Cytoplasmic volume modulates spindle size during embryogenesis

Science

Volumn 342, Issue 6160, 2013, Pages 856-860

  Good, Matthew C ^a,b   Vahey, Michael D ^b   Skandarajah, Arunan ^b   Fletcher, Daniel A ^b,c   Heald, Rebecca ^a  

^a University of California Berkeley   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CHROMOSOME; CYTOPLASM; EGG; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FROG; SIZE; VOLUME;

ARTICLE; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SIZE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VOLUME; CYTOPLASM; EGG; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; XENOPUS;

EID: 84887704731     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1243147     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. R. Kafri et al., Nature 494, 480-483 (2013).
2. J. J. Turner, J. C. Ewald, J. M. Skotheim, Curr. Biol. 22, R350-R359 (2012).
3. A. Tzur, R. Kafri, V. S. LeBleu, G. Lahav, M. W. Kirschner, Science 325, 167-171 (2009).
4. M. Pinot et al., Curr. Biol. 19, 954-960 (2009).
5. M. Pinot et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 11705-11710 (2012).
6. L. Laan et al., Cell 148, 502-514 (2012).
7. N. Minc, D. Burgess, F. Chang, Cell 144, 414-426 (2011).
8. O. M. Lancaster et al., Dev. Cell 25, 270-283 (2013).
9. M. Wühr et al., Curr. Biol. 18, 1256-1261 (2008).
10. Y. H. Chan, W. F. Marshall, Science 337, 1186-1189 (2012).
11. S. Dumont, T. J. Mitchison, Curr. Biol. 19, R749-R761 (2009).
12. N. W. Goehring, A. A. Hyman, Curr. Biol. 22, R330-R339 (2012).
13. G. Goshima, J. M. Scholey, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 21-57 (2010).
14. D. L. Levy, R. Heald, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 113-135 (2012).
15. G. Greenan et al., Curr. Biol. 20, 353-358 (2010).
16. Y. Hara, A. Kimura, Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 1411-1419 (2013).
17. A. Courtois, M. Schuh, J. Ellenberg, T. Hiiragi, J. Cell Biol. 198, 357-370 (2012).
18. A. Desai, A. Murray, T. J. Mitchison, C. E. Walczak, Methods Cell Biol. 61, 385-412 (1998).
19. E. Hannak, R. Heald, Nat. Protoc. 1, 2305-2314 (2006).
20. K. S. Brown et al., J. Cell Biol. 176, 765-770 (2007).
21. M. Decker et al., Curr. Biol. 21, 1259-1267 (2011).
22. E. G. Conklin, J. Exp. Zool. 12, 1-98 (1912).
23. A description of the spindle centering analysis and a detailed derivation of the limiting component model can be found in the supplementary materials.
24. R. Lattao, S. Bonaccorsi, M. Gatti, J. Cell Sci. 125, 584-588 (2012).
25. J. Brugués, V. Nuzzo, E. Mazur, D. J. Needleman, Cell 149, 554-564 (2012).
26. R. Loughlin, R. Heald, F. Nédélec, J. Cell Biol. 191, 1239-1249 (2010).
27. L. Brun, B. Rupp, J. J. Ward, F. Nédélec, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 21173-21178 (2009).
28. M. E. Janson, M. E. de Dood, M. Dogterom, J. Cell Biol. 161, 1029-1034 (2003).
29. S. B. Reber et al., Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 1116-1122 (2013).
30. J. D. Wilbur, R. Heald, eLife 2, e00290 (2013).
31. R. Loughlin, J. D. Wilbur, F. J. McNally, F. J. Nédélec, R. Heald, Cell 147, 1397-1407 (2011).