Evaluation of VIE (Visible Implant Elastomer) and PIT (Passive Integrated Transponder) physical tagging systems for the identification of red porgy fingerlings (Pagrus pagrus)

Aquaculture International

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 571-583

  Soula, Mohamed ^a   Navarro, Ana ^a   Hildebrandt, Silvia ^a   Zamorano, María J ^a   Roo, Javier ^a   Hernández Cruz, Carmen M ^a   Afonso, Juan M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Pagrus pagrus; Passive Integrated Transponder (PIT); Red porgy; Visible Implant Elastomer (VIE)

Indexed keywords

BREEDING; FISH CULTURE; GENETICS; GROWTH RATE; MORTALITY; TAGGING;

PAGRUS PAGRUS;

EID: 84860881691     PISSN: 09676120     EISSN: 1573143X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-011-9486-0     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Acolas ML, Roussel JM, Lebel JM, Baglinière JL (2007) Laboratory experiment on survival, growth and tag retention following PIT injection into the body cavity of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta). Fish Res 86: 280-284.
2. Astorga N, Afonso JM, Zamorano M, Montero D, Oliva V, Fernández H (2005) Evaluation of visible implant elastomer tags for tagging juvenile gilthead seabream Sparus auratus L.; effects on growth, mortality, handling time and tag loss. Aquac Res 36: 733-738.
3. Baras E, Westerloppe L, Melard C, Philippart JC (1999) Evaluation of implantation procedures for PIT-tagging juvenile Nile Tilapia. N Am J Aquac 61: 246-251.
4. Baras E, Malbrouck C, Houbart M, Kestemont P, Mélard C (2000) The effect of PIT tags on growth and physiology of age-0 cultured Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis of variable size. Aquaculture 185: 59-173.
5. Bateman DS, Gresswell RE (2006) Survival and growth of age-0 steelhead after surgical implantation of 23-mm passive integrated transponders. N Am J Fish Manag 26: 545-550.
6. Bolland JD, Cowx IG, Lucas MC (2009) Evaluation of VIE and PIT tagging methods for juvenile cyprinid fishes. J Appl Ichthyol 25: 381-386.
7. Brennan NP, Leber KM, Blackburn BR (2007) Use of coded-wire and visible implant elastomer tags for marine stock enhancement with juvenile red snapper Lutjanus campechanus. Fish Res 83: 90-97.
8. Bruyndoncx L, Knaepkens G, Meeus W, Bervoets L, Eens M (2002) The evaluation of passive integrated transponder PIT tags and visible implant elastomer VIE marks as new marking techniques for the bullhead. J Fish Biol 60: 260-262.
9. Bushon AM, Stunz GW, Reese MM (2007) Evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking juvenile red drum. N Am J Fish Manag 27: 460-464.
10. Close TL, Jones TS (2002) Detection of visible implant elastomer in fingerling and yearling rainbow trout. N Am J Fish Manag 22: 961-964.
11. Dare MR (2003) Mortality and long-term retention of passive integrated transponder tags by spring chinook salmon. N Am J Fish Manag 23: 1015-1019.
12. Dewey MR, Zigler SJ (1996) An evaluation of fluorescent elastomer for marking bluegills in experimental studies. Prog Fish Cult 58: 219-220.
13. Dieterman DJ, Hoxmeier R (2009) Instream evaluation of passive integrated transponder retention in brook trout and brown trout: effects of season, anatomical placement, and fish length. N Am J Fish Manag 29: 109-115.
14. Doupé RG, Partridge GJ, Lymbery AJ (2003) Visible implant fluorescent elastomer tags as pedigree markers for applied aquaculture: an evaluation using black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri. Aquac Res 34: 681-683.
15. Feldhaus JW, Heppell SA, Mesa MG, Li H (2008) Hepatic heat shock protein 70 and plasma Cortisol levels in rainbow trout after tagging with a passive integrated transponder. T Am Fish Soc 137: 690-695.
16. Frederick J (1997) Evaluation of fluorescent elastomer injection as a method for marking small fish. B Mar Sci 61: 399-408.
17. Fryda NJ, Laux JW, Koupal KD, Hoback WW (2007) Management and ecological note successful application of visible implant elastomer tags on crappies, Pomoxis spp., without the use of anesthetic. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 235-238.
18. Goldsmith RJ, Closs GP, Steen H (2003) Evaluation of visible implant elastomer for individual marking of small perch and common bully. J Fish Biol 63: 631-636.
19. Gries G, Letcher BH (2002) Tag retention and survival of age-0 Atlantic salmon following surgical implantation with passive integrated transponder tags. N Am J Fish Manag 22: 219-222.
20. Herbinger CM, O'Reilly PT, Doyle RW, Wright JM, O'Flynn F (1999) Early growth performance of Atlantic salmon full-sib families reared in single family tanks versus in mixed family tanks. Aquaculture 173: 105-116.
21. Jennings MJ, Hatzenbeler GR, Kampa JM (2009) One-year retention of passive integrated transponders in adult muskellunge, and applications to broodstock management. N Am J Aquac 71: 330-332.
22. Josephson DC, Robinson JM (2008) Long-term retention and visibility of visible implant elastomer tags in brook trout. N Am J Fish Manag 28: 1758-1761.
23. Kerwath SE, Gotz A, Wilke C, Attwood CG, Sauer WHH (2006) A comparative evaluation of three methods used to tag South African linefish. Afr J Mar Sci 28: 637-643.
24. Knaepkens G, Maerten E, Tudorache C, De Boeck G, Eens M (2007) Evaluation of passive integrated transponder tags for marking the bullhead (Cottus gobio), a small benthic freshwater fish: effects on survival, growth and swimming capacity. Ecol Freshw Fish 16: 404-409.
25. Lee J, Park IS, Cho SH (2009) Long-term effects of passive integrated transponder tagging on the growth of olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. J World Aquac Soc 40: 134-139.
26. Liu ZJ, Cordes JF (2004) DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquaculture 238: 1-37.
27. Mahapatra KD, Gjerde B, Reddy PVG, Sahoo M, Jana RK, Saha JN, Rye M (2001) Tagging: on the use of passive integrated transponder PIT tags for the identification of fish. Aquac Res 32: 47-50.
28. Navarro A, Oliva V, Zamorano MJ, Ginés R, Izquierdo M, Astorga N, Afonso JM (2006) Evaluation of PIT system as method to tag fingerling of gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.): effects on growth, mortality and tag loss. Aquaculture 257: 309-315.
29. Navarro A, Badilla R, Zamorano MJ, Pasamontes V, Hildebrandt S, Sánchez JJ, Afonso JM (2008) Development of two new microsatellite multiplex PCRs for three sparid species: gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.), red porgy (Pagrus pagrus L.) and redbanded seabream (P. auriga, Valenciennes, 1843) and their application to paternity studies. Aquaculture 285: 30-37.
30. Navarro A, Zamorano MJ, Hildebrandt S, Ginés R, Aguilera C, Afonso JM (2009a) Estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations for growth and carcass traits in gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.), under industrial conditions. Aquaculture 289: 225-230.
31. Navarro A, Zamorano MJ, Hildebrandt S, Ginés R, Aguilera C, Afonso JM (2009b) Estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations for body composition traits and G × E interactions, in gilthead seabream (Sparus auratus L.). Aquaculture 295: 183-187.
32. Olsen EM, Voellestad LA (2001) An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking age-brown trout. N Am J Fish Manag 21: 967-970.
33. Phillips CT, Fries JN (2009) An evaluation of visible implant elastomer for marking the federally listed fountain darter and the San Marcos salamander. N Am J Fish Manag 29: 529-532.
34. Quartararo N, Bell JD (1992) Effect of intraperitoneal passive implantable transponder (PI) tags on the growth and survival of juvenile snapper, Pagrus auratus (Bloch and Schneider). Aquac Fish Manag 23: 543-548.
35. Reeves KS, Buckmeier DL (2009) Mortality, predation, and tag visibility of fish marked with visible implant elastomer tags. N Am J Fish Manag 29: 323-329.
36. Sigourney DB, Horton GE (2005) Electroshocking and PIT tagging of juvenile Atlantic salmon: are there interactive effects on growth and survival? N Am J Fish Manag 25: 1016-1021.
37. Summers DW, Roberts DE, Giles N, Stubbing DN (2006) Retention of visible implant and visible implant elastomer tags in brown trout in an English chalk stream. J Fish Biol 68: 622-627.
38. Tatara CP (2009) Size at implantation affects growth of juvenile steelhead implanted with 12-mm passive integrated transponders. N Am J Fish Manag 29: 417-422.
39. Thorland I, Papaioannou N, Kottaras L, Refstie T, Papasolomontos S, Rye M (2007) Family based selection for production traits in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) and European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in Greece. Aquaculture 272(S1): S238-S321.
40. Weston MR, Johnson RL (2008) Visible implant elastomer as a tool for marking etheostomine darters (Actinopterygii: Percidae). Southeast Nat 7: 159-164.
41. Willis TJ, Babcock RC (1998) Retention and in situ detectability of visible implant fluorescent elastomer VIFE tags in Pagrus auratus Sparidae. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 32: 247-254.
42. Willis TJ, Parsons DM, Babcock RC (2001) Evidence for long-term site fidelity of snapper (Pagrus auratus) within a marine reserve. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 35: 581-590.
43. Winter JD (1996) Advances in underwater biotelemetry. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 555-590.
44. Younk JA, Herwig BR, Pittman BJ (2010) Short- and long-term evaluation of passive integrated transponder and visible implant elastomer tag performance in muskellunge. N Am J Fish Manag 30: 281-288.
45. Zeller MM, Cairns SH (2010) Evaluation of visible implant elastomer (VIE) for marking fingerling blue catfish. N Am J Fish Manag 30: 254-258.