A., Perel M.L., Judy K.W., Misch C.E., Wang H.L. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the international congress of oral implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012, 21:1-9.
5. Bushberg J.T., Seibert J.A., Leidholdt E.M., Boone J.M. The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging 2002, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. second ed.
6. Fuchs T., Kalender W.A. On the correlation of pixel noise, spatial resolution and dose in computed tomography: theoretical prediction and verification by simulation and measurement. Physica Med. 2003, 19:153-164.
7. Jaffray D.A., Siewerdsen J.H. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. Med. Phys. 2000, 27:1311-1323.
8. Kalender W.A. The use of flat-panel detectors for CT imaging. Radiology 2003, 43:379-387.
9. Katsumata A., Hirukawa A., Okumura S., et al. Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2007, 104:829-836.
10. Ludlow J.B., Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2008, 106:106-114.
11. Ludlow J.B., Davies-Ludlow L.E., Brooks S.L., Howerton W.B. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2006, 35:219-226.
12. Martens J. Image Technology Design: A Perceptual Approach 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston. second ed.
13. Mozzo P., Procacci C., Tacconi A., Martini P.T., Andreis I.A. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur. Radiol. 1998, 8:1558-1564.
14. Roberts J.A., Drage N.A., Davies J., Thomas D.W. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br. J. Radiol. 2009, 82:35-40.
15. Seeram E. Computed Tomography. Physical Principles, Clinical Applications, and Quality Control 2001, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. second ed.
16. Siewerdsen J.H., Jaffray D.A. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of X-ray scatter. Med. Phys. 2001, 28:220-231.
17. Suomalainen A., Kiljunen T., Kaser Y., Peltola J., Kortesniemi M. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2009, 38:367-378.
18. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, 2008. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Paper presented at Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-third Session, Supplement No. 46, 2010, New York.
19. van Daatselaar A.N., van der Stelt P.F., Weenen J. Effect of number of projections on image quality of local CT. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol. 2004, 33:361-369.