Morphological features used to identify Chinook salmon sex during fish passage

Southwestern Naturalist

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 197-202

  Merz, Joseph E ^a   Merz, William R ^b  

^a EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 2942700404     PISSN: 00384909     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1894/0038-4909(2004)049<0197:MFUTIC>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. BEACHAM, T. D., AND C. B. MURRAY. 1983. Sexual dimorphism in the adipose fin of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40:2019-2024.
2. BEACHAM, T. D., AND C. B. MURRAY. 1985. Sexual dimorphism in length of upper jaw and adipose fin of immature and maturing Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus). Aquaculture 58:269-276.
3. BEACHAM, T. D., C. B. MURRAY, AND R. E. WITHLER. 1988. Age, morphology, developmental biology, and biochemical genetic variation of Yukon River fall chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) and comparisons with British Columbia populations. Fishery Bulletin 86:663-674.
4. CADRIN, S. X., AND K. D. FRIEDLAND. 1999. The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fisheries Research (Amsterdam) 43:129-139.
5. COOPER, W. E., AND L. J. VITT. 1989. Sexual dimorphism of head and body size in an iguanid lizard: paradoxical results. American Naturalist 133: 729-735.
6. CRIM, L. W., AND B. D. GLEBE. 1990. Reproduction. In: Schreck, C. B., and P. B. Moyle, editors. Methods for biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Pp. 529-553.
7. DAUBLE, D. D., AND R. P. MUELLER. 2000. Difficulties in estimating survival for adult chinook salmon in the Columbia and Snake rivers. Fisheries 25: 24-34.
8. FOERSTER, R. E. 1968. The sockeye salmon. Bulletin of the Fisheries Resources Board of Canada 162: 422.
9. GATLIN, C. L., E. S. SCHABERG, W. H. JORDAN, B. L. KUYATT, AND W. C. SMITH. 1993. Point counting on the Macintosh: a semi-automated image analysis technique. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology 15:345-350.
10. GROOT, C., AND L. MARGOLIS. 1991. Pacific salmon life histories. University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
11. GRUNCHY, C. G., AND V. D. VLADYKOV. 1968. Sexual dimorphism in the anal fin of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and close relatives. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25:813-815.
12. HATCH, D. R., J. K. FRYER, M. SCHWARTZBERG, D. R. PEDERSON, AND A. WAND. 1998. A computerized editing system for video monitoring of fish passage. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:694-699.
13. HATCH, D. R., M. SCHWARTZBERG, AND P. R. MUNDY. 1994. Estimation of Pacific salmon escapement with a time-lapse video recording technique. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:626-635.
14. HERBERT, T. J. 1987. Area projections of fisheye photographic lenses. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 39:215-224.
15. HOLMGREN, K., AND H. WICKSTROEM. 1993. Sex dimorphism in cultured eels (Anguilla anguilla L.). Nordic Journal of Freshwater Research 68:80-90.
16. KEENLEYSIDE, M. H., AND H. M. C. DUPUIS. 1988. Courtship and spawning competition in pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:262-265.
17. KINNISON, M., M. UNWIN, N. BOUSTEAD, AND T. QUINN. 1998. Population-specific variation in body dimensions of adult chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tschawytscha) from New Zealand and their source population, 90 years after introduction. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:554-563.
18. LEFEUVRE, P., G. A. ROSE, R. GOSINE, R. HALE, W. PEARSON, AND R. KHAN. 2000. Acoustic species identification in the Northwest Atlantic using digital image processing. Fisheries Research (Amsterdam) 47:137-147.
19. LOVE, J. W. 2002. Sexual dimorphism in spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) from southeastern Louisiana. American Midland Naturalist 147:393-399.
20. MARTIN, C. A., J. A. ALONSO, M. B. MORALES, AND C. PITRA. 2000. An approach to sexing young great bustards Otis tarda using discriminant analysis and molecular techniques. Bird Study 47:147-153.
21. MORTON, W. M. 1965. The taxonomic significance of the kype in American salmonids. Copeia 4:14-19.
22. MOTULSKY, H. 1995. Intuitive biostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. NORMAN, K. E. 2001. An effective and economical solution for digitizing and analyzing video recordings of the microcirculation. Microcirculation 8:243-249.
24. PIPPY, J. H. C., W. G. WHELEN, AND M. F. O'CONNELL. 1997. A field guide to counting and measuring salmonids using the silhouette imaging and counting system (SIACS). Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2386.
25. QUINN, T. P., AND C. J. FOOTE. 1994. The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behaviour of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Animal Behavior 48:751-761.
26. REIST, J. D. 1985. An empirical evaluation of several univariate methods that adjust for size variation in morphometric data. Canadian Journal of Zoology 230:513-528.
27. SAMUELS, M. L., AND J. A. WITMER. 1999. Statistics for the life sciences, second edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
28. SCALABRIN, C. 1996. Acoustic identification of marine species. Oceanis 22:51-70.
29. SEIBERT, T. F., J. G. SIDLE, AND J. A. SAVIDGE. 1996. Inexpensive aerial videography acquisition, analysis, and reproduction. Wetlands 16:245-250.
30. STRAUSS, R. E., AND C. E. BOND. 1990. Taxonomic methods: morphology. In: Schreck, C. B., and P. B. Moyle, editors. Methods for fish biology. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland. Pp. 109-140.
31. TATSUOKA, M. M. 1971. Multivariate analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
32. VOGT, H. 1995. Video image analysis of coral reefs in Saudi Arabia: a comparison of methods. Beitraege zur Palaeontologie 20:99-105.
33. ZHANG, X. Y., C. K. SUN, AND A. M. WHEATLEY. 2000. A novel approach to the quantification of hepatic stellate cells in intravital fluorescence microscopy of the liver using a computerized image analysis system. Microvascular Research 60:232-240.