The ideologically objectionable premise model: Predicting biased political judgments on the left and right

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 138-151

  Crawford, Jarret T ^a  

^a Department of Health and Exercise Science   (United States)

Author keywords

Motivated reasoning; Political attitudes; Political judgment; Right wing authoritarianism; Social dominance orientation

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655184178     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. Altemeyer B. Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism 1988, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, US.
3. Altemeyer B. The authoritarian specter 1996, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Altemeyer B. The other "authoritarian personality". Advances in experimental social psychology 1998, Vol. 30:47-91. Academic Press, New York.
5. Bartels L.M. Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions. Political Behavior 2002, 24(2):117-150.
6. Bizumic B., Duckitt J., Popadic D., Dru V., Krauss S. A cross-cultural investigation into a reconceptualization of ethnocentrism. European Journal of Social Psychology 2009, 39:871-899.
7. Blass T. Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:398-413.
8. Buhrmester M., Kwang T., Gosling S.D. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2011, 6(1):3-5.
9. Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Kao C.F., Rodriguez R. Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1032-1043.
10. Cohrs J.C., Moschner B., Maes J., Kielmann S. The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31(10):1425-1434.
11. Costello K., Hodson G. Social dominance-based threat reactions to immigrants in need of assistance. European Journal of Social Psychology 2011, 41(2):220-231.
12. Crawford, J. T., Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., & Cohen, F. (in press). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially predict biased evaluations of media reports. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
13. Ditto P.H., Lopez D.F. Motivated skepticism: The use of differential decision-making criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1992, 63:568-584.
14. Duckitt J. A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 2001, 33:41-113.
15. Duckitt J. Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32(5):684-696.
16. Duckitt J., Sibley C.G. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality 2007, 21:113-130.
17. Duckitt J., Sibley C.G. Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality 2010, 78(6):1861-1893.
18. Duckitt J., Sibley C.G. Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially moderate intergroup effects on prejudice. European Journal of Personality 2010, 24(7):583-601.
19. Duckitt J., Wagner C., du Plessis I., Birum I. The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:75-93.
20. Edwards K., Smith E.E. A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71(1):5-24.
21. Fleeson W. Moving personality beyond the person-situation debate. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2004, 13:83-87.
22. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B.A. Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2009, 96(5):1029-1046.
23. Greenberg J., Jonas E. Psychological motives and political orientation-The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129(3):376-382.
24. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 2001, 108:814-834.
25. Haley H., Sidanius J. The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32(5):656-668.
26. Hastorf A.H., Cantril H. They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1954, 49:129-134.
27. Henry P.J. College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry 2008, 19:49-71.
28. Horton J.J., Rand D.G., Zeckhauser R.J. The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics 2011, 14(3):399-425.
29. Hunsberger B., Altemeyer B. Atheists: A groundbreaking study of America's nonbelievers 2006, Prometheus Books, Buffalo.
30. Janoff-Bulman R. Political attitudes and complexity: Responses from a motivational perspective. Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:177-182.
31. Jost J.T. The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 2006, 61(7):651-670.
32. Jost J.T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A.W., Sulloway F.J. Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129(3):339-375.
33. Jost J.T., Glaser J., Kruglanski A.W., Sulloway F.J. Exceptions that prove the rule-Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin 2003, 129(3):383-393.
34. Knight K. Liberalism and conservatism. Measures of political attitudes 1999, 59-158. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, L.S. Wrightsman (Eds.).
35. Kunda Z. Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 53(4):636-647.
36. Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 1990, 108(3):480-498.
37. Kruglanski A.W., Webster D.M., Klem A. Motivated resistance to openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65(5):861-876.
38. Lindner N.M., Nosek B.A. Alienable speech: Ideological variations in the application of free-speech principles. Political Psychology 2009, 30(1):67-92.
39. Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37(11):2098-2109.
40. Martin J.L. The Authoritarian Personality, 50years later: What lessons are there for political psychology?. Political Psychology 2001, 22(1):1-26.
41. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (in press). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods. doi:. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6.
42. McFarland S. On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students' attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2005, 31:360-367.
43. Morgan G.S., Mullen E., Skitka L.J. When values and attributions collide: Liberals' and conservatives' values motivate attributions for alleged misdeeds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2010, 36:1241-1254.
44. Neuberg S.L., Newsom J.T. Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993, 65(1):113-131.
45. Paolacci G., Chandler J., Ipeirotis P.G. Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5:411-419.
46. Perkins J.E., Bourgeois M.J. Perceptions of police use of deadly force. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2006, 36(1):161-177.
47. Peterson B.E., Duncan L.E., Pang J.S. Authoritarianism and political impoverishment: Deficits in knowledge and civic disinterest. Political Psychology 2002, 23(1):97-112.
48. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 19:123-205.
49. Plant E.A., Devine P.G. Internal and external motivation to respond without prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:811-832.
50. Pratto F., Cathey C. The role of social ideologies in legitimizing political attitudes and public policy. The social psychology of politics 2002, 135-155. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, US, xvi, 244pp. V.C. Ottati, R.S. Tindale, J. Edwards, F.B. Bryant, L. Heath (Eds.).
51. Pratto F., Sidanius J., Levin S. Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology 2006, 17:261-320.
52. Sibley C.G., Robertson A., Wilson M.S. Social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects. Political Psychology 2006, 27:755-768.
53. Sidanius J., Pratto F. Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression 1999, Cambridge University Press, New York.
54. Skitka L.J., Bauman C.W., Aramovich N.P., Morgan G.S. Confrontational and preventative policy responses to terrorism: Anger wants a fight and fear wants "them" to go away. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2006, 28:375-384.
55. Skitka L.J., Mullen E., Griffin T., Hutchinson S., Chamberlin B. Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 83(2):470-487.
56. Solomon S., Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T. A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. Advances in experimental social psychology 1991, Vol. 24:91-159. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
57. Son Hing L.S., Bobocel D.R., Zanna M.P. Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007, 92:67-81.
58. Stenner K. The authoritarian dynamic 2005, Cambridge University Press, New York.
59. Stenner K. Three kinds of "conservatism". Psychological Inquiry 2009, 20:142-159.
60. Taber C.S., Lodge M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 2006, 50:755-769.
61. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The social psychology of intergroup relations 1979, 33-48. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA. W.G. Austin, S. Worchel (Eds.).
62. Tetlock P.E. Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984, 46:365-375.
63. Thomsen L., Green E.G.T., Sidanius J. We will hunt them down: How social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism fuel ethnic persecution of immigrants in fundamentally different ways. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44:1455-1464.
64. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Oakes P.J., Reicher S.D., Wetherell M.S. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory 1987, Blackwell, Oxford.
65. Uhlmann E.L., Pizarro D.A., Tannenbaum D., Ditto P.H. The motivated use of moral principles. Judgement and Decision Making 2009, 4(6):476-491.
66. Vallone R.P., Ross L., Lepper M.R. The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1985, 49(3):577-585.
67. Van Hiel A., Pandelaere M., Duriez B. The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2004, 30:824-837.
68. Wheatley T., Haidt J. Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 2005, 16(10):780-784.