Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 80-93

  Stratemann, S A ^a   Huang, J C ^a   Maki, K ^b   Miller, Arthur J ^a   Hatcher, D C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Craniofacial; Mandible

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; DENTAL RADIOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MEASUREMENT ERROR; ORTHODONTICS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PHYSICAL MODEL; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; SKULL; STATISTICAL MODEL; VOLUMETRY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HISTOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL;

EID: 41949096847     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/31349994     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-1564.
2. Fullmer JM, Scarfe WC, Kushner GM, Alpert B, Farman AG. Cone beam computed tomographic findings in refractory chronic suppurative osteomyelitis of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 45: 364-371.
3. Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Loubele M, Schutyser F, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10: 1-7.
4. Honda K, Larheim T, Maruhashi K, Matsumoto K, Iwai K. Osseous abnormalities of the mandibular condyle: diagnostic reliability of cone beam computed tomography compared with helical computed tomography based on an autopsy material. Dentomaxiltofac Radiol 2006; 35: 152-157.
5. Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Obhayashi N, et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 253-259.
6. Kau CH, Richmond S, Palomo JM, Hans MG. Three-dimensional cone beam computerized tomography in orthodontics. J Orthod 2005; 32: 282-293.
7. Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 418-423.
8. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 257-265.
9. Swennen GR, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs. cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130: 410-416.
10. Pinsky HM, Dyda S, Pinsky RW, Misch KA, Sarment DP. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 410-416.
11. Kitaura H, Yonetsu K, Kitamori H, Kobayashi K, Nakamura T. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000; 37: 349-356.
12. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 170-176.
13. Krarup S, Darvann TA, Larsen P, Marsh JL, Kreiborg S. Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular growth and tooth eruption. J Anat 2005; 207: 669-682.
14. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 508-513.
15. Tsikiakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005; 56: 413-417.
16. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB MercuRay, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35: 219-226.
17. Carlsson C. Imaging modalities in x-ray computerized tomography and in selected volume tomography. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: R23-56.
18. Hatcher DC, Aboudara CL. Diagnosis goes digital. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2004; 125: 512-515.
19. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6 (Suppl. 1):31-36.
20. Yang K, Kwan AL, Miller DF, Boone JM. A geometric calibration method for cone beam CT systems. Med Phys 2006; 33: 1695-1706.
21. Yamamoto K, Ueno K, Seo K, Shinohara D. Development of dento-maxillofacial cone-beam x-ray computed tomography system. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6 (Suppl. 1): 160-162.
22. Araki K, Maki K, Seki K, Sakamaki K, Harata Y, Sakaino R, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial X-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRayTM): system configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 51-59.
23. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod 1971; 60: 111-127.
24. Richtsmeier JT, Paik CH, Elfert PC, Cole TM III, Dahlman HR. Precision, repeatability and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995; 32: 217-227.
25. Cavalcanti MG, Haller JW, Vannier MW. Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning: experimental validation in vitro. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999; 57: 690-694.
26. Williams FL, Richtsmeier J. Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data. Clin Anat 2003; 16: 494-500.
27. Lo LJ, Lin WY, Wong HF, Lu KT, Chen YR. Quantitative measurement of three-dimensional computed tomography: an experimental validation using phantom objects. Chag Gun Med J 2000; 23: 354-359.
28. Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Dus I, et al. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 416-424.
29. Mah J, Hatcher D. Current status and future needs in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6 (Suppl. 1):10-16.
30. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Computer-assisted simulations in orthodontic diagnosis and the application of a new cone beam x-ray computed tomography. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6 (Suppl. 1):95-101.
31. Maki K, Inou N, Takanishi A, Miller AJ. Modeling of structure, quality and function in the orthodontic patient. Orthod Craniofacial Res 2003; 6 (Suppl. 1):52-58.
32. Maki K, Miller AJ, Okano T, Hatcher D, Yamaguchi H, Shibasaki Y. Cortical bone mineral density in asymmetrical mandibles: a three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography study. Eur J Orthod 2001; 23: 217-232.
33. Maki K, Miller AJ, Okano T, Shibasaki Y. A three-dimensional, quantitative computed tomographic study of changes in distribution of bone mineralization in the developing human mandible. Arch Oral Biol 2001; 46: 667-678.
34. Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker GR Fr, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery patients. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 369-375.
35. Seo K, Ueno K, Matsuoka M, Kanou M, Yamamoto K, Tanaka K, et al. Development of dentomaxillofacial conebeam X-ray CT system model CB MercuRay. MEDIX 2003; 37: 40-45.
36. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurman H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 83-86.
37. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 229-234.
38. Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 225-234.
39. Aboudara CL. Nasopharyngeal airway size determined on lateral cephalometric headfilms and cone-beam CT scans. Growth and development. San Francisco, CA: University of California, San Francisco; 2003, p. 60.
40. Yoo SK, Kim YO, Kim H-J, Kim NH, Jang YB, Kim K-D, et al. Alignment of CT images of skull dysmorphology using anatomy-based perpendicular axes. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 2681-2695.
41. Ogawa T, Enciso R, Shintaku WH, Clark GT. Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 102-108.
42. Cevidanes LH, Bailey LJ, Tucker SF, Styner MA, Mol A, Phillips CL, et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 44-50.
43. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurement of distance using limited cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 228-231.
44. Holberg C, Steinhauser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop 2005; 66: 434-444.
45. Lagravere MO, Fang Y, Carey J, Toogood RW, Packota GV, Maior PW. Density conversion factor determined using a cone-beam computed tomography unit NewTom QR-DVT 9000. Dentomaxiliofac Radiol 2006; 35: 407-409.