Modeling land use decisions with Bayesian networks: Spatially explicit analysis of driving forces on land use change

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 52, Issue , 2014, Pages 222-233

  Celio, Enrico ^a   Koellner, Thomas ^b   Grêt Regamey, Adrienne ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Land use decisions; Land use modeling; Participatory modeling

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; DECISION MAKING; FORESTRY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SURVEYS; TOPOGRAPHY;

DELIBERATIVE PROCESS; LAND USE MODELS; LAND-USE DECISIONS; PARTICIPATORY MODELING; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; PROBABILITY OF OCCURRENCE; QUALITATIVE CRITERIA; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT;

LAND USE;

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOPHYSICS; DATA ACQUISITION; DECISION MAKING; LAND USE CHANGE; POLICY MAKING; PROBABILITY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING; FORESTRY; LAND USE; SURVEYS;

SWITZERLAND;

EID: 84890067845     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.014     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aalders I. Modeling land-use decision behavior with Bayesian belief networks. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13:22.
2. Aitkenhead M.J., Aalders I.H. Predicting land cover using GIS, Bayesian and evolutionary algorithm methods. J.Environ. Manage. 2009, 90:236-250.
3. Althaus P. Entscheidungsverhalten junger Landwirte - Analyse mittels ökonomischer Experimente. ETH Zürich 2008.
4. Arthur W.B. Urban systems and historical path-dependence 1988, Morrison Institute Working Papers (12) 11.
5. BAFU Düngung und Umwelt. Fachkommentare zum anwendbaren Bundesrecht. Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU 2006.
6. Beedell J., Rehman T. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' concervation behaviour. J.Rural Stud. 2000, 16:117-127.
7. Bolliger J., Kienast F., Soliva R., Rutherford G. Spatial sensitivity of species habitat patterns to scenarios of land use change (Switzerland). Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22:773-789.
8. Boulanger P.-M., Bréchet T. Models for policy-making in sustainable development: the state of the art and perspectives for research. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55:337-350.
9. Briassoulis H. Land-use policy and planning, theorizing, and modeling: lost in translation, found in complexity?. Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Des. 2007, 35(1):16-33.
10. Bromley J. Guidelines for the use of Bayesian networks as a participatory tool for Water Resource Management. NERC Open Res. Arch. 2005, 137.
11. Bundesamt für Landwirtschaft B.L.W. Die landwitschafltichen Erschwerniszonen der Schweiz 2008, 16. Eidgenössisches Volkswirtschaftsdepartement EVD, Bern.
12. Cain J. Planning Improvements in Natural Resources Management. Guidelines for Using Bayesian Networks to Support the Planning and Management of Development Programmes in the Water Sector and beyond 2001, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.
13. Carmona G., Varela-Ortega C. Integration of Bayesian networks and agro-economic models as a decision support system for water management in the upper Guadiana Basin. CAIWA, International Conference on Adaptive and Integrated Water Management 2007, 12-15.
14. Castelletti A., Soncini-Sessa R. Bayesian networks and participatory modelling in water resource management. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22(8):1075-1088.
15. Celio E., Brunner S.H., Grêt-Regamey A. Participatory land use modeling with Bayesian networks: a focus on subjective validation. Proceedings of the 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software, Sixth Biennial Meeting, Leipzig, Germany 2012.
16. Chen S.H., Pollino C.A. Good practice in Bayesian network modelling. Environ. Model. Softw. 2012, 37(0):134-145.
17. Dekkers J., Koomen E. Land-use simulation for water management. Modelling land-use change. Prog. Appl. 2007, 355-373.
18. Edwards-Jones G. Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges. Anim. Sci. 2006, 82(06):783-790.
19. Geist H., McConnell W., Lambin E.F., Moran E., Alves D., Rudel T. Causes and trajectories of land-use/cover change. Land-use and Land-cover Change 2006, 42-70. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. E.F. Lambin, H. Geist (Eds.).
20. Grêt-Regamey A., Straub D. Spatially explicit avalanche risk assessment linking Bayesian networks to a GIS. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 6:911-926.
21. Grêt-Regamey A., Brunner S.H., Altwegg J., Bebi P. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J.Environ. Manage. 2013, 127(Supplement):S145-S154.
22. Haines-Young R. Exploring ecosystem service issues across diverse knowledge domains using Bayesian belief networks. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35(5):681-699.
23. Henriksen H.J., Rasmusen P., Brandt G., von Bülow D., Jensen F.V. Public participation modelling using Bayesian networks in management of groundwater contamination. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22:1101-1113.
24. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2007, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
25. Johns R. Likert Items and Scales. Survey Question Bank: Methods Fact Sheet (March 2010) 1 11 2010.
26. Kass R.E., Wasserman L. The selection of prior distributions by formal rules. J.Am. Stat. Assoc. 1996, 91(435):1343-1370.
27. Kjaerulff U.B., Madsen A.L. Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams 2008, Springer.
28. Kocabas V.E. Toward Integration of Bayesian Networks with Geographic Information Systems and Complex Systems Theory for Urban Land Use Change Modelling 2008, Simon Fraser University.
29. Koomen E., Stillwell J. Modelling land-use change. Modelling Land-use Change 2007, 1-22. Springer Netherlands. E. Koomen, J. Stillwell, A. Bakema, H. Scholten (Eds.).
30. Kunz M., Grêt-Regamey A., Hurni L. Customized visualization of natural hazards assessment results and associated uncertainties through interactive functionality. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2011, 38(2):232-242.
31. Kynn M. The 'heuristics and biases' bias in expert elicitation. J.R. Stat. Soc. 2008, 171:239-264.
32. Lambin E.F., Geist H., Rindfuss R.R. Introduction: local processes with global impacts. Land-use and Land-cover Change 2006, 1-8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. E.F. Lambin, H. Geist (Eds.).
33. Le Q.B., Park S.J., Vlek P.L.G., Cremers A.B. Land-Use Dynamic Simulator (LUDAS): a multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system. I. Structure and theoretical specification. Ecol. Inform. 2008, 3(2):135-153.
34. Lei Z., Pijanowski B.C., Olson J. Distributed modeling architecture of a multi-agent-based behavioral economic landscape (MABEL) model. Simulation 2005, 81:503-515.
35. LUSTAT Statistik Luzern. Gemeinden 2011, Statistikportal, Luzern.
36. Maier H.R., Ascough J.C., Wattenbach M., Renschler C.S., Labiosa W.B., Ravalico J.K. Uncertainty in Environmental Descision Making: Issues, Challenges and Future Directions, Environmental Modelling, Software and Decision Support 2008, 69-85. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
37. Marcot B., Steventon J.D., Sutherland G.D., McCann R. Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36:3063-3074.
38. Matthews R.B., Gilbert N.G., Roach A., Polhill J.G., Gotts N.M. Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications. Landscape Ecol. 2007, 22:1447-1459.
39. McCloskey J.T., Lilieholm R.J., Cronan C. Using Bayesian belief networks to identify potential compatibilities and conflicts between development and landscape conservation. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2011, 101(2):190-203.
40. McIntosh B.S., Giupponi C., Voinov A.A., Smith C., Matthews K.B., Monticino M., Kolkman M.J., Crossman N., van Ittersum M., Haase D., Haase A., Mysiak J., Groot J.C.J., Sieber M., Verweij P., Quinn N., Waeger P., Gaber N., Hepting D., Scholten H., Sulis A., van Delden H., Gaddis E., Assaf H. Bridging the gaps between design and use: developing tools to support environmental management and policy. Environmental Modelling, Software and Decision Support 2008, 33-48. Elsevier, Amsterdam. A.J. Jakeman (Ed.).
41. MeteoSwiss Normwerte 1981-2010: Niederschlagssumme 2012, 9. Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss, Zurich.
42. Norsys Netica's Help System 2011, Norsys Software Corp.
43. O'Hagan A., Buck C.E., Daneshkhah A., Eiser J.R., Garthwaite P.H., Jenkinson D.J., Oakley J.E., Rakow T. Uncertain Judgements: Eliciting Experts' Probabilities 2006, 193-217. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
44. Pearl J. Causality. Models, Reasoning, and Inference 2009, Cambridge University Press. second ed.
45. Pontius G.R., Millones M. Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement of accuracy assessment. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32(15):4407-4429.
46. Pontius R.G., Cornell J.D., Hall C.A.S. Modeling the spatial pattern of land-use change with GEOMOD2: application and validation for Costa Rica. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 85(1-3):191-203.
47. Pontius R.G., Huffaker D., Denman K. Useful techniques of validation for spatially explicit land-change models. Ecol. Model. 2004, 179(4):445-461.
48. Roy Chowdhury R. Landscape change in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico: modeling the driving forces of smallholder deforestation in land parcels. Appl. Geogr. 2006, 26(2):129-152.
49. Santé I., Garcia A.M., Miranda D., Crecente R. Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2010, 96(2):108-122.
50. Scholz R.W., Tietje D. Embedded Case Study Methods. Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge 2002, Sage Publications.
51. Smith C.S., Howes A.L., Price B., McAlpine C.A. Using a Bayesian belief network to predict suitable habitat of an endangered mammal - the Julia Creek dunnart (Sminthopsis douglasi). Biol. Conserv. 2007, 139(3-4):333-347.
52. Sohl T.L., Sleeter B.M., Sayler K.L., Bouchard M.A., Reker R.R., Bennett S.L., Sleeter R.R., Kanengieter R.L., Zhu Z.L. Spatially explicit land-use and land-cover scenarios for the Great Plains of the United States. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 153:1-15.
53. Stassopoulou A., Petrou M., Kittler J. Application of a Bayesian network in a GIS based decision making system. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 1998, 12:23-45.
54. Stelzenmüller V., Lee J., Garnacho E., Rogers S.I. Assessment of a Bayesian Belief Network-GIS framework as a practical tool to support marine planning. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2010, 60(10):1743-1754.
55. van der Gaag L.C., Renooij S., Witteman C.L.M., Aleman B.M.P., Taal B.G. How to Elicit Many Probabilities 1999, UU-CS-1999-15 15.
56. Van Schrojenstein Lantman J., Verburg P.H., Bregt A., Geertman S. Chapter 3. Core principles and concepts in land-use modelling: a literature review. Land-use Modelling in Planning Practice 2011, 35-57. Springer Sciense+Business Media B.V. E. Koomen, J. Borsboom-van Beurden (Eds.).
57. Verburg P., Overmars K. Combining top-down and bottom-up dynamics in land use modeling: exploring the future of abandoned farmlands in Europe with the Dyna-CLUE model. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24(9):1167-1181.
58. Verburg P.H. Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models. Landsc. Ecol. 2006, 21(8):1171-1183.
59. Verburg P.H., Schot P.P., Dijst M.J., Veldkamp A. Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 2004, 61:309-324.