Comparison of manual measurements and computer-assisted image analysis in fish morphometry

Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 88-94

  Petrtýl, Miloslav ^a   Kalous, Lukáš ^a   Memiş, Devrim ^b  

^a CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Digital caliper; Ichthyology; Prussian carp; Software LUCIA; Variation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84891643441     PISSN: 13000128     EISSN: 13036181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/vet-1209-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Holcík J, Hensel K. Ichtyologická prírucka. Bratislava, Czechoslovakia: Obzor, 1972 (book in Slovak).
2. Chaput GJ, Leblanc CH, Bourque C. Evaluation of an electronic fish measuring board. ICES J Mar Sci 1992; 49: 335-339.
3. Armstrong MC, Nagtegaal DA, Boutillier JA. Microcomputerbased measuring device for collecting biological data. Prog Fish-Cult 1989; 51: 47-51.
4. Sigler MF. An electronic measuring board with bar codes. T A Fish Soc 1993; 123: 115-117.
5. Ovredal JT, Totland B. The scantrol FishMeter for recording fish length, weight and biological data. Fish Res 2002; 55: 325-328.
6. Roitberg ES, Orlova VF, Kuranova VN, Bulakhova NA, Zinenko OI, Ljubisavljevic K, Shamgunova RR, Carretero MA, Clasen A, Fokt M et al. Inter-researcher and intra-researcher differences in measuring body length: a test in the common lizard, Zootoca vivipara. Amphibia-Reptilia 2011; 32: 477-484.
7. Mazurová E, Zukal J, Jurajda P. Methodical notes to morphometric studies in ichthyology. In: 5th Czech Conference of Ichthyology, Brno, 2002: 108-113.
8. Billy AJ. The effects of formalin and isopropyl alcohol on length and weight measurements of Sarotherodon mossambicus Trewavas. J Fish Biol 1982; 21: 107-112.
9. Murphy BR, Willis DW. Fisheries Techniques. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD, USA: American Fisheries Society, 1996.
10. Neave FB, Mandrak NE, Docker MF, Noakes DL. Effects of preservation on pigmentation and length measurements in larval lampreys. J Fish Biol 2006; 68: 991-1001.
11. Sagnes P. Potential artefacts in morphometric analyses of fish: effects of formalin preservation on 0+ grayling. J Fish Biol 1997; 50: 910-914.
12. Quinonez-Velazquez C. Shrinkage of haddock larvae Melanogrammus aeglefinus Linnaeus (1758) preserved in ethanol. Cienc Mar 1996; 22: 1-8.
13. Thorstad EB, Finstad AG, Jensen AJ, Museth J, Naesje TF, Saksgard LM. To what extent does ethanol and freezing preservation cause shrinkage of juvenile Atlantic salmon and European minnow? Fisheries Manag Ecol 2007; 14: 295-298.
14. Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Ital J Zool 2004; 71: 5-16.
15. Bookstein FL. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
16. Zelditch M, Swiderski D, Sheets DH, Fink WL. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. San Diego, CA, USA: Elsevier Academic Press, 2004.
17. Arnqvist G, Martensson T. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zool Acad Sci H 1998; 44: 73-96.
18. Goodenough AE, Stafford R, Catlin-Groves CL, Smith AL, Hart AG. Within- and among-observer variation in measurements of animal biometrics and their influence on accurate quantification of common biometric-based condition indices. Ann Zool Fenn 2010; 47: 323-334.
19. Goodenough AE, Smith AL, Stubbs H, Williams R, Hart AG. Observer variability in measuring animal biometrics and fluctuating asymmetry when using digital analysis of photographs. Ann Zool Fenn 2012; 49: 81-92.
20. önsoy B, Tarkan AS, Filiz H, Bilge G. Determination of the best length measurement of fish. N West J Zool 2011; 7: 178- 180.
21. Yezerinac SM, Lougheed SC, Handford P. Measurement error and morphometric studies: statistical power and observer experience. Syst Biol 1992; 41: 471-482.
22. StatSoft Inc. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), version 9.0. Tulsa, OK, USA: StatSoft, 2009.
23. Bourque C, Cairns DK. Efficiency and accuracy of an automated data capture and error-checking system for laboratory fish processing. N Am J Fish Manage 1994; 14: 650-655.
24. Gutreuter S, Krzoska DJ. Quantifying precision of in situ length and weight measurements of fish. N Am J Fish Manage 1994; 14: 318-322.
25. Cavalcanti MJ, Monteiro LR, Lopes PRD. Landmark-based morphometric analysis in selected species of serranid fishes (Perciformes: Teleostei). Zool Stud 1999; 38: 287-294.
26. Hard JJ, Berejikian BA, Tezak EP, Schroder SL, Knudsen CM, Parker LT. Evidence for morphometric differentiation of wild and captively reared adult Coho salmon: a geometric analysis. Environ Biol Fish 2000; 58: 61-73.
27. Loy A, Busilacchi S, Costa C, Ferlin L, Cataudella S. Comparing geometric morphometrics and outline fitting methods to monitor fish shape variability of Diplodus puntazzo (Teleostea: Sparidae). Aquacult Eng 2000; 21: 271-283.
28. Palma J, Andrade JP. Morphological study of Diplodus sargus, Diplodus puntazzo, and Lithognathus mormyrus (Sparidae) in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Fish Res 2002; 57: 1-8.
29. Trapani J. Geometric morphometric analysis of body-form variability in Cichlasoma minckleyi, the Cuatro Cienegas cichlid. Environ Biol Fish 2003; 68: 357-369.