Teacher vs. Peer Oral Corrective Feedback in the German Language Classroom

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 688-705

  Sippel, Lieselotte ^a   Jackson, Carrie N ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Classroom research; Corrective feedback; German; Grammatical accuracy; Postsecondary higher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952630612     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: 19449720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/flan.12164     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
2. Bochert, M.-A. (Producer, Director). (1999). Kleingeld [Motion picture]. Germany: Hochschule für Film und Fernsehen Konrad Wolf.
3. Chu, R.-X. (2013). Effects of peer feedback on Taiwanese adolescents' English speaking practices and development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Edinburgh.
4. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals and meta-analysis. New York: Taylor and Francis.
5. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339-360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
7. Erlam, R., & Loewen, S. (2010). Implicit and explicit recasts in L2 oral French interaction. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 66, 877-905.
8. Gass, S. M. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
9. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (2nd ed.; pp. 180-206). New York: Routledge.
10. Glass, G. V., & Hopkins, K. D. (1996). Statistical methods in education and psychology (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
11. Kitzler, A. (Producer), & Danquart, P. (Director). (1992). Schwarzfahrer [Motion picture]. Germany: TRANS-FILM GmbH.
12. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
13. Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
14. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
16. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2009). To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.
18. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
19. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
20. Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1-40.
21. Lyster, R., & Sato, M. (2013). Skill acquisition theory and the role of practice in L2 development. In M. del Pilar García Mayo, M. Junkal Gutierrez Mangado, & M. Martínez Adrián (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 71-92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. M. (2012). Interactionist approach. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7-23). London: Routledge.
23. Miao, Y., Badger, R., & Zhen, Y. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.
24. Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories. London: Routledge.
25. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. Modern Language Journal, 97, 611-633.
27. Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591-626.
28. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
29. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Sheen, Y. (2010). Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 203-234.
31. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
32. Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 367-382.
33. Williams, J. N. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In J. N. Williams, B. VanPatten, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203-218). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34. Yang, Y., & Lyster, R. (2010). Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners' acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 235-263.
35. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209-222.
36. Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15, 3-17.