Framing, gender and tax compliance

Journal of Economic Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 517-533

  Hasseldine, John ^a   Hite, Peggy A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Framing; Gender; Prospect theory; Tax compliance; Tax evasion

Indexed keywords

EID: 30244441162     PISSN: 01674870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00209-X     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Allingham M.G. Sandmo A. Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis Journal of Public Economics 1 1972 323-338
2. Andreoni J. Erard B. Feinstein J. Tax compliance Journal of Economic Literature 36 June 1998 818-860
3. Baldry J.C. Income tax evasion and the tax schedule: Some experimental results Public Finance 42 1987 357-383
4. Dillman D.A. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method 1978 John Wiley New York
5. Druckman J.N. The implications of framing effects for citizen incompetence Political Behavior 23 2001 225-256
6. Eagly A.H. Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation 1987 Lawrence Earlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
7. Elffers H. Hessing D.J. Influencing the prospects of tax evasion Journal of Economic Psychology 18 1997 289-304
8. Fagley N.S. Miller P.M. Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 71 1997 355-373
9. Fallan L. Gender, exposure to tax knowledge, and attitudes towards taxation: An experimental approach Journal of Business Ethics 18 1999 173-184
10. Fowler F.J. Survey research methods 1988 Sage Publications Newbury Park
11. Frisch D. Reasons for framing effects Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54 1993 399-429
12. Ganzach Y. Karsahi N. Message framing and buying behavior Journal of Business Research 32 1995 11-17
13. Gilligan C. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development 1993 Harvard University Press London
14. Hasseldine J. Using persuasive communications to increase tax compliance: What experimental research has (and has not) told us Australian Tax Forum 15 2000 227-242
15. Hovland C.I. Janis I.L. Kelley H.H. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change 1953 Yale University Press New Haven, CT
16. Internal Revenue Service Statistics of income bulletin: Spring 1996 Department of the Treasury Washington, DC Publication 1136
17. Jackson B.R. Jaouen P.R. Influencing taxpayer compliance through sanction threat or appeals to conscience Advances in Taxation 2 1989 131-147
18. Jackson B.R. Milliron V.C. Tax compliance research: Findings, problems, prospects Journal of Accounting Literature 5 1986 125-165
19. Kahneman D. Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47 1979 263-291
20. Kaplan S.E. Newberry K.J. Reckers P.M.J. The effect of moral reasoning and educational communications on tax evasion intentions The Journal of the American Tax Association 19 2 1997 38-54
21. Kirchler E. Maciejovsky B. Tax compliance within the context of gain and loss situations, expected and current asset position, and profession Journal of Economic Psychology 22 2001 173-194
22. Kuhberger A. The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75 1998 23-55
23. Levin I.P. Gaeth G.J. Schreiber J. Lauriola M. A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 2002 411-429
24. Levin I.P. Schneider S.L. Gaeth G.J. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 1998 149-188
25. Lewis A. The psychology of taxation 1982 Martin Robertson Oxford
26. Meyerowitz B.E. Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 1987 500-510
27. Payne J.W. Bettman J.R. Johnson E.J. The adaptive decision maker 1993 Cambridge University Press New York
28. Powell M. Ansic D. Gender differences in risk behavior in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis Journal of Economic Psychology 18 1997 605-628
29. Riger S. From snapshots to videotape: New directions in research on gender differences Journal of Social Issues 53 1997 395-408
30. Robben H. Webley P. Weigel R. Warneryd K.-E. Kinsey K. Hessing D. Alvira-Martin F. Elffers H. Wahlund R. van Langenhove L. Long S. Scholz J. Decision frame and opportunity as determinants of tax cheating: An international experimental study Journal of Economic Psychology 11 1990 341-364
31. Roberts M.L. An experimental approach to changing taxpayers' attitudes towards fairness and compliance via television The Journal of the American Tax Association 16 1 1994 67-86
32. Rothman A.J. Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing Psychological Bulletin 121 1997 3-19
33. Rothman A.J. Salovey P. Antone C. Keough K. Martin C. The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29 1993 408-433
34. Schepanski A. Shearer T. A prospect theory account of the income tax withholding phenomenon Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 1995 174-186
35. Schmidt D. The prospects of taxpayer agreement with aggressive tax advice Journal of Economic Psychology 22 2001 157-172
36. Schwartz R.D. Orleans S. On legal sanctions University of Chicago Law Review 25 1967 274-300
37. Tversky A. Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice Science 211 1981 453-458
38. US Bureau of the Census Statistical abstract of the United States 1998 US Government Printing Office Washington, DC
39. Wartick M.L. Legislative justification and the perceived fairness of tax law changes: A referent cognitions theory approach The Journal of the American Tax Association 16 2 1994 106-123
40. Webley P. Robben H. Elffers H. Hessing D. Tax evasion: An experimental approach 1991 Cambridge University Press Cambridge