Public policy

The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 457-471

  Schmukler, Kristina R ^a   Rasquiza, Ana ^a   Dimmitt, Julie ^a   Crosby, Faye J ^b  

^a University of California ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949743054     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446200919.n28     Document Type: Chapter

References (114)

1. Aberson, C. L., &Haag, S. C. Beliefs about affirmative action and diversity and their relationship to support for hiring policies. Analysis of Social Issues and Policy, 3,121-138. (2003).
2. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D. J., &Sanford, R. N.(1950). The authoritarian personality. New York:Harper.
3. Alba, R. Rumbaut, R. G., &Marotz, K. A distorted nation: Perceptions of racial/ethnic group sizes and attitudes toward immigrants and other minorities. Social Forces, 84,901-919. (2005).
4. Allport, G. W.(1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA:Addison-Wesley.
5. Bart, D. Van Klel, A., &Kossowka, M. Authoritarian and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of sociopolitical context and pf political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26,299-320. (2005).
6. Bobo, L.(2000). Race and beliefs about affirmative action: Addressing the effects of interests, group threat, ideology, and racism. In D. O.Sears, J.Sidanius, & L.Bobo (Eds.), Racialized politics: The debate about racism in America (pp. 137-164).Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
7. Bobo, L., &Kluegel, J. R. Opposition to race-targeting: Self-interest, stratification ideology, or racial attitudes? American Sociological Review, 58,443-464. (1993).
8. Bobocel, D. R., Son Hing, L. A., Holmvall, C. M., &Zanna, M. P.(2002). Policies to redress social injustice: Is the concern for justice a cause both of support and of opposition. In M.Ross & D.Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 204-225).New York:Cambridge University Press.
9. Braddock, J. H., II &McPartland, J. M. Social psychological processes that perpetuate racial segregation: The relationship between school and employment desegregation. Journal of Black Studies, 19,267-289. (1989).
10. Bullock, H. E. Wyche, K. F., &Williams, W. R. Media images of the poor. Journal of Social Issues, 57,229-249. (2001).
11. Chandler, C. R., &Tsai, Y. Social factors influencing immigration attitudes: An analysis of data from the general social survey. The Social Science Journal, 38,177-188. (2001).
12. Christie, R.(1991). Authoritarianism and related constructs. In J. P.Robinson, P. R.Shaver, & L.Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 551-571).San Diego:Academic Press.
13. Chong, D. Citrin, J., &Conley, P. When self-interest matters. Political Psychology, 22,541-570. (2001).
14. Clayton, S., &Crosby, F. Postscript: The nature of connections. Journal of Social Issues, 42,189-194. (1986).
15. Combs, G. M., &Nadkarni, S. The tale of two cultures: Attitudes towards affirmative action in the United States and India. Journal of World Business, 40,158-171. (2005).
16. Cook, S. Social science and school desegregation: Did we mislead the Supreme Court? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5,420-437. (1979).
17. Crain, R. L. School integration and the academic achievement of Negroes. Sociology of Education, 44,1-26. (1971).
18. Crain, R. L., &Mahard, R. E. School racial composition and Black college attendance and achievement test performance. Sociology of Education, 51,81-101. (1978).
19. Crosby, F. J.(2004). Affirmative action is dead; long live affirmative action. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
20. Crosby, F. J., &Bearman, S. The uses of a good theory. Journal of Social Issues, 62,415-438. (2006).
21. Crosby, F. Bromley, S., &Saxe, L. Recent unobtrusive studies of black and white discrimination and prejudice: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 87,546-563. (1980).
22. Crosby, F. J., &Clayton, S. Affirmative action: Psychological contributions to policy. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1,71-87. (2001).
23. Crosby, F. J., &Cordova, D. I. Words worth of wisdom: Toward an understanding of affirmative action. Journal of Social Issues, 52,33-49. (1996).
24. Crosby, F. J., &Dovidio, J. F.(2008). Discrimination in America and legal strategies for reducing it. In E.Borgida & S.Fiske (Eds), Psychological science in court: Beyond common knowledge (pp. 23-43).Boston:Blackwell.
25. Crosby, F. J. Iyer, A. Clayton, S., &Downing, R. Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58,93-115. (2003).
26. Crosby, F. J. Iyer, A., &Sincharoen, S. Understanding affirmative action. Annual Review of Psychology, 57,586-611. (2006).
27. Crosby, F. J., &Smith, A. E.(2007). The University of Michigan cases: Social scientific studies of diversity and fairness. In R. L.Weiner, B.Bornstein, R.Schopp, & S.Willborn (Eds.), Legal decision making in everyday life: Controversies in social consciousness (pp. 121-142).New York:Springer.
28. Crosby, F. J., &Stockdale, M. S.(2007). Understanding sex discrimination. In F. J.Crosby, M. S.Stockdale, & A. S.Ropp (Eds.), Sex discrimination in the workplace: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3-5).Boston:Blackwell.
29. Cuccia, A. D., &Carnes, G. A. A closer look at the relation between tax complexity and tax equity perceptions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22,113-140. (2001).
30. Davis, J. A., &Smith, T. W.(2000). General Social Surveys, 1972-1990. Chicago:National Opinion Research Center.
31. Deaux, K.(2006). To be an immigrant. NewYork:Russell Sage Foundation.
32. DeCoster, J. Banner, M. J. Smith, E. R., &Semin, G. R. On the inexplicability of the implicit: Differences in the information provided by implicit and explicit tests. Social Cognition, 24,5-21. (2006).
33. Deutsch, M., &Collins, M.(1951). Interracial housing. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.
34. Dovidio, J. F. Gaertner, S. L., &Validzic, A. Intergroup bias: Status, differentiation, and a common in-group identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,109-120. (1998).
35. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., &Gaertner, S. L.(2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In S.Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 137-163).Mahwah, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
36. Duckitt, J., &Sibley, C. G. Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21,113-130. (2007).
37. Ellison, C. G., &Powers, D. A. The contact hypothesis and racial attitudes among Black Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 75,385-400. (1994).
38. Epstein, W. M. Cleavage in American attitudes toward social welfare. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 31,177-201. (2004).
39. Eriksen, K., &Fallan, L. Tax knowledge and attitudes towards taxation: A report on a quasiexperiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17,387-402. (1996).
40. Espenshade, T. J., &Hempstead, K. Contemporary American attitudes toward U. S. immigration. International Migration Review, 30,535-570. (1996).
41. Esses, V. M. Dovidio, J. F. Jackson, L. M., &Armstrong, T. L. The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57,389-412. (2001).
42. Esses, V. M. Jackson, L. M., &Armstrong, T. L. Intergroup competition and attitudes toward immigrants and immigration: An instrumental model of group conflict. Journal of Social Issues, 54,699-724. (1998).
43. Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. Munoz-Rojas, D. Invernizzi, F., &Mugny, G. Perceived in-group threat as a factor moderating the influence of in-group norms on discrimination against foreigners. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34,135-153. (2004).
44. Feather, N. T., &Boeckmann, R. J. Gender, discrimination beliefs, group-based guilt, and response to affirmative action for Australian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31,290-304. (2007).
45. Frey, F., &Tropp, L. Being seen as individuals versus as group members: Extending research on metaperception to intergroup contexts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10,265-280. (2006).
46. Fujiwara, L. H. Immigrant rights are human rights: The reframing of immigrant entitlement and welfare. Social Problems, 52,79-101. (2005).
47. Gilens, M. Race and poverty in America: Public misperceptions and the American news media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60,515-541. (1996).
48. GoldenH. HinkleS., &CrosbyF.J. Reactions to affirmative action: Substance and semantics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31,73-88. (2001).
49. Green, D. P., &Gerken, A. E. Self-interest and public opinion toward smoking and restrictions and cigarette taxes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53,1-16. (1989).
50. Green, D. P. Kahneman, D., &Kunreuther, H. How the scope and method of public funding affect willingness to pay for public goods. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58,49-67. (1994).
51. Gurin, P.(2004). The educational value of diversity. In P.Gurin, J. S.Lehman, & E.Lewis (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 97-188).Ann Arbor, MI:University of Michigan Press.
52. Harrison, D. A. Kravitz, D. A. Mayer, D. M. Leslie, L. M., &Lev-Arey, D. Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Addressing reactions to redressing discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology. 91,1013-1036. (2006).
53. Hasseldine, J., &Hite, P. A. Framing, gender and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24,517-533. (2003).
54. Henry, P., &Sears, D. The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85,259-275. (2003).
55. Hewstone, M. Rubin, M., &Willis, H. Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53,575-604. (2002).
56. Jackson, J. S. Brown, K. T. Brown, T. N., &Marks, B. Contemporary immigration policy orientation among dominant-group members in Western Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 57,431-456. (2001).
57. Khan, S. S., &Liu, J. H. Intergroup attributions and ethnocentrism in the Indian subcontinent: Theultimate attribution error. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39,16-36. (2008).
58. Kinder, D. The continuing American dilemma: White resistance to racial change 40 years after Myrdal. Journal of Social Issues, 42,151-169. (1986).
59. Kinder, D., &Sears, D. Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40,414-431. (1981).
60. Kluegel, J. R., &Smith, E. R.(1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans' views of what is and what ought to be, social institutions and social change. New York:A. de Gruyter.
61. Knight, J. L., &Hebl, M. R. Affirmative reaction: The influence of type of justification on non-beneficiary attitudes toward affirmative action plans in higher education. Journal of Social Issues, 61,547-568. (2005).
62. Konrad, A. M., &Hartmann, L. Gender differences in attitudes towards affirmative action programs in Australia: Effects of beliefs, interests and attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 45,415-432. (2001).
63. Kravitz, D. A. Attitudes toward affirmative action plans directed at Blacks: Effects of plan and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25,2192-2220. (1995).
64. Kravitz, D. A., Harrison, D. A., Turner, M. E., Levine, E. L., ChavesW., Brannick, M., et al.(1997). Affirmative action: A review of psychological and behavioral research. Bowling Green, OH:Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
65. Kravitz, D. A., &Klineberg, S. L. Reactions to two versions of affirmative action among Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85,597-611. (2000).
66. Kravitz, D. A., &Platania, J. Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: Effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78,928-938. (1993).
67. Krings, F. Tschan, F., &Bettex, S. Determinants of attitudes towards affirmative action in a Swiss sample. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21,585-611. (2007).
68. Leonardelli, G. J., &Brewer, M. B. Minority and majority discrimination: When and why. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37,468-485. (2001).
69. Lipset, S. M., &Raab, S. M.(1970). The politics of unreason. New York:Harper and Row.
70. McCaffery, E. J., &Baron, J. Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25,679-705. (2004).
71. Middleton, M. R. Tajfel, H., &Johnson, N. B. Cognitive and affective aspects of children's national attitudes. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 9,122-134. (1970).
72. Milgram, S.(1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York:Harper and Row.
73. Moscovici, S. Zavalloni, M., &Weinberger, M. Studies on polarization of judgments: II. person perception, ego involvement and group interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2,92-94. (1972).
74. Mullen, B. Ethnophaulisms for ethnic immigrant groups. Journal of Social Issues, 57,457-475. (2001).
75. Myrdal, G.(1944). An American dilemma. New York:Harper.
76. National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders (1968). Report. Washington, D.C.:U. S. Government Printing Office.
77. Neubeck, K. J., &Cazenave, N. A.(2001) Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America's poor. New York:Routledge.
78. Orfield, G., &Eaton, S. E.(1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of Education. New York:The New Press.
79. Otten, S., &Epstude, K. Overlapping mental representations of self, ingroup, and outgroup: Unraveling self-stereotyping and self-anchoring. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32,957-969. (2006).
80. Ozawa, K. Crosby, M., &Crosby, F. Individualism and resistance to affirmative action: A comparison of Japanese and American samples. Journal of Applied. Social Psychology, 26,1138-1152. (1996).
81. Pettigrew, T. F. Reactions toward the new minorities in Western Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 24,77-103. (1998).
82. Pettigrew, T. F. A half century after Brown v Board of Education. American Psychologist, 59,521-529. (2004).
83. Pettigrew, T. F. Christ, O. Wagner, U. Meertens, R. W. van Dick, R., &Zick, A. Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64,385-401. (2008).
84. Pettigrew, T. F., &Green, R. L. School desegregation in large cities: A critique of the Coleman "white flight" thesis. Harvard Educational Review, 46,1-53. (1976).
85. Pettigrew, T. F., &Meertens, R. W. Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25,57-75. (1995).
86. Pratto, F., &Lemieux, A. F. The psychological ambiguity of immigration and its implications for promoting immigration policy. Journal of Social Issues, 57,413-430. (2001).
87. Quinn, K. A. Ross, E. M., &Esses, V. M. Attribution of responsibility and reactions to affirmative action: Affirmative action as help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,321-331. (2001).
88. Reyna, C. Tucker, A. Korfmacher, W., &Henry, P. J. Searching for common ground between supporters and opponents of affirmative action. Political Psychology, 26,667-682. (2005).
89. Sears, D. O., &Henry, P. J. The origins of symbolic racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85,259-275. (2003).
90. Schmukler, K. R., Thompson, E. M., &Crosby, F. J.(2008). Affirmative action: Images and realities. In G.S.Parks, S. E.Jones, & W. J.Cardi (Eds.), Critical race realism: Intersections of psychology, race, and law (pp. 155-164).New York:The New Press.
91. Schofield, J. W.(1995). Review of research on school desegregation's impact on elementary and secondary school students. In J. A.Banks & C. A.Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 597-616).NewYork:Macmillan.
92. Schooler, C. Serfdom's legacy. American Journal of Sociology, 81,1265-1286. (1976).
93. Semyonov, M. Raijman, R. Tov, A. Y., &Schmidt, P. Population size, perceived threat and exclusion: A multiple indicators analysis of attitudes toward foreigners in Germany. Social Science Research, 44,681-701. (2004).
94. Shen, F., &Edwards, H. H. Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55,795-809. (2005).
95. Sidanius, J. Pratto, F., &Bobo, L. Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70,476-490. (1996).
96. Sidanius, J. Pratto, F. van Laar, C., &Levin, S. Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25,845-880. (2004).
97. Smith, A. E., &Crosby, F. J.(2008). From Kansas to Michigan: The path from desegregation to diversity. In G.Adams, M.Biernat, N.Branscombe, C.Crandall, & L. S.Wrightsman (Eds.), Commemorating Brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination (pp. 99-113).Washington, DC:APA Books.
98. Smith, M. B. The American soldier and its critics: What survives the attack on positivism? Social Psychology Quarterly, 47,192-198. (1984).
99. Smith, M. B.(2003). For a significant social psychology: The collected writings of M. Brewster Smith. New York:New York University Press.
100. Smith-McLallen, A. Johnson, B. T. Dovidio, J. F., &Pearson, A. M. Black and White: The role of color bias in implicit race bias. Social Cognition, 24,46-73. (2006).
101. Sniderman, P. M., &Piazza, T.(1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
102. Sniderman, P. M. Piazza, T. Tetlock, P. E., &Kendrick, A. The new racism. American Journal of Political Science, 35,423-447. (1991).
103. Sniderman, P., &Tetlock, P. Symbolic racism: Problems of motive attribution in political analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 42,129-149. (1986).
104. Soss, J., Schram, S. F., Vartanian, T. P., &O'Brien, E.(2003). The hard line and the color line: Race, welfare, and the roots of get-tough reform. In. S. F.Schram, J.Soss, & R. C.Fording (Eds.). Race and the politics of welfare reform (pp. 225-252).Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press.
105. Stephan, W. G. Ybarra, O., &Bachman, G. Prejudice toward immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29,2221-2237. (1999).
106. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., &Williams, R. M.(1949) The American soldier. Adjustment During Army Life (Vol 1).Princeton:Princeton University Press.
107. Tedin, K. L. Matland, R. E., &Weiher, G. R. Age, race, self-interest, and financing public schools through referenda. Journal of Politics, 63,270-294. (2001).
108. Thomas, W. F. The meaning of race to employers: A dynamic qualitative perspective. Sociological Quarterly, 44,227-242. (2003).
109. Tropp, L. R., &Wright, S. C. The inclusion of ingroup in the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27,585-600. (2001).
110. Turner, J. C. Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 5,5-34. (1975).
111. Turner, J. C. Brown, R. J., &Tajfel, H. Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9,187-204. (1979).
112. Villano, P., &Zani, B. Social dominance orientation and prejudice in an Italian sample. Psychological Reports, 101,614-616. (2007).
113. Wells, A. S. Reexamining research on school desegregation: Long-versus short-term effects. Teachers College Record, 96,691-706. (1995).
114. Zick, A. Pettigrew, T. F., &Wagner, U. Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe. Journal of Social Issues, 64,233-251. (2008).