Understanding and managing conservation conflicts

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 100-109

  Redpath, Steve M ^a   Young, Juliette ^b   Evely, Anna ^a   Adams, William M ^c   Sutherland, William J ^c   Whitehouse, Andrew ^a   Amar, Arjun ^d   Lambert, Robert A ^e   Linnell, John D C ^f   Watt, Allan ^b   Gutierrez R J ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^f NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; TRADE-OFF; UNDERPINNING;

ANIMAL; CONFLICT; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAME; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LEGAL ASPECT; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GAME THEORY; HUMANS; NEGOTIATING;

EID: 84872677432     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Wittmer H., et al. How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:1-9.
2. Young J.C., et al. The emergence of biodiversity conflicts from biodiversity impacts: characteristics and management strategies. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:3973-3990.
3. People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? 2005, Cambridge University Press. R. Woodroffe (Ed.).
4. Treves A., Karanth K.U. Human-carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:1491-1499.
5. Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2007, Blackwell Publishing. D.W. MacDonald, K.M. Service (Eds.).
6. Dickman A.J. Complexities of conflict: the importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict. Anim. Conserv. 2010, 13:458-466.
7. Contemporary Conflict Resolution 2011, Polity Press. 3rd edn. O. Ramsbotham (Ed.).
8. Henle K., et al. Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe - a review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 124:60-71.
9. Rauschmayer F., Wittmer H. Institutional challenges for resolving conflicts between fisheries and endangered species conservation. Mar. Policy 2008, 32:178-188.
10. Yasmi Y., Schanz H. Managing conflict escalation in forestry: logging versus local community interests in Baru Pelepat village, Sumatra, Indonesia. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2010, 6:43-51.
11. Dowie M. Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict between Global Conservation and Native Peoples 2009, MIT Press.
12. Woodroffe R., et al. The future of coexistence: resolving human-wildlife conflicts in a changing world. People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? 2005, 388-405. Cambridge University Press. R. Woodroffe (Ed.).
13. Conover M.R. Resolving Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Science of Wildlife Damage Management 2001, CRC Press.
14. Peterson M.N., et al. Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict. Conserv. Lett. 2010, 3:74-82.
15. Adams W.M., et al. Managing tragedies: understanding conflict over common pool resources. Science 2003, 302:1915-1916.
16. Raik D.B., et al. Power in natural resources management: an application of theory. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2008, 21:729-739.
17. Sidaway R. Resolving Environmental Disputes: From Conflict to Consensus 2005, Earthscan.
18. Wishart R. A story about a muskox: some implications of Tetlit Gwich'in human-animal relationships. Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North 2004, 79-92. Berghahn Books. D. Anderson, M. Nutall (Eds.).
19. Katz C. Whose nature? Whose culture? Private productions of space and the 'preservation' of nature. Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium 1998, 46-63. Routledge. B. Braun, N. Castree (Eds.).
20. Armitage D.A., et al. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2009, 7:95-102.
21. Bryant R.L. Non-governmental organizations and governmentality: 'consuming' biodiversity and indigenous people in the Philippines. Polit. Stud. 2002, 50:268-292.
22. Niemela J., et al. Identifying, managing and monitoring conflicts between forest biodiversity conservation and other human interests in Europe. Forest Policy Econ. 2005, 7:877-890.
23. Adams W.M. Thinking like a human: social science and the two cultures problem. Oryx 2007, 41:275-276.
24. White P.C.L., Ward A.I. Interdisciplinary approaches for the management of existing and emerging human-wildlife conflicts. Wildl. Res. 2010, 37:623-629.
25. White R.M., et al. Developing an integrated conceptual framework to understand biodiversity conflicts. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:242-253.
26. Manfredo M.J., Dayer A.A. Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human-wildlife conflict in a global context. Hum. Dimensions Wildl. 2004, 9:1-20.
27. Naidoo R., et al. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:681-687.
28. Wellock T.R. Preserving the Nation: The Conservation and Environmental Movements, 1870-2000 2007, Harlan Davidson.
29. Frodeman R., et al. Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity 2010, Oxford University Press.
30. Young J., Marzano M. Embodied interdisciplinarity: what is the role of polymaths in environmental research?. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 37:373-375.
31. Maser C., Pollio C.A. Resolving Environmental Conflicts 2012, CRC Press. 2nd edn.
32. Colyvan M.J., Regan H.M. The conservation game. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:1246-1253.
33. Brox O. Schismogenesis in the wilderness: the reintroduction of predators in Norwegian forests. Ethnos 2000, 65:387-404.
34. Chase L.C., et al. Innovations in stakeholder involvement: what's the next step?. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 2000, 28:208-217.
35. Beierle T.C., Konisky D.M. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environ. Plann. C: Government Policy 2001, 19:515-527.
36. Jones-Walters L., Cil A. Biodiversity and stakeholder participation. J. Nat. Conserv. 2011, 19:327-329.
37. Ansell C., Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 2008, 18:571.
38. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2417-2431.
39. Mosse D. 'People's knowledge', participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development. Participation: The New Tyranny? 2001, 16-35. Zed Books. B. Cook, U. Kothari (Eds.).
40. Baruch-Mordo S., et al. The carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human-wildlife conflicts. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e15681.
41. Dickman A.J., et al. A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human-carnivore coexistence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:13937-13944.
42. Nelson F., et al. Payments for ecosystem services as a framework for community-based conservation in northern Tanzania. Conserv. Biol. 2010, 24:78-85.
43. Satterfield T. Anatomy of a Conflict: Identity, Knowledge, and Emotion in Old-growth Forests 2002, University of British Columbia Press.
44. Thirgood S., Redpath S. Hen harriers and red grouse: science, politics and human-wildlife conflict. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:1550-1554.
45. Nie M.A. Beyond Wolves: The Politics of Wolf Recovery and Management 2003, University of Minnesota Press.
46. Peterson M.N., et al. Conservation and the myth of consensus. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:762-767.
47. McShane T.O., et al. Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:966-972.
48. Salafsky N. Integrating development with conservation: a means to a conservation end, or a mean end to conservation?. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:973-978.
49. Young J., et al. Less government intervention in biodiversity management: risks and opportunities. Biodivers. Conserv. 2012, 21:1095-1100.
50. Linnell J.D.C, Boitani L. Building biological realism into wolf management policy: the development of the population approach in Europe. Ital. J. Mammal. 2012, 10.4404/hystrix-23.1-4676.
51. Lane M.B. Decentralization or privatization of environmental governance? Forest conflict and bioregional assessment in Australia. J. Rural Stud. 2003, 19:283-294.
52. Decker D.J., et al. Co-management: an evolving process for the future of wildlife management. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 2000, 65:262-277.
53. Borowski I., et al. Spatial misfit in participatory river basin management: effects on social learning, a comparative analysis of German and French case studies. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13:7.
54. Bulte E.H., Rondeau D. Why compensating wildlife damages may be bad for conservation. J. Wildl. Manag. 2005, 69:14-19.
55. Thirgood S., Redpath S. Hen harriers and red grouse: the ecology of a conflict. Conserv. Biol. Ser. 2005, 9:192-208.
56. MacMillan D.C., Phillip S. Can economic incentives resolve conservation conflict: the case of wild deer management and habitat conservation in the Scottish highlands. Hum. Ecol. 2010, 38:485-493.
57. MacLennan S.D., et al. Evaluation of a compensation scheme to bring about pastoralist tolerance of lions. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:2419-2427.
58. Barua M. Whose issue? Representations of human-elephant conflict in Indian and international media. Sci. Commun. 2010, 32:55-75.
59. Rejic D. The news media and the transformation of ethnopolitical conflicts. Transforming Ethnopolitical Conflict: The Berghof Handbook 2004, 319-321. Springer. A. Austin (Ed.).
60. Heydon M.J., et al. Wildlife conflict resolution: a review of problems, solutions and regulation in England. Wildl. Res. 2010, 37:731-748.
61. Sarewitz D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ. Sci. Policy 2004, 7:385-403.
62. Treves A., et al. Co-managing human-wildlife conflicts: a review. Hum. Dimensions Wildl. 2006, 11:383-396.
63. Whitehouse A. The balance of nature: entangled science and ethics in debates about raptors in Scotland. Animals and Science: From Colonial Encounters to the Biotech Industry 2011, 126-141. Cambridge Scholar Press. M. Bolton, C. Degnen (Eds.).
64. Pielke R.A. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics 2007, Cambridge University Press.
65. Emerson K., et al. Environmental conflict resolution: evaluating performance outcomes and contributing factors. Confl. Resolut. Quart. 2009, 27:27-64.
66. Treves A., et al. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate human-wildlife conflicts. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23:1577-1587.
67. Redpath S.M., et al. Using decision modeling with stakeholders to reduce human-wildlife conflict: a raptor-grouse case study. Conserv. Biol. 2004, 18:350-359.
68. Wilson J. Scientific uncertainty, complex systems, and the design of common pool institutions. The Drama of the Commons. National Research Council, Committee on Human Dimensions of Global Climate Change 2002, 327-360. National Academy Press. P. Stern (Ed.).
69. Marcot B.G., et al. Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Can. J. Forest Res. 2006, 36:3063-3074.
70. Smith A.D.M., et al. Experience in implementing harvest strategies in Australia's south-eastern fisheries. Fish. Res. 2008, 94:373-379.
71. Linnell J.D.C., et al. Confronting the costs and conflicts associated with biodiversity. Anim. Conserv. 2010, 13:429-431.
72. Chan K.M.A., et al. When agendas collide: human welfare and biological conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:59-68.
73. Treves A. Hunting for large carnivore conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:1350-1356.
74. Young J., et al. Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14:1641-1661.
75. Brooks J.S., et al. Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:1528-1538.
76. Sutherland W.J., et al. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:305-308.
77. Thirgood S.J., et al. Habitat loss and raptor predation: disentangling long- and short-term causes of red grouse declines. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2000, 267:651-656.
78. Etheridge B., et al. The effects of illegal killing and destruction of nests by humans on the population dynamics of the hen harrier Circus cyaneus in Scotland. J. Appl. Ecol. 1997, 34:1081-1105.
79. Redpath S., Thirgood S. Hen harriers and red grouse: moving towards consensus?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:961-963.
80. Carter T.J., et al. Predation by seals on salmonids in two Scottish estuaries. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2001, 8:207-225.
81. Matejusova I., et al. Using quantitative real-time PCR to detect salmonid prey in scats of grey Halichoerus grypus and harbour Phoca vitulina seals in Scotland: an experimental and field study. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:632-640.
82. Butler J.R.A., et al. Modelling the impacts of removing seal predation from Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, rivers in Scotland: a tool for targeting conflict resolution. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2006, 13:285-291.
83. Lambert R.A. The grey seal in Britain: a twentieth century history of a nature conservation success. Environ. Hist. 2002, 8:449-474.
84. USDI Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for the Northern Spotted Owl. Federal Register 1990, 55:26114-26194.
85. USDI Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; final rule to list the Mexican spotted owl as a threatened species. Federal Register 1993, 58:14248-14271.
86. Thomas J.W., Verner J. Accommodation with socio-economic factors under the endangered species act-more than meets the eye. Trans. North Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 1992, 57:627-641.
87. Gutiérrez R.J. Spotted owl research: a quarter century of contributions to Education, ornithology, ecology, and wildlife management. Condor 2008, 110:792-798.
88. Anderson D.R., et al. A protocol for conflict resolution in analyzing empirical data related to natural resource controversies. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1999, 27:1050-1058.
89. SOW Stumpage Value Determination Tables: Jan 1 Through June 30 2012 2011, Department of Revenue, Washington State.
90. Lee P., Graham M.D. African elephants and human-elephant interactions: implications for conservation. Int. Zoo Yearbook 2006, 40:9-19.
91. Osborn F.V., Parker G. Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx 2003, 37:80-84.
92. Omondi P., et al. Managing human-elephant conflicts: the Kenyan experience. Pachyderm 2004, 36:80-88.
93. Graham M.D., et al. Patterns of crop-raiding by elephants, Loxodonta africana, in Laikipia, Kenya, and the management of human-elephant conflict. Syst. Biodivers. 2010, 8:435-445.
94. Graham M.D., Ochieng T. Uptake and performance of farm-based measures for reducing crop-raiding by elephants Loxodonta africana among smallholder farms in Laikipia District, Kenya. Oryx 2008, 42:76-82.
95. Graham M.D., et al. The Use of Community Drama in the Mitigation of Human-Elephant Conflict, Laikipia, Kenya 2009, Laikipia Elephant Project.