Box-Behnken design for the optimization of nanoscale retrograded starch formation by high-power ultrasonication

LWT

Volumn 67, Issue , 2016, Pages 206-213

  Ding, Yongbo ^a,b   Zheng, Jiong ^a,b   Xia, Xuejuan ^a,b   Ren, Tingyuan ^a,b   Kan, Jianquan ^a,b  

^a SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INSTITUTE   (China)

Author keywords

Box Behnken design; Nanoscale RS3; Optimization; Ultrasonication

Indexed keywords

CRYSTALLINITY; OPTIMIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; STARCH; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS;

BOX-BEHNKEN DESIGN; CROSS-LINKING TECHNIQUES; CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURE; EXPERIMENTAL VALUES; INDEPENDENT VARIABLES; NANO SCALE; ULTRA-SONICATION; WATER-IN-OIL MINIEMULSION;

NANOTECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84953403662     PISSN: 00236438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adinarayana K., Ellaiah P. Response surface optimization of the critical medium components for the production of alkaline protease by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences 2002, 5(3):272-278.
2. Angellier H., Choisnard L., Molina-Boisseau S., Ozil P., Dufresne A. Optimization of the preparation of aqueous suspensions of waxy maize starch nanocrystals using a response surface methodology. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5:1545-1551.
3. Bel Haaj S., Magnin A., Pétrier C., Boufi S. Starch nanoparticles formation via high power ultrasonication. Carbohydrate Polymers 2013, 92:1625-1632.
4. Benyounis K.Y., Olabi A.G., Hashmi M.S.J. Effect of laser welding parameters on the heat input and weld-bead profile. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2005, 164:978-985.
5. Englyst H.N., Kingman S.M., Cummings J.H. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1992, 46(2):33-50.
6. Evans M. Optimisation of manufacturing processes: A response surface approach 2003, Vol. 791. Maney Pub.
7. Giezen F., Jongboom R., Gotlieb K., Boersma, A. (2000) Wo 00/69916.
8. Guo W.Q., Ren N.Q., Wang X.J., Xiang W.S., Ding J., You Y., et al. Optimization of culture conditions for hydrogen production by Ethanoligenens harbinense B49 using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technology 2009, 100(3):1192-1196.
9. Haralampu S.G. Resistant starch-A review of the physical properties and biological impact of RS3. Carbohydrate Polymers 2000, 41:285-292.
10. Imandi S.B., Bandaru V.R., Somalanka S.R., Garapati H.R. Optimization of medium constituents for the production of citric acid from byproduct glycerol using doehlert experimental design. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2007, 40(5):1367-1372.
11. Kapelko M., Zieba T., Golachowski A., Gryszkin A. Effect of production method on the properties of RS3/RS4 type resistant starch. Part 1. Properties of retrograded starch (RS3) produced under various conditions and its susceptibility to acetylation. Food Chemistry 2012, 135:1494-1504.
12. Kawasaki H., Takeda Y., Arakawa R. Mass spectrometric analysis for high molecular weight synthetic polymers using ultrasonic degradation and the mechanism of degradation. Analytical Chemistry 2007, 11:4182-4187.
13. Kim H.Y., Han J.A., Kweon D.K., Park J.D., Lim S.T. Effect of ultrasonic treatments on nanoparticle preparation of acid-hydrolyzed waxy maize starch. Carbohydrate Polymers 2013, 93(2):582-588.
14. Kim H.Y., Park D.J., Kim J.Y., Lim S.T. Preparation of crystalline starch nanoparticles using cold acid hydrolysis and ultrasonication. Carbohydrate Polymers 2013, 98(1):295-301.
15. Kim H.Y., Lee J.H., Kim J.Y., Lim W.J., Lim S.T. Characterization of nanoparticles prepared by acid hydrolysis of various starches. Starch-Stärke 2012, 64(5):367-373.
16. Kim H., Lee I., Kwon Y., Kim B.C., Ha S., Lee J.H., et al. Immobilization of glucose oxidase into polyaniline nanofiber matrix for biofuel cell applications. Biosensors and Bioelectronics 2011, 26(9):3908-3913.
17. Kim J.Y., Park D.J., Lim S.T. Fragmentation of waxy rice starch granules by enzymatic hydrolysis. Cereal Chemistry 2008, 85(2):182-187.
18. Kristo E., Biliaderis C.G. Physical properties of starch nanocrystalrein forced pullulan films. Carbohydrate Polymers 2007, 68:146-158.
19. Le Corre D., Bras J., Dufresne A. Starch nanoparticles: a review. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11(5):1139-1153.
20. Lin N., Huang J., Chang P.R., Feng L., Yu J. Effect of polysaccharide nanocrystals on structure, properties, and drug release kinetics of alginate-based microspheres. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 2011, 85:270-279.
21. Liu H.L., Chiou Y.R. Optimal decolorization efficiency of reactive Red 239 by UV/TiO 2 photocatalytic process coupled with response surface methodology. Chemical Engineering Journal 2005, 112(1):173-179.
22. Liu H.L., Lan Y.W., Cheng Y.C. Optimal production of sulphuric acid by Thiobacillus thiooxidans using response surface methodology. Process Biochemistry 2004, 39(12):1953-1961.
23. Malvern Instruments Zetasizer nano user manual 2007, Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire WR14 1XZ, UK.
24. Nara S., Komiya T. Studies on the relationship between water-saturated state and crystallinity by the diffraction method for moistened potato starch. Starch-Stärke 1983, 35(12):407-410.
25. Rouxel D., Hadji R., Vincent B., Fort Y. Effect of ultrasonication and dispersion stability on the cluster size of alumina nanoscale particles in aqueous solutions. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2011, 18(1):382-388.
26. Sauter C., Emin M.A., Schuchmann H.P., Tavman S. Influence of hydrostatic pressure and sound amplitude on the ultrasound induced dispersion and deagglomeration of nanoparticles. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2008, 15:517-523.
27. Shi A.M., Li D., Wang L.J., Li B.Z., Adhikari B. Preparation of starch-based nanoparticles through high-pressure homogenization and miniemulsion cross-linking: Influence of various process parameters on particle size and stability. Carbohydrate Polymers 2011, 83(4):1604-1610.
28. Shi A.M., Li D., Wang L.J., Zhou Y.G., Adhikari B. Spray drying of starch submicron particles prepared by high pressure homogenization and mini-emulsion cross-linking. Journal of Food Engineering 2012, 113(3):399-407.
29. Sievert D., Czuchajowska Z., Pomeranz Y. Enzyme-resistant starch. III. X-ray diffraction of autoclaved amylomaize VII starch and enzyme-resistant starch residues. Cereal Chemistry 1991, 68(1):86-91.
30. Sun Q., Fan H., Xiong L. Preparation and characterization of starch nanoparticles through ultrasonic-assisted oxidation methods. Carbohydrate Polymers 2014, 106:359-364.
31. Suslick K.S. Ultrasound: Its chemical, physical, and biological effects 1988, VCH Press, New York. K. S Suslick (Ed.).
32. Zhu J., Li L., Chen L., Li X. Study on supramolecular structural changes of ultrasonic treated potato starch granules. Food Hydrocolloids 2012, 29(1):116-122.
33. Zobel B.J. Breeding for wood properties in forest trees. Unasylva 1964, 18(2-3):73-74.