Corporate social responsibility and the communication imperative: Perspectives from CSR managers

International Journal of Business Communication

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 419-442

  Chaudhri, Vidhi ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Constitutive approach; Corporate communication; Corporate social responsibility (CSR); India; Instrumental; Relational

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950297038     PISSN: 23294884     EISSN: 23294892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2329488414525469     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149.
2. Amaladoss, M. X., & Manohar, H. L. (2013). Communicating corporate social responsibility— A case of CSR communication in emerging economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20, 65–80. doi:10.1002/csr.287
3. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2011). Commentary: The view from management. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 516-533). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
4. Arevalo, J A., & Aravind, D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: Approach, drivers, and barriers. Corporate Governance, 11, 399-414.
5. Arvidsson, S. (2010). Communication of corporate social responsibility: A study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 96, 339-354.
6. Axley, S. R. (1984). Managerial and organizational communication in terms of the conduit metaphor. Academy of Management Review, 9, 428-437.
7. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008, January 1). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49, 37-44.
8. Blowfield, M. E., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81, 499-513.
9. Boje, D. M. (1991). The storytelling organization: A study of story performance in an office-supply firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 106-126.
10. Boje, D. M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-land.” Academy of Management Journal, 38, 997-1035.
11. Botan, C. (1997). Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations. Journal of Business Communication, 34, 188–202.
12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
13. Broadfoot, K. J., & Munshi, D. (2007). Diverse voices and alternative rationalities: Imagining forms of postcolonial organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 249-267.
14. Cappelli, P., Singh, H., Singh, J. V., & Useem, M. (2010). Leadership lessons from India. Harvard Business Review, 88, 90-97.
15. Capriotti, P. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through the Internet and social media. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 358-378). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
16. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48.
17. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 85-105.
18. Chaudhri, V., & Wang, J. (2007). Communicating corporate social responsibility on the Internet: A case study of the top 100 IT companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 232-247.
19. Cheney, G., & Christensen, L. T. (2001). Organizational identity: Linkages between internal and external communication. In F.M. Jablin & L.L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 231-269). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Cheney, G., & McMillan, J. J. (1990). Organizational rhetoric and the practice of criticism. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 93-114.
21. Cloud, D. L. (2007). Corporate social responsibility as oxymoron: Universalization and exploitation. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 219-231). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2011). The polyphony of corporate social responsibility: Deconstructing accountability and transparency in the context of identity and hypocrisy. In G. Cheney, S. May, & D. Munshi (Eds.) The handbook of communication ethics (pp. 457-474). New York, NY: Routledge Curzon.
23. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20, 372-393. DOI: 10.1177/1350508413478310
24. CONE Communication/Echo Global CSR Study. (2013). Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://www.conecomm.com/stuff/contentmgr/files/0/fdf8ac4a95f78de426c2cb117656b846/files/2013_cone_communicationsecho_global_csr_study.pdf
25. Corporate Social Responsibility Voluntary Guidelines. (2009). Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latest-news/CSR_Voluntary_Guidelines_24dec2009.pdf
26. Crable, R. E. (1990). Organizational rhetoric as the fourth great system: Theoretical, critical, and pragmatic implications. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 115-128.
27. Deetz, S. A. (2007). Corporate governance, corporate social responsibility, and communication. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 267-278). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12, 8-19.
29. Edelman’s Trust Barometer. (2013). Retrieved May 17, 2013, from http://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/trust-2013/
30. Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, B. G. (1999). Corporate World Wide Web pages: Serving the news media and other publics. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 456-467.
31. Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14, 5-26.
32. Fombrun, C. J. (2005). A world of reputation research, analysis and thinking—building corporate reputation through CSR initiatives: Evolving standards. Reputation Review, 8, 7-12.
33. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
34. Gautam, R., & Singh, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility practices in India: A study of top 500 companies. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 2, 41-56.
35. Global Reporting Initiative. (2011). GRI sustainability reporting statistics. Retrieved June 20, 2013, from https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI-Reporting-Trends-2011.pdf
36. Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationships between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30, 777-798.
37. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 425-445.
38. Golob, U., & Podnar, K. (2011). Corporate social responsibility communication and dialogue. In In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 231-251). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39. Grant, D., & Nyberg, D. (2011). The view from organizational studies: A discourse-base understanding of corporate social responsibility and communication. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 534-549). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
40. Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39, 254-280.
41. Hemingway, C. A., & Maclagan, P. W. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33-44.
42. Hooghiemstra, R. (2000). Corporate communication and impression management–new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27, 55-68.
43. Ihlen, O., Bartlett, J., & May, S. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
44. Juholin, E. (2004). For business or the good of all? A Finnish approach to corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance, 4, 20–31.
45. Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review, 28, 21–37.
46. Ledingham, J. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15, 181–198.
47. Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management and public relations: Dimensions of an organization–public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24, 55–65.
48. L’Etang, J., Lugo-Ocando, J., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2011). Ethics: Corporate social responsibility, power and strategic communication. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 170-187). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
49. Lenssen, G. (2007). Foreword. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. v-vi). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50. Livesey, S. M., & Graham, J. (2007). Greening of corporations? Eco-talk and the emerging social imaginary of sustainable development. In S. May, G. Cheney, & J. Roper (Eds.), The debate over corporate social responsibility (pp. 336-350). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 455-469.
52. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33, 404-424.
53. Maxwell, J. A. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 279-300.
54. Mishra, S., & Suar, D. (2010). Does corporate social responsibility influence firm performance of Indian companies? Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 571–601. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0441-1
55. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
56. Mitra, M. (2007). It’s only business! India’s corporate social responsiveness in a globalized world. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
57. Mitra, R. (2012). “My country’s future”: A culture-centered interrogation of corporate social responsibility in India. Journal of Business Ethics, 106, 131-147.
58. Mohan, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship: Perspectives from India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2, 107-117.
59. Monge, P. (1988). 1998 ICA presidential address: Communication structures and processes in globalization. Journal of Communication, 48, 142-153.
60. Morsing, M (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 171-182.
61. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15, 323-338.
62. Morsing, M., Schultz, M., & Nielsen, K. U. (2008). The “Catch 22” of communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish study. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14, 97–111.
63. Mumby, D. K. (1988). Communication and power in organizations: Discourse, ideology and domination. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
64. Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2009). Investigating CSR communication in SMEs: A case study among Danish middle managers. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18, 83-93.
65. O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 529-551.
66. O’Connor, A., Shumate, M., & Meister, M. (2008). Walk the line: Active moms define corporate social responsibility. Public Relations Review, 34, 343-350.
67. Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 613–627.
68. Owen, W. F. (1984). Relational themes in interpersonal communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274-287.
69. Pal, M., & Dutta, M. J. (2013). “Land is our mother”: Alternative meanings of development in subaltern organizing. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 6, 203-220.
70. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71. Pedersen, E. R. (2006). Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: How companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Business and Society Review, 111, 137–163.
72. Planken, B., Sahu, S., & Nickerson, C. (2010). Corporate social responsibility communication in the Indian context. Journal of Indian Business Research, 2, 10-22.
73. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-92.
74. Premji, A. (2009, August 23). No such thing as quick victories: Azim Premji. The Economic Times. Retrieved from http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-company/corporate-trends/No-such-thing-as-quick-victories-Azim-Premji/articleshow/4924498.cms
75. Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013). Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18, 193-211.
76. Schultz, F., & Wehmeier, S. (2010). Institutionalization of corporate social responsibility within corporate communications. Combining institutional, sensemaking and communication perspectives. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 15, 9-29.
77. Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 43-62.
78. Sims, R. R., & Brinkman, J. (2003). Enron ethics (Or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243-256.
79. Srivastava, A. K., Negi, G., Mishra, V., & Pandey, S. (2012). Corporate social responsibility: A case study of TATA group. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 3, 17-27.
80. Starck, K., & Kruckeberg, D. (2003). Ethical obligations of public relations in an era of globalisation. Journal of Communication Management, 8, 29-40.
81. Stohl, C. (2001). Globalizing organizational communication. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 323-375). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82. Sundar, P. (2000). Beyond business: From merchant charity to corporate citizenship in India. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill.
83. Taylor, J. R., & Van Every, E. J. (2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
84. Tench, R., Bowd, R., & Jones, B. (2007). Perceptions and perspectives: Corporate social responsibility and the media. Journal of Communication Management, 11, 348-370.
85. Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 473-499). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
86. Waddock, S., & Smith, N. (2000). Corporate responsibility audits: Doing well by doing good. Sloan Management Review, 41, 75-83.
87. Waldman, D. A., et al. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 823-837.
88. Wehmeier, S., & Schultz, F. (2011). Corporate communication and corporate social responsibility: A storytelling perspective. In O. Ihlen, J. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.) The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility (pp. 467-488). Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.