The University of Michigan cases: Social scientific studies of diversity and fairness

Social Consciousness in Legal Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 121-142

  Crosby, Faye J ^a   Smith, Amy E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37249040993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-46218-9_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Antonio, A. L., Chang, M. J., Hakuta, K., Kenny, D. A., Levin, S., & Milem, J. F. (2004). Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science, 15(8), 507-510.
2. Ayers, L. R. (1992). Perceptions of affirmative action among its beneficiaries. Social Justice Research, 5, 223-238.
3. Ayres, I., & Brooks, R. (2005). Does affirmative action reduce the number of Black lawyers? Stanford Law Review, 57, 1807-1854.
4. Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer, Jr. (Ed.), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Barton, A. H. (2003). A note on the Rothman, Liposet, and Nevitte paper. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 381-388.
6. Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
7. Bowen, W. G., & Rudenstine, N. L. (2003, February 7). Race-sensitive admissions: Back to basics. The Chronicle of Higher Education, B7-B10.
8. Brown, R. P., Charnsangavej, T., Keough, K. A., Newman, M. L., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2000). Putting the "affirm" into affirmative action: Preferential selection and academic performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 736-747.
9. Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2004). Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants Evidence from California and Texas. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10366. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10366.
10. Carter, S. L. (1991). Reflections of an affirmative action baby. New York: Basic Books.
11. Chambers, D. L., Clydesdale, T. T., Kidder, W. C., & Lempert, R. O. (2005). The real impact of eliminating affirmative action in American law schools: An empirical critique of Richard Sander's study. Stanford Law Review, 57, 1855-1898.
12. Chang, M. J., Astin, A. W., & Kim, D. (2004). Cross-racial interaction among undergraduates: Some causes and consequences. Research in Higher Education, 45(5), 529-553.
13. Chesler, M., & Peet, M. (2002). White student views of affirmative action on campus. The Diversity Factor, 10(2), 21-27.
14. Cordes, M. W. (2004). Affirmative action after Grutter and Gratz. Northern Illinois University Law Review, 24, 691-751.
15. Coser, R. (1975). The complexity of roles as a seedbed of individual autonomy. In L. A. Coser (Ed.) The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton (pp. 85-102). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16. Crosby, F. (1994). Understanding affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 13-41.
17. Crosby, F. J. (2004a). Affirmative action is dead; long live affirmative action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
18. Crosby, F. J. (2004b). Expert witness testimony. John M. Kohlbek and Michael Pritchard v. The City of Omaha, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska Case No. 8:03CV68.
19. Crosby, F. J., & Clayton, S. (2004). Affirmative action and the search for educational equity. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4, 243-249.
20. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A., Clayton, S., & Downing, R. A. (2003). Affirmative action; Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist, 58, 93-115.
21. Crump, D. (2004). The narrow tailoring issue in the affirmative action cases: Reconsidering the Supreme Court's approval in Gratz and Grutter of race-based decision-making by individualized discretion. Florida Law Review, 56(3), 483-539.
22. Cunningham, C. D., Loury, G. C., & Skrentny, J. D. (2002). Passing strict scrutiny: Using social science to design affirmative action programs. The Georgetown Law Journal, 90, 835-885.
23. Dale, C. V. (2004, December 15). Affirmative action revisited: A legal history and prospectus. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress.
24. Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (1999). Estimating the payoff to attending a more selective college on application of selection on observables and unobservables. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7322. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7322.
25. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137-149.
26. Eastland, T. (1997). Ending affirmative action: The case for colorblind justice. New York: Basic Books.
27. Elizondo, E., & Crosby, F. J. (2004). Attitudes toward affirmative action as a function of the strength of ethnic identity among Latino college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 1773-1796.
28. Erikson, E. L. H. (1956). The problem of ego identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4, 56-121.
29. Geiser, S., & Studley, R. (2001). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California. Retrieved February 28, 2005 from http://www.ucop.edu/sas/research/ researchandplanning/.
30. Green, D. O. (2004). Justice and diversity: Michigan's response to Gratz, Grutter, and the affirmative action debate. Urban Education, 39, 374-393.
31. Gurin, P. (1999). Expert report of Patricia Gurin, Gratz, et al. v. Bollinger, et al., No. 97-75321 (E.D. Mich). In The Compelling Need for Diversity in Higher Education. Retrieved January 22, 2003 from the University of Michigan Admissions Website: http://www.umich.edu/~urel/admissions/legal/ expert/gurintoc/html.
32. Gurin, P. (2004). The educational value of diversity. In P. Gurin, J. S. Lehman, & E. Lewis (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 97-188). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
33. Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330-366.
34. Gurin, P., Nagda, B. R. A., & Lopez, G. E. (2004). The benefits of diversity in education for democratic citizenship. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 17-34.
35. Heilman, M. E., & Alcott, V. B. (2001). What I think you think of me: Women's reactions to being viewed as beneficiaries of preferential selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 574-582.
36. Heilman, M. E., Battle, W. S., Keller, C. E., & Lee, R. A. (1998). Type of affirmative action policy: A determinant of reactions to sex-based preferential selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 190-205.
37. Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Stathatos, P. (1997). The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 603-625.
38. Heilman, M. E., Lucas, J. A., & Kaplow, S. R. (1990). Self-derogating consequences of sex-based preferential selection: The moderating role of initial self-confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 46, 202-216.
39. Heilman, M. E., McCullough, W. F., & Gilbert, D. (1996). The other side of affirmative action: Reactions of nonbeneficiaries to sex-based preferential selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 346-357.
40. Heilman, M. E., Simon, M. C., & Repper, D. P. (1987). Intentionally favored, unintentionally harmed? Impact of sex-based preferential selection on self-perceptions and selfevaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 62-68.
41. Heriot, G. L. (2003). Strict scrutiny, public opinion, and affirmative action on campus: Should the courts find a narrowly tailored solution to a compelling need in a policy most Americans oppose? Harvard Journal on Legislation, 40, 217-233.
42. Jackson, J. (2003). Toward administrative diversity: An analysis of the African-American male educational pipeline. Journal of Men's Studies, 12, 43-60.
43. Jencks, C. (1998). Racial bias in testing. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 55-85). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
44. Kane, T. J. (1998). Racial and ethnic preferences in college admissions. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp. 431-456) Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
45. Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995a). Formalized HRM structures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practices? Academy of Management Journal, 38, 787-820.
46. Konrad, A. M., & Linnehan, F. (1995b). Race and sex differences in line managers' reactions to equal employment opportunity and affirmative action interventions. Group and Organizational Management, 20, 409-439.
47. Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 2, pp. 36-58. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Laycock, D. (2004). The broader case for affirmative action: Desegregation, academic excellence, and future leadership. Tulane Law Review, 78, 1767-1843.
49. Lehman, J. S. (2004). The evolving language of diversity and integration in discussions of affirmative action from Bakke to Grutter. In P. Gurin, J. S. Lehman, & E. Lewis (Eds.), Defending diversity: Affirmative action at the University of Michigan (pp. 61-96). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
50. Lempert, R. O., Chambers, D. L., & Adams, T. K. (2000a). Michigan's minority graduates in practice: The river runs through law school. Law and Social Inquiry, 25, 395-505.
51. Lempert, R. O., Chambers, D. L., & Adams, T. K. (2000b). Law school affirmative action: An empirical study of Michigan's minority graduates in practice: Answers to methodological queries. Law and Social Inquiry, 25, 585-597.
52. Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
53. Lopez, G. E., Gurin, P., & Nagda, B. A. (1998). Education and understanding structural causes for group inequalities. Political Psychology, 19, 305-329.
54. Marinoff, L. (2000). Equal opportunity versus equity. Sexuality and Culture: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, 4, 23-43.
55. Newcomb, T. L. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. New York: Dryden Press.
56. Newcomb, T. L., Koenig, K. E., Flacks, R., & Warwick, D. P. (1967). Persistence and change: Bennington College and its students after 25 years. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
57. Orfield, G., & Whitla, D. (2001). Diversity and legal education: Student experiences in leading law schools. In G. Orfield & M. Kurlaender (Eds.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 143-174). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., & Christiansen, N. D. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82, 376-389.
59. Perloff, R., & Bryant, F. B. (2000). Identifying and measuring diversity's payoffs: Light at the end of the affirmative action tunnel. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 101-111.
60. Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In D. R. Green, M. P. Ford, & G. B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 1-11). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Ponterotto, J. G., Martinez, F. M., & Hayden, D. C. (1986). Student affirmative action programs: A help or hindrance to development of minority graduate students. Journal of College Student Personnel, 27, 318-325.
62. Prentice, D., & Crosby, F. (1987). The importance of context for assessing deservingness. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives (pp. 165-182). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Renner, K. E., & Moore, T. (2004). The more things change, the more they stay the same: The elusive search for racial equity in higher education. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4, 227-241.
64. Rothman, S., Lipset, S. M., & Nevitte, N. (2003). Does enrollment diversity improve university education? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15, 8-26.
65. Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302-318.
66. Sander, R. H. (2004). A systemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stanford Law Review, 57, 367-483.
67. Schmermund, A., Sellers, R., Mueller, B., & Crosby, F. (2001). Attitudes toward affirmative action as a function of racial identity among African American college students. Political Psychology, 22, 759-774.
68. Smith, A. E., & Crosby, F. J. (In press). From Kansas to Michigan: The path from desegregation to diversity. In G. Adams, N. Branscomb, & M. Biernat (Eds.), Brown at 50. Washington, DC: Psychological Press.
69. Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 493-509.
70. Steele, S. (1990). The content of our character: a new vision of race in America. New York: Harper Perennial.
71. Stewart, A. J. & Healy, J. M. (1989). Linking individual development and social change. American Psychologist, 44, 30-42.
72. Stohr, G. (2004). A black and white case: How affirmative action survived its greatest legal challenge. Princeton, NJ: Bloomberg Press.
73. Sugrue, T. (1999) Expert report of T. Sugrue, Gratz, et al. v. Bollinger, et al., No. 97-75321 (E.D. Mich). In The compelling need for diversity in higher education. Retrieved on February 28, 2005 from http://www.umich.edu/ ~urel/admission/legal/expert/sugrutoc. html.
74. Taylor, M. C. (1994). Impact of affirmative action on beneficiary groups: Evidence from the 1990 General Social Survey. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 143-178.
75. Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A.M. (1997). America in black and white: One nation indivisible. New York: Simon & Schuster.
76. Thomas, K. R., & Weinrach, S.G. (1998). Multiculturalism, cultural diversity, and affirmative action goals: A reconsideration. Rehabilitation Education, 12, 65-75.
77. Tomasson, R. F. (1996). Against affirmative action. In R. F. Tomasson, F. J. Crosby, & S. D. Herzberger (Eds.), Affirmative action: The pros and cons of policy and practice (pp. 112-267). Washington, DC: The American University Press.
78. Tougas, F., Joly, S., Beaton, A. M., & St.-Pierre, L. (1996). Reactions of beneficiaries to preferential treatment: A reality check. Human Relations, 49, 453-464.
79. Truax, K., Wood, A., Wright, E., Cordova, D. I., & Crosby, F. J. (1998). Undermined? Affirmative action from the targets' point of view. In J .K. Swim & C. Strangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 171-188). New York: Academic Press.
80. Tyler, T. A., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
81. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
82. Van Laar, C., & Levin, S. (2000, June). Persona, and social identity in stereotype threat: Is affirmative action stigmatizing?. Paper presented at the biannual meeting of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Minneapolis, MN.
83. Vars, F. E., & Bowen, W. G. (1998). Scholastic aptitude test scores, race, and academic performance in selective colleges and universities. In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 457-479). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
84. Whitla, D. K., Orfield, G., Silen, W., Teperow, C., Howard, C., & Reede, J. (2003). Educational benefits of diversity in medical school: A survey of students. Academic Medicine, 78, 460-466.
85. Wilkins, D. B. (2005). A systematic response to systemic disadvantage: A response to Sander. Stanford Law Review, 57, 1915-1961.
86. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2001). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. In H. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (pp. 337-351). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
87. Wright, S. C., & Tropp, L. R. (2002). Collective action is response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. In I. Walker & H. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 200-236). New York: Cambridge University Press.
88. Zelnick, B. (1996). Backfire: A reporter's look at affirmative action. Washington: Regnery.
89. Zuriff, G. E. (2004). Is affirmative action fair? American Psychologist, 59, 124-125.