Evaluation of peer-graded assignments in a skills-based course sequence

Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 283-287

  Storjohann, Tara ^a   Raney, Erin ^a   Pogge, Elizabeth ^a   Cauthon, Kim ^b  

^a MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD   (United States)

Author keywords

Peer assessment; Peer grading; SOAP notes

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; COURSE EVALUATION; CURRICULUM; FACULTY STUDENT RELATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; PEER GRADING; PEER GROUP; PHARMACY STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

EID: 84879158916     PISSN: 18771297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2013.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Dochy F., Sergers M., Sluijsmans D. The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review. Stud Higher Educ 1999, 24(3):331-350.
2. Topping K. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Rev Educ Res 1998, 68(3):249-276.
3. Basheti I.A., Ryan G., Woulfe J., Bartimote-Aufflick K. Anonymous peer assessment of medication management reviews. Am J Pharm Educ 2010, 75(5). Article 77.
4. Somervell H. Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment. Assess Eval Higher Educ 1993, 18(3):221-233.
5. Blooms B.S. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. 1. The Cognitive Domain 1956, David McKay, Inc, New York.
6. Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and guidelines for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. 〈〉; 2011 Accessed January 18, 2013. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/deans/standards.asp.
7. Weed L. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med 1968, 278:593-597.
8. Cho K., Schunn C.D., Wilson R.W. Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. J Educ Psychol 2006, 98(4):891-901.
9. Krause J.E., Popovich N.G. A group interaction peer/self assessment process in pharmacy practice course. Am J Pharm Educ 1996, 60:136-145.
10. O'Brein C.E., Franks A.M., Stowe C.D. Multiple rubric-based assessment of student case presentations. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72(3). Article 58.
11. Planas L.G., Er N.L. A systems approach to scaffold communication skills development. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72(2). Article 35.
12. Wagner M.L., Suh D.C., Cruz S. Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading. Am J Pharm Educ 2011, 75(7). Article 130.