IMAFISH_ML: A fully-automated image analysis software for assessing fish morphometric traits on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.), meagre (Argyrosomus regius) and red porgy (Pagrus pagrus)

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 121, Issue , 2016, Pages 66-73

  Navarro, Ana ^a   Lee Montero, Ivonne ^a,b   Santana, Dulce ^a   Henríquez, Patricia ^a   Ferrer, Miguel A ^a   Morales, Aythami ^a   Soula, Mohamed ^a   Badilla, Rodrigo ^a   Negrín Báez, Davinia ^a   Zamorano, María J ^a   Afonso, Juan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD SANTO TOMÁS   (Chile)

Author keywords

Genetic assessment; Gilthead seabream; Image analysis; Meagre; Morphometric traits; Red porgy

Indexed keywords

AQUACULTURE; COMPUTER VISION; CORRELATION METHODS; FISH; MATLAB; PHOTOGRAPHY;

GENETIC ASSESSMENT; GILTHEAD SEABREAM; MEAGRE; MORPHOMETRIC TRAITS; RED PORGY;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY; COMPUTER VISION; EQUIPMENT; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GROWTH RATE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MORPHOMETRY; PERCIFORM; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOGRAPH; SOFTWARE;

ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS; EQUUS ASINUS; PAGRUS PAGRUS; SPARUS AURATA;

EID: 84951078562     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.11.015     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abdullah, N., Mohd Rahim, M.S., Amin, I.M., 2009. Measuring Fish Length from Digital Images (FiLeDI). In: Proc. 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences (ICIS): Information Technology, Culture and Human 2009, November 24-26, Seoul, Korea, pp. 38-43.
2. Afonso, J.M., Manchado, M., Estévez, A., Ramis, G., Lee-Montero, I., Ponce, M., Sánchez, J.A., Armero, E., Navarro, A., Puertas, M.A., Borrell, Y., García, M., Negrín-Báez, D., Crespo, A.M., Blanco, G., Mariadolores, E., Sánchez, J.J., Martín, N., Aguilera, C., Roo, F.J., Zamorano, M.J., Toro, M.A., 2012. PROGENSA®: development of a genetic improvement program in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) between industry and research centers in Spain. In: Proc. AQUA 2012, No 0824. September 1-5, Prague, Csech Republic.
3. APROMAR, 2014. Fish Marine Aquaculture in Spain. <> (accessed 21.04.15). http://www.apromar.es.
4. Balaban M.O., Chombeau M., Cirban D., Gumus B. Prediction of the weight of Alaskan pollock using image analysis. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75:E552-E556.
5. Balaban M.O., Sengor G.F.U., Soriano M.G., Ruiz E.G. Using image analysis to predict the weight of Alaskan salmon of different species. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75:E157-E162.
6. Blonk R.J.W., Komen J., Tenghe A., Kamstra A., van Arendonk J.A.M. Heritability of shape in common sole, Solea solea, estimated from image analysis data. Aquaculture 2010, 307:6-11.
7. Brosnan T., Sun D.W. Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision - a review. J. Food Eng. 2004, 61:3-16.
8. Costa C., Antonucci F., Pallottino F., Aguzzi J., Sun D.W., Menesatti P. Shape analysis of agricultural products: a review of recent research advances and potential application to computer vision. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4:673-692.
9. Costa C., Loy A., Cataudella S., Davis D., Scardi M. Extracting fish size using dual underwater cameras. Aquacult. Eng. 2006, 35:218-227.
10. Costa C., Vandeputte M., Antonucci F., Boglione C., De Verdal H., Chatain B. Are trunk lateral line anomalies and disoriented scale patterns in European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) influenced by genetics?. Aquaculture 2015, 448:38-43.
11. Dowlati M., Mohtasebi S.S., de la Guardia M. Application of machine-vision techniques to fish-quality assessment. Trends Anal. Chem. 2012, 40:168-179.
12. Du C.J., Sun D.W. Recent developments in the applications of image processing techniques for food quality evaluation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 15:230-249.
13. Gaygusuz Ö., Gürsoy Ç., Özulu M., Tarkan A.S., Acipinar H., Bilge G., Filiz H. Conversions of total, fork and standard length measurements based on 42 marine and freshwater fish species (from Turkish Waters). Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2006, 6:79-84.
14. Gjedrem T. Flesh quality improvement in fish through breeding. Aquacult. Int. 1997, 5:197-206.
15. Gjedrem T. Genetic improvement of cold-water fish species. Aquacult. Res. 2000, 31:25-34.
16. Gjedrem T. Genetic improvement for the development of efficient global aquaculture: a personal opinion review. Aquaculture 2012, 344-349:12-22.
17. Haffray P., Bugeon J., Rivard Q., Quittet B., Puyo S., Allamelou J.M., Vandeputte M., Dupont-Nivet M. Genetic parameters of in-vivo prediction of carcass, head and fillet yields by internal ultrasound and 2D external imagery in large rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 2013, 410-411:236-244.
18. Hosseini H.G., Luo D., Xu G., Liu H., Benjamin D. Intelligent fish freshness assessment. J. Sens. 2008, 2008:1-8.
19. Kause A., Paananen T., Ritola O., Koskinen H. Direct and indirect selection of visceral lipid weight, fillet weight, and fillet percentage in a rainbow trout breeding program. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85:3218-3227.
20. Kong F., Tang J., Rasco B., Crapo C., Smiley S. Quality changes of salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) muscle during thermal processing. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72:103-111.
21. Korel F., Luzuriaga D.A., Balaban M.Ö. Objective quality assessment of raw tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fillets using electronic nose and machine vision. J. Food Sci. 2001, 66:1018-1024.
22. Lee-Montero I., Navarro A., Negrín-Báez D., Zamorano M.J., Borrell Y., Berbel C., Sánchez J.A., García-Celdran M., Manchado M., Estévez A., Armero E., Afonso J.M. Genetic parameters and GxE interactions for skeleton deformities and growth traits at different ages on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) in four Spanish regions. Anim. Genet. 2015, 46:164-174.
23. López-Fanjul C., Toro M.A. Fundamentos de la mejora genética en acuicultura. Genética y genómica en acuicultura (in Spanish with English abstract) 2007, 155-182. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid. P. Martínez, A. Figueras (Eds.).
24. Loy A., Busilacchi S., Costa C., Ferlin L., Cataudella S. Comparing geometric morphometrics and outline fitting methods to monitor fish shape variability of Diplodus puntazzo (Teleostea: Sparidae). Aquac. Eng. 2000, 21:271-283.
25. Martinez-de Dios J.R., Serna C., Ollero A. Computer vision and robotics techniques in fish farms. Robotica 2003, 21:233-243.
26. Merz J.E., Merz W.R. Morphological features used to identify chinook salmon sex during fish passage. Southwest. Nat. 2004, 49:197-202.
27. Murasawa N., Kuchida K., Osawa T., Hori T., Kato K. Image analytic characteristics for marbling of rib eye divided into four areas and their genetic parameters in Japanese Black steers. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho 2008, 79:343-351.
28. Navarro A., Badilla R., Zamorano M.J., Pasamontes V., Hildebrandt S., Sánchez J.J., Afonso J.M. Development of two new microsatellite multiplex PCRs for three sparid species: Gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.), red porgy (Pagrus pagrus L.) and redbanded seabream (P. auriga, Valenciennes, 1843) and their application to paternity studies. Aquaculture 2008, 285:30-37.
29. Navarro A., Zamorano M.J., Hildebrandt S., Ginés R., Aguilera C., Afonso J.M. Estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations for growth and carcass traits in gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.), under industrial conditions. Aquaculture 2009, 289:225-230.
30. Navarro A., Zamorano M.J., Hildebrandt S., Ginés R., Aguilera C., Afonso J.M. Estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations for body composition traits and G×E interactions, in gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.). Aquaculture 2009, 295:183-187.
31. Odone F., Trucco E., Verri A. A trainable system for grading fish from images. Appl. Art. Int. 2001, 15:735-745.
32. Osawa T., Kuchida K., Hidaka S., Kato T. Genetic parameters for image analysis traits on M. longissimus thoracis and M. trapezius of carcass cross section in Japanese Black steers. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86:40-46.
33. Petrtýl M., Kalous L., Memiş D. Comparison of manual measurements and computer-assisted image analysis in fish morphometry. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2014, 38:88-94.
34. Digital Image Processing 2007, Wiley-Interscience, New Jersey, USA. fourth ed. W.K. Pratt (Ed.).
35. Rius-Vilarrasa E., Bünger L., Maltin C., Matthews K.R., Roehe R. Evaluation of Video Image Analysis (VIA) technology to predict meat yield of sheep carcasses on-line under UK abattoir conditions. Meat Sci. 2009, 82:94-100.
36. Sang N.V., Thomassen M., Klemetsdal G., Gjøen H.M. Modelling of fillet fat, fillet weight and fillet yield on live River Catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus). Aquaculture 2009, 288:166-171.
37. Sezgin M., Sankur B. Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J. Electron. Imaging 2004, 13:146-165.
38. Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep 1998, Farming Press, Tombridge, UK. G. Simm (Ed.).
39. Soula M., Navarro A., Hildebrandt S., Zamorano M.J., Roo J., Hernández-Cruz C.M., Afonso J.M. Evaluation of VIE (Visible Implant Elastomer) and PIT (Passive Integrated Transponder) physical tagging systems for the identification of red porgy fingerlings (Pagrus pagrus). Aquacult. Int. 2012, 20:571-583.
40. Soula, M., Negrín-Báez, D., Zamorano, M.J., Navarro, A., Sánchez, J.J., Afonso, J.M., 2012a. Variación genética para caracteres de crecimiento a diferentes edades en corvina (Argyrosomus regius), usando dos nuevas PCR múltiples en la asignación bajo condiciones de puesta masal. Proc. XVI Reunión de Mejora Genética Animal, pp. 31-32 (in Spanish). May 31- June 2, Menorca, Spain.
41. Stien L.H., Manne F., Ruohonen K., Kause A., Kiessling A. Automated image analysis as a tool to quantify the colour and composition of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss W.) cutlets. Aquaculture 2006, 261:695-705.
42. Storbeck F., Daan B. Fish species recognition using computer vision and a neural network. Fish. Res. 2001, 51:11-15.
43. Torisawa S., Kadota M., Komeyama K., Suzuki K., Takagi T. A digital stereovideo camera system for three-dimensional monitoring of free-swimming Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis, cultured in a net cage. Aquat. Living Resour. 2011, 24:107-112.
44. Trapani J. Geometric morphometric analysis of body-form variability in Cichlasoma minckleyi, the Cuatro Cienegas cichlid. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2003, 68:357-369.
45. White D.J., Svellingen C., Strachan N.J.C. Automated measurement of species and length of fish by computer vision. Fish. Res. 2006, 80:203-210.
46. Yağiz Y., Balaban M.O., Kristinsson H.G., Welt B.A., Marshall M.R. Comparison of Minolta colorimeter and machine vision system in measuring colour of irradiated Atlantic salmon. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89:728-730.
47. Zion B. The use of computer vision technologies in aquaculture - a review. Comput. Elect. Agric. 2012, 88:125-132.
48. Zion B., Alchanatis V., Ostrovsky V., Bark I.A., Karplus I. Real-time underwater sorting of edible fish species. Comput. Elect. Agric. 2007, 56:34-45.
49. Zion B., Shklyar A., Karplus I. Sorting fish by computer vision. Comput. Elect. Agric. 1999, 23:175-187.