Automated Integrative Complexity: Current Challenges and Future Directions

Political Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 647-659

  Houck, Shannon C ^a   Conway, Lucian Gideon ^a   Gornick, Laura Janelle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation; Computer scoring; Integrative complexity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925294534     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12209     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bieri, J., Atkins, A. L., Briar, S., Leaman, R. L., Miller, H., & Tripodi, T. (1966). Clinical and social judgment: The discrimination of behavioral information. New York, NY: Wiley.
2. Conway, L. G., III, Dodds, D., Towgood, K. H., McClure, S., & Olson, J. (2011). The biological roots of complex thinking: Are heritable attitudes more complex? Journal of Personality, 79, 101-134.
3. Conway, L. G., III, Houck, S. C., & Gornick, L. J. (in press). Regional differences in individualism and why they matter. In J. Rentfrow (Ed.), Psychological Geography. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Conway, L. G., III., Thoemmes, F., Allison, A. M., Hands Towgood, K., Wagner, M. J., Davey, K., Salcido, A., Stovall, A. N., Dodds, D. P., Bongard, K, & Conway, K. R. (2008). Two ways to be complex and why they matter: Implications for attitude strength and lying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1029-1044.
5. Fletcher, G. J. O., Danilovics, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D., & Reeder, G. D. (1986). Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 875-884.
6. Hermann, M., & Sakiev, A. (2011). Leadership, terrorism, and the use of violence. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 4, 126-134.
7. Hermann, M. G., Sakiev, A., & Smith, M. (2010) Governance in context: Understanding the ingredients of political leadership. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
8. Kitayama, S., Conway, L. G., III, Pietromonaco, P. R., Park, H., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: The production-adoption model of cultural change. American Psychologist, 65, 559-574.
9. Lashley, B. R., & Kenny, D. A. (1998). Power estimation in social relations analyses. Psychological Methods, 3, 328-338.
10. Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
11. Neuberg, S. N., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113-131.
12. th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
13. Scott, W. A. (1969). Structure of natural cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 261-278.
14. Suedfeld, P., Frisch, S., Hermann, M., & Mandel, D. (under review). The complexity construct in political psychology: Personological and cognitive approaches. Manuscript under review.
15. Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Integrative complexity at forty: Steps toward resolving the scoring dilemma. Political Psychology, 35, 597-601.
16. Suedfeld, P., & Tetlock, P. E., & Ramirez, C. (1977). War, peace, and integrative complexity: UN speeches on the Middle East problem, 1947-1976. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21, 427-442.
17. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
18. Tetlock, P. E., & Tyler, A. (1996). Churchill's cognitive and rhetorical style: The debates over Nazi intentions and self-government for India. Political psychology, 17, 149-170.
19. Tetlock, P., Emlen Metz, S., Scott, S., & Suedfeld, P. (2014). Integrative complexity coding raises integratively complex issues. Political Psychology, 35, 625-634.
20. Thoemmes, F., & Conway, L. G., III (2007). Integrative complexity of 41 US presidents. Political Psychology, 24, 781-801.
21. Tweed, R., Conway, L. G., III, & Ryder, A. G. (1999). The target is straw or the arrow is crooked. American Psychologist, 54, 837-838.
22. Vannoy, J. S. (1965). Generality of cognitive complexity-simplicity as a personality construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 385-396.
23. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2009). Recognizing contextual polarity: An exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Computational linguistics, 35(3), 399-433.
24. Young, M. D., & Hermann, M. G. (2014). Increased complexity has its benefits. Political Psychology, 35, 635-645.