The end of equipotentiality: A moral foundations approach to ideology-attitude links and cognitive complexity

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 20, Issue 2-3, 2009, Pages 172-176

  Joseph, Craig M ^a   Graham, Jesse ^b   Haidt, Jonathan ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68749105868     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10478400903088882     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 617-645.
2. Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255-297.
3. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
4. Hansson, R. 0., Keating, J. P., & Terry, C. (1974). The effects of mandatory time limits in the voting booth on liberalconservative voting patterns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 336-342.
5. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W, & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism, as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
6. Koleva, S., Graham, J., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The ties that bind: How mor-al concerns (particularly purity) organize and explain political attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
7. Kossowska, M., & Van Hiel, A. (2003). The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology, 24, 501-518.
8. McAdams, D. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person? Journal of Personality, 63, 365-396.
9. McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 978-990.
10. Medin, D. L., Ross, N., & Cox, D. G. (2006). Culture and resource conflict: Why meanings matter. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11. Mineka, S., & Cook, M. (1988). Social learning and the acquisition of snake fear in monkeys. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 51-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Seligman, M. P. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2, 307-320.
13. Shweder, R. A., & Haidt, J. (1993). The future of moral psychology: Truth, intuition, and the pluralist way. Psychological Science, 4, 360-365.
14. Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The "big three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "big three" explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119-172). New York: Routledge.
15. Skitka, L. J., Mullen, E., Griffin, T, Hutchinson, S., & Chamberlin, B. (2002). Dispositions, scripts, or motivated correction? Understanding ideological differences in explanations for social problems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 470-487.
16. Sugar, J. A., Viney, W., & Rohe, J. (1992). A comparison of contemporary and historical conservatism. Journal of General Psychology, 119, 89-97.
17. Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., & Lerner, J. S. (1996). Revising the value pluralism, model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values, Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 25-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Tetlock, P. E. (1986). A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 819-827.
19. Tetlock, P. E., Armor, D., & Peterson, R. S. (1994). The slavery debate in antebellum. America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 115-126.
20. Tetlock, P. E., Bernzweig, J., & Gallant, J. L. (1985). Supreme Court decision making: Cognitive style as a predictor of ideological consistency of voting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1227-1239.
21. Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870.
22. van Leeuwen, F., & Park, J. H. (2009). Perceptions of social dangers, moral foundations, and political orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 169-173.