Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes

Environmental Research

Volumn 144, Issue , 2016, Pages 15-26

  Gonzalez Redin, Julen ^a   Luque, Sandra ^b,c   Poggio, Laura ^a   Smith, Ron ^d   Gimona, Alessandro ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

^d CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Spatial Bayesian belief networks; Spatial planning; Sustainable forest management; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GIS; GRAPHICAL METHOD; MAPPING METHOD; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY; TRADE-OFF;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORK; BIODIVERSITY; CONCEPT MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; ECOLOGY; ECONOMICS; FOREST; FRANCE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES;

ALPS; FRANCE;

BAYES THEOREM; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; FORESTS; FRANCE; PLANNING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84949535903     PISSN: 00139351     EISSN: 10960953     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. Angeon V., Lardon S. Participation and governance in territorial development projects: the 'territory game' as a local project leadership system. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2008, 11(2):262-281.
2. Armitage D.R., Plummer R., Berkes F., Arthur R.I., Charles A.T., Davidson-Hunt I.J., Diduck A.P., Doubledy N.C., Jonhson D.S., Marschke M., McConney P., Pinkerton E.W., Wollenberg E.K. Adaptative co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7(2):95-102.
3. Bagstad K.J., Semmens D.J., Winthrop.R. Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: a case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 5:40-50.
4. Barbero, A., 2000. Afforestation in Spain-Stocktaking Report After the Regionalization. NEWFOR - New Forests for Europe: Afforestation at the Turn of the Century, p. 67.
5. Bastian O. The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol Indicators 2013, 24:13-22.
6. Multifunctional Landscapes. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Landscape Research and Management 2000, 264. Centre for Landscape Research, Roskilde, Denmark. J. Brandt, B. Tress, G. Tress (Eds.).
7. Brunckhorst D. Bioregional Planning: Resource Management Beyond the New Millennium 2000, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam.
8. Bryan B.A., Raymond C.M., Crossman N.D., King D. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25(1):172-181.
9. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:17-29.
10. Cain J.D., Jinapala K., Makin I.W., Somaratna P.G., Ariyaratna B.R., Perera L.R. Participatory decision support for agricultural management. A case study from Sri Lanka. Agric. Syst. 2003, 76(2):457-482.
11. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think 1999, Academic Press, United States of America. S.K. Card, J.D. Mackinlay, B. Shneiderman (Eds.).
12. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 2009, 106:1305-1312.
13. Celio E., Koellner T., Grêt-Regamey A. Modeling land use decisions with Bayesian networks: Spatially explicit analysis of driving forces on land use change. Environ. Model. Softw. 2014, 52:222-233.
14. Chan T.U., Hart B.T., Kennard M.J., Pusey B.J., Shenton W., Douglas M.M., Valentine E., Patel S. Bayesian network models for environmental flow decision making in the Daly River, Northern Territory, Australia. River Res. Appl. 2012, 28:283-301.
15. Chan K., Shaw R., Cameron D., et al. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. Plos Biol. 2006, 44:2138-2152.
16. Cowell R.G., Dawid A.P., Lauritzen S.L., Spiegelhalter D.J. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Statistics for Engineering and Information Science 1999, Springer-Verlag, New York.
17. Cowling R.M., Egoh B., Knight A.T., O'Farrell P.J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Roux D.J., et al. An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105(28):9483-9488.
18. De Fries R., Karanth K.K., Pareeth S. Interactions between protected areas and their surroundings in human-dominated tropical landscape. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143(12):2870-2880.
19. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex 2010, 7:260-272.
20. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA), Australian Government Bayesian Networks: A Guide for their Application in Natural Resource Management And Policy 2010, Technical Report no. 14.
21. Djokic I. Territorial Cohesion of Europe and Integrative Planning. Privred. Kretanja Eỳkon. Polit. 2009, 19(120):93-101.
22. Dreyfus, P., 2011. Carte de Réserve Utile Maximum (RUM) probable sur les zones forestières du Massif du Vercors'. Couche matricielle SIG (résolution théorique: 50 m, étendue de la couche: 820025,1965025: 880025,2040025, en Lambert 2 étendu).
23. Dreyfus P. Méthode de Pré-simulation de Peuplements, Associant Régénération et Couvert 2013, Rapport interne FORGECO, 9p.+annexes.
24. Duran P., Thoenig J.C. L'Etat et la gestion publique territoriale. Rev. Française Sci. Politique 1996, 46(4):606-629.
25. Dwyer, J., 2007. Case studies of subsidy reform and sustainable development: agriculture, In: OECD, ed. Subsidy reform and sustainable development: political economy aspects. OECD, pp. 71-93. ISBN 9789264019362.
26. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Bode M., Richardson D.M. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142(3):553-562.
27. Elmqvist et al., TEEB (2010). Ch2: Biodiversity, Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services [NB: the entire TEEB Foundation report can be downloaded from www.teebweb.org].
28. Evans J. In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. TRENDS Cognit. Sci. 2003, 7(10):454-459.
29. Fagerholm N., Kayhkor N., Ndumbaro F., Khamis M. Community stakeholders' knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol. Ind. 2012, 18:421-433.
30. Frayer J., Sun Z., Müller D., Munroe D.K., Xu J. Analysing the drivers of tree planting in Yunnan, China, with Bayesian networks. Land Use Policy 2014, 36:248-258.
31. Fürst C., Opdam P., Inostroza L., Luque S. A balance score card tool for assessing how successful the ecosystem services concept is applied in participatory land use planning. Landsc. Ecol. 2014, 29(8):1435-1446.
32. García-Nieto A.P., García-Llorente M., Iniesta-Arandia I., Martín-López B. Mapping forest ecosystem services: From providing units to beneficiaries. Ecosyst. Serv. 2013, 4:126-138.
33. Gimona A., van der Horst D. Mapping hotspots of landscape functions: a case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22(8):1255-1264.
34. Gramfeld L., Sna T., Bagchi R., et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4:1340. 10.1038/ncomms2328.
35. Grêt-Regamey A., Brunner S.H., Altwegg J., Bebi P. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 127:S145-S154.
36. Haines-Young R. Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:178-186.
37. Haines-Young R. Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian Belief Networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35(5):681-699.
38. Haines-Young R., Potschin M., Kienast F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:39-53.
39. Haines-Young R., Watkins C., Wale C., Murdock A. Modelling natural capital: the case of landscape restoration on the South Downs, England. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 75(3):244-264.
40. Henriksen H.J., Rasmussen P., Brandt G., von Bulow D., Jensen F.V. Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22(8):1101-1113.
41. Hijmans, R.J., van Etten, J., 2013). Raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling R package version 2.1-25. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
42. Højsgaard S. Graphical independence networks with the grain package for R. J. Stat. Softw. 2012, 46(10):1-26.
43. Jenks George F. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearb. Cartogr. 1967, 7:186-190.
44. Jensen F.V. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Statistics for Engineering and Information Science 2001, Springer, New York.
45. Keitt, T., Bivand, R., Pebesma, E., and Rowlingson, B., 2009. 'rgdal: Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. R package version 0.6-21.
46. Kienast F., Bolliger J., Potschin M., De Groot R., Verburg P., Heller I., Wascher D., Haines-Young R. Assessing landscape functions with broad-scale environmental data: insights gained from a prototype development for Europe. Environ. Manag. 2009, 44(6):1099-1120.
47. Kjærulff U.B., Madsen A.L. Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams: A Guide to Construction and Analysis 2013, Springer, Germany. second ed.
48. Knickel K., Renting H. Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural developmen'. Sociol. Rural. 2000, 40(4):512-528.
49. Landau B., Lakusta L. Spatial representation across species: geometry, language, and maps. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2009, 19:12-19.
50. Landuyt D., Broekx S., D'hondt R., Engelen G., Aertsens J., Goethals P. A review of Bayesian belief networks in ecosystem service modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2013, 46:1-11.
51. Landuyt, D., Broekx, S., Van der Biest, K., Goethals, P., 2014. Probabilistic mapping with Bayesian belief networks: an application on ecosystem service delivery in Flanders, Belgium. International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs). In: 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, San Diego, CA, USA.
52. Lardon, S., 2013. Le jeu de territoire , un outil de coordination de acteurs locaux. Revue FacSADe, Resultats de recherches du department Inra-Sad, vol. 38, p. 4.
53. Lardon S., Piveteau V. Méthodologie de diagnostic pour le projet de territorie: une approche par les modèles spatiaux'. Géocarrefour 2005, 80(2):75-90.
54. Lardon, S., Caron, A., Chambon, P., Bouchard, M., 2012. La demarche participative comme outil au service de l'apprentissage collectif. Le jeu de territoire 'Gestion integree de la forest du Vercors'. Workshop: Mieux produire et preserver: quelles approches pour les forets au sein des territoires ?; ENS Lyon, December, 2012. http://www.gip-ecofor.org/?q=node/801.
55. Lasfargeas, S., Poggio, L., Gimona, A., n.d., in preparation. Bayes-GIS: a tool for spatial Bayesian Belief Network.
56. Lavigne-Delville, P., N. E. Selamna, et al., 2000. Les enquêtes participatives en débat, ambitions, pratiques et enjeux. ARIS, Karthala, ICRA, GRET.
57. Luque Sandra, Louis Iverson Ecosystem services in a biome context: forest-related ecosystem services. Earthscan from Routledge 2016, 640. Handbook of Ecosystem Services, Pages. R. Haynes-Young, M. Potschin, R. Fish, R.K. Turner (Eds.).
58. Mace G.M., Norris K., Fitter A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-layered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2012, 27(1):19-26.
59. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:1-12.
60. Mander U., Helming K., Wiggering H. Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, Springer, Berlin.
61. Marcot B., Steventon J., Sutherland G., McCann R. Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36:3063-3074.
62. Mather, A., 2000. Afforestation: progress, trends and policies. vol. 35, pp. 11-19.
63. Mattson M.P. Superior pattern processing is the essence of the evolved human brain. Front. Neurosci. 2014, 8:265.
64. McCann R.K., Marcot B.G., Ellis R. Bayesian belief networks: applications in ecology and natural resource management. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36(12):3053-3062.
65. McCloskey J., Lilieholm R., Cronan C. Using Bayesian belief networks to identify potential compatibilities and conflicts between development and landscape conservation. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 101(2):190-203.
66. McCormack, A., O'Leary, T., 2000. Towards a Holistic and Balanced Forest Landscape Strategy in Ireland. NEWFOR-New Forests for Europe: Afforestation at the Turn of the Century: 101.
67. McMaster R. In Memoriam: George F. Jenks (1916-1996). Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 1997, 24(1):56-59.
68. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
69. Nagarajan R., Scutari M., Lebre S. Bayesian Networks in R with Applications. Systems Biology 2013, Springer, New York. N. Radhakrishnan, S. Marco, Lè. Sophie (Eds.).
70. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105(28):9495-9500.
71. Nelson E., Mendoza G., Regetz J., Polasky S., Tallis H., Cameron D.R., et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:4-11.
72. Palomo I., Martin-Lopez B., Potschin M., Haines-Young R., Montes C. National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: mapping ecosystem service flows. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 4:104-116.
73. Paivio A. Mind and its Evolution: A Dual Coding Theoretical Approach 2007, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, ISBN 0-978-0-8058-52-2.
74. Parmentier C. Modelisation prospective des changements d'occupation du sol. Le cas du territorie des Quatre Montagnes (Vercors) 2013, 106. Departement Geographie et Historie, Domaine Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Universite de Cergy-Pontoise, France.
75. Parmentier, C., Thierion, V., Cordonnier, T., Luque, S., 2013. Simulation des dynamiques paysagères: analyse de l'évolution d'indicateurs de production et de biodiversité forestière dans les Quatre Montagnes. In: Proceedings Séminaire FORGECO Forêts et écosystèmes cultivés: vers une intensification écologique ? pp 67-74. ANR, France 115 pages.
76. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Series in Representation and Reasoning 1988, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, United States of America.
77. Pointereau, P., Coulon, F., 2009. Abandon et artificialisation des terres agricoles Le Courrier de. l 'Environment de l'INR A, vol. 57, pp. 109-120.
78. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from southern Germany. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2003, 63(2):93-108.
79. Pryor, S., 2000. Afforestation in Britain: Opportunities and Obstacles, Strategies and Targets. NEWFOR - New Forests for Europe: Afforestation at the Turn of the Century, p. 77.
80. Pullin A.S., Knight T.M., Stone D.A., Charman K. Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making?. Biol. Conserv. 2004, 119:245-252.
81. Quinn J., Monaghan R., Bidwell V., Harris S. A Bayesian Belief Network approach to evaluating complex effects of irrigation-driven agricultural intensification scenarios on future aquatic environmental and economic values in a New Zealand catchment. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2013, 64(5):460-474.
82. Quinn Lauren D., Barney J.N., Mcubbins J.S.N., Enders B. Navigating the "noxious" and "invasive" regulatory landscape: suggestions for improved regulati. BioScience 2013, Vol. 63(2):124-131.
83. R Core Team, 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 3-900051-07-0 〈URL http://www.R-project.org/〉.
84. Redon, M, 2012. Biodiversité potentielle dans les forêts du Vercors: une approche hiérarchique pour la conservation des espaces forestiers. These de Doctorat, Universite Joseph Fourrier.
85. Redpath S.M., Young J., Evely A., Adams W.M., Sutherland W.J., Whitehouse A., Amar A., Lambert R.A., Linnell J.D.C., Watt A., Gutiérrez R.J. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:100-109.
86. Rouget M., Cowling R., Lombard A., Knight A., Kerley G. Designing large scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:549-561.
87. Rouget M., Cowling R.M., Vlok J., Thompson M., Balmford A. Getting the biodiversity intactness index right: the importance of habitat degradation data. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12:2032-2036. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01238.x.
88. Sandifer Paul A., Sutton-Grier Ariana E., Bethney P.Ward Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst. Serv. 2015, 12:1-15.
89. Schneiders A., Van Daele T., Van Landuyt W., Van Reeth W. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: complementary approaches for ecosystem manage-ment?. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:123-133.
90. Scutari M. Learning Bayesian networks with the bnlearn R Package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010, 35(3):1-22. 〈http://www.jstatsoft.org/v35/i03/〉.
91. Seppelt R., Fath B., Burkhard B., Fisher J.L., Grêt-Regamey A., Lautenbach S., Pert P., Hotes S., Spangenberg J., Verburg P.H., van Oudenhoven A.P.E. Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:145-154.
92. Sieber R. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 2006, 96(3):491-507.
93. Smith C.S., Howes A.L., Price B., McAlpine C.A. Using a Bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal - the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi). Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139(3-4):333-347.
94. Smith J.Q. Bayesian Decision Analysis: Principles and Practice 2010, Cambridge University Press.
95. Song S.J., M'Gonig M. Science, power, and system dynamics: the political economy of conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 2001, 15:980-989.
96. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual difference in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:645-726.
97. Sternberg R., Leighton J.P. The Nature of Reasoning 2004, Cambridge University Press.
98. Schwenk W.S., et al. Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol. Appl.: Publ. Ecol. Soc. Am. 2012, 22:1612-1627.
99. Tufte E.R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information 1983, Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.
100. Turner W.R., Brandon K., Brooks T.M., Costanza R., da Fonseca G.A.B., Portela R. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 2007, 57:868-873.
101. Tyrvainen, L. and Tahvanainen, L., 2000. Impacts of afforestation on the scenic value of rural countryside. NEWFOR -New Forests for Europe: Afforestation at the Turn of the Century. European Forest Institute (EFI) Proceedings, vol. 35, pp.141-150.
102. Van der Biest K., D'Hondt R., Jacobs S., Landuyt D., Staes J., Goethals P., Meire P. EBI: an index for delivery of ecosystem service bundles. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 37:252-265.
103. Vejre H., Abildtrup J., Andersen E., Andersen P.S., Brandt J., Busck A., Dalgaard T., Hasler B., Huusom H., Kristensen L.S., Kristensen S.P., Præstholm S., et al. Multifunctional agriculture and multifunctional landscapes - land use as interface. Multifunctional Land Use. Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, 93-104. Springer Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-540-36782-8. Ü. Mander, H. Wiggering, K. Helming (Eds.).
104. Villa F., Bagstad K.J., Voigt B., Johnson G.W., Portela R., Honzak M., Batker.D. A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment. Plos ONE 2014, 9(3):e91001.
105. Wang Q.J., Robertson D.E., Haines C.L. A Bayesian network approach to knowledge integration and representation of farm irrigation: 1. Model development. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45(2):W02409.