Assessment of a revised method for evaluating peer-graded assignments in a skills-based course sequence

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 79, Issue 8, 2015, Pages

  Storjohann, Tara ^a   Raney, Erin ^a   Buckley, Kelsey ^a  

^a MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer assessment; Peer grading; SOAP notes

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIKERT SCALE; PERCEPTION; SKILL; STUDENT; STUDENT T TEST; UNIVERSITY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; PEER GROUP; PHARMACY STUDENT; PROCEDURES;

COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY; HUMANS; PEER GROUP; STUDENTS, PHARMACY;

EID: 84949764678     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/ajpe798123     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Medina MS, Plaza CM, Stowe CD et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education (CAPE) educational outcomes. Am J Pharm Educ.2013; 77 (8):Article 162.
2. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Guidance for the accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Guidance for standards 2016. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/ GuidanceforStandards2016FINAL.pdf Accessed November, 13 2015.
3. Dochy F, Sergers M, Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer and coassessment in higher education: A review. Study Higher Educ. 1999;24(3):331-350.
4. Blooms BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. 1st Ed. The cognitive domain. NewYork: David McKay, Inc.; 1956.
5. Basheti IA, Ryan G, Woulfe J, et al. Anonymous peer assessment of medication management reviews. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;75(5): Article 77.
6. Krause JE, Popovich NG. A group interaction peer/selfassessment process in pharmacy practice course. Am J Pharm Educ. 1996;60:Article 136-145.
7. O’Brein CE, Franks AM, Stowe CD. Multiple rubric-based assessment of student case presentations. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008; 72(3):Article 58.
8. Planas LG, Er NL. A systems approach to scaffold communication skills development. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(2) :Article 35.
9. Wagner ML, Suh DC, Cruz S. Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading. Am J Pharm Educ. 2011;75(7) :Article 130.
10. Storjohann T, Raney E, Pogge E, et al. Evaluation of peer-graded assignments in a skills-based course sequence. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2013;5(4):283-287