The Deliberative Digital Divide: Opinion Leadership and Integrative Complexity in the U.S. Political Blogosphere

Political Psychology

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 741-755

  Brundidge, Jennifer ^a   Reid, Scott A ^b   Choi, Sujin ^c   Muddiman, Ashley ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Kookmin University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Blogs; Deliberative democracy; Ideology; Integrative complexity; Internet; Linguistic Inquiry Word Count; LIWC; Opinion leadership; Political

Indexed keywords

EID: 84911888744     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12201     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Abe, J. A. (2011). Changes in Alan Greenspan's language use across the economic cycle: A text analysis of his testimonies and speeches. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30, 212-223.
2. Abe, J. A. (2012). Cognitive affective styles associated with position on war. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31, 212-222.
3. Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (May, 2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 presidential election: Divided they blog. 2nd Annual Weblogging Workshop, WWW 2005, Chiba, Japan.
4. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246-1247.
5. Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Steiner, J. (2010). Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: Competing theories, their empirical blind-spots, and complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18, 32-63.
6. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
7. Baum, M., & Groeling, T. (2008). New media and the polarization of American discourse. Political Communication, 25, 345-365.
8. Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731.
9. Biber, D. (1988). Variations across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Bobbio, N. (1996). Left and right: The philosophical basis of a political distinction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11. Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
12. Campus, D. (2012). Political discussion, opinion leadership, and trust. European Journal of Communication, 27, 46-55.
13. Carney, D., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2008). The secret lives of liberals and conservatives, personality profiles, interaction styles, and the things they leave behind. Political Psychology, 29, 807-840.
14. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Pettit (Eds.), The good polity: Normative analysis of the state (pp. 17-34). New York: Basil Blackwell.
15. Cohn, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2004). Linguistic markers surrounding psycho- logical change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15, 687-693.
16. Conway, L. G., III, Suedfeld, P., & Clements, S. M. (2003). Beyond the American reaction: Integrative complexity of Middle Eastern leaders during the 9/11 crisis. Psicologia Politica, 27, 93-103.
17. Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147-162.
18. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 223-256.
20. Fishkin, J. S., & Laslett, P. (2002). Introduction. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 125-128.
21. Fraser, N. (1993). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). Boston: MIT Press.
22. Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision-making, and communication. Philadelphia, PA: New Society.
23. Golec De Zavala, A., Cisak, A., & Wesolowska, E. (2010). Political conservatism, need for cognition, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31, 521-541.
24. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202.
25. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
26. Green, G. C. (2004). The impact of cognitive complexity on project leadership performance. Information and Software Technology, 46, 165-172.
27. Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5-20.
28. Gruenfeld, D. H., & Preston, J. (2000). Upending the status quo: Cognitive complexity in U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1013-1022.
29. Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of communicative action (2 vols.). Boston: Beacon Press.
30. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
31. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411-426.
32. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98-116.
33. Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self- categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-255.
34. Hoyt, T., & Yeater, E. A. (2009). Factors affecting women's verbal immediacy to sexually risky situations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28, 312-319.
35. Inbar, Y., & Lammers, J. (2012). Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 496-503.
36. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
37. Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Reese, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21, 677-680.
38. Karpf, D. (2008). Understanding blogspace. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 5, 369-385.
39. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (2006 [1955]). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communication. New York: Transaction.
40. Kerbel, M. R. (2009). Netroots: Online progressives and the transformation of American politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
41. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind. New York: Viking Press.
43. Laponce, J. A. (1981). Left and right: The topography of political perceptions. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
44. Lorenz, T. A., & Meston, C. M. (2012). Associations among childhood sexual abuse, language use, and adult sexual functioning and satisfaction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 36, 190-199.
45. Manin, B. (2005, October). Deliberation: Why we should focus on debate rather than discussion. Paper presented at the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminar, Princeton University. http://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Manin101305/Manin101305.pdf
46. Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., Thompson, D. F., & Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In. J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems (pp. 1-26). New York: Cambridge University.
47. McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472-488.
48. Mercier, H., & Landemore, H. (2012). Reasoning is for arguing: Understanding the successes and failures of deliberation. Political Psychology, 33, 243-258.
49. Morales, L. (2012). U.S. distrust in media hits new high. Gallup Politics. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/157589/distrust-media-hits-new-high.aspx
50. Moy, P., & Gastil, J. (2006). Predicting deliberative conversation: The impact of discussion networks, media use, and political cognitions. Political Communication, 23, 443-460.
51. Pancer, S. M., Hunsberger, B., Pratt, M. W., Boisvert, S., & Roth, D. (1992). Political roles and the complexity of political rhetoric. Political Psychology, 13, 31-43.
52. Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1293-1312.
53. Pew Research Center for People and the Press (2013). Majority says the government threatens their personal rights. Retrieved from http://www.people-press.org/2013/01/31/majority-says-the-federal-government-threatens-their-personal-rights/
54. Pohlig, C. (2003). How a Newspaper Becomes H.I.P. Neiman Reports (Winter): 24-26.
55. Raelin, J. A. (2012). Dialogue and deliberation as expressions of democratic leadership in participatory organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25, 7-23.
56. Robinson, S. (2006). The mission of the j-blog: Recapturing journalistic authority online. Journalism, 7, 65-83.
57. Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347-376.
58. Schoel, C., Bluemke, M., Mueller, P., & Stahlberg, D. (2011). When autocratic leaders become an option. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 521-540.
59. Schroder, H. M., & Suedfeld, P. (Eds.). (1971). Personality theory and information processing. New York: Ronald.
60. Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1967). Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
61. Setälä, M., Grönlund, K., & Herne, K. (2010). Citizen deliberation on nuclear power: A comparison of two decision-making methods. Political Studies, 58, 688-714.
62. Shaw, A., & Benkler, Y. (2012). A tale of two blogospheres: Discursive practices on the left and the right. American Behavioral Scientist, 56, 459-487.
63. Shook, N. J., & Fazio, R. H. (2009). Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 995-998.
64. Sidanius, J. (1978). Cognitive functioning and socio-political ideology: An explorative study. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 46, 515-530.
65. Sidanius, J. (1988). Political sophistication and political deviance: A structural equation examination of context theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 37-51.
66. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
67. Sobieraj, S., & Berry, J. M. (2011). From incivility to outrage: Political discourse in blogs, talk radio, and cable news. Political Communication, 28, 19-41.
68. Slatcher, R. B., Chung, C. K., Pennebaker, J. W., & Stone, L. D. (2007). Winning words: Individual differences in linguistic style among US presidential and vice presidential candidates. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 63-75.
69. Steenbergen, M. R., Bächtiger, A., Sporndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1, 21-48.
70. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
71. Stroud, N. (2010). Polarization and partisan selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 60, 556-576.
72. Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University.
73. Suedfeld, P. (1992). Bilateral relations between countries and the complexity of newspaper editorials. Political Psychology, 13, 601-611.
74. Suedfeld, P. (2010). The cognitive processing of politics and politicians: Archival studies of conceptual and integrative complexity. Journal of Personality, 78, 1669-1702.
75. Suedfeld, P., Bluck, S., Ballard, E. J., & Baker-Brown, G. (1990). Canadian federal elections: Motive profiles and integrative complexity in political speeches and popular media. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 26-36.
76. Suedfeld, P., & Coren, S. (1992). Cognitive correlates of conceptual complexity. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1193-1199.
77. Suedfeld, P., Cross, R. W., & Brcic, J. (2011). Two years of ups and downs: Barack Obama's patterns of integrative complexity. Political Psychology, 32, 1007-1032.
78. Suedfeld, P., & Leighton, D. C. (2002). Early communication in the war against terrorism: An integrative complexity analysis. Political Psychology, 23, 585-599.
79. Suedfeld, P., Wallace, M. D., & Thachuk, K. L. (1993). Changes in integrative complexity among Middle East leaders during the Persian Gulf Crisis. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 183-199.
80. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
81. Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Neither Hayek nor Habermas. Public Choice, 134, 87-95.
82. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 22, 24-54.
83. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Cognitive style and political ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 118-126.
84. Tetlock, P. E. (1984). Cognitive style and political belief systems in the British House of Commons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 365-375.
85. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
86. Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Cognitive biases and organization correctives. Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder? Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 293-326.
87. Tetlock, P. E., Bernzweig, J., & Gallant, J. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227-1239.
88. Tetlock, P. E., & Suedfeld, P. (1988). Integrative complexity coding of verbal behavior. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Lay explanation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
89. Thoemmes, F. J., & Conway, L. G. III (2007). Integrative complexity of 41U.S. Presidents. Political Psychology, 28, 193-226.
90. Thompson, D. F. (2008). Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 497-520.
91. Thórisdóttir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32, 785-811.
92. Van Hiel, A., & Mervielde, I. (2003). The measurement of cognitive complexity and its relationship with political extremism. Political Psychology, 24, 781-801.
93. Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 1-13.
94. Wallsten, K. (2008). Political blogs: Transmission belts, soapboxes, mobilizers, or conversation starters? Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 4, 19-40.
95. Wall, M. (2005). Blogs of war. Journalism, 6, 153-172.
96. Weary, G., & Edwards, J. A. (1996). Causal-uncertainty beliefs and related goal structures. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 148-181). New York: Guilford Press.
97. Weary, G., Tobin, S. J., & Edwards, J. E. (2010). The causal uncertainty model revisited. In R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, & P. J. Carroll (Eds.), Handbook of the uncertain self (pp. 78-100). New York: Psychology Press.
98. Weber, C. R., & Federico, C. M. (2013). Moral foundations in heterogeneity in ideological preferences. Political Psychology, 34, 107-126.
99. Webster, D., & Kruglanski, A. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
100. Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
101. Wilson, G. D. (Ed.). (1973). The psychology of conservatism. London: Academic Press.
102. Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Social dominance orientation and right wing authoritarianism: Additive and interactive effects on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 34, 277-284.