Are Conservatives Really More Simple-Minded than Liberals? The Domain Specificity of Complex Thinking

Political Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 777-798

  Conway, Lucian Gideon ^a   Gornick, Laura Janelle ^b   Houck, Shannon C ^a   Anderson, Christopher ^c   Stockert, Jennifer ^d   Sessoms, Diana ^a   McCue, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b ROANOKE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attitudes; complexity; ideology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951144219     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12304     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E. J., Bluck, S., de Vries, B., Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 605–611). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 27–34. doi:10.1177/0963721413510932
3. Brundidge, J., Reid, S. A., Choi, S., & Muddiman, A. (2014). The “deliberative digital divide:” Opinion leadership and integrative complexity in the U.S. political blogosphere. Political Psychology. doi:10.1111/pops.12201
4. Conway, L. G., III, & Conway, K. R. (2011). The terrorist rhetorical style and its consequences for understanding terrorist violence. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4, 175–192.
5. Conway, L. G., III, Conway, K. R., Gornick, L. J., & Houck, S. C. (2014). Automated integrative complexity. Political Psychology, 35, 603–624.
6. Conway, L. G. III, Dodds, D., Hands Towgood, K., McClure, S, & Olson, J. (2011). The biological roots of complex thinking: Are heritable attitudes more complex? Journal of Personality, 79, 101–134.
7. Conway, L.G., III, & Gornick, L. J. (2011). Cognitive complexity. In D. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology (pp. 849–853). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
8. Conway, L. G., III, Gornick, L. J., Burfiend, C., Mandella, P., Kuenzli, A., Houck, S. C., & Fullerton, D. T. (2012). Does simple rhetoric win elections? An integrative complexity analysis of U.S. presidential campaigns. Political Psychology, 33, 599–618.
9. Conway, L. G., III, Schaller, M., Tweed, R. G., & Hallett, D. (2001). The complexity of thinking across cultures: Interactions between culture and situational context. Social Cognition, 19, 230–253.
10. Conway, L. G., III, Suedfeld, P., & Clements, S. M. (2003). Beyond the American reaction: Integrative complexity of Middle Eastern leaders during the 9/11 crisis. Psicologia Politica, 27, 93–103.
11. Conway, L. G., III, Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2001). Integrative complexity and political decisions that lead to war or peace. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century (pp. 66–75). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.
12. Conway, L. G., III, Thoemmes, F., Allison, A. M., Towgood, K. H., Wagner, M. J., Davey, K., et al. (2008). Two ways to be complex and why they matter: Implications for attitude strength and lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1029–1044.
13. Crawford, J. T. (2012). The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 138–151.
14. Dasen, P. R. (1975). Concrete operational development in three cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 156–172.
15. Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (in press). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
16. Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H. J., & Martin, N. G. (1989). Genes, culture, and personality: An empirical approach. London, UK: Academic Press.
17. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027.
18. Federico, C. M., Deason, G., & Fisher, E. L. (2012). Ideological asymmetry in the relationship between epistemic motivation and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0029063
19. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.
20. Houck, S. C., Conway, L. G., III, & Gornick, L. J. (2014). Automated integrative complexity: Current challenges and future directions. Political Psychology, 35(5), 647–659.
21. Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. M. (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
22. Joseph, C. M., Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2009). The end of equipotentiality: A moral foundations approach to ideology-attitude links and cognitive complexity. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 172–176.
23. Jost, T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3), 339–375.
24. Judd, C. M., & Lusk, C. M. (1984). Knowledge structures and evaluative judgments: Effects of structural variables on judgmental extremity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1193–1207.
25. Lavallee, L., & Suedfeld, P. (1997). Conflict in Clayoquot Sound: Using thematic content analysis to understand psychological aspects of environmental controversy. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29, 194–209.
26. Liht, J., Conway, L. G. III, Savage, S., White, W., O'Neill, K. A. (2011). Religious fundamentalism: An empirically derived construct and measurement scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33, 299–323.
27. Martin, N. G., Eaves, L.J., Heath. A. R., Jardine, R., Feingold, L. M., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 83, 4364–4368.
28. Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113–131.
29. Olson, J. M., Vernon, P.A., Harris, J., & Jang, K. L. (2001). The heritability of attitudes: A study of twins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 80, 845–860.
30. Pancer, S. M., Jackson, L. M., Hunsberger, B., Pratt, M. W., et al. (1995). Religious orthodoxy and the complexity of thought about religious and nonreligious issues. Journal of Personality, 63, 213–232.
31. Ray, J. J. (1970). The development and validation of a balanced dogmatism scale. Australian Journal of Psychology, 22, 253–260.
32. Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems. New York, NY: Basic Books.
33. Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1965). Information processing systems in individuals and groups. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
34. Sibley, C. G., & Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279.
35. Sibley, C. G., Osborne, D., & Duckitt, J. (2012). Personality and political orientation: meta-analysis and test of a threat-constraint model. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 664–677.
36. Sidanius, J. (1984). Political interest, political information search, and ideological homogeneity as a function of sociopolitical ideology: A tale of three theories. Human Relations, 37, 811–828.
37. Simons, H. W. (1968). Dogmatism scales and leftist bias. Speech Monographs, 35, 149–153.
38. Simonton, D. K. (2006). Presidential IQ, openness, intellectual brilliance, and leadership: Estimates and correlations for 42 U.S. chief executives. Political Psychology, 27, 511–526.
39. Suedfeld, P. (2000). Domain-related variation in integrative complexity: A measure of political importance and responsiveness? Clinton, Gingrich, Gorbachev, and various Canadian political leaders. In O. Feldman & C. De Landtsheer (Eds.), Beyond public speech and symbols: Explorations in the rhetoric of politicians and the media (pp. 17–34). Westport, CT: Praeger.
40. Suedfeld, P., & Bluck, S. (1988). Changes in integrative complexity prior to surprise attacks. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 26, 626–635.
41. Suedfeld, P., Bluck, S., & Ballard, E. J. (1994). The effects of emotional involvement and psychological distance on integrative complexity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 443–452.
42. Suedfeld, P., Bluck, S., Loewen, L., & Elkins, D. (1994). Sociopolitical values and integrative complexity of members of student political groups. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 26, 121–141.
43. Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S., & Wnek, D. (1972). Helper-sufferer similarity and specific request for help: Bystander intervention during a peace demonstration. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2, 17–23.
44. Suedfeld, P., & Leighton, D. C. (2002). Early communications in the war against terrorism: An integrative complexity analysis. Political Psychology, 23, 585–599.
45. Suedfeld, P., & Rank, A. D. (1976). Revolutionary leaders: Long-term success as a function of changes in conceptual complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 169–178.
46. Suedfeld, P., Steel, G. D., & Schmidt, P. W. (1994). Political ideology and attitudes toward censorship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 765–781.
47. Suedfeld, P., & Streufert, S. (1966). Information search as a function of conceptual and environmental complexity. Psychonomic Science, 4(10), 351–352.
48. Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. (1976). Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(1), 169–184.
49. Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P., & Streufert, S. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
50. Suedfeld, P., & Wallbaum, A. B. C. (1992). Modifying integrative complexity in political thought: Value conflict and audience disagreement. International Journal of Psychology, 26, 19–36.
51. Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365–375.
52. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819–827.
53. Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1989). Cognitive and rhetorical styles of traditionalist and reformist Soviet politicians: A content analysis study. Political Psychology, 10, 209–232.
54. Tetlock, P. E., Emlen Metz, S., Scott, S. E., & Suedfeld, P. (2014). Integrative complexity coding raises integratively complex issues. Political Psychology, 35, 625–634.
55. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. & Lerner, J. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In C. Seligman, J. Olson, & M. Zanna (Eds.), Values: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 25–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Thoemmes, F. J., & Conway, L. G., III. (2007). Integrative complexity of 41 U.S. presidents. Political Psychology, 28, 193–226.
57. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2003). The measurement of cognitive complexity and its relationship with political extremism. Political Psychology, 24(4), 781–801.
58. Van Hiel, A., Onraet, E., & De Pauw, S. (2010). The relationship between social-cultural attitudes and behavioral measures of cognitive style: A meta-analytic integration of studies. Journal of Personality, 78, 1765–1800.
59. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062.