Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 79-85

  Okano, T ^a   Harata, Y ^a   Sugihara, Y ^b   Sakaino, R ^a   Tsuchida, R ^a   Iwai, K ^c   Seki, K ^a   Araki, K ^a  

^a SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b J Morita Mfg Corp   (Japan)

^c NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Radiation dosage; Tomography, X ray computed

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; BONE MARROW; BRAIN; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MANDIBLE; NECK; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PELVIS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; SALIVARY GLANDS; SKIN; THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY; THORAX; THYROID GLAND; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 62549111002     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/14769929     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PA, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Euro Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-1564.
2. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 245-248.
3. Nakagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Ishii H, Mishima A, Ishii H, Asada K, et al. Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 322-326.
4. Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner(CB MercuRay): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 51-59.
5. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J CalifDent Assoc 2003; 31: 825-833.
6. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam X-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6 (Suppl. 1): 95-101.
7. Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multi-detector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 371-377.
8. Danforth RA, Peck J, Hall P. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 847-852.
9. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, Berutti E, Bianchi SD Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: ''low-dose cone-beam'' CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003; 29: 773-775.
10. Sato S, Arai Y, Shinoda K, Ito K. Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 525-528.
11. Honda K, Arai Y, Kashima M, Takano Y, Sawada K, Ejima K, Iwai K. Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT(3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 391-395.
12. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19:2 28-231.
13. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 196-201.
14. Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Jr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 369-375.
15. Holberg C, Steinhauser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005; 66: 434-44.
16. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1261-1266.
17. Honda K, Larheim TA, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 152-7.
18. Hashimoto K, Kawashima S, Araki M, Iwai K, Sawada K, Akiyama Y. Comparison of image performance between cone-beam computed tomography for dental use and four-row multidetector helical CT J Oral Sci 2006; 48: 27-34.
19. Iwai K, Arai Y, Hashimoto K, Nishizawa K. Estimation of effective dose from limited cone beam X-ray CT examination Dental Radiology 2000; 40: 251-259 (In Japanese with English abstract).
20. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219-226.
21. Asahi Techno Glass Corporation. Explanation materials ofRPL glass dosimeter: small element system. Tokyo: ATGC, 2004(Available in English at: http//www.c-technol.co.jp/technol-eng/detail-pages/03dose-ace.html/). 22. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Radiation Dosimetry: X Rays Generated at Potentials of 5 to 150 kV. ICRU Report 17. Bethesda, MD: ICRUM, 1970, pp 25-28.
22. International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60; 1990 recommendations of the ICRP. Annals of the ICRP. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.
23. Hashizume M, Maruyama T, Kumamoto Y. Est mation of population doses from diagnostic medical examinations in Japan, 974: Per caput mean marrow dose and leukemia significant doseNippon Acta Radiologica 1976; 36: 216-224(in Japanese withEnglish abstract).
24. Tanaka G, Kawashima H, Nomura E. Reference Japanese man Distribution of Strontium in the skeleton and in the mass of mineralized bone. Health Phys 1981; 40: 601-614.
25. International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103: the 2007 recommendations of ICRP.Annalsof the ICRP, volume 37. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007.
26. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 229-234.
27. Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose cone beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 413-417.
28. Hoshi Y, Nomura T, Oda T, Iwasaki T, Fujita K, Ishikawa T, et al Application of a newly developed photoluminescence glass dosimeter for measuring the absorbed dose in individual mice exposed to low-dose rate 137Cs gamma-rays. J Radiat Res 2000; 41: 129-137.
29. Araki F, Ikegami T, Ishidoya T, Kubo HD. Measurements of Gamma-Knife helmet output factors using a radiophotolumines-cent glass rod dosimeter and a diode detector. Med Phys 2003; 30: 1976-1981.
30. Danforth RA, Clark DE. Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 236-243.
31. Lecomber AR, Downes SL, Mokhtari M, Faulkner K Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 107-112.
32. Brem MH, Zamani AA, Riva R, Zou KH, Rumboldt Z, Hennig FF, et al. Multidetector CT of the paranasal sinus: potential for radiation dose reduction. Radiology 2007; 243: 847-52.
33. Hagtvedt T, Aaløkken TM, Nøtthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 976-80.