Effect of roughage on rumen microbiota composition in the efficient feed converter and sturdy Indian Jaffrabadi buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)

BMC Genomics

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Nathani, Neelam M ^a,c   Patel, Amrutlal K ^a   Mootapally, Chandra Shekar ^a   Reddy, Bhaskar ^a   Shah, Shailesh V ^b   Lunagaria, Pravin M ^b   Kothari, Ramesh K ^c   Joshi, Chaitanya G ^a  

^a Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu Vishwa Vidyalaya   (India)

^b ANAND AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (India)

^c SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

CAZymes; Jaffrabadi rumen metagenome; MG RAST; Roughage proportions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BACTEROIDETES; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYANOBACTERIUM; FEMALE; FIBROBACTER; FIRMICUTES; GENE SEQUENCE; HIGH FIBER DIET; METHANOGENESIS; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NITROGEN CONCENTRATION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEOBACTERIA; RUMEN MICROORGANISM; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; WATER BUFFALO; ANIMAL; BUFFALO; DIETARY FIBER; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; RUMEN;

GLYCOSIDASE;

ANIMALS; BUFFALOES; DIETARY FIBER; GLYCOSIDE HYDROLASES; METAGENOME; METAGENOMICS; MICROBIOTA; RUMEN;

EID: 84952764777     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2340-4     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Goodacre R. Metabolomics of a superorganism. J Nutr. 2007;137(1 Suppl):259S-66S.
2. Hooper LV. Bacterial contributions to mammalian gut development. Trends Microbiol. 2004;12(3):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2004.01.001.
3. Egert M, de Graaf AA, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Venema K. Beyond diversity: functional microbiomics of the human colon. Trends Microbiol. 2006;14(2):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2005.12.007.
4. Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312(5778):1355-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1124234.
5. Xu J, Gordon JI. Honor thy symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(18):10452-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1734063100.
6. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS, Manichanh C, et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464(7285):59-65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821.
7. Clauss M, Hume ID, Hummel J. Evolutionary adaptations of ruminants and their potential relevance for modern production systems. Animal. 2010;4(7):979-92. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110000388.
8. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1022-3. doi: 10.1038/4441022a.
9. Stevens CE, Hume ID. Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients. Physiol Rev. 1998;78(2):393-427.
10. Coleman GS. The rate of uptake and metabolism of starch grains and cellulose particles by Entodinium species, Eudiplodinium maggii, some other entodiniomorphid protozoa and natural protozoal populations taken from the ovine rumen. J Appl Bacteriol. 1992;73(6):507-13.
11. Hobson PN, Stewart CS. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem. London: Chapman + Hall; 1997.
12. Mackie RI. Mutualistic fermentative digestion in the gastrointestinal tract: diversity and evolution. Integrative Comparative Biol. 2002;42(2):319-26. doi: 10.1093/icb/42.2.319.
13. Weimer PJ, Russell JB, Muck RE. Lessons from the cow: what the ruminant animal can teach us about consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(21):5323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.075.
14. Edwards EJ, McEwan RN, Travis JA, John WR. 16S rDNA library-based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2004;86(3):263-81.
15. Das AK, Sharma D, Kumar N. Buffalo genetic resources in India and their conservation. Buffalo Bull. 2008;27(4):265-8.
16. Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal. 2010;4(3):351-65.
17. Foley PA, Kenny DA, Callan JJ, Boland TM, O'Mara FP. Effect of DL-malic acid supplementation on feed intake, methane emission, and rumen fermentation in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 2009;87(3):1048-57. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1026.
18. Storm E, Orskov ER, Smart R. The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 2. The apparent digestibility and net utilization of microbial N for growing lambs. Br J Nutr. 1983;50(2):471-8.
19. Morrison M, Pope PB, Denman SE, McSweeney CS. Plant biomass degradation by gut microbiomes: more of the same or something new? Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(3):358-63. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.004.
20. Wilson DB. Microbial diversity of cellulose hydrolysis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14(3):259-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.004.
21. Shanks OC, Kelty CA, Archibeque S, Jenkins M, Newton RJ, McLellan SL, et al. Community structures of fecal bacteria in cattle from different animal feeding operations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(9):2992-3001. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02988-10.
22. Pedros-Alio C. Genomics and marine microbial ecology. Int Microbiol. 2006;9(3):191-7.
23. von Mering C, Hugenholtz P, Raes J, Tringe SG, Doerks T, Jensen LJ, et al. Quantitative phylogenetic assessment of microbial communities in diverse environments. Science. 2007;315(5815):1126-30. doi: 10.1126/science.1133420.
24. Achenbach LA, Coates JD. Disparity between bacterial phylogeny and physiology - comparing 16S rRNA sequences to assess relationships can be a powerful tool, but its limitations need to be considered. ASM News. 2000;66:714-5.
25. Meyer F, Paarmann D, D'Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:386. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386.
26. Park BH, Karpinets TV, Syed MH, Leuze MR, Uberbacher EC. CAZymes Analysis Toolkit (CAT): web service for searching and analyzing carbohydrate-active enzymes in a newly sequenced organism using CAZy database. Glycobiology. 2010;20(12):1574-84. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwq106.
27. Parks DH, Beiko RG. Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):715-21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq041.
28. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica. 2001;4(1):1-9.
29. Zhou M, Chung YH, Beauchemin KA, Holtshausen L, Oba M, McAllister TA, et al. Relationship between rumen methanogens and methane production in dairy cows fed diets supplemented with a feed enzyme additive. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;111(5):1148-58.
30. McCann JC, Wickersham TA, Loor JJ. High-throughput Methods Redefine the Rumen Microbiome and Its Relationship with Nutrition and Metabolism. Bioinformatics Biol Insights. 2014;8:109-25. doi: 10.4137/BBI.S15389.
31. Jami E, White BA, Mizrahi I. Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085423.
32. Li M, Penner GB, Hernandez-Sanabria E, Oba M, Guan LL. Effects of sampling location and time, and host animal on assessment of bacterial diversity and fermentation parameters in the bovine rumen. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;107(6):1924-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04376.x.
33. Pitta DW, Pinchak E, Dowd SE, Osterstock J, Gontcharova V, Youn E, et al. Rumen bacterial diversity dynamics associated with changing from bermudagrass hay to grazed winter wheat diets. Microb Ecol. 2010;59(3):511-22. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9609-6.
34. Patel V, Patel AK, Parmar NR, Patel AB, Reddy B, Joshi CG. Characterization of the rumen microbiome of Indian Kankrej cattle (Bos indicus) adapted to different forage diet. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(23):9749-61. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6153-1.
35. Ochman H, Worobey M, Kuo CH, Ndjango JB, Peeters M, Hahn BH, et al. Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(11):e1000546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000546.
36. Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, Le Paslier D, Yamada T, Mende DR, et al. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2011;473(7346):174-80. doi: 10.1038/nature09944.
37. Parmar NR, Solanki JV, Patel AB, Shah TM, Patel AK, Parnerkar S, et al. Metagenome of Mehsani buffalo rumen microbiota: an assessment of variation in feed-dependent phylogenetic and functional classification. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;24(4):249-61. doi: 10.1159/000365054.
38. Brulc JM, Antonopoulos DA, Miller ME, Wilson MK, Yannarell AC, Dinsdale EA, et al. Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(6):1948-53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806191105.
39. Parnell JA, Reimer RA. Prebiotic fiber modulation of the gut microbiota improves risk factors for obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Gut microbes. 2012;3(1):29-34. doi: 10.4161/gmic.19246.
40. Thomas F, Hehemann JH, Rebuffet E, Czjzek M, Michel G. Environmental and gut bacteroidetes: the food connection. Frontiers Microbiol. 2011;2:93. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00093.
41. Dehority BA. Effects of microbial synergism on fibre digestion in the rumen. Proc Nutr Soc. 1991;50(2):149-59.
42. Strobel HJ. Vitamin B12-dependent propionate production by the ruminal bacterium Prevotella ruminicola 23. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58(7):2331-3.
43. O'Neill BF, Deighton MH, O'Loughlin BM, Mulligan FJ, Boland TM, O'Donovan M, et al. Effects of a perennial ryegrass diet or total mixed ration diet offered to spring-calving Holstein-Friesian dairy cows on methane emissions, dry matter intake, and milk production. J Dairy Sci. 2011;94(4):1941-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3361.
44. Kong Y, Teather R, Forster R. Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;74(3):612-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00977.x.
45. Mahowald MA, Rey FE, Seedorf H, Turnbaugh PJ, Fulton RS, Wollam A, et al. Characterizing a model human gut microbiota composed of members of its two dominant bacterial phyla. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(14):5859-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901529106.
46. Gruninger RJ, Sensen CW, McAllister TA, Forster RJ. Diversity of rumen bacteria in canadian cervids. PLoS One. 2014;9(2), e89682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089682.
47. Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Mahowald MA, Magrini V, Mardis ER, Gordon JI. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444(7122):1027-31. doi: 10.1038/nature05414.
48. Fernando SC, Purvis 2nd HT, Najar FZ, Sukharnikov LO, Krehbiel CR, Nagaraja TG, et al. Rumen microbial population dynamics during adaptation to a high-grain diet. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(22):7482-90. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00388-10.
49. Wells JE, Russell JB, Shi Y, Weimer PJ. Cellodextrin efflux by the cellulolytic ruminal bacterium Fibrobacter succinogenes and its potential role in the growth of nonadherent bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61(5):1757-62.
50. Allison MJ, Bryant MP. Biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids from branched-chain fatty acids by rumen bacteria. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1963;101:269-77.
51. Blackburn TH, Hungate RE. Succinic acid turnover and propionate production in the bovine rumen. Appl Microbiol. 1963;11:132-5.
52. Fron MJ, Boling JA, Bush LP, Dawson KA. Sulfur and nitrogen metabolism in the bovine fed different forms of supplemental sulfur. J Anim Sci. 1990;68(2):543-52.
53. Storm E, Orskov ER. The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 1. Large-scale isolation and chemical composition of rumen micro-organisms. Br J Nutr. 1983;50(2):463-70.
54. Allen MS. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J Dairy Sci. 1997;80(7):1447-62. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76074-0.
55. Lailer PC, Dahiya SS, Lal D, Chauhan TR. Rumen fermentation patter in buffaloes fed complete feed block. Indian J Animal Nut. 2011;28:177-80.
56. Bergman EN. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev. 1990;70(2):567-90.
57. Reichardt N, Duncan SH, Young P, Belenguer A, McWilliam Leitch C, Scott KP, et al. Phylogenetic distribution of three pathways for propionate production within the human gut microbiota. ISME J. 2014;8(6):1323-35. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.14.
58. Sergeant MJ, Constantinidou C, Cogan TA, Bedford MR, Penn CW, Pallen MJ. Extensive microbial and functional diversity within the chicken cecal microbiome. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091941.
59. Macy JM, Probst I. The biology of gastrointestinal bacteroides. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1979;33:561-94. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.33.100179.003021.
60. Lettat A, Hassanat F, Benchaar C. Corn silage in dairy cow diets to reduce ruminal methanogenesis: effects on the rumen metabolically active microbial communities. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96(8):5237-48. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-6481.
61. Li CJ, Li RW. Butyrate induced cell cycle arrest in bovine cells through targeting gene expression relevant to DNA replication apparatus. Gene Regulation Systems Biol. 2008;2:113-23.
62. van Kessel JAS, Russell JB. The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 1996;20(4):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00319.x.
63. Wright ADG, Kennedy P, O'Neill CJ, Toovey AF, Popovski S, Rea SM, et al. Reducing methane emission in sheep by immunization against rumen methanogens. Vaccine. 2004;22:3976-85.
64. Mastepanov M, Sigsgaard C, Dlugokencky EJ, Houweling S, Strom L, Tamstorf MP, et al. Large tundra methane burst during onset of freezing. Nature. 2008;456(7222):628-30. doi: 10.1038/nature07464.
65. Johnson KA, Johnson DE. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci. 1995;73(8):2483-92.
66. Patel DD, Patel AK, Parmar NR, Shah TM, Patel JB, Pandya PR, et al. Microbial and Carbohydrate Active Enzyme profile of buffalo rumen metagenome and their alteration in response to variation in the diet. Gene. 2014;545(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.05.003.
67. Dodd D, Kocherginskaya SA, Spies MA, Beery KE, Abbas CA, Mackie RI, et al. Biochemical analysis of a beta-D-xylosidase and a bifunctional xylanase-ferulic acid esterase from a xylanolytic gene cluster in Prevotella ruminicola 23. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(10):3328-38. doi: 10.1128/JB.01628-08.
68. Harmon DL. Dietary influences on carbohydrases and small intestinal starch hydrolysis capacity in ruminants. J Nutr. 1992;122(1):203-10.