The Biosynthetic Basis of Cell Size Control

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 793-802

  Schmoller, Kurt M ^a   Skotheim, Jan M ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL DNA; HISTONE; MESSENGER RNA; RIBOSOME PROTEIN; RIBOSOME RNA;

BIOSYNTHESIS; BLASTULA; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL DIVISION; CELL GROWTH; CELL SIZE; DAUGHTER CELL; DIPLOIDY; DNA CONTENT; DNA REPLICATION; EUKARYOTIC CELL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; MACROMOLECULE; NONHUMAN; PLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; YEAST CELL; ANIMAL; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SIZE; HUMANS; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS;

EID: 84950133504     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.006     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. Chan Y-H.M., Marshall W.F. Scaling properties of cell and organelle size. Organogenesis 2010, 6:88-96.
2. Goehring N.W., Hyman A.A. Organelle growth control through limiting pools of cytoplasmic components. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R330-R339.
3. Williamson D.H., Scopes A.W. The distribution of nucleic acids and protein between different sized yeast cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1961, 24:151-153.
4. Crissman H.A., Steinkamp J.A. Rapid, simultaneous measurement of DNA, protein, and cell volume in single cells from large mammalian cell populations. J. Cell Biol. 1972, 59:766-771.
5. Wu J-Q., Pollard T.D. Counting cytokinesis proteins globally and locally in fission yeast. Science 2005, 310:310-314.
6. Newman J.R.S., et al. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 2006, 441:840-846.
7. Zhurinsky J., et al. A coordinated global control over cellular transcription. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2010-2015.
8. Schmidt E.E. Cell size regulation, a mechanism that controls cellular RNA accumulation: consequences on regulation of the ubiquitous transcription factors Oct1 and NF-Y and the liver-enriched transcription factor DBP. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 128:467-483.
9. Padovan-Merhar O., et al. Single mammalian cells compensate for differences in cellular volume and DNA copy number through independent global transcriptional mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2015, 58:339-352.
10. Kempe H., et al. The volumes and transcript counts of single cells reveal concentration homeostasis and capture biological noise. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015, 26:797-804.
11. Jorgensen P., et al. The size of the nucleus increases as yeast cells grow. Mol. Biol. Cell 2007, 18:3523-3532.
12. Neumann F.R., Nurse P. Nuclear size control in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 179:593-600.
13. Rafelski S.M., et al. Mitochondrial network size scaling in budding yeast. Science 2012, 338:822-824.
14. Decker M., et al. Limiting amounts of centrosome material set centrosome size in C. elegans embryos. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1259-1267.
15. Chan Y-H.M., Marshall W.F. Organelle size scaling of the budding yeast vacuole is tuned by membrane trafficking rates. Biophys. J. 2014, 106:1986-1996.
16. Weber S.C., Brangwynne C.P. Inverse size scaling of the nucleolus by a concentration-dependent phase transition. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25:641-646.
17. Wühr M., et al. Evidence for an upper limit to mitotic spindle length. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1256-1261.
18. Hara Y., Kimura A. Cell-size-dependent spindle elongation in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1549-1554.
19. Farhadifar R., et al. Scaling, selection, and evolutionary dynamics of the mitotic spindle. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25:732-740.
20. Hazel J., et al. Changes in cytoplasmic volume are sufficient to drive spindle scaling. Science 2013, 342:853-856.
21. Good M.C., et al. Cytoplasmic volume modulates spindle size during embryogenesis. Science 2013, 342:856-860.
22. Robert L. Size sensors in bacteria, cell cycle control, and size control. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6:515.
23. Turner J.J., et al. Cell size control in yeast. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R350-R359.
24. Ginzberg M.B., et al. On being the right (cell) size. Science 2015, 348:1245075.
25. Martin S.G., Berthelot-Grosjean M. Polar gradients of the DYRK-family kinase Pom1 couple cell length with the cell cycle. Nature 2009, 459:852-856.
26. Moseley J.B., et al. A spatial gradient coordinates cell size and mitotic entry in fission yeast. Nature 2009, 459:857-860.
27. Rowlett V.W., Margolin W. The bacterial Min system. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:R553-R556.
28. Wood E., Nurse P. Pom1 and cell size homeostasis in fission yeast. Cell Cycle 2013, 12:3228-3236.
29. Pan K.Z., et al. Cortical regulation of cell size by a sizer cdr2p. Elife 2014, 3:e02040.
30. Bryan A.K., et al. Measurement of mass, density, and volume during the cell cycle of yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 107:999-1004.
31. Hartwell L.H., Unger M.W. Unequal division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its implications for the control of cell division. J. Cell Biol. 1977, 75:422-435.
32. Johnston G.C., et al. Coordination of growth with cell division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Exp. Cell Res. 1977, 105:79-98.
33. Harvey S.L., Kellogg D.R. Conservation of mechanisms controlling entry into mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:264-275.
34. Di Talia S., et al. The effects of molecular noise and size control on variability in the budding yeast cell cycle. Nature 2007, 448:947-951.
35. Schmoller K.M., et al. Dilution of the cell cycle inhibitor Whi5 controls budding yeast cell size. Nature 2015, 526:268-272.
36. Epstein C.B., Cross F.R. Genes that can bypass the CLN requirement for Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle START. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994, 14:2041-2047.
37. Ferrezuelo F., et al. Bck2 is a phase-independent activator of cell cycle-regulated genes in yeast. Cell Cycle 2014, 8:239-252.
38. Bastajian N., et al. Bck2 acts through the MADS box protein Mcm1 to activate cell-cycle-regulated genes in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003507.
39. Tyers M., et al. Comparison of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae G1 cyclins: Cln3 may be an upstream activator of Cln1, Cln2 and other cyclins. EMBO J. 1993, 12:1955-1968.
40. Futcher B. Cyclins and the wiring of the yeast cell cycle. Yeast 1996, 12:1635-1646.
41. Wang H., et al. Recruitment of Cln3 cyclin to promoters controls cell cycle entry via histone deacetylase and other targets. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000189.
42. Vergés E., et al. Cyclin Cln3 is retained at the ER and released by the J chaperone Ydj1 in late G1 to trigger cell cycle entry. Mol. Cell 2007, 26:649-662.
43. Yahya G., et al. A Whi7-anchored loop controls the G1 Cdk-cyclin complex at Start. Mol. Cell 2014, 53:115-126.
44. Costanzo M., et al. CDK activity antagonizes Whi5, an inhibitor of G1/S transcription in yeast. Cell 2004, 117:899-913.
45. De Bruin R.A.M., et al. Cln3 activates G1-specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5. Cell 2004, 117:887-898.
46. Doncic A., et al. Distinct interactions select and maintain a specific cell fate. Mol. Cell 2011, 43:528-539.
47. Spellman P.T., et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 1998, 9:3273-3297.
48. Amodeo A.A., Skotheim J.M. Cell-size control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, Published online August 7, 2015. 10.1101/cshperspect.a019083.
49. Blythe S.A., Wieschaus E.F. Coordinating cell cycle remodeling with transcriptional activation at the Drosophila MBT. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2015, 113:113-148.
50. Newport J., Kirschner M. A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: II. Control of the onset of transcription. Cell 1982, 30:687-696.
51. Amodeo A.A., et al. Histone titration against the genome sets the DNA-to-cytoplasm threshold for the Xenopus midblastula transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015, 112:E1086-E1095.
52. Springer M., et al. A general lack of compensation for gene dosage in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6:368.
53. Dephoure N., et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. Elife 2014, 3:e03023.
54. Jorgensen P., Tyers M. How cells coordinate growth and division. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:R1014-R1027.
55. Scott M., et al. Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 2010, 330:1099-1102.
56. Klumpp S., Hwa T. Bacterial growth: global effects on gene expression, growth feedback and proteome partition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 28:96-102.
57. Hui S., et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals a simple strategy of global resource allocation in bacteria. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2015, 11:784.
58. Keren L., et al. Promoters maintain their relative activity levels under different growth conditions. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9:701.
59. Elliott S.G., McLaughlin C.S. Regulation of RNA synthesis in yeast. III. Synthesis during the cell cycle. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1979, 169:237-243.
60. Marguerat S., Bahler J. Coordinating genome expression with cell size. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:560-565.
61. Ogur M., et al. The nucleic acids in a polyploid series of Saccharomyces. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1952, 40:175-184.
62. De Godoy L.M.F., et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 2008, 455:1251-1254.
63. Galitski T. Ploidy regulation of gene expression. Science 1999, 285:251-254.
64. Wu C-Y., et al. Control of transcription by cell size. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000523.
65. Elliott S.G., et al. Synthesis of ribosomal proteins during the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 1979, 137:1048-1050.
66. Mitchison J.M. Growth during the cell cycle. Int. Rev. Cytol. 2003, 226:165-258.
67. Elliott S.G., McLaughlin C.S. Rate of macromolecular synthesis through the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1978, 75:4384-4388.
68. Tzur A., et al. Cell growth and size homeostasis in proliferating animal cells. Science 2009, 325:167-171.
69. Godin M., et al. Using buoyant mass to measure the growth of single cells. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:387-390.
70. Campos M., et al. A constant size extension drives bacterial cell size homeostasis. Cell 2014, 159:1433-1446.
71. Soifer, I. et al. (2014) Single-cell analysis of growth in budding yeast and bacteria reveals a common size regulation strategy. Published online October 23, 2014. http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.4771.
72. Taheri-Araghi S., et al. Cell-size control and homeostasis in bacteria. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25:385-391.
73. Das Neves R.P., et al. Connecting variability in global transcription rate to mitochondrial variability. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000560.
74. Guantes R., et al. Global variability in gene expression and alternative splicing is modulated by mitochondrial content. Genome Res. 2015, 25:633-644.
75. Doncic A., et al. An algorithm to automate yeast segmentation and tracking. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e57970.